[Bronchial thermoplasty: report on the first endoscopic treatment for asthma in Latin America]

Long-term efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma: a systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

We therefore performed a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed studies focusing on BT intervention in asthma control published between January 2000 and June 2014. Three randomized controlled studies and extension studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 6). Outcomes assessed after BT included spirometric data, adverse respiratory events, emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalization for respiratory illness. One-year and 5-year follow-up data were defined as V1 and V5, respectively.

RESULTS

There were 249 BT-treated subjects in total who had a 1-year follow-up (V1), whereas 216 of them finished a 5-year follow-up (V5). No evidence of significant decline was found in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted) (WMD = 0.75; 95% CI: 3.36 to 1.85; p = 0.57), or in post-bronchodilator FEV1 (% predicted) (WMD = 0.62; 95% CI: 3.32 to 2.08; p = 0.65) between V1 and V5. In addition, the frequency of respiratory adverse events was reduced significantly during the follow-up (RR = 3.41, 95% CI: 2.96-3.93, p < 0.00001). The number of ER visits for adverse respiratory events remained unchanged (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.77-1.46, p = 0.71) after BT treatment. There was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of hospitalization for respiratory adverse events (V5 vs. V1, RR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.69-3.12, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate long-term benefits of BT with regard to both asthma control and safety for moderate-to-severe asthmatic patients.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of a novel intervention for asthma, bronchial thermoplasty (BT), in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. An electronic literature search identified three randomized controlled trials (RCT) of BT that recruited 421 patients in total. Outcomes of interest were the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), tolerability and safety. Compared with standard medications and sham BT treatment, BT significantly improved AQLQ scores and PEF from baseline to the end of the trials. There were more respiratory adverse events and hospitalizations for adverse respiratory events with BT than with medications or sham treatment during the treatment period, but most events resolved, on average, within a week. This effect of BT treatment was not seen during the posttreatment period. Additional long-term RCT are required to confirm whether BT provides benefit to patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.