Application of antimicrobial pharmacodynamic concepts into clinical practice: focus on beta-lactam antibiotics: insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Optimizing Piperacillin Dosing in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Pathophysiological changes post-liver transplantation impact the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibiotics. Piperacillin, often used in combination with tazobactam, is a key antibiotic after transplantation to its broad-spectrum activity, but there is a lack of specific pharmacokinetic data in this population. This study aims to describe the pharmacokinetic parameters and target attainment of piperacillin in pediatric liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients with preserved renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2) receiving intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam at 112.5 mg/kg every 8 h (100 mg piperacillin/12.5 mg tazobactam), with a rapid infusion (0.5-1 h), were included. Two blood samples per child were collected during the same interval within 48 h of starting therapy. A Bayesian approach was applied to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and perform dosing recommendations against Enterococcus spp., Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

RESULTS

Eight patients with median age of 8 months were included. Median piperacillin clearance and central volume of distribution for the cohort were 11.11 L/h/70 kg and 9.80 L/70 kg, respectively. Seven patients (87.5%) presented with concentrations below the target of 100% fT > MIC. Simulations suggested that these patients required more frequent dosing and extended duration of infusion to ensure target attainment. One patient (12.5%) had trough concentrations that exceed 16 mg/L and could receive a lower daily dose.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the importance of personalized therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients due to the unpredictable and highly variable piperacillin pharmacokinetics in this population.

Combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for adult patients with serious Gram-negative infections: a review of the literature

Treatment of patients with serious infections due to resistant Gram-negative bacteria remains highly problematic and has prompted clinicians to use existing antimicrobial agents in innovative ways. One approach gaining increased therapeutic use is combination therapy with IV fosfomycin. This article reviews the preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) infection model and clinical data surrounding the use of combination therapy with IV fosfomycin for the treatment of serious infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Data from dynamic in vitro and animal infection model studies of highly resistant Enterobacterales and non-lactose fermenters are positive and suggest IV fosfomycin in combination with a β-lactam, polymyxin or aminoglycoside produces a synergistic effect that rivals or surpasses that of other aminoglycoside- or polymyxin-containing regimens. Clinical studies performed to date primarily have involved patients with pneumonia and/or bacteraemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Overall, the observed success rates with fosfomycin combination regimens were consistent with those reported for other combination regimens commonly used to treat these patients. In studies in which direct treatment comparisons can be derived, the results suggest that patients who received fosfomycin combination therapy had similar or improved outcomes compared with other therapies and combinations, especially when it was used in combination with a β-lactam that (1) targets PBP-3 and (2) has exceptional stability in the presence of β-lactamases. Collectively, the data indicate that combination therapy with IV fosfomycin should be considered as a potential alternative to aminoglycoside or polymyxin combinations for patients with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative infections when benefits outweigh risks.

Amoxicillin and penicillin G dosing in pediatric community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia in the era of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines

BACKGROUND

Parenteral penicillin G (PENG) and oral amoxicillin (AMOX) are recommended as treatment for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). With recent epidemiologic penicillin susceptibility data for Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common etiology of CAP, the objective of this study was to evaluate optimal dosing regimens of PENG and AMOX based on population pharmacokinetics linked to current susceptibility data.

METHODS

Using NONMEM v7.3, Monte Carlo simulations (N = 10,000) were conducted for AMOX 15 mg/kg/dose PO every 8 h (standard-dose), AMOX 45 mg/kg/dose PO every 12 h (high-dose), and PENG 62,500 units/kg/day IV every 6 h using six virtual subjects with ages spanning 3 months to 15 years old. The probability of target attainment (PTA) was determined for both serum and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to achieve free drug concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) across the population of pneumococci for 30%-50% of the dosing interval.

RESULTS

In 2018, all 21 (100%) pneumococcal isolates were susceptible to both PENG and AMOX based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; MIC at 2 mg/L) breakpoints, and 15 of 21 (71%) were susceptible based on EUCAST (MIC at 0.5 mg/L) breakpoints. As compared to CLSI, EUCAST breakpoints consistently achieved higher PTA for all antibiotic regimens. At 50% fT>MIC in the serum at the susceptible MICs, standard-dose AMOX achieved >4% PTA (CLSI) and >86% PTA (EUCAST); high-dose AMOX achieved >73% PTA (CLSI) and >99% PTA (EUCAST); and PENG achieved 0% PTA (using CLSI) and 100% PTA (using EUCAST). Standard-dose AMOX, high-dose AMOX, and PENG achieved >71%, >93%, and 100% PTA, respectively, in the serum at 30%-50% fT>MIC when each patient was stochastically linked to an MIC based on the frequency distribution of national susceptibility data. The PTA was consistently lower in ELF as compared with serum for all regimens.

CONCLUSION

Based on the recent rates of resistance, antibiotic doses evaluated provide appropriate exposure for pediatric CAP based on the serum and ELF data associated with predicted clinical and microbiologic success for pneumococcus. High-dose AMOX may still be required to treat pediatric CAP, especially if using CLSI breakpoints. Ongoing surveillance for resistance is essential.

Pharmacokinetic of ceftazidime-avibactam in a critically ill patient under high-volume continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration: A first paediatric case report

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel cephalosporin/B-lactamase inhibitor developed in the context of increasing resistance. This case reports the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam in a critically ill child under continuous renal replacement (CRRT) therapy for fluid overload. The patient was a 6-month-old female with sepsis due to bloodstream infection to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia following stem cell transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency. CRRT was started on Day 2. Concentrations have been monitored using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Treatment was given every 8 h with a 2 h infusion of 30-7,5 mg/kg and did not reach pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Total clearance was respectively 1.7 and 3.02 L/h, with CRRT clearance respectively 28.8%-60% for ceftazidime and 14%-33% for avibactam. Those clearances are higher than reported in adult literature leading to a risk of treatment failure and emerging resistance. This supports the benefit of monitoring antimicrobial therapy under CRRT and the necessity to assess higher dosing or continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam.

Continuous Intrathecal Medication Delivery With the IRRA flow Catheter: Pearls and Early Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intrathecal (IT) medications are routinely introduced through catheterization of the intraventricular space or subarachnoid space. There has been sporadic use of IT medications delivered directly to the ventricle either by intermittent injection through an external ventricular drain (EVD) or by an Ommaya reservoir with a ventricular catheter. IT medication delivery through EVD has many drawbacks, including the necessary opening of a sterile system, delivery of medication in a bolus form, and requirements to clamp the EVD after medication delivery. Despite these setbacks, IT medications delivered through EVD have been used across a wide range of applications, including antibiotic delivery treatment of vasospasm with nicardipine and delivery of tissue plasminogen activator.

METHODS

We used a newly developed active fluid exchange device to treat various severe conditions involved in the cerebral ventricles. Here, we present our treatment protocols and advice on the techniques related to successful active fluid exchange therapy.

RESULTS

Seventy patients have been treated with our system with various conditions, including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, ventriculitis, and cerebral abscess. Total complication rate was 14% with only 1 catheter occlusion and low rates of hemorrhage, infection, and spinal fluid leak.

CONCLUSION

Current continuous IT medication dosages and protocols are based on reports and consensus statements evaluating intermittent instillation of medication boluses. The pharmacokinetics of continuous dosing and the therapeutic and safety profiles of the medications need to be studied in a prospective manner to evaluate the true optimal dosing standards. Furthermore, the ability to deliver continuous, sterile medications directly through an IT route will open new avenues of pharmacotherapy that were previously closed. This report serves as a basic guide for the safe and effective use of the IRRA flow active fluid exchange catheter to deliver IT medications.

Assessment of antibiotic release and antibacterial efficacy from pendant glutathione hydrogels using ex vivo porcine skin

Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) confer a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Local antibiotic delivery systems can provide controlled drug release directly to the site of infection to maximize efficacy and minimize systemic toxicity. The purpose of this study was to examine the antibacterial activity of antibiotic-loaded glutathione-conjugated poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels (GSH-PEG) against ABSSSIs utilizing an ex vivo porcine dermal explant model. Vancomycin- or meropenem-loaded GSH-PEG hydrogels at 3 different dose levels were loaded over 1 h. Drug release was monitored in vitro under submerged conditions, by the Franz cell diffusion method, and ex vivo utilizing a porcine dermis model. Antibacterial activity was assessed ex vivo on porcine dermis explants inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates treated with vancomycin- or meropenem-loaded GSH-PEG hydrogels, respectively. Histological assessment of the explants was conducted to evaluate tissue integrity and viability in the context of the experimental conditions. A dose-dependent release was observed from vancomycin and meropenem hydrogels, with in vitro Franz cell diffusion data closely representing ex vivo vancomycin release, but not high dose meropenem release. High dose vancomycin-loaded hydrogels resulted in a >3 log10 clearance against all S. aureus isolates at 48 h. High dose meropenem-loaded hydrogels achieved 6.5, 4, and 2 log10 reductions in CFU/ml against susceptible, intermediate, and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the potential application of GSH-PEG hydrogels for flexible, local antibiotic delivery against bacterial skin infections.

Development and validation of a rabbit model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa non-ventilated pneumonia for preclinical drug development

Background

New drugs targeting antimicrobial resistant pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, have been challenging to evaluate in clinical trials, particularly for the non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia indications. Development of new antibacterial drugs is facilitated by preclinical animal models that could predict clinical efficacy in patients with these infections.

Methods

We report here an FDA-funded study to develop a rabbit model of non-ventilated pneumonia with Pseudomonas aeruginosa by determining the extent to which the natural history of animal disease reproduced human pathophysiology and conducting validation studies to evaluate whether humanized dosing regimens of two antibiotics, meropenem and tobramycin, can halt or reverse disease progression.

Results

In a rabbit model of non-ventilated pneumonia, endobronchial challenge with live P. aeruginosa strain 6206, but not with UV-killed Pa6206, caused acute respiratory distress syndrome, as evidenced by acute lung inflammation, pulmonary edema, hemorrhage, severe hypoxemia, hyperlactatemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoglycemia, which preceded respiratory failure and death. Pa6206 increased >100-fold in the lungs and then disseminated from there to infect distal organs, including spleen and kidneys. At 5 h post-infection, 67% of Pa6206-challenged rabbits had PaO2 <60 mmHg, corresponding to a clinical cut-off when oxygen therapy would be required. When administered at 5 h post-infection, humanized dosing regimens of tobramycin and meropenem reduced mortality to 17-33%, compared to 100% for saline-treated rabbits (P<0.001 by log-rank tests). For meropenem which exhibits time-dependent bactericidal activity, rabbits treated with a humanized meropenem dosing regimen of 80 mg/kg q2h for 24 h achieved 100% T>MIC, resulting in 75% microbiological clearance rate of Pa6206 from the lungs. For tobramycin which exhibits concentration-dependent killing, rabbits treated with a humanized tobramycin dosing regimen of 8 mg/kg q8h for 24 h achieved Cmax/MIC of 9.8 ± 1.4 at 60 min post-dose, resulting in 50% lung microbiological clearance rate. In contrast, rabbits treated with a single tobramycin dose of 2.5 mg/kg had Cmax/MIC of 7.8 ± 0.8 and 8% (1/12) microbiological clearance rate, indicating that this rabbit model can detect dose-response effects.

Conclusion

The rabbit model may be used to help predict clinical efficacy of new antibacterial drugs for the treatment of non-ventilated P. aeruginosa pneumonia.

Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Target Attainment of Meropenem in Pediatric Post-Liver Transplant Patients: Extended vs Intermittent Infusion

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to characterize the concentration-time profile, pharmacokinetics parameters, and therapeutic target attainment of meropenem in pediatric post-liver transplant patients according to the duration of infusion.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort of pediatric transplant recipients with preserved renal function receiving meropenem 40 mg/kg every 8 hours. The patients were stratified into 2 groups based on infusion duration: G1 (15 minutes of intermittent infusion) and G1 (3 hours of extended infusion). Two blood samples per child were collected during the same interval within 48 hours of starting the antimicrobial. Meropenem concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using a noncompartmental analysis. The therapeutic target was defined as 100% of the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration.

FINDINGS

Fourteen patients with 28 measured meropenem concentrations were included. Lower values of volume of distribution and meropenem clearance compared with other critically ill pediatric populations were found. All patients achieved the therapeutic target against gram-negative pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤8 mg/L. Patients receiving a 15-minute infusion had higher values of peak and trough concentrations, resulting in unnecessary increased total drug exposure when compared to patients receiving a 3-hour infusion (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem at 120 mg/kg/d attained the therapeutic target against sensitive microorganisms in pediatric liver transplant recipients. The extended infusion should be preferred for patient safety. Because of the pharmacokinetic changes resulting from liver transplantation, individualized meropenem dosing regimens may be necessary.

Breaking Down the Breakpoints: Rationale for the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Revised Piperacillin-Tazobactam Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales

Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most common antibiotics administered to hospitalized patients. Its broad activity against gram-negative, gram-positive, and anaerobic pathogens; efficacy in clinical trials across diverse infection types and patient populations; and generally favorable toxicity profile make it a particularly appealing antibiotic agent. PTZ susceptibility interpretive criteria (ie, breakpoints) for the Enterobacterales were initially established in 1992, as the drug was undergoing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the ensuing 30 years, changes in the molecular epidemiology of the Enterobacterales and its impact on PTZ susceptibility testing, mounting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data generated from sophisticated techniques such as population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation, and disturbing safety signals in a large clinical trial prompted the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) to review available evidence to determine the need for revision of the PTZ breakpoints for Enterobacterales. After an extensive literature review and formal voting process, the susceptibility criteria were revised in the 2022 CLSI M100 document to the following: ≤8/4 µg/mL (susceptible), 16/4 µg/mL (susceptible dose-dependent), and ≥32/4 µg/mL (resistant). Herein, we provide a brief overview of the CLSI process of antibiotic breakpoint revisions and elaborate on the available data that ultimately led to the decision to revise the PTZ breakpoints.

Piperacillin-tazobactam dosing in anuric acute kidney injury patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy

INTRODUCTION

To determine appropriate dosing of piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

METHODS

The databases of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched. We used the Medical Subject Headings of "piperacillin-tazobactam," "CRRT," and "pharmacokinetics" or related terms or synonym to identify the studies for reviews. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was conducted to predict piperacillin levels for the initial 48 h of therapy. The pharmacodynamic target was 50% of free drug level above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and 4 times of the MIC. The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment was defined as an optimal dose.

RESULTS

Our simulation study reveals that the dosing regimen of piperacillin-tazobactam 12 g/day is appropriate for treating Pseudomonal infection with KDIGO recommended effluent rate of 25-35 mL/kg/h. The MIC values of each setting were an important factor to design piperacillin-tazobactam dosing regimens.

CONCLUSION

The Monte Carlo simulation can be a useful tool to evaluate drug dosing in critically ill acute kidney injury patients receiving CRRT when limited pharmacokinetic data are a concern. Clinical validation of these results is needed.

Impact of Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists on improving urinary tract infection antibiotic appropriateness at an acute psychiatric hospital

Introduction

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common indications for antibiotic use; patients with psychiatric disorders have a greater risk for UTI compared with patients without these disorders. However, there is little guidance on how best to manage antibiotic therapy in psychiatric hospitals. This study assessed the impact of a Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacist (BCPP)-driven guideline on managing UTI treatment in an acute psychiatric hospital.

Methods

The guideline was developed by the psychiatric pharmacy team and distributed to internists, psychiatrists, and pharmacists. Preintervention data were assessed for patients admitted between November 30, 2019, and February 23, 2020; postintervention data were assessed from February 25, 2020, to April 24, 2020. All patients ages 13 years and older who were admitted and had orders for an antibiotic to treat a UTI were included in this study. Appropriate UTI management was defined as an appropriate agent, dose, route, and frequency per the treatment guideline. Additionally, the following criteria were to be ordered and assessed to be deemed appropriate: urinalysis, urine culture, complete blood count, basic or complete metabolic panel, temperature, and subjective symptoms.

Results

Before intervention, 19.0% of antibiotic orders were appropriate; after intervention, 46.7% of antibiotic orders were appropriate (P = .048).

Conclusion

The implementation of a BCPP-driven treatment algorithm was associated with a significant increase in appropriate antibiotic regimens for the treatment of UTIs in patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital.

The Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials study (NAPPA): investigating amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin pharmacokinetics from birth to adolescence

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic (PK) data underlying paediatric penicillin dosing remain limited, especially in critical care.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials study (NAPPA) was to characterize PK profiles of commonly used penicillins using data obtained during routine care, to further understanding of PK variability and inform future evidence-based dosing.

METHODS

NAPPA was a multicentre study of amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Patients were recruited with informed consent. Antibiotic dosing followed standard of care. PK samples were obtained opportunistically or at optimal times, frozen and analysed using UPLC with tandem MS. Pharmacometric analysis was undertaken using NONMEM software (v7.3). Model-based simulations (n = 10 000) tested PTA with British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) and WHO dosing. The study had ethical approval.

RESULTS

For the combined IV PK model, 963 PK samples from 370 participants were analysed simultaneously incorporating amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin data. BNFC high-dose regimen simulations gave these PTA results (median fT>MIC at breakpoints of specified pathogens): amoxicillin 100% (Streptococcus pneumoniae); benzylpenicillin 100% (Group B Streptococcus); flucloxacillin 48% (MSSA); and piperacillin 100% (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Oral population PK models for flucloxacillin and amoxicillin enabled estimation of first-order absorption rate constants (1.16 h-1 and 1.3 h-1) and bioavailability terms (62.7% and 58.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

NAPPA represents, to our knowledge, the largest prospective combined paediatric penicillin PK study undertaken to date, and the first paediatric flucloxacillin oral PK model. The PTA results provide evidence supportive of BNFC high-dose IV regimens for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin and piperacillin.

Continuous vs Intermittent Meropenem Administration in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: The MERCY Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Meropenem is a widely prescribed β-lactam antibiotic. Meropenem exhibits maximum pharmacodynamic efficacy when given by continuous infusion to deliver constant drug levels above the minimal inhibitory concentration. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous administration of meropenem may improve clinical outcomes.

Objective

To determine whether continuous administration of meropenem reduces a composite of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria compared with intermittent administration in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A double-blind, randomized clinical trial enrolling critically ill patients with sepsis or septic shock who had been prescribed meropenem by their treating clinicians at 31 intensive care units of 26 hospitals in 4 countries (Croatia, Italy, Kazakhstan, and Russia). Patients were enrolled between June 5, 2018, and August 9, 2022, and the final 90-day follow-up was completed in November 2022.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive an equal dose of the antibiotic meropenem by either continuous administration (n = 303) or intermittent administration (n = 304).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28. There were 4 secondary outcomes, including days alive and free from antibiotics at day 28, days alive and free from the intensive care unit at day 28, and all-cause mortality at day 90. Seizures, allergic reactions, and mortality were recorded as adverse events.

Results

All 607 patients (mean age, 64 [SD, 15] years; 203 were women [33%]) were included in the measurement of the 28-day primary outcome and completed the 90-day mortality follow-up. The majority (369 patients, 61%) had septic shock. The median time from hospital admission to randomization was 9 days (IQR, 3-17 days) and the median duration of meropenem therapy was 11 days (IQR, 6-17 days). Only 1 crossover event was recorded. The primary outcome occurred in 142 patients (47%) in the continuous administration group and in 149 patients (49%) in the intermittent administration group (relative risk, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81-1.13], P = .60). Of the 4 secondary outcomes, none was statistically significant. No adverse events of seizures or allergic reactions related to the study drug were reported. At 90 days, mortality was 42% both in the continuous administration group (127 of 303 patients) and in the intermittent administration group (127 of 304 patients).

Conclusions and Relevance

In critically ill patients with sepsis, compared with intermittent administration, the continuous administration of meropenem did not improve the composite outcome of mortality and emergence of pandrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant bacteria at day 28.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03452839.

Cefepime extended infusion versus intermittent infusion: Clinical and cost evaluation

Background

Extended infusion cefepime (1 gram every 6 hours administered over 3 hours) achieves pharmacodynamic efficacy against bacteria with a MIC of ≤8 mg/L in Monte Carlo simulations. This regimen has not been evaluated in clinical practice.

Objective

Compare clinical and economic outcomes for cefepime by intermittent infusion and by extended infusion in the acute-care setting.

Design

Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

Patients

Hospitalized adults who received cefepime between August 2016 and July 2018 with a diagnosis of sepsis or pneumonia.

Methods

Clinical and economic outcomes were compared for patients who received empiric cefepime via intermittent infusion (30-minute infusion of 2 g every 8 hours) or extended infusion (3-hour infusion of 1 g every 6 hours). Clinical outcomes analyses were carried out using appropriate statistical methods.

Results

Overall, 111 patients received intermittent infusion and 93 patients received extended infusion. Approximately half of the included patients had a positive culture for a bacterial pathogen (intermittent infusion 45.9% vs extended infusion 47.3%). Median hospital length of stay (intermittent infusion 6 days vs extended infusion 6 days; P = .67) and 90-day readmission rates (intermittent infusion 61.3% vs extended infusion 67.7%; P = .34) did not differ between the groups. Mortality was infrequent in both groups (intermittent infusion 2.9% vs extended infusion 1.5%; P = .45). Cefepime cost per patient was lower with cefepime by extended infusion: average total daily cost $86.06 for intermittent infusion versus $43.39 for extended infusion.

Conclusions

Cefepime via extended infusion (4 grams/day) did not differ in clinical outcomes compared to intermittent infusion (6 grams/day) but reduced drug expenditure. Prospective, multicenter, high-quality studies should be conducted to evaluate a mortality difference between these regimens.

Recommendations of Gentamicin Dose Based on Different Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets for Intensive Care Adult Patients: A Redefining Approach

Background

In addition to the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio, the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_24h) to MIC has recently been suggested as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for efficacy and safety in once-daily dosing of gentamicin (ODDG) in critically ill patients.

Purpose

This study aimed to predict the optimal effective dose and risk of nephrotoxicity for gentamicin in critically ill patients for two different PK/PD targets within the first 3 days of infection.

Methods

The gathered pharmacokinetic and demographic data in critically ill patients from 21 previously published studies were used to build a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) method was conducted with the use of gentamicin once-daily dosing ranging from 5-10 mg/kg. The percentage target attainment (PTA) for efficacy, C_max/MIC ~8-10 and AUC_24h/MIC ≥110 targets, were studied. The AUC_24h >700 mg⋅h/L and C_min >2 mg/L were used to predict the risk of nephrotoxicity.

Results

Gentamicin 7 mg/kg/day could achieve both efficacy targets for more than 90% when the MIC was <0.5 mg/L. When the MIC increased to 1 mg/L, gentamicin 8 mg/kg/day could reach the PK/PD and safety targets. However, for pathogens with MIC ≥2 mg/L, no studied gentamicin doses were sufficient to reach the efficacy target. The risk of nephrotoxicity using AUC_24h >700 mg⋅h/L was small, but the risk was greater when applying a C_min target >2 mg/L.

Conclusion

Considering both targets of Cmax/MIC ~8-10 and AUC_24h/MIC ≥110, an initial gentamicin dose of 8 mg/kg/day should be recommended in critically ill patients for pathogens with MIC of ≤1 mg/L. Clinical validation of our results is essential.

Effectiveness of Extended or Continuous vs. Bolus Infusion of Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics for Febrile Neutropenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review aimed to compare extended infusion or continuous infusion with bolus infusion for febrile neutropenia (FN). We included clinical trials comparing extended or continuous infusion with bolus infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics as empirical treatment for FN and evaluated the clinical failure, all-cause mortality, and adverse event rates. Five articles (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective studies) from 2014 to 2022 were included. Clinical failure was assessed with a risk ratio (RR) (95% coincident interval (CI)) of 0.74 (0.53, 1.05) and odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) of 0.14 (0.02, 1.17) in the 2 RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. All-cause mortality was assessed with an RR (95% CI) of 1.25 (0.44, 3.54) and OR (95% CI) of 1.00 (0.44, 2.23) in the RCTs and retrospective studies, respectively. Only 1 RCT evaluated adverse events (with an RR (95% CI) of 0.46 (0.13, 1.65)). The quality of evidence was "low" for clinical failure and all-cause mortality in the RCTs. In the retrospective studies, the clinical failure and all-cause mortality evidence qualities were considered "very low" due to the study design. Extended or continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics did not reduce mortality better than bolus infusion but was associated with shorter fever durations and fewer adverse events.

Outcomes of Intravenous Push versus Intermittent Infusion Administration of Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients

The equivalence of intravenous push (IVP) and piggyback (IVPB) administration has not been evaluated in the critically ill population for most medications, but it is especially relevant for antibiotics, such as cefepime, that exhibit time-dependent bactericidal activity. A single center, retrospective, observational pre/post-protocol change study included critically ill adults who received cefepime as empiric therapy between August 2015 and 2021. The primary outcome was treatment failure, which was defined as a composite of escalation of antibiotic regimen or all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included adverse drug events, days of cefepime therapy, total days of antibiotic therapy, and ICU and hospital length of stay. Outcomes were compared using Chi-squared, Mann Whitney U, and binary logistic regression as appropriate. A total of 285 patients were included: 87 IVPB and 198 IVP. Treatment failure occurred in 18% (n = 16) of the IVPB group and 27% (n = 54) of the IVP group (p = 0.109). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Longer duration of antibiotics (odds ratio [OR] 1.057, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.103), SOFA score (OR 1.269, 95% CI 1.154-1.397) and IVP administration of cefepime (OR 2.370, 95% CI 1.143-4.914) were independently associated with treatment failure. Critically ill patients who received IVP cefepime were more likely to experience treatment failure in an adjusted analysis. The current practice of IVP cefepime should be reevaluated, as it may not provide similar clinical outcomes in the critically ill population.

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions.

RESULTS

The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Clinical efficacy and safety of prolonged versus intermittent administration of antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics in adults with severe acute infections: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

In order to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of prolonged versus intermittent antipseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotic infusion for the treatment of severe acute infections in adult patients, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases until December 2022. The outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and adverse events. The pooled risk ratios (RR) were estimated by the fixed or random effect methods according to heterogeneity statistics. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

Twenty eligible RCTs with 2081 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the prolonged infusion group than in the intermittent infusion group (RR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.95, p = 0.01, I² = 0%; moderate certainty). Treatment with prolonged infusion showed significant benefit in clinical success (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, p = 0.008, I² = 19%; moderate certainty). There were no significant differences in microbiological eradication (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.99-1.28, p = 0.07, I² = 49%; low certainty), any adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86-1.08, p = 0.50, I² = 27%; moderate certainty) and serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.70-1.39 p = 0.95, I² = 0%; low certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged antipseudomonal beta-lactam infusion probably decreases all-cause mortality. Additionally, it probably increases clinical success in adults with severe acute infections. This infusion strategy may result in little to no difference in microbiological eradication and is probably not associated with a rise in any adverse events.The evidence suggests that prolonged infusion may not increase serious adverse events.

Oral stepdown in Gram-positive bloodstream infections: A step in the right direction

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Gram-positive organisms have traditionally been treated with prolonged courses of intravenous antimicrobials. However, this dogma is associated with substantial burden to the patient and health care system. Consequently, there is growing interest in the utilization of oral stepdown therapy, defined as the transition of intravenous therapy to an active oral agent, for this indication. This review highlights available literature examining oral stepdown in adult patients with BSI due to commonly encountered Gram-positive pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. Support for oral stepdown in this setting is primarily derived from observational studies subject to selection bias. Nevertheless, this treatment strategy exhibits promising potential in carefully selected patients as it is consistently associated with reductions in hospital length of stay without jeopardizing clinical cure or survivability. Prospective, randomized trials are needed for validation of oral stepdown in Gram-positive BSI and to identify the optimal patient population and regimen.

Oral β-lactams vs fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for step-down therapy for Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

PURPOSE

To compare rates of treatment failure for patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis who received oral step-down antibiotic therapy with either a fluoroquinolone (FQ) or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) to rates for those who received an oral β-lactam (BL).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, cohort study included 397 unique adult hospitalized patients with a BSI due to E. coli, K. pneumoniae, or P. mirabilis at 6 hospitals in central Texas between July 11, 2016, and July 11, 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of treatment failure comprising 30-day readmission due to recurrence, 30-day all-cause mortality, and change in oral antibiotic. Secondary outcomes included 90-day development of Clostridioides difficile infection, 90-day colonization with a multidrug-resistant organism, 90-day all-cause readmission, hospital length of stay, and the individual components of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 397 patients included, 200 received oral step-down therapy with a BL while 197 received an FQ or SXT. Most patients had an infection due to E. coli (82.8%) and a urinary source of infection (85%). Median total duration of therapy was 14 days in both groups. No difference in treatment failure was identified between the groups treated with a BL and FQ/SXT (7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.561). Median hospital length of stay was the only secondary endpoint in which there was an observed difference (6 vs 5 days, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

We observed no difference in treatment failure rates for patients receiving an oral BL compared to an oral FQ or SXT for step-down therapy of BSIs due to E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin using total and unbound serum concentrations in patients with high body weight

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefazolin in patients with a high body weight. Cefazolin was administered by 0.5-h infusions to 11 patients with total body weight (TBW) ≥120 kg receiving 3 g q8h, and 12 patients with TBW <120 kg receiving 2 g q8h. Total and unbound serum concentration-time data obtained from serial blood samples were analysed simultaneously by population pharmacokinetic modelling using NONMEM. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated for various dosing regimens through Monte Carlo simulations based on the cumulative percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value for the pathogen at steady state (fT_MIC) ≥40%, ≥60% and 100%. A two-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and allometric scaling of the central volume of distribution using TBW best characterized both total and unbound concentration-time data. Unbound clearance was significantly associated with creatinine clearance, and maximum protein binding constant was significantly associated with serum albumin concentration and body mass index (P <0.05). Based on unbound concentration-time profiles, all simulated regimens achieved PTA >90% at MIC values ≤2 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥40%, at MIC values ≤1 mg/L using fT_MIC ≥60%, and at MIC values ≤0.5 mg/L using fT_MIC of 100%. At fT_MIC ≥60%, 0.5-h infusion of cefazolin 1 g q8h achieved PTA <90% at MIC values ≥2 mg/L in patients with TBW≥120 kg; however, prolonged-infusion and higher-dose regimens improved PTA to >90%. Overall, cefazolin pharmacokinetics are altered considerably in obese patients. Higher-dose and/or prolonged-infusion cefazolin regimens should be considered in patients with TBW ≥120 kg, particularly those with less-susceptible Gram-negative infections.

Effectiveness and Safety of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics with and without Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia or Bloodstream Infection

This objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia (PNA) or bloodstream infection (BSI) receiving beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) infusions with and without the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A retrospective, parallel cohort study was conducted at two academic medical centers between December 2015 and January 2020, UF Shands Gainesville, which uses BLA TDM for select patients (BLA TDM), and UF Health Jacksonville, which does not use BLA TDM (No-BLA TDM). All hospitalized adult patients with respiratory or blood culture positive for P. aeruginosa who met diagnosis criteria for lower respiratory tract infection with a positive P. aeruginosa respiratory culture and who received ≥48 h of intravenous BLA with in vitro susceptibility within 72 h of positive culture collection were included. The primary outcome was a composite of presumed treatment failure defined as the presence of any of the following from index-positive P. aeruginosa culture collection to the end of BLA therapy: all-cause mortality, escalation of and/or additional antimicrobial therapy for P. aeruginosa infection after 48 h of treatment with susceptible BLA due to worsening clinical status, or transfer to a higher level of care (i.e., the intensive care unit [ICU]). Analyses were adjusted for possible confounding with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Two-hundred patients were included (BLA TDM, n = 95; No-BLA TDM, n = 105). In IPTW-adjusted analysis of the primary composite endpoint, BLA TDM demonstrated a significant decrease in presumed treatment failure compared to No-BLA TDM (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.037, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.013 to 0.107]; P < 0.001). BLA TDM had more 30-, 60- and 90-day infection-related readmissions ([aOR], 11.301, 95% CI (3.595 to 35.516); aOR 10.389, 95% CI [2.496 to 43.239], and aOR 24.970, 95% CI [6.703 to 93.028]) in IPTW analyses. For both unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted cohorts, there was no significant difference in hospital and ICU length of stay, adverse effects while on BLA, or microbiological eradication between BLA TDM and No-BLA TDM. In hospitalized adult patients with P. aeruginosa PNA or BSI, the use of TDM-guided BLA infusions decreased the odds of presumed treatment failure compared to patients receiving BLA infusions without TDM guidance. Future studies should evaluate BLA TDM impact on readmission.

Implementation of a β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring program: Experience from a large academic medical center

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To describe the implementation and operationalization of a β-lactam (BL) therapeutic drug monitoring(TDM) program at a large academic center.

SUMMARY

BLs are the most used class of antibiotics. Suboptimal antibiotic exposure is a significant concern in hospitalized patients, particularly in those with altered pharmacokinetics. BL-TDM provides clinicians the opportunity to optimize drug concentrations to ensure maximal therapeutic efficacy while minimizing toxicity. However, BL-TDM has not been widely adopted due to the lack of access to assays. The University of Florida Shands Hospital developed a BL-TDM program in 2015. This is a consultative service primarily run by pharmacists and is conducted in all patient care areas. An analysis was performed on the first BL-TDM encounter for 1,438 patients. BL-TDM was most frequently performed for cefepime (61%, n = 882), piperacillin (15%, n = 218), and meropenem (11%, n = 151). BL-TDM was performed a median of 3 days (interquartile range, 1-5 days) from BL initiation. Among patients with available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and trough concentrations, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of 100% fT>MIC was attained in 308 patients (88%). BL-TDM resulted in a dosage adjustment in 25% (n = 361) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a BL-TDM program requires the concerted efforts of physicians, pharmacists, nursing staff, phlebotomists, and personnel in the analytical laboratory. Standard antibiotic dosing failed to achieve optimal PK/PD targets in all patients; utilizing BL-TDM, dose adjustments were made in 1 of every 4 patients.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of mezlocillin in neonates and young infants

OBJECTIVES

Mezlocillin is used in the treatment of neonatal infectious diseases. However, due to the absence of population pharmacokinetic studies in neonates and young infants, dosing regimens differ considerably in clinical practice. Hence, this study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of mezlocillin in neonates and young infants, and propose the optimal dosing regimen based on the population pharmacokinetic model of mezlocillin.

METHODS

A prospective, open-label pharmacokinetic study of mezlocillin was carried out in newborns. Blood samples were collected using an opportunistic sampling method. HPLC was used to measure the plasma drug concentrations. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using NONMEM software.

RESULTS

Ninety-five blood samples from 48 neonates and young infants were included. The ranges of postmenstrual age and birth weight were 29-40 weeks and 1200-4000 g, respectively, including term and preterm infants. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination was developed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin. Postmenstrual age, current weight and serum creatinine concentration were the most important covariates. Monte Carlo simulation results indicated that the current dose of 50 mg/kg q12h resulted in 89.2% of patients achieving the therapeutic target, when the MIC of 4 mg/L was used as the breakpoint. When increasing the dosing frequency to q8h, a dose of 20 mg/kg resulted in 74.3% of patients achieving the therapeutic target.

CONCLUSIONS

A population pharmacokinetic model of mezlocillin in neonates and young infants was established. Optimal dosing regimens based on this model were provided for use in neonatal infections.

Evaluation of β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring among US health systems with postgraduate year 2 infectious diseases pharmacy residency programs

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

While some guidelines recognize the need for β-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), there is still a paucity of data regarding the prevalence of and barriers to performing β-lactam TDM in the United States. We sought to estimate the prevalence of β-lactam TDM, describe monitoring practices, and identify actual and perceived barriers to implementation among health systems in the US.

METHODS

A multicenter, cross-sectional, 40-item electronic survey was distributed to all postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy residency program directors (RPDs) listed in the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists pharmacy residency directory. The primary outcome was the percentage of institutions with established β-lactam TDM. Secondary outcomes included assessing β-lactam TDM methods and identifying potential barriers to implementation.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 126 PGY2 ID RPDs, with a response rate of 31.7% (40 of 126). Only 7.7% of respondents (3 of 39) performed β-lactam TDM. Patient populations, therapeutic targets, and frequency and timing of obtaining repeat β-lactam concentration measurements varied among institutions. The greatest barrier to implementation was lack of access to testing with a rapid turnaround time. Institutions were unlikely to implement β-lactam TDM within the next year but were significantly more inclined to do so within 5 years (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Β-lactam TDM was infrequently performed at the surveyed US health systems. Lack of access to serum concentration testing with rapid turnaround and lack of US-specific guidelines appear to be considerable barriers to implementing β-lactam TDM. Among institutions that have implemented β-lactam TDM, there is considerable variation in monitoring approaches.

Implementation of IV Push Antibiotics for Outpatients During a National Fluid Shortage Following Hurricane Maria

Background

Prior to the introduction of intravenous (IV) drip infusion, most IV drugs were delivered in a syringe bolus push. However, intravenous drip infusions subsequently became the standard of care. Puerto Rico is the largest supplier of IV fluid bags and in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, there was a nationwide fluid bag shortage. This shortage required stewardship measures to maintain the operation of the self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program at Parkland Health.

Methods

Parkland pharmacists evaluated all self-administered antimicrobials for viability of administration as an IV syringe bolus push (IVP) instead of an IV-drip infusion. Medications deemed appropriate were transitioned to IVP. The hospital EMR was used to identify patients discharged to the OPAT clinic using all methods of parenteral drug delivery. Data was collected for patient demographics, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes. Finally cost of care was calculated for IVP and IV drip administration.

Results

One-hundred and thirteen self-administered IVP and 102 self-administered IV drip treatment courses were identified during the study period. Individuals using IVP had a statistically significant decrease in hospital length of stay. Patient satisfaction was greater with IVP and IVP saved 504 liters of normal saline resulting in a savings of $43,652 over 6 months. The 30-day readmission rate and mortality were similar.

Conclusion

The abrupt IV fluid shortage following a natural disaster led to implementation of a high value care model that improved efficiency, reduced costs, and did not affect safety or efficacy.

Pharmacodynamic Thresholds for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: A Story of Mouse Versus Man

Beta-lactams remain a critical member of our antibiotic armamentarium and are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in the inpatient setting. For these agents, the percentage of time that the free concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) of the pathogen has been shown to be the best predictor of antibacterial killing effects. However, debate remains about the quantity of fT > MIC exposure needed for successful clinical response. While pre-clinical animal based studies, such as the neutropenic thigh infection model, have been widely used to support dosing regimen selection for clinical development and susceptibility breakpoint evaluation, pharmacodynamic based studies in human patients are used validate exposures needed in the clinic and for guidance during therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). For the majority of studied beta-lactams, pre-clinical animal studies routinely demonstrated the fT > MIC should exceed approximately 40–70% fT > MIC to achieve 1 log reductions in colony forming units. In contrast, clinical studies tend to suggest higher exposures may be needed, but tremendous variability exists study to study. Herein, we will review and critique pre-clinical versus human-based pharmacodynamic studies aimed at determining beta-lactam exposure thresholds, so as to determine which targets may be best suited for optimal dosage selection, TDM, and for susceptibility breakpoint determination. Based on our review of murine and clinical literature on beta-lactam pharmacodynamic thresholds, murine based targets specific to each antibiotic are most useful during dosage regimen development and susceptibility breakpoint assessment, while a range of exposures between 50 and 100% fT > MIC are reasonable to define the beta-lactam TDM therapeutic window for most infections.

Setting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Breakpoints: A Primer for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialists on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Approach

Breakpoints are the values used by clinical microbiology laboratories to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and classify isolates as susceptible or resistant. Whether the breakpoints applied by laboratories accurately predict the likelihood of successful treatment with a particular antimicrobial is an issue of critical importance to quality clinical care. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets breakpoints, and globally, breakpoints are also set by 2 standards development organizations, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST); individual laboratories may choose which breakpoints to implement. Many CLSI breakpoints are recognized by FDA, facilitating their incorporation into widely used commercial AST devices. The CLSI Subcommittee on AST's consensus approach to establishing (and as needed, revising) breakpoints involves integration of currently available microbiological, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, and clinical data. Here, an overview of the CLSI process for establishing breakpoints is provided.

Corynebacterium amycolatum infective endocarditis in a patient with severe COVID-19: a case report

Objective. To present a case of successful treatment of a secondary bacterial infection caused by nondiphtheritic corynebacterium in a patient with severe COVID-19 and known beta-lactam intolerance. Materials and Methods. A clinical case of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Corynebacterium amycolatum in a 74-year-old patient hospitalized with severe COVID-19 is presented. Comorbidity (secondary immune deficiency due to active malignancy, chemotherapy courses; previous heart disease) and the need for immunosuppressive therapy were triggers for infection caused by a rare Gram-positive bacterium which is usually considered as clinically non-significant. The choice of empiric antimicrobial treatment was limited by the patient’s history of beta-lactam intolerance. Results. A multidisciplinary approach to medical care of the patient and alertness to secondary infections helped to diagnose IE in a timely manner and to choose effective antimicrobial therapy. Combination therapy with vancomycin and amikacin helped to make blood flow free from infection. The further switch to oral doxycycline in outpatient settings resulted in the patient recovery from the infection. Conclusions. Under conditions of limited choice of drug therapy, it is critical to have access to modern microbiological diagnostics which make it possible to diagnose rare pathogens. A dialogue between treating physician and clinical pharmacologist helps to choose an empirical and targeted antimicrobial therapy with the best efficacy-safety ratio. There is a need to be alert to secondary infections, including those of atypical locations and courses and caused by rare or opportunistic pathogens.

Beta-Lactams Therapeutic Monitoring in Septic Children-What Target Are We Aiming for? A Scoping Review

The antimicrobial therapy of sepsis and septic shock should be individualized based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters to deliver effective and timely treatment of life-threatening infections. We conducted a literature scoping review to identify therapeutic targets of beta-lactam antibiotics in septic pediatric patients and the strategies that have been applied to overcome sepsis-related altered pharmacokinetics and increase target attainment against susceptible pathogens. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases to select studies conducted since 2010 with therapeutic monitoring data of beta-lactams in septic children. Last searches were performed on 02 September 2021. Two independent authors selected the studies and extracted the data. A narrative and qualitative approach was used to summarize the findings. Out of the 118 identified articles, 21 met the eligibility criteria. Population pharmacokinetic modeling was performed in 12 studies, while nine studies reported data from bedside monitoring of beta-lactams. Most studies were conducted in the United States of America (n = 9) and France (n = 5) and reported PK/PD data of amoxicillin, ampicillin, azlocillin, aztreonam, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftaroline, ceftazidime, doripenem, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam. Therapeutic targets ranged from to 40% fT> MIC to 100% fT> 6 × MIC. Prolonging the infusion time and frequency were most described strategies to increase target attainment. Monitoring beta-lactam serum concentrations in clinical practice may potentially maximize therapeutic target attainment. Further studies are required to define the therapeutic target associated with the best clinical outcomes.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Optimization of Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and the Influence of Concomitant Renal Replacement Therapy

Critical illness and extracorporeal circulation, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), may alter the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam. We aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients during ECMO or CRRT and investigate the optimal dosage regimen needed to achieve ≥90% of patients attaining the piperacillin pharmacodynamic target of 100% of dosage time above MIC of 16 mg/L. This prospective observational study included 26 ECMO patients, of which 13 patients received continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects models, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate creatinine clearance (CrCL) and infusion method in relation to the probability of target attainment (PTA) in four patient groups according to combination of ECMO and CVVHDF. A total of 244 plasma samples were collected. In a two-compartment model, clearance decreased during ECMO and CVVHDF contributed to an increase in the volume of distribution. The range of PTA reduction as CrCL increased was greater in the order of intermittent bolus, extended infusion, and continuous infusion method. Continuous infusion should be considered in critically ill patients with CrCL of ≥60 mL/min, and at least 12, 16, and 20 g/day was required for CrCL of <40, 40 to 60, and 60 to 90 mL/min, respectively, regardless of ECMO or CVVHDF. In patients with CrCL of ≥90 mL/min, even a continuous infusion of 24 g/day was insufficient to achieve adequate PTA. Therefore, further research on permissible high continuous infusion dose focused on the risk of toxicity is required. (This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02581280, December 1, 2014.)

IMPORTANCE To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large prospective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study of piperacillin-tazobactam in ECMO patients. We used piperacillin-tazobactam plasma concentration data from four different cases (concomitant use of ECMO and CVVHDF, receiving ECMO only, weaned from ECMO and receiving CVVHDF, and weaned from ECMO and not receiving CVVHDF) to provide preliminary insights into the incremental effects of critical illness, ECMO, and CVVHDF on PK. Our analysis revealed that volume of distribution increased in patients on CVVHDF and clearance decreased during ECMO and as creatinine clearance was reduced. When targeting 100% fT_>MIC (16 mg/L, clinical breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa), continuous infusions would have achieved the highest percentage of target attainment compared to intermittent bolus or extended infusion if the total daily dose was the same. Continuous infusion should be considered in critically ill patients with creatinine clearance of ≥60 mL/min, regardless of ECMO or CVVHDF.

Comparative Plasma and Interstitial Tissue Fluid Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem Demonstrate the Need for Increasing Dose and Infusion Duration in Obese and Non-obese Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A quantitative evaluation of the PK of meropenem, a broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic, in plasma and interstitial space fluid (ISF) of subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese patients is lacking as of date. The objective of this study was the characterisation of meropenem population pharmacokinetics in plasma and ISF in obese and non-obese patients for identification of adequate dosing regimens via Monte-Carlo simulations.

METHODS

We obtained plasma and microdialysate concentrations after administration of meropenem 1000 mg to 15 obese and 15 non-obese surgery patients from a prospective clinical trial. After characterizing plasma- and microdialysis-derived ISF pharmacokinetics via population pharmacokinetic analysis, we simulated thrice-daily (TID) meropenem short-term (0.5 h), prolonged (3.0 h), and continuous infusions. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) analysis based on time unbound concentrations exceeded minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) on treatment day 1 (%fT _{> MIC}) and the sum of PTA weighted by relative frequency of MIC values for infections by pathogens commonly treated with meropenem. To avoid interstitial tissue fluid concentrations below MIC for the entire dosing interval during continuous infusions, a more conservative PK/PD index was selected (%fT _{> 4 × MIC}).

RESULTS

Adjusted body weight (ABW) and calculated creatinine clearance (CLCR_{CG_ABW}) of all patients (body mass index [BMI] = 20.5-81.5 kg/m²) explained a considerable proportion of the between-patient pharmacokinetic variability (15.1-31.0% relative reduction). The ISF:plasma ratio of %fT _{> MIC} was relatively similar for MIC ≤ 2 mg/L but decreased for MIC = 8 mg/L over ABW = 60-120 kg (0.50-0.20). Steady-state concentrations were 2.68 times (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.11-3.37) higher in plasma than in ISF, supporting PK/PD targets related to four times the MIC during continuous infusions to avoid suspected ISF concentrations constantly below the MIC. A 3000 mg/24 h continuous infusion was sufficient at MIC = 2 mg/L for patients with CLCR_{CG_ABW} ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW < 90 kg, whereas 2000 mg TID prolonged infusions were adequate for those with CLCR_{CG_ABW} ≤ 100 mL/min and ABW > 90 kg. For MIC = 2 mg/L and %fT_{> MIC} = 95, PTA was adequate in patients over the entire investigated range of body mass and renal function using a 6000 mg continuous infusion. A prolonged infusion of meropenem 2000 mg TID was sufficient for MIC ≤ 8 mg/L and all investigated ABW and CLCR_{CG_ABW} when employing the PK/PD target %fT _{> MIC} = 40. Short-term infusions of 1000 mg TID were sufficient for CLCR_{CG_ABW} ≤ 130 mL/min and distributions of MIC values for Escherichia coli, Citrobacter freundii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicated a need for higher doses (≥ 2000 mg) and prolonged infusions (≥ 3 h) for obese and non-obese patients at MIC ≥ 2 mg/L. Higher PTA was achieved with prolonged infusions in obese patients and with continuous infusions in non-obese patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2012-004383-22.

Continuous infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam significantly improves target attainment in children with cancer and fever

Background

Children with febrile neutropenia commonly exhibit alterations of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, leading to decreased β‐lactam concentrations.

Aims

This study evaluated piperacillin PK and probability of target attainment (PTA) with continuous infusion of piperacillin‐tazobactam, in order to optimize the dosing regimen.

Methods

This prospective PK study included children with cancer, aged 1–17 years, who were treated with piperacillin‐tazobactam for suspected or verified infection. A piperacillin‐tazobactam loading dose (100 mg/kg) was administered followed by continuous infusion (300 mg/kg/day). The unbound fraction of piperacillin was quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography and PK were described using population PK modeling. PK data was used to update and extend a previous PK model built on data following intermittent administration. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess PTA for targets of 100% time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (100% fT > MIC) and 50% fT > 4xMIC.

Results

We included 68 fever episodes among 38 children with a median (IQR) age of 6.5 years and body weight of 27.4 kg (15.1–54.0). A three‐compartment model adequately described the concentration‐time data. Median (95% confidence interval) estimates for clearance and piperacillin concentration at steady state were 14.2 L/h/70 kg (13.0; 15.3) and 47.6 mg/L (17.2; 129.5), respectively. Body weight or lean body weight was significantly associated with the PK parameters, and body weight was integrated in the final PK model. Based on piperacillin exposure, continuous infusion was the only dosing regimen to achieve optimal PTA for the P. aeruginosa breakpoint (16 mg/L) with the target of 100% fT > MIC, and a daily dose of 300 mg/kg reached optimal PTA. The strict target of 50% fT > 4xMIC (64 mg/L) was not feasibly attained by any dosing regimen at recommended doses.

Conclusion

Unlike conventional piperacillin intermittent administration and extended infusion regimens, continuous infusion allows the target of 100% fT > MIC to be reached for children with febrile neutropenia.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: an ASAP ECMO Study

Our study aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of piperacillin and tazobactam in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), with and without renal replacement therapy (RRT). We also aimed to use dosing simulations to identify the optimal dosing strategy for these patient groups. Serial piperacillin and tazobactam plasma concentrations were measured with data analyzed using a population PK approach that included staged testing of patient and treatment covariates. Dosing simulations were conducted to identify the optimal dosing strategy that achieved piperacillin target exposures of 50% and 100% fraction of time free drug concentration is above MIC (%fT_>MIC) and toxic exposures of greater than 360 mg/liter. The tazobactam target of percentage of time free concentrations of >2 mg/liter was also assessed. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, of which 14 patients were receiving concurrent RRT. Piperacillin and tazobactam were both adequately described by two-compartment models, with body mass index, creatinine clearance, and RRT as significant predictors of PK. There were no substantial differences between observed PK parameters and published parameters from non-ECMO patients. Based on dosing simulations, a 4.5-g every 6 hours regimen administered over 4 hours achieves high probabilities of efficacy at a piperacillin MIC of 16 mg/liter while exposing patients to a <3% probability of toxic concentrations. In patients receiving ECMO and RRT, a frequency reduction to every 12 hours dosing lowers the probability of toxic concentrations, although this remains at 7 to 9%. In ECMO patients, piperacillin and tazobactam should be dosed in line with standard recommendations for the critically ill.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin and Meropenem in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

Objective: Describe primary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of vancomycin and meropenem in pediatric patients undergoing ECMO and analyze utilized dosing to reach PK/PD target.

Design: Prospective, multicentric, population PK analysis.

Setting: Two hospitals with pediatric intensive care unit.

Patients: Pediatric patients (1 month - 15 years old) receiving vancomycin and meropenem for empiric or definitive infection treatment while ECMO support.

Measurements and Main Results: Four serum concentration were obtained for patients receiving vancomycin (n = 9) and three for meropenem (n = 9). The PK/PD target for vancomycin was a ratio of the area under the curve to the minimal inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) of >400, and for meropenem was 4 times above MIC for 50% of the dosing interval (fT_50% > 4xMIC). Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed using PMetrics 1.5.0. We included nine patients, with 11 PK profiles for each antimicrobial. The median age of patients was 4 years old (2 months - 13 years) and 45% were male. Creatinine clearance (CL) was 183 (30–550) ml/min/1.73 m². The median dose was 13.6 (range 10–15) mg/kg every 6–12 h and 40 mg/kg every 8–12 h for vancomycin and meropenem, respectively. Two compartment models were fitted. Weight was included as a covariate on volume of the central compartment (Vc) for meropenem. Weight was included as a covariate on both Vc and clearance (CL) and serum creatinine was also included as a covariate on CL for vancomycin. The pharmacokinetic parameters CL and Vc were 0.139 ± 0.102 L/h/kg and 0.289 ± 0.295 L/kg for meropenem and 0.060 ± 0.055 L/h/kg and 0.419 ± 0.280 L/kg for vancomycin, respectively. Across each dosing interval 91% of patients achieved the PK/PD targets for adequate exposure for meropenem and 63.6% for vancomycin.

Conclusion: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic objectives for vancomycin were achieved partially with conventional doses and higher dosing with extended infusion were needed in the case of meropenem.

Similar Piperacillin/Tazobactam Target Attainment in Obese versus Nonobese Patients despite Differences in Interstitial Tissue Fluid Pharmacokinetics

Precision dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in obese patients is compromised by sparse information on target-site exposure. We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of current and alternative piperacillin/tazobactam dosages in obese and nonobese patients. Based on a prospective, controlled clinical trial in 30 surgery patients (15 obese/15 nonobese; 0.5-h infusion of 4 g/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam), piperacillin pharmacokinetics were characterized in plasma and at target-site (interstitial fluid of subcutaneous adipose tissue) via population analysis. Thereafter, multiple 3-4-times daily piperacillin/tazobactam short-term/prolonged (recommended by EUCAST) and continuous infusions were evaluated by simulation. Adequacy of therapy was assessed by probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target-attainment (PTA ≥ 90%) based on time unbound piperacillin concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) during 24 h (%fT>MIC). Lower piperacillin target-site maximum concentrations in obese versus nonobese patients were explained by the impact of lean (approximately two thirds) and fat body mass (approximately one third) on volume of distribution. Simulated steady-state concentrations were 1.43-times, 95%CI = (1.27; 1.61), higher in plasma versus target-site, supporting targets of %fT>2×MIC instead of %fT>4×MIC during continuous infusion to avoid target-site concentrations constantly below MIC. In all obesity and renally impairment/hyperfiltration stages, at MIC = 16 mg/L, adequate PTA required prolonged (thrice-daily 4 g/0.5 g over 3.0 h at %fT>MIC = 50) or continuous infusions (24 g/3 g over 24 h following loading dose at %fT>MIC = 98) of piperacillin/tazobactam.

Meropenem concentrations in brain tissue of neurointensive care patients exceed CSF levels

BACKGROUND

Inadequate antibiotic exposure in cerebral infections might have detrimental effects on clinical outcome. Commonly, antibiotic concentrations within the CSF were used to estimate cerebral target levels. However, the actual pharmacological active unbound drug concentration beyond the blood-brain barrier is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare meropenem concentrations in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate of neurointensive care patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 12 patients suffering subarachnoid haemorrhage, 2000 mg of meropenem was administered every 8 h due to an extracerebral infection. Meropenem concentrations were determined in blood, CSF and cerebral microdialysate at steady state (n = 11) and following single-dose administration (n = 5).

RESULTS

At steady state, the free AUC0-8 was 233.2 ± 42.7 mg·h/L in plasma, 7.8 ± 1.9 mg·h/L in CSF and 26.6 ± 14.0 mg·h/L in brain tissue. The brain tissue penetration ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma) was 0.11 ± 0.06, which was more than 3 times higher than in CSF (0.03 ± 0.01), resulting in an AUCCSF/AUCbrain ratio of 0.41 ± 0.16 at steady state. After single-dose administration similar proportions were achieved (AUCbrain/AUCplasma = 0.09 ± 0.08; AUCCSF/AUCplasma = 0.02 ± 0.00). Brain tissue concentrations correlated well with CSF concentrations (R = 0.74, P < 0.001), but only moderately with plasma concentrations (R = 0.51, P < 0.001). Bactericidal thresholds were achieved in both plasma and brain tissue for MIC values ≤16 mg/L. In CSF, bactericidal effects were only reached for MIC values ≤1 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Meropenem achieves sufficient bactericidal concentrations for the most common bacterial strains of cerebral infections in both plasma and brain tissue, even in non-inflamed brain tissue. CSF concentrations would highly underestimate the target site activity of meropenem beyond the blood-brain barrier.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia: subset analysis of the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled phase 3 trial

Background

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) at double the dose approved for other infection sites. Among nosocomial pneumonia subtypes, ventilated HABP (vHABP) is associated with the lowest survival. In the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled trial, participants with vHABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) than those receiving meropenem. We conducted a series of post hoc analyses to explore the clinical significance of this finding.

Methods

ASPECT-NP was a multinational, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating vHABP and VABP; study design, efficacy, and safety results have been reported previously. The primary endpoint was 28-day ACM. The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at test-of-cure. Participants with vHABP were a prospectively defined subgroup, but subgroup analyses were not powered for noninferiority testing. We compared baseline and treatment factors, efficacy, and safety between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in participants with vHABP. We also conducted a retrospective multivariable logistic regression analysis in this subgroup to determine the impact of treatment arm on mortality when adjusted for significant prognostic factors.

Results

Overall, 99 participants in the ceftolozane/tazobactam and 108 in the meropenem arm had vHABP. 28-day ACM was 24.2% and 37.0%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference: 0.2, 24.8) and 18.2% and 36.6%, respectively, in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (95% CI 2.5, 32.5). Clinical cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 50.5% and 44.4%, respectively (95% CI − 7.4, 19.3). Baseline clinical, baseline microbiologic, and treatment factors were comparable between treatment arms. Multivariable regression identified concomitant vasopressor use and baseline bacteremia as significantly impacting ACM in ASPECT-NP; adjusting for these two factors, the odds of dying by day 28 were 2.3-fold greater when participants received meropenem instead of ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Conclusions

There were no underlying differences between treatment arms expected to have biased the observed survival advantage with ceftolozane/tazobactam in the vHABP subgroup. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors found to impact ACM significantly in this trial, the mortality risk in participants with vHABP was over twice as high when treated with meropenem compared with ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070757. Registered 25 February, 2014, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02070757.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03694-3.

Determining the optimal dosing of a novel combination regimen of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam against NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae using a hollow-fibre infection model

BACKGROUND

MBL-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae are a major public health concern. We sought to define optimal combination regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) of MBL-producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

METHODS

E. coli ARLG-1013 (blaNDM-1, blaCTX-M, blaCMY, blaTEM) and K. pneumoniae ARLG-1002 (blaNDM-1, blaCTXM-15, blaDHA, blaSHV, blaTEM) were studied in the HFIM using simulated human dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam. Experiments were designed to evaluate the effect of staggered versus simultaneous administration, infusion duration and aztreonam daily dose (6 g/day versus 8 g/day) on bacterial killing and resistance suppression. Prospective validation experiments for the most active combination regimens were performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.

RESULTS

Staggered administration of the combination (ceftazidime/avibactam followed by aztreonam) was found to be inferior to simultaneous administration. Longer infusion durations (2 h and continuous infusion) also resulted in enhanced bacterial killing relative to 30 min infusions. The rate of killing was more pronounced with 8 g/day versus 6 g/day aztreonam combination regimens for both tested strains. In the prospective validation experiments, ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam dosed every 8 and 6 h, respectively (ceftazidime/avibactam 2/0.5 g every 8 h + aztreonam 2 g every 6 h), or ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam as continuous infusions resulted in maximal bacterial killing and resistance suppression over 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous administration of aztreonam 8 g/day given as a continuous or 2 h infusion with ceftazidime/avibactam resulted in complete bacterial eradication and resistance suppression. Further study of this combination is needed with additional MBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens. The safety of this double β-lactam strategy also warrants further study in Phase 1 clinical trials.

Cefiderocol: a novel siderophore cephalosporin for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin that forms a complex with extracellular free ferric iron, which leads to transportation across the outer cell membrane to exert its bactericidal activity through cell wall synthesis inhibition. This pharmacological property has rendered cefiderocol active against several clinically relevant MDR Gram-negative bacteria as evidenced by several in vitro and in vivo studies. Cefiderocol was first approved by the US FDA on 14 November 2019 for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections. On 28 September 2020, cefiderocol was approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. The FDA-approved indications are based on clinical data from the APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR trials. In APEKS-cUTI, cefiderocol demonstrated non-inferiority to imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria. In APEKS-NP, cefiderocol demonstrated non-inferiority to meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. However, in CREDIBLE-CR, higher all-cause mortality was observed with cefiderocol compared with best available therapy for the treatment of severe infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, primarily in the subset of patients with Acinetobacter spp. infections. Several case reports/series have demonstrated clinical success with cefiderocol for a variety of severe infections. The purpose of this article is to review available data on the mechanism of action, in vitro and in vivo data, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, susceptibility testing, efficacy and safety of cefiderocol to address its role in therapy.

Meropenem, Cefepime, and Piperacillin Protein Binding in Patient Samples

BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of patients with a drug-resistant bacterial infection is high, as are the associated treatment costs. To overcome these issues, optimization of the available therapeutic options is required. Beta-lactams are time-dependent antibiotics and their efficacy is determined by the amount of time the free concentration remains above the minimum inhibitory concentration. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the extent and variability of protein binding for meropenem, cefepime, and piperacillin.

METHODS

Plasma samples for the analysis of meropenem, cefepime, and piperacillin were collected from patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital as part of the standard care. The bound and unbound drug fractions in the samples were separated by ultrafiltration. Validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays were used to quantify the total and free plasma concentrations, and the protein binding was determined.

RESULTS

Samples from 95 patients were analyzed. The median (range) age of patients was 56 years (17-87) and the median (range) body mass index was 25.7 kg/m (14.7-74.2). Approximately 59% of the patients were men. The median (range) unbound fraction (fu) was 62.5% (41.6-99.1) for meropenem, 61.4% (51.6-99.2) for cefepime, and 48.3% (39.4-71.3) for piperacillin. In the bivariate analysis, as the total meropenem concentration increased, the fu increased (r = 0.37, P = 0.045). A decrease in piperacillin fu was observed as the albumin concentration increased (r = -0.56, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The average fu values were lower than those reported in the literature. There was also a large variability in fu; hence, it should be considered when managing patients administered with these drugs through direct measurements of free drug concentrations.

Towards precision medicine: Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing of vancomycin and β-lactam antibiotics to maximize effectiveness and minimize toxicity

PURPOSE

The goal of this review is to explore the role of antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), especially in critically ill, obese, and older adults, with a specific focus on β-lactams and vancomycin.

SUMMARY

The continued rise of antimicrobial resistance prompts the need to optimize antimicrobial dosing. The aim of TDM is to individualize antimicrobial dosing to achieve antibiotic exposures associated with improved patient outcomes. Initially, TDM was developed to minimize adverse effects during use of narrow therapeutic index agents. Today, patient and organism complexity are expanding the need for precision dosing through TDM services. Alterations of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) in the critically ill, obese, and older adult populations, in conjunction with declining organism susceptibility, complicate attainment of therapeutic targets. Over the last decade, antimicrobial TDM has expanded with the emergence of literature supporting β-lactam TDM and a shift from monitoring vancomycin trough concentrations to monitoring of the ratio of area under the concentration (AUC) curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). PK/PD experts should be at the forefront of implementing precision dosing practices.

CONCLUSION

Precision dosing through TDM is expanding and is especially important in populations with altered PK/PD, including critically ill, obese, and older adults. Due to wide PK/PD variability in these populations, TDM is vital to maximize antimicrobial effectiveness and decrease adverse event rates. However, there is still a need for studies connecting TDM to patient outcomes. Providing patient-specific care through β-lactam TDM and transitioning to vancomycin AUC/MIC monitoring may be challenging, but with experts at the forefront of this initiative, PK-based optimization of antimicrobial therapy can be achieved.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Intensive Care Units: A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses

Piperacillin-tazobactam is a potent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic commonly prescribed in the intensive care unit setting. Admitted patients often show large variability in treatment response due to multiple pathophysiological changes present in this population that alter the drug's pharmacokinetics. This review summarizes the population pharmacokinetic models developed for piperacillin-tazobactam and provides comprehensive data on current dosing strategies while identifying significant covariates in critically ill patients. A literature search on the PubMed database was conducted, from its inception to July 2020. Relevant articles were retained if they met the defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of ten studies, published between 2009 and 2020, were eligible. One- and two-compartment models were used in two and eight studies, respectively. The lowest estimated piperacillin clearance value was 3.12 L/h, and the highest value was 19.9 L/h. The estimations for volume of distribution varied between 11.2 and 41.2 L. Tazobactam clearance values ranged between 5.1 and 6.78 L/h, and tazobactam volume of distribution values ranged between 17.5 and 76.1 L. The most frequent covariates were creatinine clearance and body weight, each present in four studies. Almost all studies used an exponential approach for the interindividual variability. The highest variability was observed in piperacillin central volume of distribution, at a value of 75.0%. Simulations showed that continuous or extended infusion methods performed better than intermittent administration to achieve appropriate pharmacodynamic targets. This review synthesizes important pharmacokinetic elements for piperacillin-tazobactam in an intensive care unit setting. This will help clinicians better understand changes in the drug's pharmacokinetic parameters in this specific population.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment in Adult and Pediatric Patients Following Administration of Ceftaroline Fosamil as a 5-Minute Infusion

The key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) efficacy index for β-lactam antibiotics is the percentage of time that free drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of bacteria during each dosing interval (fT>MIC). Ceftaroline fosamil, the prodrug of the β-lactam ceftaroline, was initially approved for administration as 60-minute intravenous (IV) infusions. Population PK analyses comparing exposure and PK/PD target attainment for 5-minute and 60-minute IV infusions, described here, have supported ceftaroline fosamil labeling updates to include variable infusion durations of 5 to 60 minutes in adults and children aged ≥2 months. A 2-compartment disposition PK model for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline was used to predict steady-state ceftaroline exposures (maximum plasma concentrations [Cmax,ss ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over 24 hours [AUCss,0-24 ]) and probability of target attainment in simulated adult and pediatric patients with various degrees of renal function receiving standard doses of ceftaroline fosamil as 5-minute or 60-minute IV infusions. Across age groups and renal function categories, median ceftaroline AUCss,0-24 values were similar for 5-minute and 60-minute infusions, whereas Cmax,ss was up to 42% higher for 5-minute infusions. Both infusion durations achieved >99% probability of target attainment based on PK/PD targets for Staphylococcus aureus (35% fT>MIC) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (44% fT>MIC) at European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing/Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute MIC breakpoints (1 mg/L and 0.25/0.5 mg/L, respectively). These findings support administration of standard ceftaroline fosamil doses over 5 to 60 minutes for adults and children aged ≥2 months, providing added flexibility to clinicians and patients.

Short and long term impact of combining restrictive and enabling interventions to reduce aztreonam consumption in a community hospital

Background Antimicrobial stewardship initiatives combining restrictive and enabling components may be an effective strategy to achieve short- and long-term objectives. Aztreonam, a relatively high-cost antipseudomonal antibiotic, is an appropriate target for stewardship initiatives based on propensity for overuse in penicillin allergy, an activity profile often warranting additional empiric gram-negative and gram-positive coverage, and a unique durability to Ambler class B metallo-beta-lactamases. Objective Analyze the immediate and long-term impact on aztreonam prescribing of combining restrictive and enabling interventions. Setting Single 233-bed community hospital with 45 adult intensive care unit beds in Nashville, Tennessee. Method Retrospective, interrupted time series analysis comparing all patients receiving aztreonam prior to intervention between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011 and following intervention between October 1, 2011 and September 30, 2019. Quarterly defined daily doses/1000 adjusted patient days and microbiology laboratory annual surveillance data were utilized for analysis. Main outcome measure Post-intervention change in trend of aztreonam consumption. Results Following intervention, a significant decline in aztreonam consumption was observed (- 1.97 defined daily doses/1000 adjusted patient days; p = 0.003) resulting in a sustained decrease in aztreonam consumption from 2011 (3rd quarter) to 2019 (3rd quarter) from 15.2 to 0.26 defined daily doses/1000 adjusted patient days. Short-term group 2 carbapenem consumption increased (p = 0.044). Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility to aztreonam improved from 2011 to 2018 (72% vs. 84%; p = 0.0004) without deleterious effects to alternative antipseudomonal beta-lactams. Conclusion Combining restrictive and enabling interventions had immediate and sustained impact on aztreonam consumption with P. aeruginosa susceptibility improvement.

A guide to therapeutic drug monitoring of β-lactam antibiotics

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) opens the door to personalized medicine, yet it is infrequently applied to β-lactam antibiotics, one of the most commonly prescribed drug classes in the hospital setting. As we continue to understand more about β-lactam pharmacodynamics (PD) and wide inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), the utility of TDM has become increasingly apparent. For β-lactams, the time that free concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as a function of the dosing interval (%fT>MIC) has been shown to best predict antibacterial effect. Many studies have shown that β-lactam %fT>MIC exposures are often suboptimal across a wide variety of disease states and clinical settings. A limitation to implementing this practice is the general lack of understanding on how to best operationalize this intervention and interpret the results. The instrumentation and expertise needed to quantify β-lactams for TDM is rarely available locally, but certain laboratories advertise these services and perform them regularly. Familiarity with the modalities and nuances of antimicrobial susceptibility testing is crucial to establishing β-lactam concentration targets that meet the relevant exposure thresholds. Evaluation of these concentrations is best accomplished using population PK software and Bayesian modeling, for which a multitude of programs are available. While TDM of β-lactams has shown an ability to increase the rate of target attainment, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that it leads to improved clinical outcomes. Although consensus guidelines for β-lactam TDM do not exist in the United States, guidance would help to promote this important practice and better standardize the approach across institutions. Herein, we discuss the basis for β-lactam TDM, review supporting evidence, and provide guidance for implementation in specific patient populations.