Trastuzumab plus Paclitaxel or Docetaxel in HER‐2–Negative/HER‐2 ECD–Positive Anthracycline‐ and Taxane‐Refractory Advanced Breast Cancer

Alteronol Enhances the Anti-tumor Activity and Reduces the Toxicity of High-Dose Adriamycin in Breast Cancer

The first-line chemotherapy drug adriamycin (ADM) is widely used for the treatment of breast cancer, but the acquired drug resistance and the normal tissue toxicity remain clinical challenges. Alteronol has been reported to exert wide-ranging anti-tumor activity. In this study, we firstly examined the synergistic anti-tumor effects and the underlying mechanisms of alteronol combined with ADM in breast cancer. We have found that the combination of alteronol and ADM significantly suppressed the expression levels of the cell cycle-related proteins (CDC2 and Cyclin B1) and induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, leading to cell proliferation inhibition in breast cancer 4T1 cells. Moreover, co-treatment of alteronol and ADM (i) remarkably activated p38 and JNK kinases, (ii) elevated ROS levels, (iii) triggered mitochondrial dysfunction, (iv) released cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, (v) upregulated apoptosis-related proteins, e.g., cleaved PARP, Bax, and cleaved caspase-3/9, and (vi) downregulated the expression of Bcl-2, followed by apoptosis. Furthermore, our in vivo studies showed that the low-dose combination of alteronol (2 mg/kg) and ADM (1 mg/kg) significantly inhibited tumor growth in tumor bearing mice, and the anti-tumor effect of the combination was the same as that of high-dose ADM (8 mg/kg). In addition, the low-dose combination group showed lower toxicities to major organs than the high-dose ADM group. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the low-dose combination of alteronol and ADM could notably improve the anti-tumor activity and have lower toxicities to major organs than those in high-dose ADM group.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumour activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201), a HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with advanced breast and gastric or gastro-oesophageal tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation study

BACKGROUND

Antibody-drug conjugates have emerged as a powerful strategy in cancer therapy and combine the ability of monoclonal antibodies to specifically target tumour cells with the highly potent killing activity of drugs with payloads too toxic for systemic administration. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (also known as DS-8201) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprised of a humanised antibody against HER2, a novel enzyme-cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. We assessed its safety and tolerability in patients with advanced breast and gastric or gastro-oesophageal tumours.

METHODS

This was an open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial done at two study sites in Japan. Eligible patients were at least 20 years old with breast or gastric or gastro-oesophageal carcinomas refractory to standard therapy regardless of HER2 status. Participants received initial intravenous doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan from 0·8 to 8·0 mg/kg and dose-limiting toxicities were assessed over a 21-day cycle; thereafter, dose reductions were implemented as needed and patients were treated once every 3 weeks until they had unacceptable toxic effects or their disease progressed. Primary endpoints included identification of safety and the maximum tolerated dose or recommended phase 2 dosing and were analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The dose-escalation study is the first part of a two-part study with the second dose-expansion part ongoing and enrolling patients as of July 8, 2017, in Japan and the USA. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02564900.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 28, 2015, and Aug 26, 2016, 24 patients were enrolled and received trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=3 for each of 0·8, 1·6, 3·2, and 8·0 mg/kg doses; n=6 for each of 5·4 and 6·4 mg/kg). Up to the study cutoff date of Feb 1, 2017, no dose-limiting toxic effects, substantial cardiovascular toxic effects, or deaths occurred. One patient was removed from the activity analysis because they had insufficient target lesions for analysis. The most common grade 3 adverse events were decreased lymphocyte (n=3) and decreased neutrophil count (n=2); and grade 4 anaemia was reported by one patient. Three serious adverse events-febrile neutropenia, intestinal perforation, and cholangitis-were reported by one patient each. Overall, in 23 evaluable patients, including six patients with low HER2-expressing tumours, ten patients achieved an objective response (43%, 95% CI 23·2-65·5). Disease control was achieved in 21 (91%; 95% CI 72·0-98·9) of 23 patients. Median follow-up time was 6·7 months (IQR 4·4-10·2), with nine (90%) of ten responses seen at doses of 5·4 mg/kg or greater.

INTERPRETATION

The maximum tolerated dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan was not reached. In this small, heavily pretreated study population, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed antitumour activity, even in low HER2-expressing tumours. Based on safety and activity, the most likely recommended phase 2 dosing is 5·4 or 6·4 mg/kg.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd.

Meaningful interpretation of serum HER2 ECD levels requires clear patient clinical background, and serves several functions in the efficient management of breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

This study was initiated to evaluate the clinical significant of HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) in the real-time management of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Five-hundred forty-six eligible breast cancer patients were divided according to their clinical background. The correlation between ECD, tissue HER2, and clinical outcome of the patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that ECD measured before receiving neoadjuvant therapy yielded the highest area under the curve (0.9185; P<0.0001), indicating that ECD and tissue HER2 levels are consistent in untreated tumor-bearing patients. At cut-off of 15.0ng/ml, the prognostic value of ECD was demonstrated using univariate (HR=1.664, P<0.0001) and multivariate (HR=1.547, P=0.011) Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with elevated ECD had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (4.0 vs. 6.1months, P<0.0001). Elevated ECD was also an adverse predictor for PFS in response to anti-HER2 therapy (4.3 vs. 10.2months, P=0.0155). In contrast, ≥20%, decreased ECD was associated with longer PFS in patients who received anti-HER2 therapy (10.9 vs. 2.4months, P=0.0164) and overall (10.7 vs. 2.8months, P=0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

A patient's clinical history can help determine whether ECD could provide added value for breast cancer management.

Pharmacogenomic biomarkers as inclusion criteria in clinical trials of oncology-targeted drugs: a mapping of ClinicalTrials.gov

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe pharmacogenomics-based inclusion criteria (enrichment) and the main characteristics of clinical trials involving oncology-targeted therapies.

METHODS

Clinical trials of oncology-targeted therapies approved after 2005 with pharmacogenomic testing required or recommended in their label were retrieved from a mapping of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

RESULTS

We examined information for 12 drugs and 858 trials. Overall, 434 trials (51%) were enriched on the biomarker first mentioned in the label and 145 (17%) were enriched on another biomarker, whereas 270 trials (31%) included all patients. The median proportion of trials corresponding to both the drug's indication and drug's target was 35%. Of the 361 trials that tested drugs in another disease than the first one in the label, 219 (61%) were without enrichment and 87 (24%) were actually enriched but on another biomarker than the first one in the label.

CONCLUSION

Several drugs have been tested in trials enriched on many different biomarkers. Nonetheless, most targeted therapies have been developed only using biomarker-positive patients; therefore, exclusion of biomarker-negative patients from treatment relies on only preclinical data and on biological understanding of the disease and target.Genet Med 18 8, 796-805.

Serum HER2 extracellular domain as a potential alternative for tissue HER2 status in metastatic gastric cancer patients

AIM

We investigated whether serum concentrations of the HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) can be used as an alternative to test tissue HER2 status in metastatic gastric cancer.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 133 cases of metastatic gastric cancer were included in present study. Serum HER2 ECD was measured by chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine optimal serum HER2 ECD concentrations for differentiation between positive and negative HER2 status.

RESULTS

The median level of serum HER2 ECD was 9.6 ng/ml in metastatic gastric cancer patients. There was a significant relationship between serum and tissue levels of HER2 protein (p < 0.001). Area under the curve for serum HER2 ECD was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.682-0.860).

CONCLUSION

Levels of serum HER2 ECD are highly correlated with tissue HER2 status in metastatic gastric cancer. Serum HER2 ECD assay can be considered as a potential alternative for tissue HER2 status.

Life-threatening metastasis was suppressed by trastuzumab containing regimen in a patient with Her2-negative breast cancer

A 49-year-old female was referred to our hospital with left breast cancer and subsequently underwent mastectomy and axillary dissection. The pathological findings showed invasive breast cancer with lymph node metastasis (2/22), nuclear grade 3, ER (6+) PgR (2+) for the Allred score, and Her2 (2+) in an immunohistochemistry. We determined the subtype of Her2-negative breast cancer according to the fluorescent in situ hybridization results, as follows: Her2/CEP17 ratio 1.1 < 2.0. The patient received the EC regimen followed by docetaxel, and toremifene was subsequently administered. One year after the operation, the CA15-3 level was elevated at 50 ng/ml, and CT revealed liver metastases. Disease progression was not suppressed by paclitaxel containing regimen and eribulin. Then, we subsequently sought to determine whether the metastatic lesion showed the Her2 expression. Although the Her2 expression in the axillary lymph node metastases showed heterogeneous staining, the results were judged as Her2 (1+) according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines. We decided to administer trastuzumab and docetaxel due to the patient's life-threatening status, after which the CA15-3 level decreased and the symptom of fatigue improved. A total of 9 cycles of trastuzumab and docetaxel were administered, followed by maintenance trastuzumab continued to the present time. Physicians should be aware of the statement in the ASCO/CAP guidelines that the clinical decision to ultimately consider Her2-targeted therapy should be individualized according to the patient's status.

Comparison of the 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP evaluation systems for HER2 amplification in breast cancer

It has been proven that chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) amplification causes misleading human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results, precluding anti-HER2-based therapy in some patients with breast carcinoma. We used the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) scoring criteria to evaluate HER2 amplification status in 175 cases of breast carcinoma with chromosome 17 polysomy. We used immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the HER2 amplification status, and 2-color FISH to detect CEP17, and reviewed the results of initial evaluation using the 2007 ASCO/CAP criteria. Of the 175 cases, 17, 95, and 63 were IHC 0/1+, 2+, and 3+, respectively. Evaluation of IHC HER2 status according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria identified significantly more HER2-positive cases compared to cases evaluated using the 2007 criteria (p<0.05). When the FISH results were evaluated in parallel with the 2013 criteria, we found that 22 cases were not HER2-negative despite the presence of polysomy 17, which, according to the 2013 criteria, indicates HER2-positive status. Our findings indicate that in breast carcinoma, HER2 status in the presence of polysomy 17 may vary with the scoring criteria used. In turn, performing FISH and evaluating samples using the 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria means that more patients with breast cancer may be appropriate for targeted treatment with trastuzumab, potentially improving their outcome.

Signaling pathways in breast cancer: therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Understanding the biology of this malignant disease is a prerequisite for selecting an appropriate treatment. Cell cycle alterations are seen in many cancers, including breast cancer. Newly popular targeted agents in breast cancer include cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) which are agents inhibiting the function of cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and agents targeting proto-oncogenic signaling pathways like Notch, Wnt, and SHH (Sonic hedgehog). CDKIs are categorized as selective and non-selective inhibitors of CDK. CDKIs have been tried as monotherapy and combination therapy. The CDKI Palbocyclib is now a promising therapeutic in breast cancer. This drug recently entered phase III trial for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer after showing encouraging results in progression free survival in a phase II trials. The tumor microenvironment is now recognized as a significant factor in cancer treatment response. The tumor microenvironment is increasingly considered as a target for combination therapy of breast cancer. Recent findings in the signaling pathways in breast cancer are herein summarized and discussed. Furthermore, the therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment in breast cancer is also considered.

Circulating HER2 Extracellular Domain: A Specific and Quantitative Biomarker of Prognostic Value in all Breast Cancer Patients?

The HER2 oncoprotein has emerged as an essential biomarker in the treatment of breast cancer patients. Once the primary breast cancer is removed, there is an increasing need to detect breast cancer recurrence as early as possible with the hope that earlier intervention with new anti-HER2 therapies will improve quality of life and increase overall survival. Numerous publications have shown that increasing blood levels of circulating HER2 is an early indicator of progression, particularly in HER2-positive patients and that the rise and fall parallels the clinical course of disease and independent of therapy. Many studies show that the HER2 status of the primary tumor may not fully and accurately reflect the HER2 status of recurrent cancer. Thus, elevated serum HER2 levels may be an early signal of the emergence of a HER2-positive metastatic tumor and therefore alert the physician to re-assess HER2 status using a tissue test.

Challenges in the clinical utility of the serum test for HER2 ECD

Approximately 15-30% of breast cancers over-express the HER2/neu receptor. Historically, over-expression of HER2/neu has been identified using IHC or FISH, both of which are invasive approaches requiring tissue samples. Recent evidence has shown that some tumors identified as "negative" using these methods can respond to HER2/neu targeted therapy. Shedding of the extracellular domain (ECD) of the receptor into the circulation has led to the development of a serum test of HER2 ECD as an additional approach to probe HER2/neu overexpression. The serum test will be able to monitor the dynamic changes of HER2 status over the course of disease progression. Some studies further suggest that the serum HER2 ECD level and its change may serve as a biomarker to reflect patients' response to therapy. Yet more than 10years after the first serum HER2 ECD test was approved by the FDA, serum HER2 testing has yet to be widely used in clinical practice. In this article we will review the progress of the serum HER2 ECD test and discuss some obstacles impeding its incorporation into broad clinical practice. We will also discuss recent improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of the assay that offer some hope for the future of serum HER2 test.

Meta-analysis of phase III trials of docetaxel alone or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Whether combination chemotherapy offers an advantage over sequential therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is still an unsettled issue. Polychemotherapy regimens containing taxanes has been shown to increase overall survival (OS), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall response rate (ORR) when compared with regimens that did not contain a taxanes, while taxane-based doublets have a statistically significant benefit over single-agent taxane only for progression-free survival. However, the term "taxanes" generally includes both paclitaxel and docetaxel, drugs with different clinical activity. Aim of this work is to compare OS, TTP, and ORR in patients with MBC receiving docetaxel alone or in combination with chemotherapy using a formal meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all published trials comparing docetaxel alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in MBC.

RESULTS

Three randomized clinical trials including 1,313 patients were retrieved. A significant reduction of risk ratio was found in TTP (P ≤ 0.0001) but not in OS (P = 0.48) or ORR (P = 0.10) for patients treated with a chemotherapy agent plus docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone. Treatment with docetaxel alone is associated with a lower incidence of grade 3 diarrhea and stomatitis (diarrhea, P = 0.011; stomatitis, P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy regimens with docetaxel show a statistically significant advantage for TTP, but not for OS and ORR in MBC. This review confirms that it is unlikely that any single agent or combination chemotherapy regimen will emerge as superior in MBC, due to its heterogeneous nature.

Lapatinib and HER2 status: results of a meta-analysis of randomized phase III trials in metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In vitro studies have shown that lapatinib is most active in HER2 over-expressing tumors, but also has activity in cell lines over-expressing HER1. Consequently, clinical testing of lapatinib has been carried out in both HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients. Here we evaluate the clinical efficacy of lapatinib in HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients.

METHODS

A published data meta-analysis of randomized trials that evaluated the efficacy of combining lapatinib with chemo- or endocrine therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer was undertaken. Hazard ratios (HR) were extracted for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival, while odds ratios were extracted for disease stabilization, serious adverse events (SAEs) and need for discontinuation. Pooled estimates were computed using inverse-variance and random-effect modeling.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials with a total of 2264 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis demonstrated the HR for PFS with lapatinib was 0.69 in patients with HER2-positive disease, while there was no improvement in PFS (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.19) for treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. Similarly, overall survival was improved in HER2-positive patients (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96), but not in HER2-negative patients (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-1.21). Patients on lapatinib were 64% more likely to develop a SAE and 2.3 times more likely to discontinue therapy due to toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Clinical benefit from treatment with lapatinib is limited to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Outside of the clinical trial setting, lapatinib should not be administered to women with HER2-negative disease because it causes increased toxicity without improving disease outcome.

The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss

Auditory brainstem response thresholds for 209 ears with cochlear hearing loss were compared with the pure-tone thresholds. It is shown that the pure-tone threshold in the 2- to 4-kHz region has a one-to-one relationship with the auditory brainstem response threshold. Estimating the pure-tone threshold from the auditory brainstem response threshold, the standard error of the estimate is 11 dB. A small part of this estimation error is due to errors in the measurement of the auditory brainstem response threshold and the mean of the pure-tone thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz. The major part is due to unknown factors that are involved in the physiological relationship between the two thresholds.