Ablation Index Guided Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation

Symmetrical recovery time course between impedance and intramyocardial temperature after bipolar radiofrequency ablation; Role of impedance monitoring to estimate temperature rise

INTRODUCTION

During radiofrequency (RF) ablation, impedance monitoring has been used to avoid steam-pop caused by excessive intramyocardial temperature (IMT) rise. However, it is uncertain why the impedance decline is related to steam-pop and whether the impedance decline is correlated to IMT.

METHODS

Twenty-one bipolar ablations (40 W, 30-g contact, 120 s) were attempted for seven perfused porcine myocardium. Immediately after ablation, a temperature electrode was inserted into the mid-myocardial portion, and the recovery process of impedance and its correlation to IMT were assessed.

RESULTS

Transmural lesion was created in all 21 applications but steam-pop occurred in 5/21 applications with large impedance decline. In the 16 applications without steam-pop, impedance and IMT soon after ablation were 97.2 ± 4.0 Ω and 66.1 ± 4.8 °C, respectively. Reasonably high linear correlation was demonstrated between the maximum IMT after ablation and impedance differences before and after ablation. Recovery processes of the decreased impedance and the elevated IMT fit well to each equation of the single exponential decay function and showed symmetric shapes with no statistical difference of time constant (100.1 ± 34.5 s in impedance vs. 108.7 ± 27.3 s in IMT) and half-time of recovery (144.5 ± 49.8 s in impedance vs. 156.9 ± 39.4 s in IMT). Recovered impedance after ablation (104.8 ± 3.9 Ω) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Ω smaller than that before ablation (109.9 ± 2.7 Ω), suggesting several factors other than IMT rise participate in impedance decline in RF ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery of impedance and IMT after ablation well correlated, which supports the usefulness of impedance monitoring for safe RF ablation.

The Impact of Regional Maximum Tolerated Interlesion Distance on the Long-Term Ablation Outcomes in Ablation Index Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

An adequate interlesion distance (ILD) applied during point-by-point pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has never been established. We hypothesized that maximum tolerated ILD may differ between PV regions and may influence long-term ablation outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 260 AF patients underwent PV isolation with 3D electroanatomical platform. Postablation, ILD values were classified into 5 groups (6-5.5 mm, 5.5-5.0 mm, 5.0-4.5 mm, 4.5-4.0 mm and <4.0 mm); the number of tags in each group was calculated and correlated with postablation AF recurrence (AFR). All measurements were performed globally for the entire encirclement around each individual PV and regionally for designated PV anatomic segments.

RESULTS

Single-procedure freedom from AF was 81% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF at 12 months. Global analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD nor the number of lesions within each ILD tag group for any PV. Segmental analysis showed that AFR was not related to median ILD. However, the presence of tags from the 5.5-6.0 mm ILD group located on the posterior aspect of right upper PV (RUPV) correlated with AFR. This was confirmed in a multivariable logistic regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximum tolerated ILD of 6.0 mm translated into well-accepted ablation results. However, the study suggests that it may be inadequate at the posterior aspect of RUPV.