Superior vena cava syndrome: endovascular management

Results of Palliative Stenting in Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Analyzing Self-Expanding Stainless Steel and Nitinol Venous Bare Metal Stents

PURPOSE

The purpose was to analyze the technical, clinical, and survival outcomes of our patients with malignant superior cava vein syndrome (SVCS) treated with endovascular approach and analyze the efficacy of different stent types used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is an observational, retrospective, single-center study. From 2006 to 2023, 42 patients (32 male, 10 female, mean age 62 years, age range, 41-87 years) underwent percutaneous stent placement for malignant SVCS. One stainless steel stent (Wallstent) and 2 venous nitinol stent type (Sinus-XL, Venovo) were used. Follow-up mean was 276 days.

RESULTS

A total of 53 stents were deployed. Clinical success was 97.6% in less 24 hours. Technical success was achieved in 97.6%. No complications were found except 1 patient died during the procedure due to stent migration and atrial dissociation (2.3%). Overall intraprocedural stent migration rate was 11.9% (18.8% stainless steel stent, 9.6% nitinol stent, p>0.05). Overall survival rates were 87.8%, 41.99%, and 34.12%, and overall primary patency rates were 100%, 93.3%, 91.6% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment is a safe and effective therapeutic option for SVCS with high technical and clinical success rates and low complication and recurrence rates.

CLINICAL IMPACT

The malignant superior cava vein syndrome is a rare clinical entity treated classically with radiation and chemotherapy with a slower response, or surgical bypass, which is an aggressive surgical technique. Endovascular treatment offers a low-invasive technique with quick clinical resolution and good permeability results. However, further studies are lacking to deal with procedure technical characteristics, stent type used, technical complications, and medium- and long-term patency studies. This study aims to evaluate all these items, analysing self-expanding stainless steel and nitinol venous bare metal stents, and add value to endovascular treatment, confirming the good results of this technique.

Using Fenestrated Stent to Increase the Flow of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation of Superior Vena Cava Compression Syndrome

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is an obstruction of the venous return through the superior vena cava (SVC) or any other significant branches. The obstruction may be external, like thoracic mass compressing the SVC, or internal, like thrombosis or tumor, which directly invades the SVC. Patients experiencing a medical emergency after being initially stabilized require treatment for SVCS, including endovenous recanalization and the implantation of an SVC stent to reduce the risk of abrupt respiratory arrest and death. A 54-year-old female presented from the university medical center with weight loss and solid food dysphagia for three months. Chest-CT scan showed a mediastinal mass of 10 x 9 x 8 cm. A transbronchial biopsy was attempted. The patient was arrested during the bronchoscopy lab procedure. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was initiated, and venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was done through the right femoral artery cannula size 15 Fr due to the narrowing of the artery and the left femoral vein cannula size 23 Fr. During the night shift, the ECMO flow was hard to maintain with fluids, which was realized with the ECMO outflow volume issue. The next day, in the hybrid operating room, a fenestrated SVC stent was placed in the SVC, brachiocephalic, and internal jugular veins. The patient's hemodynamics improved post-stenting, especially ECMO outflow. This case illustrates that stenting in SVCS is a valid therapeutic option to increase the ECMO flow in this patient group.

An updated narrative review on the management of the most common oncological and hematological emergencies

Oncological emergencies are defined as an acute life-threatening event in a patient with a tumor occurring as part of their complex treatment regimen or secondarily to their underlying malignancy. These events can occur at any time from the initial diagnosis of their cancer to end-stage disease. These oncological emergencies are broadly classified into four major categories; metabolic, structural, hematological and treatment-related causes; and can be encountered in any clinical setting, ranging from primary care physician and emergency department visits to a variety of subspecialty environments. This study aims to cover an in-depth review of the underlying pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and updated management protocol of most common emergencies belonging to the above-mentioned categories. An all-language literature search was conducted on 15th October 2021 and 10th March 2022, limited to 5 years on PubMed database using the following search strings: oncological emergencies, malignant spinal cord compression, febrile neutropenia, hyperviscosity syndrome, superior vena cava syndrome, immune related adverse events, tumor lysis syndrome, hypercalcemia of malignancy, corrected calcium, malignant pericardial effusion and chemotherapy extravasation.

Tumor mass in the lung with superior vena cava syndrome

Group of symptoms due to vena cava superior obstruction is named superior vena cava syndrome. A 65-year-old female, long-standing smoker was presented with a two-week history of dry cough and facial swelling. The patient noticed a palpable mass on the right side of the neck. Computer tomography scan with contrast showed extensive, irregular, non-homogenous consolidation in the right upper lobe, involving the right hilus, surrounding the aortic arch, supra aortic branches and pleural effusion at the right side of the body. Also, ultrasound examination of supra clavicular space showed enlarged pathologic hypoehogenic lymph node without an echogenic hilum. Ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy of lymph node was performed, and cytopathology findings showed metastatic lesion from primary microcellular lung cancer, IIIC stadium, cT4N3M0. Venous angioplasty was performed showing stenosis in the superior vena cava. After balloon dilatation, the stent was placed at the site of stenosis. The patient received chemio- and radiotherapy and survival time was seven months. Superior vena cava syndrome is an urgent clinical condition, and lung cancer is the leading cause of this syndrome. Computer tomography imaging findings and endovascular stent placement are important for detection and management of the superior vena cava thrombosis.

Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED online databases were searched, with studies involving more than ten adult patients included. Studies identified spanned 27 years, from 1993 to 2020. Meta-analyses were performed based on Clopper-Pearson estimation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies were identified, for a total of 2249 patients, of which 2015 had malignant SVCS and 222 benign SVCS. Pooled technical success and clinical success rates were 96.8% (95% CI 96.0-97.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.7-93.8%). Technical success and clinical success rates for studies investigating benign SVCS alone were identical at 88.8% (95% CI 83.0-93.1%). Pooled patency remained above 90% for the first year. Average complication and re-intervention rates were 5.78% (SD = 9.3182) and 9.11% (SD = 11.190).

CONCLUSIONS

This review confirms the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in managing SVCS. Further directions of research may include specific outcomes of endovascular stenting in benign SVCS, and the impact of procedural characteristics, such as the use of anticoagulation and type of stent used, on outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies.

Endovascular therapy for superior vena cava syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is caused by the obstruction of the SVC and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. In contemporary practice, endovascular therapy (ET) has become the standard of care for a majority of these patients. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess technical success, restenosis, and recurrence of SVC syndrome following endovascular intervention.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, we conducted a systematic literature review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception to April 14, 2021 for studies on ET for SVC syndrome. Studies included full-length journal articles on the use of ET among adults with SVC syndrome. Case reports or case series with fewer than 20 patients were excluded. We evaluated the endpoints of technical success rate, restenosis rate, and recurrence rates in SVC syndrome patients after endovascular stenting. The results of this study were calculated using random-effects models.

FINDINGS

We identified 6,012 reports, of which 39 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. A total of 2200 patients received ET for SVC syndrome. The weighted technical success rate was 98.8% (95% CI 98.2-99.3) with low heterogeneity (I²=17.4%, p = 0.185), restenosis rate was 10.5% (95% CI 8.4-12.6) with moderate heterogeneity (I²=53.5%, p<0.001), and recurrence rate was 10.8% (95% CI 8.1-13.5) with high heterogeneity (I²=75.8%, p<0.001). Total complication rate was 8.6% (95% CI 7.3%-9.9%) with a mean complication rate of 7.5% (95% CI 4.7%-10.3%).

INTERPRETATION

Our systematic review revealed high technical success, low restenosis, and low recurrence rates following ET. Collectively, these results support the paradigm of ET as an effective and safe treatment for patients with SVC syndrome.

FUNDING

None.