Focus on diagnosis: a primer on D-dimer

Mild abusive head injury: diagnosis and pitfalls

Clinicians often miss making the diagnosis of abusive head injury in infants and toddlers who present with mild, non-specific symptoms such as vomiting, fussiness, irritability, trouble sleeping and eating, and seizure. If abusive head injury is missed, the child is likely to go on to experience more severe injury. An extensive review of the medical literature was done to summarize what is known about missed abusive head injury and about how these injuries can be recognized and appropriately evaluated. The following issues will be addressed: the definition of mild head injury, problems encountered when clinicians evaluated mildly ill young children with non-specific symptoms, the risk of missing the diagnosis of mild abusive head trauma, the risks involved in subjecting infants and young children to radiation and/or sedation required for neuroimaging studies, imaging options for suspected neurotrauma in children, clinical prediction rules for evaluating mild head injury in children, laboratory tests than can be helpful in diagnosing mild abusive head injury, history and physical examination when diagnosing or ruling out mild abusive head injury, social and family factors that could be associated with abusive injuries, and interventions that could improve our recognition of mild abusive head injuries. Relevant literature is described and evaluated. The conclusion is that abusive head trauma remains a difficult diagnosis to identify in mildly symptomatic young children.

Characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

Background

Characteristics of critical Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in children is not well understood. This study described the clinical characteristics of children admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and explored factors associated with the need for invasive ventilation or mortality.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted over eight medical centers, including all patients younger than 18 years of age and admitted to the ICU due to a direct consequence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients who were admitted to the ICU for any alternate reason and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by screening test, and patients who were admitted due to multi-inflammatory syndrome in children, were excluded. Demographic, laboratory, imaging, and clinical data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to compare survivors and non-survivors. Fine and Gray’s hazard model was used to estimate the association between clinical variables and ICU death.

Results

During the study period, 25 pediatric COVID-19 patients received care in the ICUs. The median age was 2.78 years (IQR 0.21–8.51), and 60% were male. Only three patients were reported to be previously healthy at admission. Nine (36%) patients required invasive mechanical ventilation, including two were on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Four (16%) patients died during ICU care. In univariate analysis, the presence of comorbidity (HR 0.0001; 95%CI 0.00001–0.00016), platelets count (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.98–0.99), elevated procalcitonin (HR 1.05; 95%CI 1.016–1.09), and circulatory compromise (HR 16.34; 95%CI 1.99–134.35), all at the time of ICU admission, were associated with in-ICU mortality.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that children admitted to the ICU with SARS-CoV-2 infection, generally, have a favorable outcome. Low platelets count, elevated procalcitonin, presence of comorbidity, and shock at the time of ICU admission were associated with death. This study may shed more light on the disease dynamics of critical pediatric COVID-19.

Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic utility of D Dimer in acute appendicitis in children

The objective was to determine the uselfulness of D Dimer (DD) as a diagnostic or prognostic marker in acute appendicitis (AA) in children using a prospective observational study in the pediatric emergency department of a tertiary hospital. We enrolled 135 patients aged 1-16 years presenting with abdominal pain consistent with AA, who required laboratory studies. We analyzed clinical, analytical variables and histopathology findings (when they underwent surgery). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. 38.5% of the children were clinically diagnosed with AA (n = 52), confirmed by pathology in 51 patients. 55.8% were gangrenous appendicitis. Leucocyte count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and DD were higher in the AA group and in the gangrenous appendicitis group (p < 0.05), with highest values of DD in the gangrenous group. The area under the receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve for DD in the diagnosis of AA is 0.66 (95% CI 0.56-0.75). For DD cut-off point of 230 ng/mL, sensitivity (Se) was 0.40, specificity (Sp) 0.80, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.57, and negative predictive value (NPV) 0.66. The area under the ROC curve for DD in children with gangrenous appendicitis is 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-1). A DD cut-off point of 230 ng/mL exhibited: Se = 0.69, Sp = 1, PPV = 1 and NPV = 0.72.

CONCLUSION

DD levels increase in patients with AA. Although it does not constitute a useful diagnostic marker, it could be a good prognostic marker.