Isolated GH deficiency: mutation screening and copy number analysis of HMGA2 and CDK6 genes

Genetic screening of regulatory regions of pituitary transcription factors in patients with idiopathic pituitary hormone deficiencies

PURPOSE

Mutation frequencies of PROP1, POU1F1 and HESX1 in patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiencies (CPHD) vary substantially between populations. They are low in sporadic CPHD patients in Western Europe. However, most clinicians still routinely send DNA of their CPHD patients for genetic screening of these pituitary transcription factors. Before we can recommend against screening of PROP1, POU1F1 and HESX1 as part of routine work-up for Western-European sporadic CPHD patients, it is crucial to rule out possible defects in regulatory regions of these genes, which could also disturb the complex process of pituitary organogenesis.

METHODS

The regulatory regions of PROP1, POU1F1 and HESX1 are not covered by Whole Exome Sequencing as they are largely located outside the coding regions. Therefore, we manually sequenced the regulatory regions, previously defined in the literature, of PROP1, POU1F1 and HESX1 among 88 Dutch patients with CPHD. We studied promoter SNPs in relation to phenotypic data.

RESULTS

We found six known SNPs in the PROP1 promoter. In the POU1F1 promoter, we found one new variant and two known SNPs. We did not find any variant in the HESX1 promoter.

CONCLUSION

Although the new POU1F1 variant might explain the phenotype of one patient, the general conclusion of this study is that variants in regulatory regions of PROP1, POU1F1 and HESX1 are rare in patients with sporadic CPHD in the Netherlands. We recommend that genetic screening of these pituitary transcription factors should no longer be part of routine work-up for Western-European, and especially Dutch, sporadic CPHD patients.

MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Novel genetic causes of short stature

The fast technological development, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism array, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and whole exome sequencing, has led to the discovery of many novel genetic causes of growth failure. In this review we discuss a selection of these, according to a diagnostic classification centred on the epiphyseal growth plate. We successively discuss disorders in hormone signalling, paracrine factors, matrix molecules, intracellular pathways, and fundamental cellular processes, followed by chromosomal aberrations including copy number variants (CNVs) and imprinting disorders associated with short stature. Many novel causes of GH deficiency (GHD) as part of combined pituitary hormone deficiency have been uncovered. The most frequent genetic causes of isolated GHD are GH1 and GHRHR defects, but several novel causes have recently been found, such as GHSR, RNPC3, and IFT172 mutations. Besides well-defined causes of GH insensitivity (GHR, STAT5B, IGFALS, IGF1 defects), disorders of NFκB signalling, STAT3 and IGF2 have recently been discovered. Heterozygous IGF1R defects are a relatively frequent cause of prenatal and postnatal growth retardation. TRHA mutations cause a syndromic form of short stature with elevated T3/T4 ratio. Disorders of signalling of various paracrine factors (FGFs, BMPs, WNTs, PTHrP/IHH, and CNP/NPR2) or genetic defects affecting cartilage extracellular matrix usually cause disproportionate short stature. Heterozygous NPR2 or SHOX defects may be found in ∼3% of short children, and also rasopathies (e.g., Noonan syndrome) can be found in children without clear syndromic appearance. Numerous other syndromes associated with short stature are caused by genetic defects in fundamental cellular processes, chromosomal abnormalities, CNVs, and imprinting disorders.

Variations in the high-mobility group-A2 gene (HMGA2) are associated with idiopathic short stature

BACKGROUND

Several association studies confirmed high-mobility group-A2 gene (HMGA2) polymorphisms as the most relevant variants contributing to height variability. Animal models and deletions in humans suggest that alterations of HMGA2 might be relevant in causing short stature. Together, these observations led us to investigate the involvement of HMGA2 in idiopathic short stature (ISS) through an association study and a mutation screening.

METHODS

We conducted an association study (155 ISS patients and 318 normal stature controls) with three HMGA2 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (SNPs rs1042725, rs7968682, and rs7968902) using a TaqMan-based assay. The patients were then analyzed by direct sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) to detect point mutations and genomic micro-rearrangements.

RESULTS

Considering a recessive model, an OR value >1 was observed for genotypes rs7968682 TT (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.72, confidence interval (CI): 1.14-2.58) and rs1042725 TT (OR = 1.51, CI: 1.00-2.28) in accordance to the effect exhibited by the single alleles in the general population. None of the patients carried possibly causative HMGA2 mutations.

CONCLUSION

Besides the already known role in determining variability in human height, HMGA2 polymorphisms also contribute to susceptibility to ISS. Moreover, we here report the first mutation screening performed in ISS concluding that HMGA2 has not a significant impact on the monogenic form of ISS.

Complex translocation t(1;12;14)(q42;q14;q32) and HMGA2 deletion in a fetus presenting growth delay and bilateral cataracts

We report the prenatal detection of a de novo unbalanced complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR), in a fetus with growth delay and bilateral cataracts. Standard karyotype and FISH analyses on amniotic fluid revealed a complex de novo translocation, resulting in a 46,XY,t(1;12;14)(q42;q14;q32) karyotype. CGH-array showed a significant deletion of 387  kb at 12q14.3, at a distance of only 200-700 kb from the breakpoint at 12q14, which encompassed the HMGA2 gene and occurred de novo. Although 12q14 microdeletions are associated with growth delay in several reports in the literature, we present here the smallest deletion prenatally detected, and we detail the clinical description of the fetus. The correlation between cataracts and this complex genotype is puzzling. Among the genes disrupted by the breakpoint in 12q14, GRIP1 has been associated with abnormal eye development in mice, including lens degeneration. Interestingly, HMGA2 is expressed in the mouse's developing lens, and its expression is decreased in lens of elderly humans, correlated with the severity of lens opacity. In this report, we refine the link between HMGA2 loss of function and growth delay during prenatal development. We also discuss the correlation between cataracts and genotype in this unbalanced CCR case of unexpected complexity.

Isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood and adolescence: recent advances

The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) in childhood is a multistep process involving clinical history, examination with detailed auxology, biochemical testing, and pituitary imaging, with an increasing contribution from genetics in patients with congenital GHD. Our increasing understanding of the factors involved in the development of somatotropes and the dynamic function of the somatotrope network may explain, at least in part, the development and progression of childhood GHD in different age groups. With respect to the genetic etiology of isolated GHD (IGHD), mutations in known genes such as those encoding GH (GH1), GHRH receptor (GHRHR), or transcription factors involved in pituitary development, are identified in a relatively small percentage of patients suggesting the involvement of other, yet unidentified, factors. Genome-wide association studies point toward an increasing number of genes involved in the control of growth, but their role in the etiology of IGHD remains unknown. Despite the many years of research in the area of GHD, there are still controversies on the etiology, diagnosis, and management of IGHD in children. Recent data suggest that childhood IGHD may have a wider impact on the health and neurodevelopment of children, but it is yet unknown to what extent treatment with recombinant human GH can reverse this effect. Finally, the safety of recombinant human GH is currently the subject of much debate and research, and it is clear that long-term controlled studies are needed to clarify the consequences of childhood IGHD and the long-term safety of its treatment.

Chromosomal rearrangements in patients with clinical features of Silver-Russell syndrome

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is characterized by pre- and postnatal growth retardation, relative macrocephaly, asymmetry, and a triangular facial gestalt. In 5-10% of the patients the phenotype is caused by maternal UPD 7, and 38-64% of the patients present with hypomethylation at the imprinting center region 1 (ICR1) on 11p15.5. The etiology of the remaining cases is so far not known and various (sub-)microscopic chromosome aberrations with a phenotype resembling SRS have been published, especially duplication 11p15 (n = 15), deletion 12q14 (n = 19), ring chromosome 15, deletion 15qter, and various other mostly unique chromosomal aberrations (n = 30). In this study the phenotypes of these chromosomal aberrations were revisited and compared with the phenotypes of maternal UPD 7 and hypomethylation at ICR1 on 11p15.5. In some patients with a unique chromosomal aberration even the hallmarks of SRS were missing. Patients with duplication 11p15 show a more variable occipitofrontal head circumference at birth, a higher frequency of intellectual disability, and additional anomalies not reported in SRS. Deletion 12q14 is characterized by less severe pre- and postnatal growth retardation and less impressive relative macrocephaly. Patients with ring chromosome 15 and deletion 15qter have no relative macrocephaly (mostly even microcephaly) and more severe intellectual disability. Finally, deletion 15qter lacks the triangular facial gestalt. In summary, as SRS seems not an adequate diagnosis in many of these patients, diagnosis should focus on the chromosomal aberration than on SRS.

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in childhood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood is challenging, in large part because of the lack of a true gold standard and the relatively poor performance of available diagnostic testing. This review discusses the recent literature on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Auxology and clinical judgment remain the foundation for the diagnosis of GHD. Provocative growth hormone testing is poorly reproducible, dependent on factors such as body composition and pubertal status, and further limited by significant variability among commercially available growth hormone assays. Measurement of insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 is not diagnostically useful in isolation but is helpful in combination with other diagnostic measures. Neuroimaging is also useful to inform diagnosis, as pituitary abnormalities suggest a higher likelihood of GHD persisting into adulthood. Although genetic testing is not routinely performed in the diagnosis of GHD at the present time, multiple recent reports raise the possibility that it may play a more important role in diagnosing GHD in the future.

SUMMARY

Beyond physicians' integrated assessment of auxology, clinical presentation, and bone age, current tools to diagnose GHD are suboptimal. Recent literature emphasizes the need to reappraise our current practice and to consider new tools for diagnosis.