1
|
Linga BG, Mohammed SGAA, Farrell T, Rifai HA, Al-Dewik N, Qoronfleh MW. Genomic Newborn Screening for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Holistic Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2017. [PMID: 38893137 PMCID: PMC11171256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
As next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become more widely used, germline and rare genetic variations responsible for inherited illnesses, including cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) that account for up to 10% of childhood malignancies, have been found. The CPSs are a group of germline genetic disorders that have been identified as risk factors for pediatric cancer development. Excluding a few "classic" CPSs, there is no agreement regarding when and how to conduct germline genetic diagnostic studies in children with cancer due to the constant evolution of knowledge in NGS technologies. Various clinical screening tools have been suggested to aid in the identification of individuals who are at greater risk, using diverse strategies and with varied outcomes. We present here an overview of the primary clinical and molecular characteristics of various CPSs and summarize the existing clinical genomics data on the prevalence of CPSs in pediatric cancer patients. Additionally, we discuss several ethical issues, challenges, limitations, cost-effectiveness, and integration of genomic newborn screening for CPSs into a healthcare system. Furthermore, we assess the effectiveness of commonly utilized decision-support tools in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic counseling and/or direct genetic testing. This investigation highlights a tailored and systematic approach utilizing medical newborn screening tools such as the genome sequencing of high-risk newborns for CPSs, which could be a practical and cost-effective strategy in pediatric cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BalaSubramani Gattu Linga
- Department of Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), P.O. Box 3050, Doha 0974, Qatar
- Translational and Precision Medicine Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Center (WWRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha 0974, Qatar
| | | | - Thomas Farrell
- Department of Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), P.O. Box 3050, Doha 0974, Qatar
| | - Hilal Al Rifai
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Newborn Screening Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Women’s Wellness and Research Center (WWRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha 0974, Qatar
| | - Nader Al-Dewik
- Department of Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), P.O. Box 3050, Doha 0974, Qatar
- Translational and Precision Medicine Research, Women’s Wellness and Research Center (WWRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha 0974, Qatar
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Newborn Screening Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Women’s Wellness and Research Center (WWRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha 0974, Qatar
- Genomics and Precision Medicine (GPM), College of Health & Life Science (CHLS), Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Doha 0974, Qatar
- Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St George’s University of London, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, London KT1 2EE, UK
| | - M. Walid Qoronfleh
- Healthcare Research & Policy Division, Q3 Research Institute (QRI), Ann Arbor, MI 48197, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Rare diseases are a leading cause of infant mortality and lifelong disability. To improve outcomes, timely diagnosis and effective treatments are needed. Genomic sequencing has transformed the traditional diagnostic process, providing rapid, accurate and cost-effective genetic diagnoses to many. Incorporating genomic sequencing into newborn screening programmes at the population scale holds the promise of substantially expanding the early detection of treatable rare diseases, with stored genomic data potentially benefitting health over a lifetime and supporting further research. As several large-scale newborn genomic screening projects launch internationally, we review the challenges and opportunities presented, particularly the need to generate evidence of benefit and to address the ethical, legal and psychosocial issues that genomic newborn screening raises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Richard H Scott
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Genomics England, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Richards JL, Knight SJ. Parents' Perspectives on Secondary Genetic Ancestry Findings in Pediatric Genomic Medicine. Clin Ther 2023; 45:719-728. [PMID: 37573223 PMCID: PMC11182349 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With advances in genome sequencing technologies, large-scale genome-wide sequencing has advanced our understanding of disease risk and etiology and contributes to the rapidly expanding genomic health services in pediatric settings. Because it is possible to return ancestry estimates following clinical genomic sequencing, it is important to understand the interest in ancestry results among families who may have the option of receiving these results. METHODS We conducted 26 semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews of parents with children/newborns with likely genetic conditions from two studies of clinical genome sequencing. Using a purposive sampling approach, we selected parents from the SouthSeq cohort, Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER Phase 2) project active in Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana, or an earlier Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER Phase 1) initiative based in the same region. Our interviews focused on parental knowledge about, attitudes on, interest in, and preferences for receiving genetic ancestry results following clinical genome sequencing in the neonatal intensive care unit or in pediatric clinics. FINDINGS Overall, parents prioritized clinical results or results that would help guide the diagnosis and treatment of their child, but they were also interested in any genetic result, including genetic ancestry, that potentially could enhance the meaning of information on disease risk, prevention and screening guidance, or family planning. While parents thought that ancestry results would help them learn about themselves and their heritage, the had concerns over the privacy, security, and accuracy of genetic ancestry information, although parents indicated that they had greater trust in ancestry findings provided as part of clinical care compared with those offered commercially. Parents also wanted ancestry results to be returned in a timely manner by knowledgeable staff, with kid-friendly materials and online tools available to aid, as needed, in the understanding of their results. IMPLICATIONS Taken together, our results highlight that despite being in high-stress situations, such as having a newborn in the neonatal intensive care unit, parents were interested in receiving genetic ancestry results along with their clinically relevant findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimie L Richards
- Department of Genetics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Sara J Knight
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytical Sciences Center of Innovation, Salt Lake City VA Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lastrucci E, Daniotti M, Procopio E, Scaturro G, Tubili F, Martin R, la Marca G. Communicating a Positive Result at Newborn Screening and Parental Distress. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:38. [PMID: 37489491 PMCID: PMC10366888 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The assumption of this study is strictly connected to the need to focus and to know more about the impact on the psychological state of the parents whose newborn babies get a positive result at Expanded Newborn Screening (ENS). As clinical experience shows us, this aspect seems to have a potentially lasting resonance on the way the disease will be managed and handled in the family, leading to potential negative effects and repercussions on the child's wellbeing and on the quality of life within the family. On the basis of this and on the evidence emerging from a review of the literature, this study aims to investigate and objectify possible distress indicators elicited at the moment of the communication of a positive result at ENS. Questionnaires containing the Beck Depression Inventory-II, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey tests were administered to the parents of 87 newborns who received positive results at ENS. The parents of 32 babies expressed the presence of discomfort potentially related to the communication of a positive result at ENS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Lastrucci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50019 Florence, Italy;
| | - Marta Daniotti
- Metabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (M.D.); (E.P.); (G.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Elena Procopio
- Metabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (M.D.); (E.P.); (G.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Giusi Scaturro
- Metabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (M.D.); (E.P.); (G.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Flavia Tubili
- Metabolic Diseases Unit, Neuroscience Department, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (M.D.); (E.P.); (G.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Rosanna Martin
- Psychology Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Giancarlo la Marca
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50019 Florence, Italy;
- Newborn Screening, Biochemistry and Pharmacology Laboratory, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lemke AA, Thompson ML, Gimpel EC, McNamara KC, Rich CA, Finnila CR, Cochran ME, Lawlor JMJ, East KM, Bowling KM, Latner DR, Hiatt SM, Amaral MD, Kelley WV, Greve V, Gray DE, Felker SA, Meddaugh H, Cannon A, Luedecke A, Jackson KE, Hendon LG, Janani HM, Johnston M, Merin LA, Deans SL, Tuura C, Hughes T, Williams H, Laborde K, Neu MB, Patrick-Esteve J, Hurst ACE, Kirmse BM, Savich R, Spedale SB, Knight SJ, Barsh GS, Korf BR, Cooper GM, Brothers KB. Parents' Perspectives on the Utility of Genomic Sequencing in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1026. [PMID: 37511639 PMCID: PMC10382030 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is critical to understand the wide-ranging clinical and non-clinical effects of genome sequencing (GS) for parents in the NICU context. We assessed parents' experiences with GS as a first-line diagnostic tool for infants with suspected genetic conditions in the NICU. METHODS Parents of newborns (N = 62) suspected of having a genetic condition were recruited across five hospitals in the southeast United States as part of the SouthSeq study. Semi-structured interviews (N = 78) were conducted after parents received their child's sequencing result (positive, negative, or variants of unknown significance). Thematic analysis was performed on all interviews. RESULTS Key themes included that (1) GS in infancy is important for reproductive decision making, preparing for the child's future care, ending the diagnostic odyssey, and sharing results with care providers; (2) the timing of disclosure was acceptable for most parents, although many reported the NICU environment was overwhelming; and (3) parents deny that receiving GS results during infancy exacerbated parent-infant bonding, and reported variable impact on their feelings of guilt. CONCLUSION Parents reported that GS during the neonatal period was useful because it provided a "backbone" for their child's care. Parents did not consistently endorse negative impacts like interference with parent-infant bonding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy A Lemke
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | | | - Emily C Gimpel
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Katelyn C McNamara
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Carla A Rich
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | | | - Meagan E Cochran
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - James M J Lawlor
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Kelly M East
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Kevin M Bowling
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Donald R Latner
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Susan M Hiatt
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | | | - Whitley V Kelley
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Veronica Greve
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - David E Gray
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Stephanie A Felker
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
| | - Hannah Meddaugh
- Department of Genetics, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA
| | - Ashley Cannon
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Amanda Luedecke
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Kelly E Jackson
- Division of Genetics, Norton Children's Genetics Center, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Laura G Hendon
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Hillary M Janani
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Woman's Hospital, Baton Rouge, LA 70817, USA
| | - Marla Johnston
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
| | - Lee Ann Merin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Sarah L Deans
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Carly Tuura
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Trent Hughes
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Heather Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Kelly Laborde
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Woman's Hospital, Baton Rouge, LA 70817, USA
| | - Matthew B Neu
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | | | - Anna C E Hurst
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Brian M Kirmse
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
| | - Renate Savich
- Pediatrics Neonatology Division, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
| | - Steven B Spedale
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Woman's Hospital, Baton Rouge, LA 70817, USA
| | - Sara J Knight
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Gregory S Barsh
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Bruce R Korf
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Gregory M Cooper
- HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, Norton Children's Research Institute, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gold NB, Adelson SM, Shah N, Williams S, Bick SL, Zoltick ES, Gold JI, Strong A, Ganetzky R, Roberts AE, Walker M, Holtz AM, Sankaran VG, Delmonte O, Tan W, Holm IA, Thiagarajah JR, Kamihara J, Comander J, Place E, Wiggs J, Green RC. Perspectives of Rare Disease Experts on Newborn Genome Sequencing. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2312231. [PMID: 37155167 PMCID: PMC10167563 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Newborn genome sequencing (NBSeq) can detect infants at risk for treatable disorders currently undetected by conventional newborn screening. Despite broad stakeholder support for NBSeq, the perspectives of rare disease experts regarding which diseases should be screened have not been ascertained. Objective To query rare disease experts about their perspectives on NBSeq and which gene-disease pairs they consider appropriate to evaluate in apparently healthy newborns. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study, designed between November 2, 2021, and February 11, 2022, assessed experts' perspectives on 6 statements related to NBSeq. Experts were also asked to indicate whether they would recommend including each of 649 gene-disease pairs associated with potentially treatable conditions in NBSeq. The survey was administered between February 11 and September 23, 2022, to 386 experts, including all 144 directors of accredited medical and laboratory genetics training programs in the US. Exposures Expert perspectives on newborn screening using genome sequencing. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of experts indicating agreement or disagreement with each survey statement and those who selected inclusion of each gene-disease pair were tabulated. Exploratory analyses of responses by gender and age were conducted using t and χ2 tests. Results Of 386 experts invited, 238 (61.7%) responded (mean [SD] age, 52.6 [12.8] years [range 27-93 years]; 126 [52.9%] women and 112 [47.1%] men). Among the experts who responded, 161 (87.9%) agreed that NBSeq for monogenic treatable disorders should be made available to all newborns; 107 (58.5%) agreed that NBSeq should include genes associated with treatable disorders, even if those conditions were low penetrance; 68 (37.2%) agreed that actionable adult-onset conditions should be sequenced in newborns to facilitate cascade testing in parents, and 51 (27.9%) agreed that NBSeq should include screening for conditions with no established therapies or management guidelines. The following 25 genes were recommended by 85% or more of the experts: OTC, G6PC, SLC37A4, CYP11B1, ARSB, F8, F9, SLC2A1, CYP17A1, RB1, IDS, GUSB, DMD, GLUD1, CYP11A1, GALNS, CPS1, PLPBP, ALDH7A1, SLC26A3, SLC25A15, SMPD1, GATM, SLC7A7, and NAGS. Including these, 42 gene-disease pairs were endorsed by at least 80% of experts, and 432 genes were endorsed by at least 50% of experts. Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study, rare disease experts broadly supported NBSeq for treatable conditions and demonstrated substantial concordance regarding the inclusion of a specific subset of genes in NBSeq.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina B. Gold
- Division of Medical Genetics and Metabolism, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sophia M. Adelson
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nidhi Shah
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shardae Williams
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah L. Bick
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emilie S. Zoltick
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jessica I. Gold
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alanna Strong
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Rebecca Ganetzky
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Amy E. Roberts
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Cardiology and Division of Genetics and Genomics, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Melissa Walker
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander M. Holtz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vijay G. Sankaran
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ottavia Delmonte
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Weizhen Tan
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Manton Center for Orphan Diseases Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jay R. Thiagarajah
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Junne Kamihara
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Comander
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily Place
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janey Wiggs
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C. Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bowman-Smart H, Vears DF, Brett GR, Martyn M, Stark Z, Gyngell C. 'Diagnostic shock': the impact of results from ultrarapid genomic sequencing of critically unwell children on aspects of family functioning. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:1036-1043. [PMID: 35831422 PMCID: PMC9436940 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01140-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) is being increasingly used in neonatal and paediatric intensive care units. While there is emerging evidence of clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, concerns have been raised regarding the impact of delivering genomic results in an acute care setting. To help investigate these concerns, we analysed survey data collected from caregivers whose children had received rGS through a national rapid genomic diagnosis program. The impact of rGS on families was assessed through the PedsQL2.0 Family Impact Module and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6). Sixty-one parents/carers completed the survey during the study period (response rate 48%; 61/128). Mean parent and family functioning was reduced in this sample, reflecting the stressful conditions facing families with critically unwell children. We found caregivers whose children had received a diagnostic result through rGS reported a reduced family relationships score compared to caregivers of children who did not receive a diagnosis. These findings have implications for genetic counselling practice in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Bowman-Smart
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Danya F Vears
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gemma R Brett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
"We've Opened Pandora's Box, Haven't We?" Clinical Geneticists' Views on Ethical Aspects of Genomic Testing in Neonatal Intensive Care. Balkan J Med Genet 2022; 25:5-12. [PMID: 36880043 PMCID: PMC9985353 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2022-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing use of genomic testing in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) gives rise to ethical issues. Yet little is known regarding what health professionals implementing the testing think about its ethical aspects. We therefore explored the views of Australian clinical geneticists towards ethical issues in the use of genomic testing in the Neonatal Intensive care Unit (NICU). Semi-structured interviews with 11 clinical geneticists were conducted, transcribed and analysed thematically. Four themes were identified: 1) Consent: the craft is in the conversation, which encapsulated the challenges in the consent process, and with pre-test counseling; 2) Whose autonomy and who decides? This illustrates the balancing of clinical utility and potentially harms the test, and how stakeholder interests are balanced; 3) The winds of change and ethical disruption, recognizing that while professional expertise is vital to clinical decision-making and oversight of mainstreaming, participants also expressed concern over the size of the genetics workforce and 4). Finding Solutions - the resources and mechanisms to prevent and resolve ethical dilemmas when they arise, such as quality genetic counseling, working as a team and drawing on external ethics and legal expertise. The findings highlight the ethical complexities associated with genomic testing in the NICU. They suggest the need for a workforce that has the necessary support and skills to navigate the ethical terrain, drawing on relevant ethical concepts and guidelines to balance the interests of neonates, their careers and health professionals.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang H, Page R, Lopez D, Arkatkar S, Young C, Martinez D, Robbins-Furman P, Montalvo-Liendo N, Chen LS. Pregnant Latinas' views of adopting exome sequencing into newborn screening: A qualitative study. Genet Med 2022; 24:1644-1652. [PMID: 35579624 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There are, currently, conflicting opinions about the adoption of exome sequencing (ES) into the standard newborn screening program. This study aimed to explore the views of pregnant Latinas, a hard-to-reach, underserved, and understudied population, about pursuing ES for their newborns. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with 32 pregnant Latinas who predominately lived in rural areas and had low levels of income and education. An emergent coding approach was used to analyze the qualitative data collected. RESULTS Our entire sample believed that ES should be offered as a part of newborn screening, which could empower pregnant Latinas to better understand their children's health and take early treatment actions. Although some participants were concerned about potentially bad ES results and had questions about the accuracy of ES results, nearly all interviewees reported that they would be willing to have their newborns undergo ES. The main reasons given were to be informed of diseases that the baby may have, and the perception that ES is a procedure that involves minimal risk. CONCLUSION Pregnant Latinas in this study had favorable attitudes toward newborn ES. Their perspectives should be considered when decisions are made about incorporating ES into newborn screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haocen Wang
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Robin Page
- College of Nursing, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | - Daniela Lopez
- Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | | | - Christine Young
- Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
| | - Denise Martinez
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| | | | | | - Lei-Shih Chen
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Talati AN, Gilmore KL, Hardisty EE, Lyerly AD, Rini C, Vora NL. Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio-exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:775-782. [PMID: 35132674 PMCID: PMC9175118 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand motivations for and parental interpretation of results from trio-exome sequencing (ES) for fetal anomalies with a negative standard genetic diagnosis. METHODS Analysis of an ongoing, prospective prenatal trio-ES study of pregnancies with ultrasound-identified congenital anomalies and lack of a standard genetic diagnosis. After determination of pregnancy disposition, participants completed questionnaires and a semi-structured interview pre- and post-sequencing. Interviews were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory methodology to identify themes. Associations between themes and ES result were also examined. RESULTS One hundred twenty-six trios have been sequenced. Of those, 45 (36%) resulted in fetal diagnosis. One hundred twenty-five women completed pre-sequencing surveys, and 91 women completed post-sequencing surveys. The main themes identified include (1) variable reasons to pursue ES, (2) limited expectations but high hopes from ES, (3) parental adaptation to uncertain results, (4) impact on personal health and reproduction, and (5) gratitude for the process. CONCLUSION Participants pursued ES for various reasons, most often to identify a diagnosis and guide reproduction. Post-sequencing, most participants described the process, their interpretation of results, and the impact of receiving the results. Less frequently, but of most concern, participants expressed anxiety about testing and implications for themselves, relationships, and other family members, thus identifying an area of high need for additional support among patients undergoing prenatal ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asha N. Talati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly L. Gilmore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily E. Hardisty
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne D. Lyerly
- Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Neeta L. Vora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schwartz TS, Christensen KD, Uveges MK, Waisbren SE, McGuire AL, Pereira S, Robinson JO, Beggs AH, Green RC, Bachmann GA, Rabson AB, Holm IA. Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:218-229. [PMID: 34309124 PMCID: PMC8789951 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Much emphasis has been placed on participant's psychological safety within genomic research studies; however, few studies have addressed parental psychological health effects associated with their child's participation in genomic studies, particularly when parents meet the threshold for clinical concern for depression. We aimed to determine if parents' depressive symptoms were associated with their child's participation in a randomized-controlled trial of newborn exome sequencing. Parents completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at baseline, immediately post-disclosure, and 3 months post-disclosure. Mothers and fathers scoring at or above thresholds for clinical concern on the EPDS, 12 and 10, respectively, indicating possible Major Depressive Disorder with Peripartum Onset, were contacted by study staff for mental health screening. Parental concerns identified in follow-up conversations were coded for themes. Forty-five parents had EPDS scores above the clinical threshold at baseline, which decreased by an average of 2.9 points immediately post-disclosure and another 1.1 points 3 months post-disclosure (both p ≤ .014). For 28 parents, EPDS scores were below the threshold for clinical concern at baseline, increased by an average of 4.7 points into the elevated range immediately post-disclosure, and decreased by 3.8 points at 3 months post-disclosure (both p < .001). Nine parents scored above thresholds only at 3 months post-disclosure after increasing an average of 5.7 points from immediately post-disclosure (p < .001). Of the 82 parents who scored above the threshold at any time point, 43 (52.4%) were reached and 30 (69.7%) of these 43 parents attributed their elevated scores to parenting stress, balancing work and family responsibilities, and/or child health concerns. Only three parents (7.0%) raised concerns about their participation in the trial, particularly their randomization to the control arm. Elevated scores on the EPDS were typically transient and parents attributed their symptomatology to life stressors in the postpartum period rather than participation in a trial of newborn exome sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia S Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa K Uveges
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan E Waisbren
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Gloria A Bachmann
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Arnold B Rabson
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Beth A Tarini
- Center for Translational Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.,Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pereira S, Smith HS, Frankel LA, Christensen KD, Islam R, Robinson JO, Genetti CA, Blout Zawatsky CL, Zettler B, Parad RB, Waisbren SE, Beggs AH, Green RC, Holm IA, McGuire AL. Psychosocial Effect of Newborn Genomic Sequencing on Families in the BabySeq Project: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175:1132-1141. [PMID: 34424265 PMCID: PMC8383160 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) may provide health benefits throughout the life span, but there are concerns that it could also have an unfavorable (ie, negative) psychosocial effect on families. OBJECTIVE To assess the psychosocial effect of nGS on families from the BabySeq Project, a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of nGS on the clinical care of newborns from well-baby nurseries and intensive care units. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial conducted from May 14, 2015, to May 21, 2019, at well-baby nurseries and intensive care units at 3 Boston, Massachusetts, area hospitals, 519 parents of 325 infants completed surveys at enrollment, immediately after disclosure of nGS results, and 3 and 10 months after results disclosure. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-protocol basis from January 16, 2019, to December 1, 2019. INTERVENTION Newborns were randomized to receive either standard newborn screening and a family history report (control group) or the same plus an nGS report of childhood-onset conditions and highly actionable adult-onset conditions (nGS group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mean responses were compared between groups and, within the nGS group, between parents of children who received a monogenic disease risk finding and those who did not in 3 domains of psychosocial impact: parent-child relationship (Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale), parents' relationship (Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale), and parents' psychological distress (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale anxiety subscale). RESULTS A total of 519 parents (275 women [53.0%]; mean [SD] age, 35.1 [4.5] years) were included in this study. Although mean scores differed for some outcomes at singular time points, generalized estimating equations models did not show meaningful differences in parent-child relationship (between-group difference in adjusted mean [SE] Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale scores: postdisclosure, 0.04 [0.15]; 3 months, -0.18 [0.18]; 10 months, -0.07 [0.20]; joint P = .57) or parents' psychological distress (between-group ratio of adjusted mean [SE] Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale anxiety subscale scores: postdisclosure, 1.04 [0.08]; 3 months, 1.07 [0.11]; joint P = .80) response patterns between study groups over time for any measures analyzed in these 2 domains. Response patterns on one parents' relationship measure differed between groups over time (between-group difference in adjusted mean [SE] Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale scores: postdisclosure, -0.19 [0.07]; 3 months, -0.04 [0.07]; and 10 months, -0.01 [0.08]; joint P = .02), but the effect decreased over time and no difference was observed on the conflict measure responses over time. We found no evidence of persistent negative psychosocial effect in any domain. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this randomized clinical trial of nGS, there was no persistent negative psychosocial effect on families among those who received nGS nor among those who received a monogenic disease risk finding for their infant. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Leslie A. Frankel
- Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Kurt D. Christensen
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Rubaiya Islam
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Casie A. Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carrie L. Blout Zawatsky
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard B. Parad
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Susan E. Waisbren
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C. Green
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Precision Population Health Initiative, Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sources of Unease About the Use of Genome Sequencing for Diagnosing Rare Diseases in Children. J Pediatr 2021; 237:13-15. [PMID: 34166672 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
15
|
Newborn screening with targeted sequencing: a multicenter investigation and a pilot clinical study in China. J Genet Genomics 2021; 49:13-19. [PMID: 34474183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Different newborn screening (NBS) programs have been practiced in many countries since the 1960s. It is of considerable interest whether next-generation sequencing is applicable in NBS. We have developed a panel of 465 causative genes for 596 early-onset, relatively high incidence, and potentially actionable severe inherited diseases in our Newborn Screening with Targeted Sequencing (NESTS) program to screen 11,484 babies in 8 Women and Children's hospitals nationwide in China retrospectively. The positive rate from preliminary screening of NESTS was 7.85% (902/11,484). With 45.89% (414/902) follow-up of preliminary positive cases, the overall clinically confirmative diagnosis rate of monogenic disorders was 12.07% (50/414), estimating an average of 0.95% (7.85% × 12.07%) clinical diagnosis rate, suggesting that monogenic disorders account for a considerable proportion of birth defects. The disease/gene spectrum varied in different regions of China. NESTS was implemented in a hospital by screening 3923 newborns to evaluate its clinical application. The turn-around time of a primary report, including the sequencing period of < 7 days, was within 11 days by our automatic interpretation pipeline. Our results suggest that NESTS is feasible and cost-effective as a first-tier NBS program, which will change the status of current clinical practice of NBS in China.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) may optimize the health and well-being of children and families. Screening programs are required to be evidence based, acceptable, and beneficial. OBJECTIVES To identify what has been discovered following the reporting of the first gNBS pilot projects and to provide a summary of key points for the design of gNBS. EVIDENCE REVIEW A systematic literature review was performed on April 14, 2021, identifying 36 articles that addressed the following questions: (1) what is the interest in and what would be the uptake of gNBS? (2) what diseases and genes should be included? (3) what is the validity and utility of gNBS? and (4) what are the ethical, legal, and social implications? Articles were only included if they generated new evidence; all opinion pieces were excluded. FINDINGS In the 36 articles included, there was high concordance, except for gene disease inclusion, which was highly variable. Key findings were the need for equitable access, appropriate educational materials, and informed and flexible consent. The process for selecting genes for testing should be transparent and reflect that parents value the certainty of prediction over actionability. Data should be analyzed in a way that minimizes uncertainty and incidental findings. The expansion of traditional newborn screening (tNBS) to identify more life-threatening and treatable diseases needs to be balanced against the complexity of consenting parents of newborns for genomic testing as well as the risk that overall uptake of tNBS may decline. The literature reflected that the right of a child to self-determination should be valued more than the possibility of the whole family benefiting from a newborn genomic test. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this systematic review suggest that implementing gNBS will require a nuanced approach. There are gaps in our knowledge, such as the views of diverse populations, the capabilities of health systems, and health economic implications. It will be essential to rigorously evaluate outcomes and ensure programs can evolve to maximize benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Downie
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane Halliday
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J. Amor
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tutty E, Amor DJ, Jarmolowicz A, Paton K, Downie L. Personal utility of genomic sequencing for infants with congenital deafness. Am J Med Genet A 2021; 185:3634-3643. [PMID: 34184819 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Decisions about genetic testing have traditionally been based on clinical utility and cost, but personal utility is increasingly recognized when assessing the value of testing. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was offered to a population cohort of 106 infants diagnosed with congenital hearing loss. Parents could choose to receive results relating to hearing loss only or also learn additional information about childhood-onset conditions (medically nonactionable and/or actionable). This study aimed to quantify the personal utility of WES for parents after a diagnosis of hearing loss in their child. Parents completed surveys pretest (63/106), after hearing loss results (52/106) and after receiving additional information (47/72). Open-ended responses from all three surveys (N = 67) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Answers to questions regarding the value of sequencing to parents were analyzed and collated. Parents placed high value on diagnostic WES for hearing loss but had different perspectives on the personal utility of additional information. Diagnostic results provided certainty while the choice to learn additional information about childhood-onset disorders was associated with empowerment. WES also represented an opportunity to promote their child's best interests. Results provide insights into the utility of WES for the indication of congenital deafness and for genomic newborn screening broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Tutty
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David J Amor
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anna Jarmolowicz
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Paton
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lilian Downie
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maron JL, Kingsmore SF, Wigby K, Chowdhury S, Dimmock D, Poindexter B, Suhrie K, Vockley J, Diacovo T, Gelb BD, Stroustrup A, Powell CM, Trembath A, Gallen M, Mullen TE, Tanpaiboon P, Reed D, Kurfiss A, Davis JM. Novel Variant Findings and Challenges Associated With the Clinical Integration of Genomic Testing: An Interim Report of the Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (GEMINI) Study. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175:e205906. [PMID: 33587123 PMCID: PMC7885094 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance A targeted genomic sequencing platform focused on diseases presenting in the first year of life may minimize financial and ethical challenges associated with rapid whole-genomic sequencing. Objective To report interim variants and associated interpretations of an ongoing study comparing rapid whole-genomic sequencing with a novel targeted genomic platform composed of 1722 actionable genes targeting disorders presenting in infancy. Design, Setting, and Participants The Genomic Medicine in Ill Neonates and Infants (GEMINI) study is a prospective, multicenter clinical trial with projected enrollment of 400 patients. The study is being conducted at 6 US hospitals. Hospitalized infants younger than 1 year of age suspected of having a genetic disorder are eligible. Results of the first 113 patients enrolled are reported here. Patient recruitment began in July 2019, and the interim analysis of enrolled patients occurred from March to June 2020. Interventions Patient (proband) and parents (trios, when available) were tested simultaneously on both genomic platforms. Each laboratory performed its own phenotypically driven interpretation and was blinded to other results. Main Outcomes and Measures Variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics standards of pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), or variants of unknown significance (VUS). Chromosomal and structural variations were reported by rapid whole-genomic sequencing. Results Gestational age of 113 patients ranged from 23 to 40 weeks and postmenstrual age from 27 to 83 weeks. Sixty-seven patients (59%) were male. Diagnostic and/or VUS were returned for 51 patients (45%), while 62 (55%) had negative results. Results were concordant between platforms in 83 patients (73%). Thirty-seven patients (33%) were found to have a P/LP variant by 2 or both platforms and 14 (12%) had a VUS possibly related to phenotype. The median day of life at diagnosis was 22 days (range, 3-313 days). Significant alterations in clinical care occurred in 29 infants (78%) with a P/LP variant. Incidental findings were reported in 7 trios. Of 51 positive cases, 34 (67%) differed in the reported result because of technical limitations of the targeted platform, interpretation of the variant, filtering discrepancies, or multiple causes. Conclusions and Relevance As comprehensive genetic testing becomes more routine, these data highlight the critically important variant detection capabilities of existing genomic sequencing technologies and the significant limitations that must be better understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill L. Maron
- Mother Infant Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kristen Wigby
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, California
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego
| | - Shimul Chowdhury
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - David Dimmock
- Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Brenda Poindexter
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kristen Suhrie
- Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jerry Vockley
- UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Diacovo
- UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bruce D. Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute and Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Annemarie Stroustrup
- Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children’s Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, New York
| | - Cynthia M. Powell
- University of North Carolina Children’s Research Institute, University of North Carolina Health Children’s Hospital, Chapel Hill
| | - Andrea Trembath
- University of North Carolina Children’s Research Institute, University of North Carolina Health Children’s Hospital, Chapel Hill
| | - Matthew Gallen
- Athena Diagnostics/Quest Diagnostics, Marlborough, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas E. Mullen
- Athena Diagnostics/Quest Diagnostics, Marlborough, Massachusetts
| | | | - Dallas Reed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts Medical Center Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pediatrics, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anne Kurfiss
- Department of Pediatrics, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan M. Davis
- Department of Pediatrics, The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- The Tufts Clinical and Translation Science Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cakici JA, Dimmock DP, Caylor SA, Gaughran M, Clarke C, Triplett C, Clark MM, Kingsmore SF, Bloss CS. A Prospective Study of Parental Perceptions of Rapid Whole-Genome and -Exome Sequencing among Seriously Ill Infants. Am J Hum Genet 2020; 107:953-962. [PMID: 33157008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing recently became feasible for infants in intensive care units (ICUs). However, research regarding parents' perceived utility, adequacy of consent, and potential harms and benefits is lacking. Herein we report results of parental surveys of these domains from the second Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study, a randomized, controlled trial of rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing of infants in regional ICUs. More than 90% of parents reported feeling adequately informed to consent to diagnostic genomic sequencing. Despite only 23% (27) of 117 infants receiving genomic diagnoses, 97% (156) of 161 parents reported that testing was at least somewhat useful and 50.3% (88/161) reported no decisional regret (median 0, mean 10, range 0-100). Five of 117 families (4.3%) reported harm. Upon follow-up, one (1%) confirmed harm to child and parent related to negative results/no diagnosis, two (2%) reported stress or confusion, and two (2%) denied harm. In 81% (89) of 111 infants, families and clinicians agreed that genomic results were useful. Of the families for whom clinicians perceived harm from genomic testing, no parents reported harm. Positive tests/genomic diagnosis were more frequently perceived to be useful by parents, to benefit their infant, and to help manage potential symptoms (p < .05). In summary, the large majority of parents felt that first-tier, rapid, diagnostic genomic sequencing was beneficial for infants lacking etiologic diagnoses in ICUs. Most parents in this study perceived being adequately informed to consent, understood their child's results, and denied regret or harm from undergoing sequencing.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hill M, Hammond J, Lewis C, Mellis R, Clement E, Chitty LS. Delivering genome sequencing for rapid genetic diagnosis in critically ill children: parent and professional views, experiences and challenges. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1529-1540. [PMID: 32561901 PMCID: PMC7575551 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0667-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid genomic sequencing (RGS) is increasingly being used in the care of critically ill children. Here we describe a qualitative study exploring parent and professional perspectives around the usefulness of this test, the potential for unintended harms and the challenges for delivering a wider clinical service. The Rapid Paediatric Sequencing (RaPS) study offered trio RGS for diagnosis of critically ill children with a likely monogenic disorder. Main and actionable secondary findings were reported. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children offered RGS (n = 11) and professionals (genetic clinicians, non-genetic clinicians, scientists and consenters) (n = 19) by telephone (parents n = 10/professionals n = 1) or face-to-face (parents n = 1/professionals n = 18). We found that participants held largely positive views about RGS, describing clinical and emotional benefits from the opportunity to obtain a rapid diagnosis. Parental stress surrounding their child's illness complicates decision making. Parental concerns are heightened when offered RGS and while waiting for results. The importance of multidisciplinary team working to enable efficient delivery of a rapid service was emphasised. Our findings give insight into the perceived value of RGS for critically ill children. Careful pre-test counselling is needed to support informed parental decision making. Many parents would benefit from additional support while waiting for results. Education of mainstream clinicians is required to facilitate clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Hill
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
| | - Jennifer Hammond
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Celine Lewis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon Mellis
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Emma Clement
- Clinical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lyn S Chitty
- North Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boardman FK, Clark C, Jungkurth E, Young PJ. Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1026-1040. [PMID: 32114710 PMCID: PMC7754126 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
As population‐level carrier screening panels for reprogenetic information emerge globally, conditions to be included, and the timing of implementation is widely debated. Thalassemia is the only condition for which population‐based prenatal carrier screening is offered in the UK. However, little is known about the views and experiences of the UK thalassemia‐affected community toward this screening or other forms of genetic screening for thalassemia (newborn, preconception), despite the range of direct consequences of screening programmes for this group. Using a mixed‐methods integrative analysis (qualitative interviews n = 20 and quantitative survey n = 80), this study outlines the experiences and attitudes of adults with thalassemia, their family members, and screen‐identified thalassemia carriers toward preconception, prenatal, and newborn screening for thalassemia. The majority of participants described thalassemia as a burdensome condition with a range of negative impacts, which contributed to their strong support for screening in all its potential formats. However, the data also highlight the challenges of each screening mode for this group, reflected in the high level of value conflict in participants' accounts and decisions. Cultural, social, and (to a lesser extent) religious factors were found to mitigate against the advantages of early screens, particularly within faith communities. Social stigma emerged as key to this process, informing the way that thalassemia severity was not only perceived, but also experienced by affected adults, which ultimately influenced screening uptake and outcomes. These findings suggest that cultural and social sensitivity is as important as the mode of screening delivery itself, if the iatrogenic and unintended harms of screening—particularly the social/psychological burden of value conflict—are to be adequately addressed and minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity K Boardman
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Corinna Clark
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Philip J Young
- School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Haga SB. Pharmacogenomic Testing In Pediatrics: Navigating The Ethical, Social, And Legal Challenges. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2019; 12:273-285. [PMID: 31686893 PMCID: PMC6800463 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s179172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
For the past several years, the implementation of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing has become widespread in several centers and clinical practice settings. PGx testing may be ordered at the point-of-care when treatment is needed or in advance of treatment for future use. The potential benefits of PGx testing are not limited to adult patients, as children are increasingly using medications more often and at earlier ages. This review provides some background on the use of PGx testing in children as well as mothers (prenatally and post-natally) and discusses the challenges, benefits, and the ethical, legal, and social implications of providing PGx testing to children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B Haga
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gambhir SS, Ge TJ, Vermesh O, Spitler R. Toward achieving precision health. Sci Transl Med 2019; 10:10/430/eaao3612. [PMID: 29491186 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Health care systems primarily focus on patients after they present with disease, not before. The emerging field of precision health encourages disease prevention and earlier detection by monitoring health and disease based on an individual's risk. Active participation in health care can be encouraged with continuous health-monitoring devices, providing a higher-resolution picture of human health and disease. However, the development of monitoring technologies must prioritize the collection of actionable data and long-term user engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjiv Sam Gambhir
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. .,Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.,Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.,Department of Bioengineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - T Jessie Ge
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Precision Health and Integrated Diagnostics Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ophir Vermesh
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ryan Spitler
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Department of Bioengineering and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sabatello M, Juengst E. Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern. Hastings Cent Rep 2019; 49 Suppl 1:S10-S18. [PMID: 31268572 PMCID: PMC6740238 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Since the inception of large-scale human genome research, there has been much caution about the risks of exacerbating a number of socially dangerous attitudes linked to human genetics. These attitudes are usually labeled with one of a family of genetic or genomic "isms" or "ations" such as "genetic essentialism," "genetic determinism," "genetic reductionism," "geneticization," "genetic stigmatization," and "genetic discrimination." The psychosocial processes these terms refer to are taken to exacerbate several ills that are similarly labeled, from medical racism and psychological fatalism to economic exploitation and social exclusion. But as genomic information becomes more familiar in clinical and research settings as well as other life activities, do we need to continue to worry so much about this family of attitudes and their impact on existing problems? In genomics, the underlying anxiety has been that disclosure of genomic information will trigger a series of (seemingly unavoidable) negative responses that will affect individuals, their families, and their communities at large. The fundamental social challenges that hyperbolic genomic messaging, low genomic literacy, and "folk biology" help sustain remain to be addressed. If we hope to break the cycle of genomic isms and ations, we will have to get better at resisting overinterpretations of the relevance that genomics has for people's future potentials, ancestral vulnerabilities, community memberships, and ethnic affiliations.
Collapse
|
25
|
Clowes Candadai SV, Sikes MC, Thies JM, Freed AS, Bennett JT. Rapid clinical exome sequencing in a pediatric ICU: Genetic counselor impacts and challenges. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:283-291. [PMID: 30964580 PMCID: PMC6481675 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Exome sequencing (ES) has revolutionized molecular diagnosis in children with genetic disease over the past decade. However, exome sequencing in the inpatient setting has traditionally been discouraged, in part due to an increased risk of providers failing to retrieve and act upon results, as many patients are discharged before results return. The development of rapid turn-around-times (TATs) for genomic testing has begun to shift this paradigm. Rapid exome sequencing (rES) is increasingly being used as a diagnostic tool for critically ill infants with likely genetic disease and presents significant challenges to execute. We implemented a program, entitled the Rapid Inpatient Genomic Testing (RIGhT) project, to identify critically ill children for whom a molecular diagnosis is likely to change inpatient management. Two important goals of the RIGhT project were to provide appropriate genetic counseling, and to develop protocols to ensure efficient test coordination- both of which relied heavily on laboratory and clinic-based genetic counselors (GCs). Here, rES was performed on 27 inpatient trios from October 2016 to August 2018; laboratory and clinical GCs encountered significant challenges in the coordination of this testing. The GCs involved retrospectively reviewed these cases and identified three common challenges encountered during pretest counseling and coordination. The aim of this paper is to define these challenges using illustrative case examples that highlight the importance of including GCs to support rES programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah V Clowes Candadai
- Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
- Patient-Centered Laboratory Utilization Guidance Services (PLUGS), Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Megan C Sikes
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jenny M Thies
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Amanda S Freed
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James T Bennett
- Department of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Center for Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Genetti CA, Schwartz TS, Robinson JO, VanNoy GE, Petersen D, Pereira S, Fayer S, Peoples HA, Agrawal PB, Betting WN, Holm IA, McGuire AL, Waisbren SE, Yu TW, Green RC, Beggs AH, Parad RB. Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med 2019; 21:622-630. [PMID: 30209271 PMCID: PMC6420384 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0105-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has great potential to improve pediatric care. Parental interest and concerns about genomics are relatively unexplored. Understanding why parents decline research consent for nGS may reveal implementation barriers. METHODS We evaluated parental interest in a randomized trial of nGS in well-baby and intensive care unit nursery settings. Interested families attended an informational enrollment session (ES) with a genetic counselor prior to consenting. Reason(s) for declining participation and sociodemographic associations were analyzed. RESULTS Of 3860 eligible approached families, 10% attended ES, 67% of whom enrolled. Of 1760 families queried for decline reasons, 58% were uninterested in research. Among 499 families considering research, principal reasons for decline prior to ES included burdensome study logistics (48%), feeling overwhelmed postpartum (17%), and lack of interest/discomfort with genetic testing (17%). Decliners after ES more often cited concerns about privacy/insurability (41%) and uncertain/unfavorable results (23%). CONCLUSION Low interest in research and study logistics were major initial barriers to postpartum enrollment and are likely generic to many postpartum research efforts. Concerns over privacy and result implications were most commonly cited in decliners after ES. Understanding parental concerns around research nGS may inform future integration of nGS into newborn screening, predictive testing, and pediatric diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casie A Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Talia S Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Grace E VanNoy
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Devan Petersen
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shawn Fayer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hayley A Peoples
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Pankaj B Agrawal
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wendi N Betting
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan E Waisbren
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy W Yu
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics and The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richard B Parad
- Department of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Friedman JM, Bombard Y, Cornel MC, Fernandez CV, Junker AK, Plon SE, Stark Z, Knoppers BM. Genome-wide sequencing in acutely ill infants: genomic medicine's critical application? Genet Med 2019; 21:498-504. [PMID: 29895853 PMCID: PMC6752673 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0055-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic genome-wide sequencing (exome or genome sequencing and data analysis for high-penetrance disease-causing variants) in acutely ill infants appears to be clinically useful, but the value of this diagnostic test should be rigorously demonstrated before it is accepted as a standard of care. This white paper was developed by the Paediatric Task Team of the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health's Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream to address the question of how we can determine the clinical value of genome-wide sequencing in infants in an intensive care setting. After reviewing available clinical and ethics literature on this question, we conclude that evaluating diagnostic genome-wide sequencing as a comprehensive scan for major genetic disease (rather than as a large panel of single-gene tests) provides a practical approach to assessing its clinical value in acutely ill infants. Comparing the clinical value of diagnostic genome-wide sequencing to chromosomal microarray analysis, the current evidence-based standard of care, per case of serious genetic disease diagnosed provides a practical means of assessing clinical value. Scientifically rigorous studies of this kind are needed to determine if clinical genome-wide sequencing should be established as a standard of care supported by healthcare systems and insurers for diagnosis of genetic disease in seriously ill newborn infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne K Junker
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics and Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
| | - Bartha Maria Knoppers
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ayres S, Gallacher L, Stark Z, Brett GR. Genetic counseling in pediatric acute care: Reflections on ultra-rapid genomic diagnoses in neonates. J Genet Couns 2019; 28:273-282. [DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Ayres
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Melbourne Australia
| | - Lyndon Gallacher
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Australia
| | - Gemma R. Brett
- Australian Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance; Melbourne Australia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Paediatrics; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gyngell C, Newson AJ, Wilkinson D, Stark Z, Savulescu J. Rapid Challenges: Ethics and Genomic Neonatal Intensive Care. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S14-S21. [PMID: 30600266 PMCID: PMC6379057 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
NICUs are a priority implementation area for genomic medicine. Rapid genomic testing in the NICU is expected to be genomic medicine's "critical application," providing such clear benefits that it drives the adoption of genomics more broadly. Studies from multiple centers worldwide have now demonstrated the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of rapid genomic sequencing in this setting, paving the way for widespread implementation. However, the introduction of this potentially powerful tool for predicting future impairment in the NICU also raises profound ethical challenges. Developing models of good practice that incorporate the identification, exploration, and analysis of ethical issues will be critical for successful implementation. In this article, we analyze 3 such issues: (1) the value and meaning of gaining consent to a complex test in a stressful, emotionally charged environment; (2) the effect of rapid diagnosis on parent-child bonding and its implications for medical and family decisions, particularly in relation to treatment limitation; and (3) distributive justice (ie, whether the substantial cost and diversion of resources to deliver rapid genomic testing in the NICU can be justified).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Gyngell
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia,Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ainsley J. Newson
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK,Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Zornitza Stark
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; .,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Australia
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia,Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pereira S, Robinson JO, Gutierrez AM, Petersen DK, Hsu RL, Lee CH, Schwartz TS, Holm IA, Beggs AH, Green RC, McGuire AL. Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project. Pediatrics 2019; 143:S6-S13. [PMID: 30600265 PMCID: PMC6480393 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1099c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is interest in applying genomic sequencing (GS) to newborns' clinical care. Here we explore parents' and clinicians' attitudes toward and perceptions of the risks, benefits, and utility of newborn GS compared with newborn screening (NBS) prior to receiving study results. METHODS The BabySeq Project is a randomized controlled trial used to explore the impact of integrating GS into the clinical care of newborns. Parents (n = 493) of enrolled infants (n = 309) and clinicians (n = 144) completed a baseline survey at enrollment. We examined between-group differences in perceived utility and attitudes toward NBS and GS. Open-ended responses about risks and benefits of each technology were categorized by theme. RESULTS The majority of parents (71%) and clinicians (51%) agreed that there are health benefits of GS, although parents and clinicians agreed more that there are risks associated with GS (35%, 70%) than with NBS (19%, 39%; all P < .05). Parents perceived more benefit and less risk of GS than did clinicians. Clinicians endorsed concerns about privacy and discrimination related to genomic information more strongly than did parents, and parents anticipated benefits of GS that clinicians did not. CONCLUSIONS Parents and clinicians are less confident in GS than NBS, but parents perceive a more favorable risk/benefit ratio of GS than do clinicians. Clinicians should be aware that parents' optimism may stem from their perceived benefits beyond clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda M Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Devan K Petersen
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca L Hsu
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline H Lee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Talia S Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert C Green
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas;
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tremblay I, Grondin S, Laberge AM, Cousineau D, Carmant L, Rowan A, Janvier A. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Misconception: Parental Expectations and Perspectives Regarding Genetic Testing for Developmental Disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2018; 49:363-375. [DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3768-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
32
|
Wou K, Weitz T, McCormack C, Wynn J, Spiegel E, Giordano J, Wapner RJ, Chung WK. Parental perceptions of prenatal whole exome sequencing (PPPWES) study. Prenat Diagn 2018; 38:801-811. [PMID: 30035818 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study is to investigate the experiences of couples who underwent prenatal whole-exome sequencing (WES) for fetal anomalies and the amount/type of information couples want from prenatal WES. METHOD Participants in the Fetal Sequencing Study who had genetic testing for fetal anomalies were invited for a semistructured interview about their experience with prenatal WES. A constructivist grounded theory approach with an inductive coding style was used for coding and analysis. RESULTS We interviewed 29 participants from 17 pregnancies. Two pregnancies had positive prenatal WES results, and 4 were terminated prior to receipt of WES results. The main themes were anxiety and stress around the time of diagnosis, education and consent for WES, coping and support while waiting for results, and receiving genetic testing results. In response to hypothetical scenarios probing the desire for uncertain results, 86% would like to be told about results for which the provider had some degree of uncertainty, and the percent desiring results decreased as the certainty of the results decreased. CONCLUSION Participants' experience with exome sequence was similar to other prenatal genetic diagnostic tests, except for the longer wait time for results. When probed with hypothetical scenarios, participants desired more results than were provided in the study, including uncertain results that might diagnose the fetal condition. This highlights the need for specialized prenatal genetic counseling to have nuanced discussions of multiple dimensions of uncertainty with implementation of prenatal WES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Wou
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Talia Weitz
- College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Clare McCormack
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erica Spiegel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Giordano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald J Wapner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Genetics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Molecular Genetics, and Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Holm IA, Agrawal PB, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Christensen KD, Fayer S, Frankel LA, Genetti CA, Krier JB, LaMay RC, Levy HL, McGuire AL, Parad RB, Park PJ, Pereira S, Rehm HL, Schwartz TS, Waisbren SE, Yu TW, Green RC, Beggs AH. The BabySeq project: implementing genomic sequencing in newborns. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18:225. [PMID: 29986673 PMCID: PMC6038274 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1200-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The greatest opportunity for lifelong impact of genomic sequencing is during the newborn period. The "BabySeq Project" is a randomized trial that explores the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of healthy and sick newborns. METHODS Families of newborns are enrolled from Boston Children's Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital nurseries, and half are randomized to receive genomic sequencing and a report that includes monogenic disease variants, recessive carrier variants for childhood onset or actionable disorders, and pharmacogenomic variants. All families participate in a disclosure session, which includes the return of results for those in the sequencing arm. Outcomes are collected through review of medical records and surveys of parents and health care providers and include the rationale for choice of genes and variants to report; what genomic data adds to the medical management of sick and healthy babies; and the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of healthy and sick newborns. DISCUSSION The BabySeq Project will provide empirical data about the risks, benefits and costs of newborn genomic sequencing and will inform policy decisions related to universal genomic screening of newborns. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511 . Registration date: 10 April 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid A. Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Pankaj B. Agrawal
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Kurt D. Christensen
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Shawn Fayer
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Leslie A. Frankel
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Psychological, Health and Learning Sciences, University of Houston College of Education, Houston, TX USA
| | - Casie A. Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Joel B. Krier
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Rebecca C. LaMay
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Harvey L. Levy
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Richard B. Parad
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Peter J. Park
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | - Heidi L. Rehm
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Talia S. Schwartz
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Susan E. Waisbren
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Timothy W. Yu
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Robert C. Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tremblay I, Laberge AM, Cousineau D, Carmant L, Rowan A, Janvier A. Paediatricians' expectations and perspectives regarding genetic testing for children with developmental disorders. Acta Paediatr 2018; 107:838-844. [PMID: 29280190 DOI: 10.1111/apa.14203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate paediatricians' expectations and perspectives of genetic testing for children with developmental disorders. METHODS Paediatricians working in a developmental clinic were surveyed each time they ordered a chromosomal microarray (CMA) for a child with developmental disorders. Clinical charts were reviewed. Results were analysed using mixed methodology. RESULTS Ninety-seven % (73/76) of surveys were completed. Paediatricians reported that 36% of parents had difficulties understanding genetic testing and that 40% seemed anxious. The majority expected testing to have positive impacts on children/families. The themes raised were (i) clarifying the diagnosis (56%), (ii) understanding the aetiology of the condition (55%), (iii) enabling prenatal diagnosis/counselling (43%), (iv) improving medical care for the child (15%) and (v) decreasing parental guilt/anxiety (8%). Less than half anticipated negative impacts; 74% expected that the most helpful result for their patient would be an abnormal result explaining the disorder. Among the 73 children for whom CMA was ordered, 81% got tested: 66% of the results were normal, 19% were abnormal and contributed to explain the condition and 12% were abnormal but of unknown significance. CONCLUSION Paediatricians generally expect many positive and less negative impacts of genetic testing for children with developmental disorders. Parental perspectives are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Tremblay
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Psychology; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Centre Intégré du Réseau en Neuro-Développement de l'enfant (CIRENE); CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Unité d’éthique Clinique; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
| | - Dominique Cousineau
- Centre Intégré du Réseau en Neuro-Développement de l'enfant (CIRENE); CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Pediatrics; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Pediatrics; Université de Montréal; Montréal QC Canada
| | - Lionel Carmant
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center; Montréal QC Canada
- Centre Intégré du Réseau en Neuro-Développement de l'enfant (CIRENE); CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Neurology; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
| | | | - Annie Janvier
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center; Montréal QC Canada
- Unité d’éthique Clinique; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Department of Pediatrics; Université de Montréal; Montréal QC Canada
- Division of Neonatology; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada
- Bureau de l’éthique clinique; Université de Montréal; Montréal QC Canada. Palliative Care Unit; CHU Sainte-Justine; Montréal QC Canada. Unité de recherche en éthique clinique et partenariat famille (UREPAF); Montréal QC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Meeting the challenges of implementing rapid genomic testing in acute pediatric care. Genet Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
|
36
|
Anticipating uncertainty and irrevocable decisions: provider perspectives on implementing whole-genome sequencing in critically ill children with heart disease. Genet Med 2018; 20:1455-1461. [PMID: 29493583 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential impacts of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in the pediatric critical-care context, we examined how clinicians caring for critically ill children with congenital heart disease (CHD) anticipate and perceive the impact of WGS on their decision-making process and treatment recommendations. METHODS We conducted semistructured in-person and telephone interviews of clinicians involved in the care of critically ill children with CHD at a high-volume pediatric heart center. We qualitatively analyzed the transcribed interviews. RESULTS In total, 34 clinicians were interviewed. Three themes emerged: (i) uncertainty about the accuracy of WGS testing and adequacy of testing validation; (ii) the use of WGS to facilitate life-limiting decisions such as futility, rationing, and selective prenatal termination; and (iii) moral distress over using WGS with a lack of decision support. CONCLUSION Despite uncertainty about WGS testing, the interviewed clinicians were using, and anticipated expanding the use of, WGS results to justify declarations of futility, withdrawal of care, and rationing in critically ill children with CHD. This situation is causing moral distress in providers who have to make high-stakes decisions involving WGS results, with only partial understanding of them. Decision support for clinicians, and discussion with families of the risks of using WGS for rationing or withdrawal, is needed.
Collapse
|
37
|
Psychosocial impact on mothers receiving expanded newborn screening results. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:477-484. [PMID: 29379194 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-017-0069-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Expanded newborn screening (NBS) for genetic disorders has improved diagnosis of numerous treatable diseases, positively impacting children's health outcomes. However, research about the psychological impact of expanded NBS on families, especially mothers, has been mixed. Our study examined associations between maternal experiences of expanded NBS and subsequent psychosocial functioning and parenting stress in mothers whose infants received either true negative (TN), true positive (TP) or false positive (FP) results after a 4- to 6-month period. The Parenting Stress Index and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale were used to assess symptoms of anxiety, stress and depression in 3 sets of mothers, whose infants received TN (n = 31), TP (n = 8) or FP (n = 18) results. Multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) results revealed no significant differences among these three groups of mothers regarding overall anxiety, stress and depression. However, FP mothers experienced lower levels of stress related to their own health compared to TN group. Two potential trends were also identified; results suggested TN mothers might experience higher levels of isolation than mothers in the TP group and that FP mothers might report higher stress levels in relation to spousal relationships compared to the TN group. FP mothers seemed to report similar or better levels of psychosocial functioning than TN mothers. Our findings are encouraging with respect to impacts of NBS on maternal well-being. We also identify key areas for improvement (parental education) and research (isolation and spousal relationships).
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Genome sequencing is now available as a clinical diagnostic test. There is a significant knowledge and translation gap for nongenetic specialists of the processes necessary to generate and interpret clinical genome sequencing. The purpose of this review is to provide a primer on contemporary clinical genome sequencing for nongenetic specialists describing the human genome project, current techniques and applications in genome sequencing, limitations of current technology, and techniques on the horizon. RECENT FINDINGS As currently implemented, genome sequencing compares short pieces of an individual's genome with a reference sequence developed by the human genome project. Genome sequencing may be used for obtaining timely diagnostic information, cancer pharmacogenomics, or in clinical cases when previous genetic testing has not revealed a clear diagnosis. At present, the implementation of clinical genome sequencing is limited by the availability of clinicians qualified for interpretation, and current techniques in used clinical testing do not detect all types of genetic variation present in a single genome. SUMMARY Clinicians considering a genetic diagnosis have wide array of testing choices which now includes genome sequencing. Although not a comprehensive test in its current form, genome sequencing offers more information than gene-panel or exome sequencing and has the potential to replace targeted single-gene or gene-panel testing in many clinical scenarios.
Collapse
|
39
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lonna Mollison
- a Department of Genetics , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- a Department of Genetics , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Barazzetti G, Cavalli S, Benaroyo L, Kaufmann A. “Still Rather Hazy at Present”: Citizens' and Physicians' Views on Returning Results from Biobank Research Using Broad Consent. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017; 21:159-165. [DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gaia Barazzetti
- Institute of History of Medicine and Public Health, University of Lausanne–CHUV University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne–CHUV University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Samuele Cavalli
- Institute of History of Medicine and Public Health, University of Lausanne–CHUV University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lazare Benaroyo
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, and Ethos–Interdisciplinary Ethics Platform, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alain Kaufmann
- Science-Society Interface, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Berg JS, Agrawal PB, Bailey DB, Beggs AH, Brenner SE, Brower AM, Cakici JA, Ceyhan-Birsoy O, Chan K, Chen F, Currier RJ, Dukhovny D, Green RC, Harris-Wai J, Holm IA, Iglesias B, Joseph G, Kingsmore SF, Koenig BA, Kwok PY, Lantos J, Leeder SJ, Lewis MA, McGuire AL, Milko LV, Mooney SD, Parad RB, Pereira S, Petrikin J, Powell BC, Powell CM, Puck JM, Rehm HL, Risch N, Roche M, Shieh JT, Veeraraghavan N, Watson MS, Willig L, Yu TW, Urv T, Wise AL. Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health. Pediatrics 2017; 139:e20162252. [PMID: 28096516 PMCID: PMC5260149 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The rapid development of genomic sequencing technologies has decreased the cost of genetic analysis to the extent that it seems plausible that genome-scale sequencing could have widespread availability in pediatric care. Genomic sequencing provides a powerful diagnostic modality for patients who manifest symptoms of monogenic disease and an opportunity to detect health conditions before their development. However, many technical, clinical, ethical, and societal challenges should be addressed before such technology is widely deployed in pediatric practice. This article provides an overview of the Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health Consortium, which is investigating the application of genome-scale sequencing in newborns for both diagnosis and screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pankaj B Agrawal
- Divisions of Newborn Medicine and
- Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Alan H Beggs
- Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Amy M Brower
- American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Julie A Cakici
- Rady Children's Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, California
| | | | - Kee Chan
- Chicago School of Public Health, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Robert J Currier
- Genetic Disease Screening Program, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California
| | - Dmitry Dukhovny
- Department of Pediatrics and Division of Neonatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | - Ingrid A Holm
- Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Galen Joseph
- Department of Anthropology, History, and Social Medicine
| | | | | | - Pui-Yan Kwok
- Institute for Human Genetics
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, and Department of Dermatology
| | - John Lantos
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Steven J Leeder
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Megan A Lewis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and
| | | | | | - Richard B Parad
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Joshua Petrikin
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | - Cynthia M Powell
- Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Jennifer M Puck
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Myra Roche
- Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph T Shieh
- Institute for Human Genetics
- Department of Pediatrics, Benioff Children's Hospital, and
| | | | - Michael S Watson
- American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Laurel Willig
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Timothy W Yu
- Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tiina Urv
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|