Type IV Borrmann gastric adenocarcinoma: analysis of curative resection results

Borrmann Type IV Gastric Cancer: Focus on the Role of Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVES

The benefits of curative or palliative gastrectomy for Borrmann type IV (B-IV) gastric cancer remain controversial. This study was conducted to investigate whether or not gastrectomy could benefit prognosis of patients with Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cohort of 469 B-IV gastric cancer patients from January 2001 to September 2017 was retrospectively reviewed. Survival analysis was used to investigate the prognosis of patients with or without gastrectomy.

RESULTS

Among this cohort, the average age was 55 years and the median follow-up time was 12 months. One hundred and forty-six (31%) patients underwent curative resection, 187 (40%) patients underwent palliative resection, and the remaining 136 (29%) patients were judged unresectable. During the follow-up, a total of 294 (63%) patients died. Cox multivariate analysis showed that Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage (p = 0.002), grade (p = 0.033), and gastrectomy (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that, no matter in total group or subgroup stratified by tumor stage and grade, overall survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years in patients with palliative resection were significantly worse than those in patients with curative resection (all p < 0.05), but significantly better than those in patients with no resection (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Curative or palliative gastrectomy could increase the survival rate for B-IV gastric cancer patients. In the absence of alternative effective therapies, surgical resection remains a choice of improved survival or potential cure for B-IV gastric cancer.

Undiagnosed Borrmann type IV gastric cancer despite repeated endoscopic biopsies and PET-CT examination: A case report

Borrmann type IV gastric cancer is a particular histological type of carcinoma, which has the characteristic of diffused infiltration that invades the entire stomach, resulting in the thickening and stiffness of the stomach wall. Borrmann type IV gastric cancer is known for the difficulty of detecting tumor cells in endoscopic biopsy specimens. This is crucial in obtaining the pathological results to make a therapeutic decision. The case reported in the present study was highly suspected to be Borrmann type IV gastric cancer according to the clinical manifestations and gastrointestinal barium meal examinations, but demonstrated negative results in multiple endoscopic biopsies and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) examination. The patient was discharged as no affirmative diagnosis was specified. Two weeks after discharge, the patient was administered to another hospital under emergency treatment due to frequent urination. Cystoscopy examination revealed marked thickening of the right bladder wall over a large area. Biopsy specimens were sampled. Pathological consultation suggested a gastrointestinal original of the lesion, which was most likely poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine metastasis to the bladder.

Preoperative Gross Classification of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Comparison of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Multi-Detector Row CT

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) with double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS), in which intravenous microbubbles are used alongside oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound, in determining the gross classification of patients with gastric carcinoma (GC). Altogether, 239 patients with GC proved by histology after endoscopic biopsy were included in this study. DCEUS and MDCT were performed pre-operatively. The diagnostic accuracies of DCEUS and MDCT in determining the gross classification were calculated and compared. The overall accuracy of DCEUS in determining the gross appearance of GC was higher than that of MDCT (84.9% vs. 79.9%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in accuracy between DCEUS and MDCT for Borrmann I and IV classifications of advanced gastric cancer (χ(2), p = 0.323 for Borrmann type I, p = 0.141 for Borrmann type IV). The accuracy of DCEUS for early GC and Borrmann II and III classifications of GC was higher than that of MDCT (χ(2), p = 0.000 for all). DCEUS may be regarded as a valuable complementary tool to MDCT in determining the gross appearance of gastric adenocarcinoma pre-operatively.

Limited significance of curative surgery in Borrmann type IV gastric cancer

Borrmann type IV advanced gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. Although surgical resection remains the only hope for a cure, the role of curative surgery is questionable in this type of cancer. This study defined the role of curative surgery in the prognosis of type IV gastric cancer. We analyzed 168 patients with Borrmann type IV undergoing surgery at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from 1989 to 2010. We categorized the patients into curative (R0) and non-curative (R1, R2, and non-resection) groups. The curative and non-curative groups comprised 88 and 80 patients, respectively. The preoperative predictive value of Borrmann type IV was 50.5, and 8.9 % of the patients had microscopic resection margin involvement. The 3- to 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients in the curative group was significantly higher than that of in the non-curative group (p < 0.001). However, in a multivariate analysis, curability was not a significant predictor of survival (p = 0.187). In the curative group, the most frequent recurrence site was the peritoneum (85.7 %). Most recurrences occurred within 2 years. The role of surgery for Borrmann type IV is quite limited. Such cases have a poor prognosis even after curative surgery. In addition, microscopic resection margin involvement is frequent in type IV cancer because it is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Therefore, multimodal diagnostic tools and treatment strategies should be developed for Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment strategy of Borrmann type IV (B-4) gastric cancer remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of patients with B-4 gastric cancer and to assess whether or not non-curative resection improved prognosis.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.2). The odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI), and weighted average of median survival times were calculated as effect values.

Results

Fifteen studies were included. Compared with Borrmann type “others” (B-O), B-4 had a higher incidence of poorly differentiated carcinoma (OR = 4.92; 95 % CI = 3.10–7.83; P < 0.01), lymph node metastases (OR = 2.13; 95 % CI = 1.88–2.41; P < 0.01), peritoneal metastases (OR = 3.91; 95 % CI = 3.37–4.54; P < 0.01), serosal invasion (OR = 3.66; 95 % CI = 2.91–4.60; P < 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI = 1.02–1.91; P = 0.04). B-4 patients with non-curative resection were associated with a worse survival rate (HR = 2.83; 95 % CI = 2.35–3.40; P < 0.01) than patients with curative resection; however, B-4 patients with non-curative resection had a better survival rate (1-year: RR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.63–0.77; P < 0.01; 2-year: RR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.85–0.94; P < 0.01) than patients with non-resection.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated that B-4 patients were associated with poor tumor differentiation, lymph node metastases, peritoneal metastases, serosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, and prognosis. Curative resection may increase the survival rate for B-4 patients. If it is not possible to perform a curative resection, a non-curative resection may improve the prognosis.