HBV and HCV serological markers in patients with the hepatosplenic form of mansonic schistosomiasis

Meta-analysis: risk of hepatitis C virus infection associated with hospital-based invasive procedures

BACKGROUND

Healthcare settings, where invasive procedures are frequently performed, may play an important role in the transmission dynamics of blood-borne pathogens when compliance with infection control precautions is suboptimal.

AIMS

To understand and quantify the role of hospital-based invasive procedures on hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify recent studies reporting association measures of HCV infection risk that are linked to iatrogenic procedures. Based on expert opinion, invasive procedures were categorised into 10 groups for which pooled measures were calculated. Finally, the relationship between pooled measures and the country-level HCV prevalence or the Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) index was assessed by meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 71 studies in the analysis. The most frequently evaluated procedures were blood transfusion (66 measures) and surgery (43 measures). The pooled odds ratio (OR) of HCV infection varied widely, ranging from 1.46 (95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.88) for dental procedures to 3.22 (1.7-6.11) for transplantation. The OR for blood transfusion was higher for transfusions performed before 1998 (3.77, 2.42-5.88) than for those without a specified/recent date (2.20, 1.77-2.75). In procedure-specific analyses, the HCV infection risk was significantly negatively associated with the HAQ for endoscopy and positively associated with HCV prevalence for endoscopy and surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Various invasive procedures were significantly associated with HCV infection. Our results provide a ranking of procedures in terms of HCV risk that may be used for prioritisation of infection control interventions, especially in high HCV prevalence settings.

Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis, the ignored morbidity: experience from a referral hospital in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis (HSS) is an important chronic complication of Schistosoma infection. However, its diagnosis and management are complicated due to lack of evidence and uniform guidance. In this study, we described the clinical profile and management of HSS in one of Ethiopia's referral hospitals.

METHODS

A hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted using the medical records of patients diagnosed with HSS based on clinical symptoms and typical ultrasound findings observed at the gastroenterology clinic of Dessie referral hospital from September 2018 to December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patient files were evaluated. Most patients (n=39; 70%) presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and severe anaemia. Nearly three-quarters of patients were admitted and 31 (56%) received a blood transfusion. Hepatitis B coinfection was documented in 11 patients (20%). Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed in 31 patients (56%), in whom large oesophageal varices with red signs were the most common finding. Among patients who had endoscopy, band ligation was carried out in 21 cases (68%). Praziquantel was administered to 11 patients (20%).

CONCLUSION

HSS causes severe complications of portal hypertension, like variceal bleeding, which are currently not adequately treated. In addition to already existing preventive efforts, we advise control programmes to also address acute management and rehabilitation of these patients.

Machine learning algorithms to predict the 1 year unfavourable prognosis for advanced schistosomiasis

Short-term prognosis of advanced schistosomiasis has not been well studied. We aimed to construct prognostic models using machine learning algorithms and to identify the most important predictors by utilising routinely available data under the government medical assistance programme. An established database of advanced schistosomiasis in Hunan, China was utilised for analysis. A total of 9541 patients for the period from January 2008 to December 2018 were enrolled in this study. Candidate predictors were selected from demographics, clinical features, medical examinations and test results. We applied five machine learning algorithms to construct 1 year prognostic models: logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the model performance. The important predictors of the optimal model for unfavourable prognosis within 1 year were identified and ranked. There were 1249 (13.1%) cases having unfavourable prognoses within 1 year of discharge. The mean age of all participants was 61.94 years, of whom 70.9% were male. In general, XGBoost showed the best predictive performance with the highest AUC (0.846; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.821, 0.871), compared with LR (0.798; 95% CI: 0.770, 0.827), DT (0.766; 95% CI: 0.733, 0.800), RF (0.823; 95% CI: 0.796, 0.851), and ANN (0.806; 95% CI: 0.778, 0.835). Five most important predictors identified by XGBoost were ascitic fluid volume, haemoglobin (HB), total bilirubin (TB), albumin (ALB), and platelets (PT). We proposed XGBoost as the best algorithm for the evaluation of a 1 year prognosis of advanced schistosomiasis. It is considered to be a simple and useful tool for the short-term prediction of an unfavourable prognosis for advanced schistosomiasis in clinical settings.

Spatial analysis of viral hepatitis and schistosomiasis coinfection in an endemic area in Northeastern Brazil

INTRODUCTION:

This cross-sectional study analyzed the spatial distribution of hepatitis B or C virus (HBV/HBC) and schistosomiasis coinfection.

METHODS:

Serum samples were collected from patients with Schistosoma mansoni infection. These were tested for serological markers of HBV/HCV infection. The spatial distribution of coinfection was analyzed using intensity kernel estimation.

RESULTS:

Overall, 9.4% of individuals had contact with HBV and 1.7% of samples tested positive for anti-HCV antibodies. We identified clusters of risk located in the central region.

CONCLUSIONS:

Spatial analysis allowed visualization of high-risk areas, leading to a definition of priority areas to be targeted for intensification of control interventions.

Hepatitis B and Schistosoma co-infection in a non-endemic area

Schistosomiasis is related to the development of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension. Chronic co-infection with HBV and Schistosoma has been associated in endemic areas with a higher risk for a more severe liver disease. However, no studies have assessed the real importance of this co-infection in non-endemic regions. This is a retrospective observational study of Sub-Saharan immigrants attending between October 2004 and February 2014. Patients with chronic HBV infection with and without evidence of schistosomal infection were compared. Epidemiological, analytical, and microbiological data were analysed. Likelihood of liver fibrosis based on APRI and FIB-4 indexes was established. A total of 507 patients were included in the study, 170 (33.5 %) of them harbouring evidence of schistosome infection. No differences were found in transaminase, GGT, and ALP levels. In fibrosis tests, a higher proportion of patients with HVB and S. mansoni detection reached possible fibrosis scores (F > 2) when compared to patients without schistosomiasis: 17.4 vs 14.2 % and 4.3 % vs 4.2 % (using high sensitivity and high specificity cut-offs respectively), although differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.69, p = 0.96). For possible cirrhosis (F4) score, similar results were observed: 4.3 % of co-infected patients vs 2.1 % of mono-infected ones, p = 0.46. According to these datas, in non-endemic regions the degree of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B is not substantially modified by schistosome co-infection.

Coinfection of Schistosoma Species with Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Viruses

Although a considerable number of studies have been undertaken to date, it is still controversial as to whether or not coinfection with schistosomiasis increases the susceptibility to or progression from Hepatitis B virus (HBV) or Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This review is a closer examination of the key studies conducted on human populations on clinical factors that were published in English between 1975 and January 2015. Our review is mainly based on tables containing the salient information, which are arranged first by study population, country of study and publication date. We provide further explanation, clarification and discussion in the text. As such, it includes both studies that have been conducted on general populations who are largely asymptomatic for clinical disease (Table 3), as well as those focussing on special populations, which are usually comprised of clinical patients. These special populations have been presented as follows: subjects with chronic liver disease or related conditions such as cirrhosis, Table 4; subjects with primary liver cancer, Table 5; subjects with schistosomiasis, Table 6; subjects with acute or chronic hepatitis resulting from HBV, Table 7 and, subjects with HCV, Table 8. We have presented studies that compared two mono-infected groups with one that is coinfected separately in Table 9, as these offer us the best basis from which to evaluate if any synergistic effects accompany coinfection. A number of factors contributed to the results reported in our tables. These included, but are not limited to: subject selection (i.e. asymptomatic cases typically drawn from the general population vs subjects presenting to a hospital or clinic with clinical disease); study design, which directly impacts our ability to infer causality (i.e. case series, cross-sectional, case-control, cohort study); use and choice of control population (i.e. apparently healthy subjects vs other hospital patients vs none); sample size, which directly impacts statistical power and can result in a Type II error; geographic area, which may reflect differences in population genetics, public health history, environmental differences or any number of other important factors (i.e. Egypt, Brazil, China); method of testing for schistosomal infections (i.e. stool vs antibody test); method of testing to determine if advanced schistosomal disease was present (i.e. ultrasound, liver biopsy vs none); method of serological testing for HBV (i.e. use of HBsAg alone or with other markers or DNA testing); method of serological testing for HCV (i.e. use of anti-HCV alone or with RNA testing) and, year of the study, which reflects among other things, technological improvements between tests as well as possible changes in the frequency of exposure in the populations under study (i.e. use of parenteral antischistosomal therapy vs the oral antischistosomal medication). Despite all these differences, throughout this review we have observed general patterns that seem largely consistent with one another. Studies conducted on general, largely asymptomatic populations tend to support the view that having one of the diseases in question (i.e. schistosomiasis) does not necessarily predispose one to becoming coinfected with another (i.e. HBV or HCV). Rather, the probability of becoming coinfected seems most closely associated with modes of transmission for either HBV or HCV in schistosome-endemic areas, such as the past use of parenteral antischistosomal therapy or frequent blood transfusion. Once coinfected, however, the clinical course of illness for those with Schistosoma-HBV or Schistosoma-HCV infections are typically much more severe than for mono-infected subjects. The strongest evidence for this was found in the half-dozen or so prospective cohort studies that systematically monitored disease progression in their subjects. With respect to HBV infection, coinfection with Schistosoma prolonged the carriage state and more often resulted in chronic hepatitis with greater cirrhosis as well as higher mortality. Much of the same was also observed with respect to HCV, where coinfection with Schistosoma was associated with a reduced ability to spontaneously resolve the viral infection and more often resulted in rapid fibrosis as well as higher mortality. Furthermore, two of these studies which were fully comparative in nature, support the supposition that there is a synergistic association between Schistosoma-HCV for both liver fibrosis and mortality. Immunological studies, all conducted on HCV, also generally seem to support this. The results of our research argue for greater primary prevention for both HBV and HCV in Schistosoma-endemic populations. Although no vaccine currently exists for HCV as it does for HBV, additional steps can still be taken to reduce transmission in high-risk populations. Greater use of the HBV vaccine is particularly advisable. Finally, additional observational, longitudinal studies conducted on human populations that are fully comparative in nature could help answer some of the remaining questions on both Schistosoma-HBV as well as Schistosoma-HCV coinfections. Some of these include the role of active versus past schistosomal infections, the role of genetic variants, as well as the effect of coinfection on treatment. Future studies should make a particular effort to use a sufficient sample size to ensure adequate statistical power, which was not often properly considered in many of the studies we reviewed for this paper.

Schistosomiasis, hepatitis B and hepatitis C co-infection

BACKGROUND

Schistosomiasis is a significant health problem in more than 70 countries distributed between Africa, Asia and South America, with an infection rate of one in 30 individuals. Data on Schistosomiasis, Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection are scarce; however, there is a high prevalence in countries where schistosomiasis is endemic.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on published data from 1980-2014. Published papers in the databases Google, Medline, PubMed, and MiPc library were searched using the keywords epidemiology, pathogenesis and outcomes of HBV, HCV and schistosomiasis and data were extracted from the relevant studies.

RESULTS

The prevalence of HBV/schistosomiasis co-infection in countries where schistosomiasis is endemic was high, ranging between 9.6 to approximately 64% in Egypt, and a maximum of 15.8% among hospitalized patients in Brazil. Concurrent infection between HBV and schistosomiasis is often associated with countries where schistosomiasis is endemic and may lead to chronic liver inflammation. Similarly, HCV infection rates in schistosomiasis populations range from 1% in Ethiopia reaching up to 50% in Egypt.

CONCLUSION

There is controversy regarding the effects of HBV and HCV on schistosomiasis and vice versa. Vaccination might be a solution to the era of schistosomiasis and co-infection with HBV and HCV.

Chronic hepatitis B and liver schistosomiasis: a deleterious association

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and schistosomiasis are prevalent in several countries, but the impact of this association is unknown. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and morbidity of this co-infection in Minas Gerais, an endemic area of schistosomiasis in Brazil.

METHODS

In total, 406 adults with CHB (HBsAg positive >6 months) were included in a cross-sectional study. CHB was classified as replicative (HBV DNA ≥ 2.000 IU/ml), and low replicative or inactive hepatitis B carriers (HBV DNA <2.000 IU/ml). Schistosomiasis was confirmed by epidemiological and clinical records. Liver biopsies were scored by METAVIR. The risk of severe fibrosis was estimated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 406 patients, 64.8% (263) were male, and the median age was 45 years (IQR 35-54). In total, 57.9% (235) had replicative CHB, and 31.5% (128) had cirrhosis. Schistosoma mansoni was confirmed in 30.5% (124) patients, 81.5% (101) of which were male with a median age of 47 years (IQR 39.5-54). Of the co-infected patients, 61.3% (76) and 38.7% (48) had replicative and inactive CHB, respectively. Schistosomal portal fibrosis (PF) was detected in 69.4% (86/124) patients. Patients with replicative CHB and schistosomal PF had more advanced fibrosis and severe inflammation compared with patients without schistosomal PF (80.8% vs 43.6% for METAVIR F3-F4, p<0.01; 64.0% vs 39.8% for METAVIR A2-A3, p < 0.01). Age >50 years (OR = 1.10; 95% CI 1.06-1.14, p<0.001), male gender (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.12-6.09, p = 0.03), schistosomal PF (OR = 4.56, 95% CI 2.10-9.91, p<0.001) and alcoholism (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.16-5.19, p = 0.02) were independently associated with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between replicative CHB and schistosomal PF can be a risk factor for more severe liver disease, which can result in deleterious outcomes for patients from endemic areas.

The efficacy and safety of entecavir in patients with advanced schistosomiasis co-infected with hepatitis B virus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of entecavir (ETV) in patients with advanced schistosomiasis and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with advanced schistosomiasis and HBV co-infection were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the ETV treatment group (n=35) and the control group (n=32). The patients in the control group adopted routine supportive therapy for 52 weeks, and those in the ETV treatment group received ETV at a dose of 0.5mg once daily on the basis of routine supportive therapy for 52 weeks. Hepatic fibrosis markers (hyaluronic acid, type III procollagen, type IV collagen, laminin, and fibronectin), Ishak fibrosis score, alanine transaminase (ALT), HBV DNA, and Child-Pugh score were compared between the two groups. The intention to treat (ITT) population was used for the analysis. The measurement data and count data were analyzed by t-test and Chi-square test, respectively.

RESULTS

After 52 weeks of treatment, the hepatic fibrosis markers (hyaluronic acid, type III procollagen, type IV collagen, laminin, and fibronectin) were significantly improved in the ETV treatment group compared to the control group (all p<0.05). A ≥1-point improvement in the Ishak fibrosis score was found in 25.7% (9/35) of the ETV group, and the mean change from the baseline in the Ishak fibrosis score was a 0.3-point reduction. The control group showed disease progression in the Ishak fibrosis score. More patients in the ETV group than in the control group had undetectable serum HBV DNA levels (82.9% vs. 3.1%, p<0.05) and ALT normalization (68.6% vs. 18.3%, p<0.05). The ETV treatment group demonstrated an improvement in Child-Pugh score at week 52 (-3.7 vs. 0.3, p<0.05). In addition, no obvious adverse reactions were observed during ETV treatment.

CONCLUSION

ETV is safe and effective in patients with advanced schistosomiasis and HBV co-infection.