ADHD and Anxiety Symptoms: Does Construct or Assessment Type Matter More?

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the relationships between self-reported ADHD symptoms, self-reported anxiety, and continuous performance test (CPT) performance.

METHOD

128 postsecondary students referred for clinical evaluation for possible ADHD and related conditions completed the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale, the Behavior Assessment Scale for Children, Third Edition, and either of two CPTs.

RESULTS

Multiple regression models found that when self-reported anxiety and CPT performance were used to simultaneously predict self-reported ADHD symptoms, CPT performance was not a significant predictor, whereas self-reported anxiety was. This finding was replicated across two different subsamples that took different CPTs.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported anxiety and ADHD symptoms are strongly related, but neither of these variables is significantly related to CPT performance. Implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.

Validity of the factor structure of Conners' CPT

OBJECTIVE

A previous factor analysis of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) indicates that the test measures 5 sub-functions of attention, namely focused attention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, sustained attention, vigilance, and change in control. The present study further analyzes the results from Egeland & Kowalik-Gran to test the construct- and criterion-validity of these factors.

METHOD

Construct validity is tested by analyzing whether clinical groups known to be impaired in specified subprocesses actually differ with regard to factor scores. Comparison of CCPT factor scores from 282 individuals with ADHD, schizophrenia, affective disorders, brain injury, language disorders, and normal individuals gives validity to 4 factors, but not to the vigilance factor.

RESULTS

Other tests of controlled attention correlate only with focused attention, thus giving criterion validity to this factor and differential validity to the remaining 4 factors.

CONCLUSION

Grouping scores on the CCPT into 4 or 5 sub-functions of attention may provide the clinician with a tool to differentiate between clinical groups.

Measuring several aspects of attention in one test: the factor structure of conners's continuous performance test

OBJECTIVE

Continuous performance tests are known to typically measure sustained attention but usually also yield parameters that potentially measure other subprocesses of attention. The aim of the present study was to test the factor structure of the Conners's Continuous Performance Test (CCPT) in a heterogeneous clinical sample consisting of subjects considered to fail in different subfunctions of attention.

METHOD AND RESULTS

CCPT records from 376 patients were factor analyzed, yielding five factors indicating a differentiation between focused attention, hyperactivity-impulsivity, sustained attention, vigilance, and change in control.

CONCLUSION

The study warns against reducing CCPT performance to one overall score of attention. The study further emphasizes the need to reserve the concept of sustained attention for measures of change as a function of time on task. The differentiation between sustained attention and vigilance and the concept of change in mental control during the test are possible methodological contributions of the study.