Telecommunication for Advance Care Planning in Heart Failure

Effectiveness of integrated palliative care telehealth intervention in patients with chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) represents a substantial burden, impacting both health and financial domains. Despite the presence of evidence-based interventions for prevention and management, suboptimal care has been recognized as a critical contributor to adverse HF-related outcomes. We aim to analyze the impact of palliative care telehealth intervention compared to usual care in quality of life (QoL) and resource utilization of chronic HF patients.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search across various databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the impact of palliative care telehealth interventions on the QoL and health outcomes of HF patients from inception until May 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, pooling odds ratios (OR), and weighted mean differences (WMD) via a random effects model for primary and secondary outcomes. The study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024542371).

RESULTS

In our study, 16 RCTs involving 2,324 HF patients, averaging 69.2 years old, were included. Upon analyzing the primary outcome, QoL, assessed through the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care (FACIT-Pal) Scale, we found a statistically significant improvement in QoL among patients who received palliative care or palliative care telehealth interventions compared to those who received usual care. The WMD for KCCQ was 3.56 (95% CI: 0.43 to 6.69, p = 0.03; I2 = 46%) and for FACIT-Pal was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.00 to 4.08, p = 0.001; I2 = 14%). Furthermore, HF patients receiving palliative care experienced a notable decrease in hospitalizations (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.86; p = 0.006; I2 = 52%). However, we did not observe a significant change in all-cause mortality, with an OR of 1.22 (95% CI: 0.77 to 1.94, p = 0.39; I2 = 37%).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of palliative care telehealth interventions demonstrates a notable impact, positively influencing the QoL and decreasing hospitalization rates among patients with chronic HF.

Health Coaching Improves Outcomes of Informal Caregivers of Adults With Chronic Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Caring for someone with heart failure takes an emotional and physical toll. Engaging in self-care may decrease stress and improve the health of informal caregivers. We conducted a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a virtual health coaching intervention, compared with health information alone, on the self-care, stress, coping, and health status of heart failure caregivers.

METHODS

We enrolled 250 caregivers providing care at least 8 hours/week, reporting poor self-care, and able to use technology. All received a tablet device programmed with websites providing vetted information on heart failure and caregiving. Half were randomized to also receive 10 synchronous support sessions virtually with a health coach over 6 months. Data on self-care, stress, coping, and health status were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the interaction between time and treatment group.

RESULTS

The sample was majority female (85.2%), White (62.2%), spouses (59.8%), and aged 55±13.6 years. Many were employed full time (41.8%). They had been caring for the patient 8 hours/day for a median of 3.25 years. In the intention-to-treat analysis, caregivers who received the health coach intervention had statistically and clinically greater improvement across 6 months compared with the control group in the primary outcome of self-care maintenance (5.05±1.99; P=0.01) and stress (-4.50±1.00; P<0.0001). Self-care neglect declined significantly (-0.65±0.32; P=0.04), but the difference between the treatment arms disappeared when the results were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Mental health status improved statistically but not clinically (3.35±1.61; P=0.04). Active coping improved in both groups but not significantly more in the intervention group (P=0.10). Physical health status was unchanged (P=0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

This virtual health coaching intervention was effective in improving self-care and stress in heart failure caregivers.