Atypical appearance of hepatic hemangiomas with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules: comparison and differentiation between peripheral nodular cholangiocarcinoma and atypical liver hemangioma with MRI

Background

Peripheral nodular cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) and hepatic hemangioma (HG) significantly differ in treatment strategies and prognosis. However, they can present similar imaging characteristics, making them difficult to distinguish. The distinction between PCC and atypical HG using pre-operative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) holds substantial significance.

Methods

Fifty-four cases of solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules (nodules ≤3 cm in diameter and enhancement not exceeding the hepatic parenchyma) confirmed pathologically were collected, including 25 cases of PCC and 29 cases of HG. The clinical and DCE-MRI features were observed, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared. The t-test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on the diagnostic results of the two readings before and after the study by three diagnostic physicians.

Results

The signal of PCC was more heterogeneous and could be shown as a ring hyperintensity signal on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). The T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) signal of HG lesions showed a more homogeneous high-intense signal. The ADC value of PCC patients was lower than that of HG patients. Most of the patients in the two groups presented marginal enhancement in the arterial phase with infrequent abnormal perfusion around. The intratumoral vascular traversal signs in the PCC group showed a diagnostic significance. Among the lesions with marginal enhancement at arterial stage, the enhancement in PCC group was more likely to have annular enhancement with the main manifestation of delay reduction and nebulous or separated/astral center. On the other hand, HG tended to be more likely to have nodular enhancement in the arterial phase with delayed invariance at the margins and with no significant enhancement at the center. The area under the curves (AUC) of the three radiologists before and after the two readings were 0.645 and 0.888, respectively.

Conclusions

In the differentiation of PCC and atypical liver hemangioma, the presence of a circular hyper-intense signal in DWI, the ADC values, and the pattern and extent of enhancement of marginal and central lesions were of diagnostic significance.

Point-of-Care Ultrasonography in the Critical Care Setting: Abdominal POCUS

Point-of-care ultrasonography is becoming standard practice for diagnosis and management of patients in the critical care setting. When using point-of-care ultrasonography for evaluation of the abdomen, most providers will immediately think of the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma examination. However, there are a number of important abdominal applications for the nontrauma patient, including evaluation of the function of abdominal organs, differentiation of shock states, and identification of sources of sepsis. This article covers basic approaches to an abdominal point-of-care ultrasonography examination of the biliary tract, liver, kidneys, bladder, and appendix, as well as identification and management of intra-abdominal free fluid.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound With SonoVue and Sonazoid for the Diagnosis of Colorectal Liver Metastasis After Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic efficacy of SonoVue and Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in correctly detecting and characterizing colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CRLMs treated with chemotherapy and subsequently scheduled for hepatic resection were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to January 2021. Lesions detected by SonoVue or Sonazoid CEUS were recorded as and characterized as metastases or non-metastatic lesions respectively. Histopathology or intraoperative ultrasound with MRI were the reference standard.

RESULTS

A total of 348 focal liver lesions in 42 patients were investigated, including 297 CRLMs and 51 non-metastatic lesions. SonoVue showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (64.7% versus 54.0%; P < .001) and sensitivity (63.3% versus 50.5%; P < .001) in the diagnosis of CRLMs than Sonazoid, both methods presented with similar specificity (72.5% versus 74.5%; P = 1.0). Forty metastases appeared non-hypoenhancing (hyperenhancing or isoenhancing) in the late phase and postvascular phase of Sonazoid CEUS and were mischaracterized as benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

SonoVue performed significantly better than Sonazoid in the diagnosis of CRLMs after chemotherapy.

Rare Case of Large Hemolymphangioma in the Small Bowel Mesentery: A Case Report

Hemolymphangioma or hemangiolymphangioma is a rare venolymphatic vascular malformation composed of proliferations or networks of vascular spaces including the lymphatics, capillaries, veins, or arteries. The small bowel is a rare location for hemolymphangioma, and the small bowel mesentery is an even rarer site. Herein, we report a surgically confirmed large complex hemolymphangioma in the small bowel mesentery in a 55-year-old male.

When Benign Behaves Badly: Atypical Hemangiomas on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

ABSTRACT

Hemangioma is the most common benign liver tumor and is frequently encountered as an incidental finding on imaging. The classic enhancement pattern of hemangioma is diagnostic on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and it follows the same pattern of enhancement on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. However, there is a subset of hemangiomas that demonstrate atypical enhancement patterns on CEUS. The ability to recognize the different enhancement patterns and discern when additional imaging or biopsy may be necessary is essential to accurately interpret an atypical hemangioma on CEUS. This article reviews various enhancement patterns of hemangioma on CEUS to avoid pitfalls in characterization of focal liver lesions on CEUS.

Differentiation of atypical hepatic hemangioma from liver metastases: Diagnostic performance of a novel type of color contrast enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, the diagnosis is sometimes difficult with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) when the case has an atypical perfusion pattern. Color parametric imaging (CPI) is an analysis software for CEUS with better detection of temporal differences in CEUS imaging using arbitrary colors. It measures the differences in arrival time of the contrast agent in lesions so that the perfusion features of atypical hemangioma and colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis can be distinguished.

AIM

To evaluate the role of a novel type of CPI of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with a history of CRC.

METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2018, 42 patients including 20 cases of atypical hemangioma and 22 cases of liver metastases from CRC were enrolled. These patients had a mean age of 60.5 ± 9.3 years (range: 39-75 years). All patients received ultrasound, CEUS and CPI examinations. Resident and staff radiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed CEUS and CPI images. Two sets of criteria were assigned: (1) Routine CEUS alone; and (2) CEUS and CPI. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of resident and staff radiologists were analyzed.

RESULTS

The following CPI features were significantly different between liver hemangioma and liver metastases analyzed by staff and resident radiologists: Peripheral nodular enhancement (65%-70.0% vs 4.5%-13.6%, P < 0.001, P = 0.001), mosaic/chaotic enhancement (5%-10% vs 68.2%-63.6%, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and feeding artery (20% vs 59.1%-54.5%, P = 0.010, P = 0.021). CPI imaging offered significant improvements in detection rates compared with routine CEUS in both resident and staff groups. By resident radiologists, the specificity and accuracy of CEUS+CPI were significantly increased compared with that of CEUS (77.3% vs 45.5%, P = 0.030; 78.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.006). In addition, the area under the curve (AUC) of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.803 vs 0.757, P = 0.036). By staff radiologists, accuracy was improved in CEUS+CPI (81.0% vs 54.8%, P = 0.010), whereas no significant differences in specificity and sensitivity were found (P = 0.144, P = 0.112). The AUC of CEUS+CPI was significantly higher than that of CEUS (0.890 vs 0.825, P = 0.013) by staff radiologists.

CONCLUSION

Compared with routine CEUS, CPI could provide specific information on the hemodynamic features of liver lesions and help to differentiate atypical hemangioma from liver metastases in patients with CRC, even for senior radiologists.