1
|
Ghedotti MJ, Gruber JN, Barton RW, Davis MP, Smith WL. Morphology and evolution of bioluminescent organs in the glowbellies (Percomorpha: Acropomatidae) with comments on the taxonomy and phylogeny of Acropomatiformes. J Morphol 2018; 279:1640-1653. [DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryan W. Barton
- Department of Biology; Regis University; Denver Colorado
| | - Matthew P. Davis
- Department of Biological Sciences; St. Cloud State University; St. Cloud Minnesota
| | - W. Leo Smith
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Biodiversity Institute; University of Kansas; Lawrence Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Betancur-R R, Wiley EO, Arratia G, Acero A, Bailly N, Miya M, Lecointre G, Ortí G. Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evol Biol 2017; 17:162. [PMID: 28683774 PMCID: PMC5501477 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 418] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fish classifications, as those of most other taxonomic groups, are being transformed drastically as new molecular phylogenies provide support for natural groups that were unanticipated by previous studies. A brief review of the main criteria used by ichthyologists to define their classifications during the last 50 years, however, reveals slow progress towards using an explicit phylogenetic framework. Instead, the trend has been to rely, in varying degrees, on deep-rooted anatomical concepts and authority, often mixing taxa with explicit phylogenetic support with arbitrary groupings. Two leading sources in ichthyology frequently used for fish classifications (JS Nelson's volumes of Fishes of the World and W. Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes) fail to adopt a global phylogenetic framework despite much recent progress made towards the resolution of the fish Tree of Life. The first explicit phylogenetic classification of bony fishes was published in 2013, based on a comprehensive molecular phylogeny ( www.deepfin.org ). We here update the first version of that classification by incorporating the most recent phylogenetic results. RESULTS The updated classification presented here is based on phylogenies inferred using molecular and genomic data for nearly 2000 fishes. A total of 72 orders (and 79 suborders) are recognized in this version, compared with 66 orders in version 1. The phylogeny resolves placement of 410 families, or ~80% of the total of 514 families of bony fishes currently recognized. The ordinal status of 30 percomorph families included in this study, however, remains uncertain (incertae sedis in the series Carangaria, Ovalentaria, or Eupercaria). Comments to support taxonomic decisions and comparisons with conflicting taxonomic groups proposed by others are presented. We also highlight cases were morphological support exist for the groups being classified. CONCLUSIONS This version of the phylogenetic classification of bony fishes is substantially improved, providing resolution for more taxa than previous versions, based on more densely sampled phylogenetic trees. The classification presented in this study represents, unlike any other, the most up-to-date hypothesis of the Tree of Life of fishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Betancur-R
- Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, P.O. Box 23360, San Juan, PR 00931 USA
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA
| | - Edward O. Wiley
- Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS USA
- Sam Houston State Natural History Collections, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas USA
| | - Gloria Arratia
- Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS USA
| | - Arturo Acero
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Caribe, Cecimar, El Rodadero, Santa Marta, Magdalena Colombia
| | - Nicolas Bailly
- FishBase Information and Research Group, Los Baños, Philippines
| | - Masaki Miya
- Department Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, Japan
| | - Guillaume Lecointre
- Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
| | - Guillermo Ortí
- Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA
- Department of Biology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thacker CE, Satoh TP, Katayama E, Harrington RC, Eytan RI, Near TJ. Molecular phylogeny of Percomorpha resolves Trichonotus as the sister lineage to Gobioidei (Teleostei: Gobiiformes) and confirms the polyphyly of Trachinoidei. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2015; 93:172-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/01/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
4
|
Near TJ, Dornburg A, Harrington RC, Oliveira C, Pietsch TW, Thacker CE, Satoh TP, Katayama E, Wainwright PC, Eastman JT, Beaulieu JM. Identification of the notothenioid sister lineage illuminates the biogeographic history of an Antarctic adaptive radiation. BMC Evol Biol 2015; 15:109. [PMID: 26062690 PMCID: PMC4461946 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antarctic notothenioids are an impressive adaptive radiation. While they share recent common ancestry with several species-depauperate lineages that exhibit a relictual distribution in areas peripheral to the Southern Ocean, an understanding of their evolutionary origins and biogeographic history is limited as the sister lineage of notothenioids remains unidentified. The phylogenetic placement of notothenioids among major lineages of perciform fishes, which include sculpins, rockfishes, sticklebacks, eelpouts, scorpionfishes, perches, groupers and soapfishes, remains unresolved. We investigate the phylogenetic position of notothenioids using DNA sequences of 10 protein coding nuclear genes sampled from more than 650 percomorph species. The biogeographic history of notothenioids is reconstructed using a maximum likelihood method that integrates phylogenetic relationships, estimated divergence times, geographic distributions and paleogeographic history. RESULTS Percophis brasiliensis is resolved, with strong node support, as the notothenioid sister lineage. The species is endemic to the subtropical and temperate Atlantic coast of southern South America. Biogeographic reconstructions imply the initial diversification of notothenioids involved the western portion of the East Gondwanan Weddellian Province. The geographic disjunctions among the major lineages of notothenioids show biogeographic and temporal correspondence with the fragmentation of East Gondwana. CONCLUSIONS The phylogenetic resolution of Percophis requires a change in the classification of percomorph fishes and provides evidence for a western Weddellian origin of notothenioids. The biogeographic reconstruction highlights the importance of the geographic and climatic isolation of Antarctica in driving the radiation of cold-adapted notothenioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Near
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| | - Alex Dornburg
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| | - Richard C Harrington
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3AN, UK.
| | - Claudio Oliveira
- Department Morfologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Theodore W Pietsch
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
| | - Christine E Thacker
- Research and Collections, Section of Ichthyology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA.
| | - Takashi P Satoh
- National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan.
| | - Eri Katayama
- National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan.
| | - Peter C Wainwright
- Section of Evolution & Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
| | - Joseph T Eastman
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701-2979, USA.
| | - Jeremy M Beaulieu
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, 1122 Volunteer Blvd, Ste. 106, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
| |
Collapse
|