Use of goserelin in the treatment of breast cancer

A Snapshot of Selenium-enclosed Nanoparticles for the Management of Cancer

Among the primary causes of mortality in today's world is cancer. Many drugs are employed to give lengthy and severe chemotherapy and radiation therapy, like nitrosoureas (Cisplatin, Oxaliplatin), Antimetabolites (5-fluorouracil, Methotrexate), Topoisomerase inhibitors (Etoposide), Mitotic inhibitors (Doxorubicin); such treatment is associated with significant adverse effects. Antitumor antibiotics have side effects similar to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element for humans and animals, and additional Se supplementation is required, particularly for individuals deficient in Se. Due to its unique features and high bioactivities, selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs), which act as a supplement to counter Se deficiency, have recently gained worldwide attention. This study presented a safer and more economical way of preparing stable SeNPs. The researcher has assessed the antiproliferative efficiency of SeNPs-based paclitaxel delivery systems against tumor cells in vitro with relevant mechanistic visualization. SeNPs stabilized by Pluronic F-127 were synthesized and studied. The significant properties and biological activities of PTX-loaded SeNPs on cancer cells from the lungs, breasts, cervical, and colons. In one study, SeNPs were formulated using chitosan (CTS) polymer and then incorporated into CTS/citrate gel, resulting in a SeNPs-loaded chitosan/citrate complex; in another study, CTS was used in the synthesis of SeNPs and then situated into CTS/citrate gel, resulting in Se loaded nanoparticles. These formulations were found to be more successful in cancer treatment.

Major regulators of the multi-step metastatic process are potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer management

Metastasis is a multi-step process that leads to the dissemination of tumor cells to new sites and, consequently, to multi-organ neoplasia. Although most lethal breast cancer cases are related to metastasis occurrence, little is known about the dysregulation of each step, and clinicians still lack reliable therapeutic targets for metastasis impairment. To fill these gaps, we constructed and analyzed gene regulatory networks for each metastasis step (cell adhesion loss, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and angiogenesis). Through topological analysis, we identified E2F1, EGR1, EZH2, JUN, TP63, and miR-200c-3p as general hub-regulators, FLI1 for cell-adhesion loss specifically, and TRIM28, TCF3, and miR-429 for angiogenesis. Applying the FANMOD algorithm, we identified 60 coherent feed-forward loops regulating metastasis-related genes associated with distant metastasis-free survival prediction. miR-139-5p, miR-200c-3p, miR-454-3p, and miR-1301-3p, among others, were the FFL's mediators. The expression of the regulators and mediators was observed to impact overall survival and to go along with metastasis occurrence. Lastly, we selected 12 key regulators and observed that they are potential therapeutic targets for canonical and candidate antineoplastics and immunomodulatory drugs, like trastuzumab, goserelin, and calcitriol. Our results highlight the relevance of miRNAs in mediating feed-forward loops and regulating the expression of metastasis-related genes. Altogether, our results contribute to understanding the multi-step metastasis complexity and identifying novel therapeutic targets and drugs for breast cancer management.

GPCR Modulation in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer found in women living in developed countries. Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment for hormone-responsive breast tumors (about 70% of all breast cancers) and implies the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors. In contrast, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly heterogeneous disease that may account for up to 24% of all newly diagnosed cases, is hormone-independent and characterized by a poor prognosis. As drug resistance is common in all breast cancer subtypes despite the different treatment modalities, novel therapies targeting signaling transduction pathways involved in the processes of breast carcinogenesis, tumor promotion and metastasis have been subject to accurate consideration. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell-surface receptors involved in the development and progression of many tumors including breast cancer. Here we discuss data regarding GPCR-mediated signaling, pharmacological properties and biological outputs toward breast cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis. Furthermore, we address several drugs that have shown an unexpected opportunity to interfere with GPCR-based breast tumorigenic signals.

Drug delivery and release systems for targeted tumor therapy

Most toxic agents currently used for chemotherapy show a narrow therapeutic window, because of their inability to distinguish between healthy and cancer cells. Targeted drug delivery offers the possibility to overcome this issue by selectively addressing structures on the surface of cancer cells, therefore reducing undesired side effects. In this broad field, peptide-drug conjugates linked by intracellular cleavable structures have evolved as highly promising agents. They can specifically deliver toxophores to tumor cells by targeting distinct receptors overexpressed in cancer. In this review, we focus on these compounds and describe important factors to develop a highly efficient peptide-drug conjugate. The necessary properties of tumor-targeting peptides are described, and the different options for cleavable linkers used to connect toxic agents and peptides are discussed, and synthetic considerations for the introduction of these structures are reported. Furthermore, recent examples and current developments of peptide-drug conjugates are critically evaluated with a special focus on the applied linker structures and their future use in cancer therapy.

A Phase II trial of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive, operable breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone-responsive, premenopausal, operable breast cancer. One hundred and nineteen patients with hormone-responsive, premenopausal, operable breast cancer were enrolled in the study. Zoladex at 3.6 mg was given by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks for 3 cycles. CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin, 60-90 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2)) was administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. The primary objective was a pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in the breast. Thirty-one patients (26.1%) achieved a clinical complete response, and 76 patients (63.9%) achieved a clinical partial response; the clinical response rate was 90.0%. Fourteen patients (11.8%) achieved a pathologic complete response (T0/Tis, N0), and 20 patients (16.8%) achieved a pathologic complete response (T0/Tis, Nx). When stratified by the clinical lymph node status, the clinical partial response rate in the clinical lymph node negative group was significantly higher than in the clinical lymph node positive group (P = 0.02). When stratified by hormonal status, the clinical partial response rate in the ER and PR + group was significantly better than the ER or PR- group (P = 0.0471). There were no treatment-related deaths and no grades 3 or 4 toxicity. The most common adverse event was nausea (grade 1 65.5%, grade 2 18.5%), vomiting (grade 1 58.8%, grade 2 13.4%), and alopecia (grade 1 45.4%, grade 2 54.6%). Zoladex combined with CEF chemotherapy was effective as neoadjuvant therapy in hormone-responsive, premenopausal breast cancer. This regimen was particularly effective in the clinical lymph node negative group and in the ER/PR double positive group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00488722).

Phase II Parallel Group Study Showing Comparable Efficacy Between Premenopausal Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Letrozole Plus Goserelin and Postmenopausal Patients Treated With Letrozole Alone As First-Line Hormone Therapy

Purpose

Goserelin and letrozole in premenopausal patients can result in clinical outcomes comparable to those obtained by letrozole alone in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 73 patients with hormone-responsive MBC were included. Of those, 35 premenopausal patients received goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days) plus letrozole (2.5 mg orally daily), and 38 postmenopausal patients received letrozole alone as their first-line endocrine therapy in a metastatic setting.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups, except for a younger age (median, 41 v 53.5 years; P < .001) and a shorter disease-free interval (median, 1.8 v 3.3 years; P = .03) in the premenopausal group. Clinical benefit rates were comparable between the two groups (77% v 74%; P = .77). With the median follow-up of 27.4 months, there was no statistical difference in the median time to progression between the two groups (9.5 months [95% CI, 6.4 to 12.1 months] v 8.9 months [95% CI, 6.4 to 13.3 months]). In patients who did not receive bisphosphonate, letrozole ± goserelin caused a greater loss of bone mineral density at 6 months compared with that of patients receiving bisphosphonate treatment (premenopausal group, −16.7% v 53.9%; P = .002 and postmenopausal group, −13.3% v 17.4%; P = .04 at the lumbar spine).

Conclusion

Clinical efficacies in premenopausal MBC patients with combined letrozole and goserelin therapy were comparable to those in postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone. Although letrozole ± goserelin resulted in a modest increase in bone resorption, concurrent treatment with bisphosphonate could prevent bone loss at 6 months.

Adjuvant goserelin and ovarian preservation in chemotherapy treated patients with early breast cancer: results from a randomized trial

The purpose of this randomized study was to examine if goserelin concomitant to CMF-chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for premenopausal breast cancer, protects the ovaries from premature failure. A total of 285 premenopausal breast cancer patients, in a randomized adjuvant trial (Zoladex in premenopausal patients (ZIPP)), were assigned to a study on ovarian function. Node positive patients were assigned to CMF-(cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy. All patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 years of goserelin, goserelin plus tamoxifen, tamoxifen alone or no endocrine treatment. We studied, if menses were affected in the treatment groups, up to 36 months after randomization. One year after completed CMF- and endocrine therapy, 36% of the women in the goserelin group reported menses, compared to 7% in the goserelin plus tamoxifen group, 13% in the tamoxifen group and 10% of the controls. Among women treated with goserelin, there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of menstruating women, 1 year after completed treatment compared to at 24 months of treatment (P = 0.006), in contrast to all other treatment groups, who were unchanged or more often amenorrheic. In our study, there is some evidence of protective effect of goserelin on ovarian function in CMF treated women. This effect was not observed in the combined tamoxifen and goserelin treatment.

Controversies of adjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer and recommendations of the 2007 St Gallen conference

Endocrine treatment for breast cancer was introduced more than a century ago. The discovery of hormone receptors has allowed targeting of endocrine treatment to patients whose primary tumours express these receptors. In the adjuvant setting, different approaches are used in premenopausal or postmenopausal women. In premenopausal patients, suppression of ovarian function and the use of tamoxifen are the most important therapeutic options, even though questions on timing, duration, and combination of these compounds remain unanswered. The use of aromatase inhibitors in combination with ovarian-function suppression is currently under investigation in the premenopausal setting. In postmenopausal patients, aromatase inhibitors given after 2-3 years or 5 years of tamoxifen have shown a significant benefit over tamoxifen alone. However, questions on this treatment also remain unanswered. For example, whether all patients should receive an aromatase inhibitor or whether some subgroups of patients might be optimally treated by tamoxifen alone is yet to be established. In this paper we review the published work on adjuvant endocrine treatment in breast cancer and provide recommendations from the 2007 St Gallen International Conference on Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer.

Luteinizing hormone release after administration of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist Fertilan (goserelin) for synchronization of ovulation in pigs

The generic GnRH agonist, Fertilan (goserelin), was tested for the ability to induce an LH surge and ovulation in estrus-synchronized gilts. Three experiments were performed to 1) examine the effect of various doses of Fertilan on secretion of LH in barrows, to select doses to investigate in gilts (Exp. 1); 2) determine doses of Fertilan that would induce a preovulatory-like rise of LH in gilts (Exp. 2); and 3) determine the time of ovulation after Fertilan treatment (Exp. 3). In Exp. 1, 10 barrows were injected on d 1, 4, 7, 10, and 13 with 10, 20, or 40 microg of Fertilan; 50 microg of Gonavet (depherelin; GnRH control) or saline (negative control); and sequential blood samples were collected for 480 min. There was a dose-dependent stimulation (P < 0.05) of LH release. Maximal plasma concentrations of LH (LH(MAX)) were 2.1 +/- 0.2, 4.1 +/- 0.3, 2.6 +/- 0.4, and 3.4 +/- 0.3 ng/mL after 10, 20, and 40 microg of Fertilan and 50 microg of Gonavet, respectively, and duration of release was 78 +/- 9, 177 +/- 12, 138 +/- 7, and 180 +/- 11 min, respectively. Fertilan doses of 10 and 20 microg were deemed to be the most suitable for testing in gilts. In Exp. 2, 12 gilts received (after estrus synchronization with Regumate and eCG) injections of 10 or 20 microg of Fertilan or 50 microg of Gonavet 80 h after eCG to stimulate a preovulatory-like LH surge and ovulation. An LH surge was induced in 3 of the 4 gilts in both of the Fertilan groups and in all of the Gonavet-treated gilts. Characteristics of induced release of LH did not differ among groups: LH(MAX), 5.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.6 +/- 1.8 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.1 ng/mL; duration, 11.7 +/- 2.0 vs. 12.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 14.3 +/- 0.5 h; interval from GnRH injection to LH(MAX), 4.0 +/- 2.0 vs. 6.7 +/- 1.3 vs. 5.8 +/- 1.6 h. In Exp. 3, estrus-synchronized gilts were injected with 20 microg of Fertilan (n = 8) or 50 microg of Gonavet (n = 4), and the time of ovulation was determined by repeated endoscopic examination. Time of ovulation ranged from 34 to 42 h postGnRH; however, ovulation occurred earlier in the Gonavet compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). Results of these experiments indicate that 1) barrows are an appropriate model for determining GnRH doses that can be effective in inducing a preovulatory-like LH surge in females; 2) the generic GnRH agonist Fertilan, at doses of 10 to 20 microg, can stimulate an LH surge in gilts, with subsequent ovulation; and 3) Fertilan at doses of 10 and 20 microg should be examined further for use in fixed-time insemination protocols.

Tailoring Ras-pathway--inhibitor combinations for cancer therapy

Constitutive activation of Ras pathways plays a critical role in cancer development and maintenance. Inhibitors of such pathways are already in use for cancer therapy, with significant but as yet only partial success in the most deadly types of human cancers, against which even combinations of Ras-pathway inhibitors with classic cytotoxic drugs or irradiation are insufficient. Combinations of farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTI's), inhibitors of Ras pathways, are now in use in clinical trials. In this review we analyze possible reasons for the limited efficacy--including the diverse and sometimes even contradictory effects of active Ras pathways in tumor cells--and propose possible alternative methods of tailoring Ras-pathway inhibitor combinations for cancer therapy. Such tailoring is now possible thanks to increased knowledge of the complexity of Ras pathways, their cooperation with other oncogenic pathways, and their "addictive" nature. We provide examples demonstrating that this knowledge can be translated into useful drug combinations that disrupt multiple oncogenic pathways and hit a weak point of a given tumor cell. One such example is combination treatment with a Ras inhibitor and a glycolysis blocker for pancreatic tumor cells. The future design of such potential drug combination therapies and the follow-up of their outcome will undoubtedly be facilitated by gene-expression profiling and proteomic methods.