Longitudinal aneurysm shrinkage following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a source of intermediate and late complications

Geometrical changes in Anaconda endograft limbs after endovascular aneurysm repair: A potential predictor for limb occlusion

The emergence of limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair may be related to the conformational changes between the endograft structure and the patient's anatomy. This study analyzed detailed geometric changes of Anaconda endograft (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK) limbs during the cardiac cycle-based computed tomography on serial imaging after graft implantation. Fifteen patients (mean age 72.8 ± 3.7 years; 14 men) underwent postoperative electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography scans according to a prospective study design between April 2014 and May 2017. Changes in curvature, length of the limbs, and distances between successive stent rings (inter-ring distance) of the endograft limbs during a 2-year follow-up period were quantified using meticulous image processing methods involving image registration, centerline extraction, and model-based stent-ring segmentation. From discharge to 24 months, mean curvature increased significantly by 9.6 m^-1 (standard deviation [SD], 11.1 m^-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.4 to 15.8 m^-1; P = .002) for the right limbs and by 6.1 m^-1 (SD 9.4 m^-1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 11.5 m^-1; P = .21) for the left limbs. The length of the right limbs decreased significantly, by 9.5 mm (SD 7.6 mm; 95% CI, 3.5 to 15.6 mm; P = .002); the length of the left limbs decreased by 10.1 mm (SD 5.1 mm; 95% CI, 5.9 to 14.2 mm; P < .001). The minimal inter-ring distance decreased by 0.36 mm (SD 0.26 mm; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.55 mm; P < .001) for the right limbs and 0.35 mm (SD 0.19 mm; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49 mm; P < .001) for the left limbs. Cardiac pulsatility-induced changes in curvature, limb length, and inter-ring distance were negligible (2%, 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively). Changes in the geometry of the Anaconda endograft limbs after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were observed during a 2-year follow-up manifest as an increase in curvature, shortening of the stent-graft limbs, and a corresponding decrease in inter-ring distance. These stent-graft conformational changes could result in inward folding of the graft fabric, which may relate to the emergence of limb occlusion. Further investigation of these metrics in a larger cohort involving patients with and without occlusions may allow determination of their predictive value.

Positional Changes of an Endurant Endograft Leading to Simultaneous Ipsilateral Iliac Limb Obstruction and Contralateral Type IIIa Endoleak

We report the case of a 79-year-old man who was admitted to our department with acute limb ischemia due to the occlusion of the left iliac limb of an Endurant endograft. The admission computed tomography angiography revealed also a type IIIa endoleak due to modular disconnection of the iliac extensions from the right iliac limb of the endograft main body. Interestingly, during the 4-year post-endovascular aneurysm repair period, an increased kinking of the right limb has been observed leading to an almost cross-limb configuration of the limbs at the time of complications. To our knowledge, this is the first case in the literature of the simultaneous presence of limb thrombosis and late type IIIa endoleak with this particular device. The ischemia was treated with a femoro-femoral cross-over bypass, and the endoleak was corrected with the position of 2 Endurant iliac limb extensions bridging the dislocated endograft pieces.

Evaluation the Aortic Aneurysm Remodeling After a Successful Stentgraft Implantation

Background

Routine imaging follow-up after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is mainly aimed at detection of endoleaks. The aim of the study was to assess changes in the size of the abdominal aortic aneurysm sack using CT angiography (CTA) after successful treatment using endovascular stent graft implantation.

Material/Methods

A retrospective analysis of CTA results included 102 patients aged 54–88, who had no postoperative complications. Patients underwent CTA before EVAR and after the treatment (mean time between studies, 7.6 months). The largest cross-sectional area of the aneurysm sac was measured using a curved multiplanar reconstruction. A change of the aneurysm cross-sectional over 10% was considered significant.

Results

The average cross-sectional area decreased after EVAR by 3% and this change was not statistically significant. Regression of the cross-sectional area was observed in 18.6% of patients, progression was in 23.5%, and no change was seen in 57.8%. Cross-sectional areas before and after EVAR were significantly correlated (r=0.75, p<0.0001). There was no correlation between the cross-sectional area change after EVAR and patients’ age or the time between the treatment and the follow-up CTA. Cross-sectional area before the treatment predicted changes in the aneurysm size after EVAR (p=0.0045).

Conclusions

Remodeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms after EVAR is not uniform. The change of aneurysm size depends on the initial aneurysm size but not on the time from EVAR. The size of the aneurysm after EVAR should not be considered as a measure of the treatment efficacy.

Time-Related Alterations in Shape, Position, and Structure of Self-Expanding, Modular Aortic Stent-Grafts: A 4-year Single-Center Follow-up

Purpose:

To report the nature and ramifications of structural and positional changes over time in tube and modular bifurcated aortic stent-grafts.

Methods:

Two hundred ninety-one patients received endovascular aortic grafts (primarily Stentor/Vanguard) between August 1994 and August 1998. Follow-up surveillance (clinical and laboratory examination, biplanar noncontrast radiography, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography) has been maintained on all patients for 4 years. Changes in the configuration and position of endografts have been noted and their sequelae charted.

Results:

Three types of endograft shape changes have been documented: mild — slight distortions visible on plain radiographs (n = 90, 31.0%), significant — angulations reaching 60° to 90° (n = 65, 22.3%), and severe — angulations ≥ 90° (n = 10, 3.4%). Changes in position never gave rise to late migration at the proximal attachment site, whereas at the distal ends, the endograft easily retracted from the iliac arteries (n = 8). Structural alterations (rupture of the stent frame, sutures, or fabric, and total graft disintegration) were more common in the original Stentor model. Shape, position, and structural alterations were mutually dependent and led to secondary endoleaks (n = 26) and graft limb thrombosis (n = 37). Late surgical conversion was necessary in 3 (1.0%) patients.

Conclusions:

Tortuosity of the native vessels is a source of complication in long-term follow-up just as it is during implantation. Given the late appearance of complications in this patient cohort, it would seem that the durability of an endograft cannot be evaluated with < 3 years of follow-up.

Hemodynamic Functions of Fenestrated Stent Graft under Resting, Hypertension, and Exercise Conditions

The aim of this study was to assess the hemodynamic performance of a patient-specific fenestrated stent graft (FSG) under different physiological conditions, including normal resting, hypertension, and hypertension with moderate lower limb exercise. A patient-specific FSG model was constructed from computed tomography images and was discretized into a fine unstructured mesh comprising tetrahedral and prism elements. Blood flow was simulated using Navier-Stokes equations, and physiologically realistic boundary conditions were utilized to yield clinically relevant results. For a given cycle-averaged inflow of 2.08 L/min at normal resting and hypertension conditions, approximately 25% of flow was channeled into each renal artery. When hypertension was combined with exercise, the cycle-averaged inflow increased to 6.39 L/min but only 6.29% of this was channeled into each renal artery, which led to a 438.46% increase in the iliac flow. For all the simulated scenarios and throughout the cardiac cycle, the instantaneous flow streamlines in the FSG were well organized without any notable flow recirculation. This well-organized flow led to low values of endothelial cell activation potential, which is a hemodynamic metric used to identify regions at risk of thrombosis. The displacement forces acting on the FSG varied with the physiological conditions, and the cycle-averaged displacement force at normal rest, hypertension, and hypertension with exercise was 6.46, 8.77, and 8.99 N, respectively. The numerical results from this study suggest that the analyzed FSG can maintain sufficient blood perfusion to the end organs at all the simulated conditions. Even though the FSG was found to have a low risk of thrombosis at rest and hypertension, this risk can be reduced even further with moderate lower limb exercise.

A Case of Endovascular Treatment of Severe Graft Limb Kinking after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been recommended as an alternative to open aneurysm repair. The risk of severe perioperative complications is lower than that in open surgical repair; however, late complications are more likely. After EVAR, regular yearly surveillance by duplex ultrasonography or computed tomography is recommended. We report the case of a 67-year-old man with a severely kinked left iliac branch of the stent graft 10 years after EVAR. He had not undergone regular follow-up during the last 4 years. We realigned the endograft kink by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

A biomimetic approach for designing stent-graft structures: Caterpillar cuticle as design model

Stent-graft (SG) induced biomechanical mismatch at the aortic repair site forms the major reason behind postoperative hemodynamic complications. These complications arise from mismatched radial compliance and stiffness property of repair device relative to native aortic mechanics. The inability of an exoskeleton SG design (an externally stented rigid polyester graft) to achieve optimum balance between structural robustness and flexibility constrains its biomechanical performance limits. Therefore, a new SG design capable of dynamically controlling its stiffness and flexibility has been proposed in this study. The new design is adopted from the segmented hydroskeleton structure of a caterpillar cuticle and comprises of high performance polymeric filaments constructed in a segmented knit architecture. Initially, conceptual design models of caterpillar and SG were developed and later translated into an experimental SG prototype. The in-vitro biomechanical evaluation (compliance, bending moment, migration intensity, and viscoelasticity) revealed significantly better performance of hydroskeleton structure than a commercial SG device (Zenith(™) Flex SG) and woven Dacron(®) graft-prosthesis. Structural segmentation improved the biomechanical behaviour of new SG by inducing a three dimensional volumetric expansion property when the SG was subjected to hoop stresses. Interestingly, this behaviour matches the orthotropic elastic property of native aorta and hence proposes segmented hydroskeleton structures as promising design approach for future aortic repair devices.

A comparative study of the bell-bottom technique vs hypogastric exclusion for the treatment of aneurysmal extension to the iliac bifurcation

INTRODUCTION

A significant proportion of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) have common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAA). Aneurysmal involvement at the iliac bifurcation potentially undermines long-term durability.

METHODS

Patients with CIAA who underwent EVAR were identified in two teaching hospitals. Bell-bottom technique (BBT; iliac limb ≥20 mm) or internal iliac artery embolization and limb extension to the external iliac artery (IIE + EE) were used. Outcome between these two approaches was compared.

RESULTS

We identified 185 patients. Indication for EVAR included asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in 157, symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm in 19, and CIAA in nine. Mean AAA diameter was 59 mm. Among 260 large CIAAs that were treated, BBT was used to treat 166 CIAA limbs, and 94 limbs underwent IIE + EE. Total reintervention rates were 11% for BBT (n = 19) and 19.1% for IIE + EE (n = 18; P = .149). Rates of reintervention for type Ib or III endoleak were 4% for BBT (n = 7) and 4% for IIE + EE (n = 4; P > .99). The difference in limb patency rates was not significant. The 30-day mortality rate was 1%. Median follow-up was 22 months. Complications did not differ significantly between the two groups; however, the combined incidence of perioperative complications and reinterventions was higher in the IIE + EE group (49% vs 22%; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined incidence of perioperative complications and reinterventions is significantly higher with IIE + EE than with BBT; therefore, when feasible, BBT is desirable.

Aortic length changes during abdominal aortic aneurysm formation, expansion and stabilisation in a rat model

BACKGROUND

Determinants of extracellular matrix (ECM) destruction/reconstruction balance influencing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter may impact length.

OBJECTIVE

Document aortic lengthening, its correlation to diameter, and determine how treatments that impact diameter also affect length.

METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-five diameter and length measurements were performed in 308 rats during AAA formation, expansion and stabilisation in guinea pig aortas xenografted in rats. Impact of modulation of ECM destructive/reconstructive balance by endovascular Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell (VSMCs) seeding, TIMP-1, PAI-1 and TGF-beta1 overexpression on length has been assessed.

RESULTS

Length increased in correlation with diameter during formation (correlation coefficient (cc): 0.584, P<0.0001) and expansion (cc: 0.352, P=0.0055) of AAAs. Overexpression of TIMP-1 and PAI-1 decreased lengthening (P=0.02 and 0.014, respectively) demonstrating that elongation is driven by matrix metalloproteinases and their activation by the plasmin pathway. Overexpression of TGF-beta1 controlled length in formed AAAs (17.3 ± 9.6 vs. 5.9 ± 7.4mm, P=0.022), but not VSMC seeding, although both therapies efficiently prevented further diameter increase. Length and diameter correlation was lost after biotherapies.

CONCLUSION

Length increases in correlation with diameter during AAA formation and expansion, as a consequence of ECM injury driven by MMPs activated by the plasmin pathway. Correlation between length and diameter increases is not universally preserved.

Complete Endograft Collapse 9½ Years Following Endograft Repair of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Endografts are a common method of treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) because of the short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). However, the short-term benefits of endovascular repair must be balanced against long-term complications, such as the need for conversion to open repair, device migration, persistent or de novo endoleaks, and most concerning the potential for subsequent rupture of the aneurysm. Lifelong postimplantation surveillance is mandatory because the incidence of some complications increases over time. This report describes our recent experience in a patient in whom complete endograft collapse was discovered 9½ years following EVAR necessitating conversion to open repair.

Multidetector-row computed tomography angiography in abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair: evaluation of optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for the detection of low-flow endoleaks

PURPOSE

To evaluate the optimal timing of delayed phase imaging for detecting low-flow endoleaks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with endovascular repair underwent 1- and 6-month follow-up multidetector row computed tomography (CT) performed during unenhanced, arterial, and delayed phase. At 6-month follow-up, delayed phase imaging, focused on stent graft, was performed with a delay of 60 (early delayed enhanced phase) and 300 seconds (late delayed enhanced phase) after intravenous injection of 120 mL of iodinated nonionic contrast medium (iomeprol 300 mgI/mL, Iomeron), at a flow rate of 3 mL/s via an antecubital vein, with a detector-row configuration of 4 x 1-mm, a 1.25-mm slice width, and a pitch of 6. Six-month follow-up CT images were independently evaluated by 2 readers during 2 different reading sessions: sets A (unenhanced, arterial, and early delayed phase images) and B (unenhanced, arterial, and late delayed phase images). Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of both reading sessions were compared. The standard of reference was represented by the combined evaluation of 1- and 6-month CT scans.

RESULTS

At standard of reference, 24 of 58 patients had an endoleak classified as type 1 in 2 cases, type 2 in 21 cases, and type 3 in the last 1 case. Seven of 21 type 2 endoleaks were classified as low-flow endoleaks. Set A reading session, including early delayed enhanced phase, allowed the detection of 19 of 24 endoleaks (5 false-negative cases represented by low-flow endoleaks), whereas all endoleaks were detected during set B reading session, including late delayed enhanced phase. Differences between sets A and B in terms of sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For optimal multidetector CT detection of low-flow endoleaks in patients who underwent endovascular repair, delayed phase should be acquired 300 seconds after injection of contrast medium.

Renewed endovascular repair for recurrent acute abdominal aortic aneurysm

The aim of the study was to describe the successful endovascular management of a patient who was admitted urgently with a second episode of acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) 30 months after emergency endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (eEVAR) for a ruptured AAA. The patient, an 84 year-old male physician, presented with severe acute abdominal and back pain. Contrast-enhanced computer tomography scanning showed type III endoleak owing to complete disconnection of both graft limbs and the prosthetic main body. Treatment consisted of acute stent-grafting with two bridging stent-grafts to seal the endoleak and reline the graft. The patient is alive and well 6 months postoperatively. This case indicates the need for follow-up after eEVAR, but also that complications can be managed endovascularly.

Limb Graft Occlusion Following EVAR: Clinical Pattern, Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Occurrence

INTRODUCTION

We reviewed our experience with limb occlusion after EVAR in order (1) to assess the clinical pattern and treatment options (2) to assess outcomes and (3) to identify predictive factors of occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Between 1995 and 2005, 460 AAA patients were electively treated with a variety of commercially available stent grafts. There were 369 bifurcated and 91 aortouniiliac grafts (829 limbs). Follow-up included physical examination, plain X-ray, Duplex ultrasonography, and spiral computed tomographic scans at 1, 6, 12 months and annually thereafter. All pertinent data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. The follow-up period ranged from Day 0 to 104 months, with a median follow-up of 23.4 months.

RESULTS

36 limbs in 33 patients (7.2%) occluded between Day 0 and 71 months (average: 9.5 months) after EVAR. Presentation was acute ischemia in 11 cases, rest pain in 9, claudication in ten. Four occlusions remained asymptomatic and two occurred intraoperatively. Treatment was femoro-femoral cross-over graft in 19 cases, axillo-femoral bypass in three, thrombectomy and stent in three, thrombolysis and stent in nine, and conservative in two. One patient (3%) died of multiple organ failure after thrombolysis. There was no amputation. Reocclusions occurred in two patients (6.1%). Multivariate logistic regression showed that kinking (odds ratio [OR] 11.9; confidence interval [CI] 3.39-42.1; p=0.0001), first graft generation (OR 2.87; CI 1.25-6.62; p=0.017) and younger age (OR 1.05; CI 1.00-1.09; p=0.034) were independently related to the occurrence of graft limb occlusion.

CONCLUSION

Acute graft limb occlusion is not rare after EVAR. The frequency of limb occlusion has declined with current stent grafts generation. Although surgery and endovascular treatments are efficient and safe, development of a graft limb kink should lead to aggressive pre-emptive treatment to prevent occlusion.

Imaging Techniques for Detection and Management of Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair1

Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is evolving into a viable alternative to open surgical repair for many patients with abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Endoleak development is a complication of EVAR and represents one of the limitations of this procedure. Endoleaks represent blood flow outside the stent-graft lumen but within the aneurysm sac. Lifelong imaging surveillance of patients after EVAR is critical to detect endoleaks for the patient's benefit and to determine the long-term performance of the stent-graft. Although computed tomographic angiography is the most commonly used examination for imaging surveillance, magnetic resonance angiography, ultrasonography, and digital subtraction angiography all have a role in endoleak detection and management. This review will focus on imaging techniques used for endoleak detection and the role imaging surveillance plays in the overall care of the post-EVAR patient.

Mid-Term Comparison of Bifurcated Modular Endograft Versus Aorto-Uni-Iliac Endograft in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcome of the Talent bifurcated endograft versus the Endofit aorto-uni-iliac endograft in the short-term and mid-term. Between March 2000 and December 2003, 86 patients were treated with the Talent bifurcated endograft (group A) and 21 with the Endofit aorto-uni-iliac endograft (group B) in the same institute by the same surgical team. All patients followed a prospective protocol of preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up. We compared groups A and B in terms of perioperative mortality and morbidity, mid-term endoleak rate, mid-term success rate, and mid-term survival. The perioperative mortality for group A was 1.63%, while that for group B was 0% (P = 0.62). The endoleak rate for group A was 4.65%, and that for group B was 14.29% (P = 0.135). The mid-term success rate was 96.5% for group A and 100% for group B (P = 0.386). There was no significant difference in outcome between the patients treated with the Talent and those treated with the Endofit endoprosthesis. Treating abdominal aortic aneurysms with aorto-uni-iliac endoprosthesis is as safe and effective as treating them with bifurcated endografts.

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

The operative mortality following conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has not fallen significantly over the past two decades. Since its inception in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has provided an alternative to open AAA repair and perhaps an opportunity to improve operative mortality. Two recent large randomised trials have demonstrated the short and medium term benefit of EVAR over open AAA repair, although data on the long term efficacy of the technique are still lacking. This review aimed at providing an overview of EVAR and a discussion of the potential benefits and current limitations of the technique.

Results After Endovascular Stent Graft Placement in Atherosclerotic Aneurysms Involving the Descending Aorta

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine durability and need for reinterventions after endovascular stent graft placement in atherosclerotic aneurysms involving the descending aorta.

METHODS

We performed a prospective follow-up analysis of a consecutive series of 79 patients undergoing endovascular stent graft placement due to atherosclerotic aneurysms involving the descending aorta between 1996 and 2006. Acute aortic syndromes were excluded from this analysis. Mean follow-up was 42 months (range, 1 to 108 months). Data were collected for in-hospital mortality, occurrence of early and late endoleaks, reintervention due to early and late endoleaks, and survival.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 6.3% (n = 5). Two of these patients underwent emergent treatment. Early type I and III endoleaks were observed in 29% of patients (n = 23). The assisted primary endoleak rate was 11%. Late type I or III endoleaks occurred in 21% (n = 17). At 1, 3, and 5 years, overall actuarial survival was 96%, 86%, and 69%, and event-free survival was 90%, 82%, and 65%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that a short proximal landing zone and a high number of stent grafts used were independent risk factors for early and late endoleak formation. Late endoleak formation was an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular stent graft placement in atherosclerotic aneurysms involving the descending aorta has satisfactory durability. An extensive landing zone is a prerequisite of early and late success. Further clinical investigations are warranted to evaluate long-term durability of this attractive treatment modality.

Multidetector CT in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treated with Endovascular Repair: Are Unenhanced and Delayed Phase Enhanced Images Effective for Endoleak Detection?

PURPOSE

To retrospectively determine the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced, delayed enhanced phase (DEP), and arterial enhanced phase (AEP) multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) for depicting endoleaks during follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients (two women, 48 men; mean age, 72 years) underwent follow-up multi-detector row CT 1, 6, and 12 months after endovascular aneurysm repair. Unenhanced CT was performed with 2.5-mm collimation; 1-mm collimation was used with AEP and DEP examinations. Two independent readers assessed the presence of endoleak in three reading sessions: AEP (session A), unenhanced and AEP (session B), and AEP and DEP (session C). At 6- and 12-month follow-up, a fourth set was included: 1-month unenhanced and AEP (session D). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of each session were calculated. Triple-phase multi-detector row CT was the reference standard.

RESULTS

At 1 month, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 79%, 75%, and 55% for session A; 93%, 97%, and 93% for session B; and 93%, 78%, and 62% for session C. At 6 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 92%, 68%, and 48% for session A; 92%, 100%, and 100% for session B; and 100%, 84%, and 67% for session C. At 12 months, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, respectively, were 80%, 80%, and 50% for session A; 90%, 98%, and 90% for session B; and 100%, 80%, and 56% for session C. Sensitivity did not significantly differ (P > .05) among reading sessions A, B, and C, whereas specificity and positive predictive values in session B were significantly higher (P < .001). For 6- and 12-month follow-up, no significant differences (P > .05) were found between sessions D and B.

CONCLUSION

The combination of AEP and unenhanced imaging performed at 1-month follow-up offers improved specificity and positive predictive values compared with AEP alone. DEP imaging does not significantly increase sensitivity for detection of endoleaks, but it does depict low-flow endoleaks not seen at AEP.

Three-dimensional visualization of suprarenal aortic stent-grafts: evaluation of migration in midterm follow-up

PURPOSE

To investigate the midterm results of transrenal fixation of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with regard to device migration and encroachment of stent wires on the renal and visceral branches.

METHODS

Imaging data from 18 patients (15 men; mean age 75 years, range 63-84) undergoing transrenal stent-graft fixation for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were included in the study. Computed tomographic angiographic data acquired within 1 week of stent-graft implantation were compared to the latest follow-up images. Postprocessing methods generated 3-dimensional (3D) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) for evaluation of the relationship between suprarenal stents and aortic branches. Aortic neck angulation was measured in each patient for correlation with the incidence of stent migration.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 40 months. 3D image visualizations showed that the stent-graft moved caudally in all patients (range 2.6-14.2 mm), with migration (>10 mm) observed in 4 (22%) patients. Corresponding VIE images documented changes in stent wire encroachment on the aortic branch ostia in 11 patients, including the number and position of crossing stent wires. There was no close relationship between aortic neck angulation and stent migration.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that migration occurs at midterm follow-up in transrenally deployed stent-grafts. 3D images were valuable for the assessment of stent migration, as well as its relationship with aortic branch ostia. Long-term follow-up of transrenal fixation deserves to be investigated, especially after observing stent migration relative to aortic ostial encroachment.

Stent-Grafts for Unruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Current Status

Aortic stent-grafts were introduced at the beginning of the 1990s as a less invasive method of dealing with aortic aneurysms in patients with poor cardiovascular reserve. The numbers of procedures performed worldwide has increased exponentially despite the current lack of any substantial evidence for long-term efficacy in comparison with the gold standard of open surgical grafting. This review summarizes the evolution of the abdominal aortic stent-graft, the techniques used for assessment and deployment, and the effect of the procedure on both the patient and the device. The recent publication of two national multicenter trials has confirmed that the endovascular technique confers a 2.5-fold reduction in 30-day mortality in comparison with open surgery. However, over 4 years of follow-up, there is a 3-fold increase in the risk of reintervention and the overall costs are 30% greater with endovascular repair. Although the improvement in aneurysm-related mortality persists in the mid-term, because of the initial reduction in perioperative mortality, the all-cause mortality rate at 4 years is actually no better than for open surgery. Longer-term data from the randomized trials are awaited as well as results from the latest trials utilizing state-of-the-art devices. Whilst the overall management of abdominal aortic aneurysms has undoubtedly benefited from the introduction of stent-grafts, open repair currently remains the gold standard treatment.

Aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair of aortic diseases

BACKGROUND

There are two graft materials for endovascular repair of aortic diseases, i.e., polyester and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). The latest reports have suggested that there is graft-specific difference in outcomes. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the difference in terms of aneurysm shrinkage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients who underwent endovascular repair of aortic diseases were included. Forty patients had true aortic aneurysms, 8 had aortic pseudoaneurysms, and 38 had aortic dissections. Eighteen patients with true aortic aneurysms were treated with stent grafts fabricated with polyester, while the other 68 patients, including 22 patients with true aneurysms, 8 patients with pseudoaneurysms, and 38 patients with aortic dissections, were treated with stent grafts fabricated with ePTFE. All patients were followed-up by computed tomography (CT) for more than 1 year. The mean follow-up term was 28 months. Computed tomography confirmed that there were sufficiently long necks, and the aneurysm or the entry tear was completely excluded without any endoleak in all patients. The diameter of the preoperative lesion was compared with that measured on follow-up CT at 1 year and at the end of the follow-up term. Increase or decrease in the diameter by more than 5 mm was defined as a significant diameter change.

RESULTS

Aneurysm shrinkage was observed in 40% of patients with true aneurysms, 88% of patients with pseudoaneurysms, and 55% of patients with aortic dissections at 1 year. There was no significant increase in patients with aneurysm shrinkage at the end of follow-up in any groups. In the case of true aortic aneurysms, shrinkage of aneurysms was observed more frequently with polyester-fabricated stent grafts (67%, 13/18) than with ePTFE-fabricated ones (18%, 4/22) at 1 year (P<.01). In contrast, expansion of aneurysms was observed only in patients treated with ePTFE (14%, 3/22). Shrinkage of the descending aorta was observed in 55% of patients with acute aortic dissections and 36% of patients with chronic aortic dissections. There was no case with aortic enlargement in either group. There was no significant difference between acute and chronic dissection in terms of shrinkage of the descending aorta.

CONCLUSION

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene appears to be effective for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms and aortic dissections. However, polyester seems to be more effective than ePTFE when true aneurysms are to be treated.

Risk-Adjusted Outcome Analysis of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in a Large Population:How Do Stent-Grafts Compare?

PURPOSE

To compare differences in the applicability and incidence of postoperative adverse events among stent-grafts used for repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

An analysis of 6787 patients from the EUROSTAR Registry database was conducted to compare aneurysm morphological features, patient characteristics, and postoperative events for the AneuRx, EVT/Ancure, Excluder, Stentor, Talent, and Zenith devices versus the Vanguard device (control) and each other. Annual incidence rates of complications were determined, and risks were compared using the Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

The annual incidence rates were: device-related endoleak (types I and III) 6% (range 4%-10%), type II endoleak 5% (range 0.3%-11%), migration 3% (range 0.5%-5%), kinking 2% (range 1%-5%), occlusion 3% (range 1%-5%), rupture 0.5% (range 0%-1%), and all-cause mortality 7% (range 5%-8%). After adjustment for factors influencing outcome, AneuRx, Excluder, Talent, and Zenith devices were associated with a lower risk of migration, kinking, occlusion, and secondary intervention compared to the Vanguard device. Significant increased risk for conversion (EVT/Ancure) and reduced risk of aneurysm rupture (AneuRx and Zenith) and all-cause mortality (Excluder) were found compared to the Vanguard device.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences exist between stent-grafts of different labels in terms of applicability and complications during intermediate to long-term follow-up. Since each stent-graft has its drawbacks, no single label can be identified as the best. It is reassuring that developments in stent-grafts indeed result in better performance than the early stent-grafts. However, a single device incorporating all the perceived improvements should still be pursued.

Flow Visualization in a Model of a Bifurcated Stent-Graft

PURPOSE

To use an in vitro flow model to investigate the flow patterns in a bifurcated stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

METHODS

Experiments were performed in an in vitro test rig incorporating a simplified non-planar model of an AAA. A two-component bifurcated device consisting of a stent structure and transparent polyurethane "graft" was deployed in the AAA model. Using a blood analogue fluid, a pulsatile blood flow waveform simulating resting flow condition was produced by means of a piston pump system. Flow patterns in the lateral and anteroposterior planes of the stent-graft were recorded and analyzed using flow visualization techniques.

RESULTS

The flow patterns within the stent-graft were complex and influenced by the geometry of the stent-graft itself, as well as that of the aortic neck and iliac vessels. Regions of flow separation, low velocity and stagnation, and slow oscillatory flow near the walls were seen in the main body of the stent-graft. Constriction at the stump in the contralateral limb resulted in flow disturbances and flow separation. Kinking at the junctions of stent segments and folding of the graft compounded these complex flow structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow structures within stent-grafts are complex, with features that may predispose to thrombus formation. Arterial geometry, including aortic neck angulation and iliac vessel tortuosity, and the design of the stent-graft are factors that influence hemodynamics and may impact the performance of aortic stent-grafts.

Incidence of Renal Infarctions After Transrenal Stent Placement in an Animal Model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and appearance of renal infarctions after transrenal stent placement in an animal model.

METHODS

An aortic stent was placed via a femoral approach in 20 female Merino sheep. Ten animals had intentional coverage of one renal ostium with the bare struts, 1 sheep had both renal artery ostia covered, and the other 9 sheep had no stent impingement on the renal orifices. Animals were sacrificed after 3 to 12 months (mean 6) for gross pathological and histological evaluation. Infarction locations and patterns were evaluated and correlated to stent placement.

RESULTS

Of the 40 renal arteries, coverage was proven at autopsy in 12 cases; the remaining 28 arteries were free of any stent overlay. Overall, 14 (35%) renal infarctions were detected; 7 were found in the 12 arteries with a transrenal stent (58.3% incidence in covered renal arteries). By comparison, the other 7 infarctions were found in the 28 unaffected arteries (25% incidence in noncovered renal arteries; p = 0.04). All infarctions appeared to be well-defined punctate lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

A transrenal stent position in the abdominal aorta is related to increased renal infarctions in an animal model.

Endovascular Treatment of Proximal Bilateral Iliac Limb Dislocation and Kinking following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

We report the case of a 69-year-old man with a late type 1b endoleak due to proximal migration of both iliac limbs 5 years after endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The endovascular method used to correct bilaterally this condition is described. Final angiographic control shows patency of the stent-graft without signs of endoleak.

What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension

Endovascular repair has been used over a decade as a treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and has become a widely accepted treatment method with a low rate of perioperative complications. Endoleak, perigraft blood flow outside endograft but within aneurysmsac, has been intensively studied during the last 10 years of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR). The natural history of aneurysms with endoleak and the true clinical significance of various types of endoleaks remains unclear. Type I/III endoleak has been found to be associated with aneurysm rupture, while the risk of rupture of aneurysms with type II endoleak and endotension appears very small. In endotension, the aneurysm sac remains pressurized, even if there is no evidence of an endoleak. Currently,it is accepted that type I/III endoleaks should be corrected, preferably by endovascular means, due to the risk of rupture. If endovascular repair is not possible, then open conversion should be considered. The risk of conversion should be weighed against the risk of aneurysm rupture. Treatment of type II endoleaks and endotension is more controversial. In those with aneurysm enlargement,secondary interventions are often performed.

Initial Results After Combined Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms by Sequential Transposition of the Supra-Aortic Branches and Consecutive Endovascular Stent-Graft Placement

BACKGROUND

To evaluate safety and efficacy of a combined repair of aortic arch aneurysms by sequential transposition of the supra-aortic branches and endovascular stent-graft placement.

METHODS

Between October 2002 and September 2003, 5 patients (mean age, 79.5 years) presented with aortic arch aneurysms involving the origin of the left carotid artery. Treatment was made by sequential transposition of the left carotid artery into the brachiocephalic trunk and transposition of the left subclavian artery into the already transposed left common carotid artery with consecutive endovascular stent-graft placement into the aortic arch.

RESULTS

All patients survived both procedures. At completion angiography, a small type 1a endoleak was observed in 1 patient. After 1 week, the patient was readmitted for completion three-dimensional computed tomographic scan. The leak had already occluded spontaneously. Mean follow-up was 10 months (range, 4 to 16 months). At follow-up, all patients had normal computed tomographic scans with regular perfusion of the supra-aortic branches without any signs of endoleaks.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined repair of aortic arch aneurysms by sequential transposition of the supra-aortic branches with consecutive endovascular stent-graft placement is feasible. Extended application of this technique will enable safe and effective treatment of a highly selected subgroup of patients with aortic aneurysms by avoiding conventional arch aneurysm repair in deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest.

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become widely used. Supporters claim high success rates, few complications and a dramatically reduced hospital stay. However, endoleak, endotension and reports of endoprosthesis rupture are causes of concern.

METHODS

A Medline search was undertaken to identify articles on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Additional papers were identified by manual scanning of the references from key articles.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Endoleak is a potentially serious complication of the endovascular technique and occurs in a significant proportion of patients. It is still not possible to judge whether the presence of an endoleak alone signifies failure of treatment, and the long-term durability of prosthetic covered stents is unknown. However, endovascular repair does appear to confer a degree of protection from rupture although patients must be advised of the need for life-long imaging surveillance and, perhaps, further intervention.

The Vanguard Endovascular Stent-graft: Mid-term Results from a Single Centre

PURPOSE

Despite initial enthusiasm for endovascular aortic repair, few descriptions of longer-term follow-up of any endovascular device have been published. This paper represents the experience of a single centre with the Vanguard device over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with a median age of 71 years (range 45-87 years) and aneurysm diameter of 59 mm (45-84 mm) received a bifurcated Vanguard stent-graft between December 1995 and July 1999. Follow-up was according to the Eurostar criteria (clinical assessment, plain film radiography and computed tomography) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and then annually thereafter.

RESULTS

All primary stent deployments were successful. Median duration of surgery was 120 min (70-360 min). Median post-operative stay was 3 days (1-19 days) with a peri-operative mortality of 5.5%. In the follow-up period (median 40 months, range 6-64 months) there was one aneurysm associated death, and 14 deaths due to other causes. There have been three device migrations, 12 occluded graft limbs, four type II endoleaks and nine type III endoleaks. At 48 months, this has resulted in a survival rate of 67%, an endoleak free survival of 81% and intervention free survival of 59% (Kaplan-Meier).

CONCLUSION

Medium term results with the Vanguard device appear to be at least equivalent to open repair with regard to morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, several delayed complications appear to be related to endograft limb distortion. Important lessons have been learnt in relation to the deployment of bifurcated endografts to reduce the incidence of secondary limb related problems.

Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data

OBJECTIVES

The behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. The importance of sac behavior is manifested by the correlation between aneurysm size or size change and risk for rupture, and potentially further extrapolated to define the need for secondary intervention. This study was undertaken to define graft-specific differences and the effect of endoleak on sac remodeling.

METHODS

Core laboratory data were obtained for three US Phase II clinical trials. Patients were included if they met anatomic inclusion criteria and underwent placement of the latest version of a bifurcated endovascular prosthesis. Unsupported Dacron (Ancure), supported Dacron (Zenith), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Excluder) grafts were evaluated. Digitized images were electronically assessed for aneurysm size (area, maximum, minimum diameter) with National Institutes of Health Image software. Two blinded reviewers analyzed each radiographic study to ensure accurate image selection and establish the presence or absence of endoleak. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. chi(2) analysis and mixed nonlinear modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 1506 patients evaluated, 723 (227 Ancure, 343 Excluder, 153 Zenith) met inclusion criteria for the study. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (Ancure, 31.3 months; Excluder, 19.6 months; Zenith, 19.3 months). The incidence of any endoleak was 39.1% (Ancure, 58.1%; Excluder, 34.7%; Zenith, 20.9%; P <.001). Type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size were determinants of rate of aneurysm shrinkage. Reduction in sac size was greatest with the Zenith graft, followed by the Ancure and Excluder grafts. Presence of endoleak had a moderating effect on rate of sac shrinkage with the Zenith and Ancure grafts; however, sac size increased in the presence of endoleak with the Excluder graft. Finally, baseline size was positively correlated with rate of aneurysm shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The behavior of the aneurysm sac depends on the type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size of the sac. Differential sac behavior must be considered when determining the need for secondary interventions, timing follow-up studies, and assessing success or failure of endovascular repair.