A self-reported Frailty Index predicts long-term mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis

Evaluation of Five Screening Tools in Detecting Physical Frailty in Cirrhosis and Their Prognostic Role

Background: Physical frailty (PF) is a syndrome of decreased physical function and reserves, preventing patients from coping with stressful events. PF screening tools in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) can help evaluate the risk of complications and death. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of five screening tools in detecting PF and their ability to predict 18-month mortality in LC. Methods: The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) were compared with the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) as the method of reference. Patients with an LFI ≥ 4.5, SPPB ≤ 8, FFP ≥ 3, CFS ≥ 6 points, and those walking <250 m, were considered frail. Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients with stable LC were included [63.3% male, median age 62 years, (IQR 52-70), MELD 9 (7-14.5), 46.8% with decompensated LC (DC)]. PF was present in 23.9%, 27.5%, 41.3%, 13.8%, and 28.4% as assessed by the LFI, SPPB, FFP, CFS, and 6MWT, respectively. Cohen's kappa measurement of agreement of four of the tools with LFI was 0.568, 0.334, 0.439, and 0.502, respectively (p < 0.001 for each). Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 18 months showed higher mortality in frail patients compared to non-frail patients by any method (log rank p < 0.05). In the multivariate models, PF defined by any method emerged as an independent prognostic factor of 18-month mortality after adjustment for age, gender, and MELD-score. Conclusions: Patients characterized as frail by five screening tools were not identical. However, PF defined by either method was proven to be an independent poor prognostic factor for long-term mortality after adjustment for covariates.

Prevalence of Frailty and Its Impact on Mortality and Hospitalization in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background & aims

Frailty in patients with cirrhosis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of frailty and its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

An elaborate search was undertaken in the databases "PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, and preprint servers", and an assessment of all published articles till 17 February 2023 was done. Studies that provided data on prevalence, mortality and hospitalization among frail patients with cirrhosis were included. The study characteristics and data on the prevalence, mortality, and hospitalization were extracted from included studies. The primary outcome was to estimate the pooled prevalence of frailty and determine its impact on mortality and hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis.

Results

Overall, 12 studies were included. Data on prevalence of frailty and mortality were available in 11 studies, while seven studies reported data on hospitalization. The analysis conducted among 6126 patients with cirrhosis revealed pooled prevalence of frailty to be 32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24-41). A total of 540 events of death revealed a pooled mortality rate of 29% (95% CI, 19-41). Six-month and twelve-month pooled estimates of mortality were found to be 24% (95% CI, 17-33) and 33% (95% CI, 23-45), respectively. The pooled hospitalization rate among the seven studies was 43% (95% CI, 21-68).

Conclusion

The prevalence of frailty in patients with cirrhosis is high, leading to poor outcomes. Frailty assessment should become an integral part of cirrhosis evaluation.

Registry and registration number of study

PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022377507.

Frailty and transplant-free survival of patients with liver cirrhosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a common condition among patients with liver cirrhosis. Nonetheless, its role in predicting liver transplant-free survival (TFS) remains unclear.

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to elucidate the relationship between frailty and TFS in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Cohort studies addressing the objective of this meta-analysis were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test, and the I^2 statistic was estimated. Random-effect models, considering potential heterogeneity, were employed to combine the results.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis encompassed 17 cohort studies involving 6273 patients with cirrhosis, of whom 1983 (31.6%) were classified as frail at baseline. The follow-up periods in the included studies ranged from 3 to 29 months, with an average duration of 11.5 months. The analysis revealed that frailty was significantly associated with a poor TFS (risk ratio [RR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.72 to 2.50, p<0.001; I2 = 51%). Sensitivity analyses that sequentially omitted one dataset consistently supported these findings (RR: 1.95 to 2.17, p<0.05 in all cases). Subgroup analyses based on variables such as study design, mean age of patients, baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, tool used for frailty evaluation, follow-up duration, and study quality score also yielded congruent results.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that frailty may be an independent risk factor for poor TFS in patients with liver cirrhosis, thus emphasizing the importance of early identification and management of frailty in this population.

Health-related quality of life and frailty in liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is limited evidence concerning the predictive value of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on the presence of frailty in the context of cirrhosis. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between HRQoL and multidimensional frailty and to determine which HRQoL dimension independently impacted frail phenotype in our established cohort.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study by consecutively enrolling 355 patients with cirrhotic with decompensated signs in China. The HRQoL and frail phenotype were evaluated by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) Questionnaire and Frailty Index, respectively. The relationship between EQ-5D utility index, as well as respective EQ-5D dimension, and Frailty Index was analysed according to the multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

More than half of the patients (56.3%) reported problems in any dimension of the EQ-5D, suggestive of impaired HRQoL. Moreover, the proportion of patients experiencing some/extreme problems significantly increased across all five dimensions (all p<0.001) in correspondence to transition from the robust to frail phenotype. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that age, ascites and hepatic encephalopathy were positively associated with Frailty Index, while EQ-5D utility index (standardised β coefficient= -0.442, p<0.001) negatively associated with Frailty Index. Notably, usual activities, self-care and mobility were the most influencing predictors associated with frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support a rapid HRQoL assessment via EQ-5D may assist in predicting multidimensional frailty, and usual activities, self-care and mobility tend to be remediable targets while taking their effect on frail phenotype into consideration among patients with cirrhosis.

Accumulating awareness on the clinical significance and relevance of frailty in cirrhosis: Time to dig deeper into mechanistic basis!

Frailty corresponds to an emerging construct in the hepatology which is originally introduced as a validated geriatric syndrome regarding increased vulnerability to pathophysiological stressors. As for patients with cirrhosis, the presence of frailty is indicative of debilitating conditions that subjects are prone to deleterious acute insults and have difficulties to restore even if the underlying liver function partially returned to normal levels. Since this conceptual development, a variety of tools assessing frailty have been proposed and evaluated in the context of cirrhosis. A recent performance-based metric for frailty, designated as Liver Frailty Index, has broadly been applied in patients with cirrhosis and exhibited acceptable predictive ability in relation to disease progression, mortality and hospitalization. However, those functional tests measuring frailty may be impossible to perform in circumstance that patients are critically ill or undergoing detrimental events. An interesting modality indicates the use of alternative tests to evaluate frailty, which may be more adaptable and of choice for specific subgroups. The interrelation between frailty and various cirrhosis-associated pathological entities is of clinical importance and implication. Noticeably, it is imperative to clarify these complex linkages to highlight novel therapeutic targets or interventional endpoints. The efficient and effective management of frailty is still challenging, but many attempts have been made to overcome barriers of affordability and availability. Some clinical trials on small scale revealed that home-based exercise and individualized nutrition therapy show benefits in patients with cirrhosis, and high adherence to the treatment regimen may direct better efficacy and performance.

Liver transplantation in the patient with physical frailty

Frailty is a decline in functional reserve across multiple physiological systems. A key component of frailty is sarcopenia, which denotes a loss of skeletal muscle mass and impaired contractile function that ultimately result in physical frailty. Physical frailty/sarcopenia are frequent and contribute to adverse clinical outcomes before and after liver transplantation. Frailty indices, including the liver frailty index, focus on contractile dysfunction (physical frailty), while cross-sectional image analysis of muscle area is the most accepted and reproducible measure to define sarcopenia. Thus, physical frailty and sarcopenia are interrelated. The prevalence of physical frailty/sarcopenia is high in liver transplant candidates and these conditions have been shown to adversely impact clinical outcomes including mortality, hospitalisations, infections, and cost of care both before and after transplantation. Data on the prevalence of frailty/sarcopenia and their sex- and age-dependent impact on outcomes are not consistent in patients on the liver transplant waitlist. Physical frailty and sarcopenic obesity are frequent in the obese patient with cirrhosis, and adversely affect outcomes after liver transplantation. Nutritional interventions and physical activity remain the mainstay of management before and after transplantation, despite limited data from large scale trials. In addition to physical frailty, there is recognition that a global evaluation including a multidisciplinary approach to other components of frailty (e.g., cognition, emotional, psychosocial) also need to be addressed in patients on the transplant waitlist. Recent advances in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of sarcopenia and contractile dysfunction have helped identify novel therapeutic targets.

Dissecting the Contributing Role of Divergent Adipose Tissue to Multidimensional Frailty in Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Emerging evidence has demonstrated that abnormal body composition may potentiate the development of frailty, whereas little work focuses on the role of divergent adipose tissue. Therefore, we aimed to determine the potential contribution of adipose tissue distribution to multidimensional frailty in decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Divergent adipose tissues were assessed by computed tomography-derived subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI) and total adipose tissue index (TATI), respectively. Frailty was identified by our validated self-reported Frailty Index. Multiple binary logistic models incorporating different covariates were established to assess the relationship between adipose tissue distribution and frailty.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 245 cirrhotic patients with 45.3% being male. The median Frailty Index, body mass index (BMI) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score were 0.11, 24.3 kg/m² and 8.9 points, respectively. In both men and women, patients who were frail exhibited lower levels of SATI in comparison with nonfrail patients. SATI inversely correlated with Frailty Index in the entire cohort (r_s=-0.1361, p=0.0332). Furthermore, SATI or TATI was independently associated with frail phenotype in several multiple logistic regression models adjusting for age, BMI, presence of ascites, sodium, Child-Pugh class or MELD score in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of decompensated cirrhosis, low SATI and concomitant TATI were associated with higher risk of being frail. These findings highlight the importance to further apply tissue-specific tools of body composition in place of crude metric like BMI.

Systematic review: the role of frailty in advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a known predictor of outcome and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, most patients remain unsuitable transplant candidates. It is not yet known if the assessment of frailty in non-transplant candidates can aid prognostication.

AIM

To collate and interrogate the various frailty tools presently used to predict mortality in the non-transplant cirrhosis setting.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published from inception to March 2022 was undertaken, excluding those where patients underwent transplantation or had hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

We identified 12 observational cohort studies, featuring 9 frailty indices. These were from various global healthcare settings and of fair or good quality. Most were objective tools utilising clinician-based assessments. All frailty scores predicted prognosis, with variability in the method of application, and utilisation in long- or short-term mortality. Three studies directly compared different indices in the same population. There was some evidence that simple tools could perform as well, if not better, than more complex, time-consuming scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Various frailty tools can reproducibly evaluate mortality in patients with cirrhosis who are ineligible for transplant. However, further prospective head-to-head comparative studies are needed. In addition to determining model utility, studies should focus on important relative considerations which may limit widespread implementation including, ease of use and limited resources, given the global disparity of liver care provision. These tools may positively identify specific patient cohorts at risk of impending deterioration, thereby stratifying those patients likely to benefit from early integration with palliative care.

Sarcopenia and frailty combined increases the risk of mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

Background:

Both sarcopenia and frailty are prevalent in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and associated with negative outcomes. However, few studies investigated the impact of their coexistence on mortality. We aimed to evaluate the role of sarcopenia and frailty on survival in a cohort of hospitalized cirrhotics.

Methods:

This was an observational cohort study including 221 patients hospitalized for decompensated events. The cutoff for low skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra level on computed tomography built by our previous work (male: SMI <46.96 cm²/m²; female: SMI <32.46 cm²/m²) was used for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Individuals with a Frailty Index >0.38 were considered frail. The sample was divided into four groups: sarcopenia and frailty (SF); sarcopenia and non-frailty (SN); non-sarcopenia and frailty (NF); and non-sarcopenia and non-frailty (NN). Follow-up for survival lasted 2 years.

Results:

Sarcopenia and frailty were present in 21.7% and 14.5% of the patients, respectively. The frequency of frailty in the group of sarcopenic patients was significantly higher than in the patients without sarcopenia (27.1% versus 11%, p = 0.009). In the survival analysis, the SF group showed a higher hazard ratio (2.604 in model 1; 4.294 in model 2) for mortality when compared with the NN group. In addition, the concurrence of those two conditions does give rise to incremental risk for mortality when compared with the group with each disturbance separately, namely, the SN/NF group.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia and frailty combined showed higher mortality risk.

Low free triiodothyronine levels are associated with frail phenotype in hospitalized inpatients with cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Frailty is a prevalent complication predicting morbidity and mortality in cirrhosis. However, the association between thyroid hormone levels and frailty in cirrhotics remains elusive. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the relationship between thyroid hormone and frail phenotype in euthyroid patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 214 adult cirrhotic inpatients were divided into two groups according to Frailty Index. Concentrations of free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were compared. An analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was implemented to determine the best cut-off for frailty. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the association between FT3 and frailty.

RESULTS

ROC analysis indicated that the optimal cut-off to stratify frailty was FT3 <3.03 pmol/L with an area under the curve of 0.673 (95% CI: 0.582-0.764, p = 0.002), sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 51.9%. Patients with FT3 <3.03 pmol/L exhibited higher incidence of Child-Pugh class B/C, elevated model for end-stage liver disease score, higher creatinine, lower sodium as well as higher incidence of frailty (23.7 vs 6.0%, p < 0.001). A negative correlation was observed between FT3 values and Frailty Index (r = -0.220, p = 0.001). FT3 remained an independent risk factor for frailty after adjusting for age, Child-Pugh class, creatinine, sodium and alanine aminotransferase.

CONCLUSION

In our current study, FT3 <3.03 pmol/L were significantly associated with increased risk for frailty. Measuring FT3, a readily available biomarker, may be useful for identifying frail phenotype in euthyroid patients with cirrhosis.

Frailty is associated with increased risk of cirrhosis disease progression and death

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The Liver Frailty Index (LFI) is a well-studied tool that evaluates frailty in patients with cirrhosis. Consisting of grip strength, chair stands, and balance testing, the LFI has been associated with increased mortality in patients awaiting liver transplant. We aimed to extend our understanding of frailty in cirrhosis by exploring the relationship between the LFI and the risk of (1) cirrhosis progression, (2) mortality, and (3) unplanned hospitalizations, in both compensated and decompensated disease.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adult patients with cirrhosis from four centers in North America and one in India were included. Frailty was measured at baseline using the LFI and categorized as robust (LFI < 3.2), prefrail (LFI 3.2-4.5), and frail (LFI > 4.5). Progression of cirrhosis was defined by an increase in clinical stage, ranging from 1 to 5, from baseline using the D'Amico classification. Factors associated with progression, mortality, and hospitalizations were evaluated using multivariate regression models, with transplant as a competing risk. In total, 822 patients with cirrhosis were included. Average Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15.5 ± 6.0. In patients with compensated cirrhosis, being frail versus robust was associated with increased risk of progression to the next cirrhosis stage or to death (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.14-5.29) and with an increased risk of unplanned hospitalizations (2.32; 95% CI, 1.13-4.79), after adjusting for age, sex, and MELD score. Similar HRs were observed in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty was an independent predictor of cirrhosis progression or death and unplanned hospitalization across patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to evaluate the possibility of slowing cirrhosis disease progression by reversing or preventing frailty.

Association between sleep disturbance and multidimensional frailty assessed by Frailty Index in hospitalized cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Both sleep disturbance and frailty are common in patients with cirrhosis, but their correlation remains elusive. We aimed to investigate whether dysregulated sleep [as estimated by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)] is independently associated with frailty and their relationship in distinct subgroups.

METHODS

In total 105 adult cirrhotic patients were recruited. The frailty phenotype was identified by a self-reported scale (Frailty Index) which demonstrates good validity and moderate performance based on our previous publication. Patients were categorized into frailty and nonfrailty groups according to a cut-point of 0.38 by Frailty Index. Multiple linear regression was performed to determine independent factors associated with frailty.

RESULTS

The median PSQI was 6.0 in the entire cohort and sleep disturbance was observed in 61 patients with cirrhosis (58.1%). Poor sleepers had a significantly higher Frailty Index than that in good sleepers (0.11 vs. 0.08; P = 0.025). In univariate analysis, PSQI score was markedly associated with the Frailty Index (β = 0.012; 95% CI, 0.006-0.018; P < 0.001), and remained significantly associated with frailty phenotype in multivariate adjustment (β = 0.010; 95% CI, 0.004-0.015; P = 0.001). The escalating PSQI scores were more prominent in frail patients, with female gender or aged 65 years and over.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor sleep quality is strongly associated with frailty in patients with cirrhosis. Given that sleep disturbance is modifiable, our data suggest that efficient interventions to mitigate frailty should incorporate strategies by reversing sleep dysfunction in cirrhotics with poor sleep quality.

Relationship between sarcopenia/myosteatosis and frailty in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis: a sex-stratified analysis

Background:

Previous studies have shown that sarcopenia appears to be a significant contributor to physical frailty among outpatients with cirrhosis. However, the evidence is scant regarding the relationship between sarcopenia and multi-dimensional frailty among inpatients. We aimed to investigate the potential contribution of sarcopenia to frailty in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis in a sex-dependent manner.

Methods:

This cohort enrolled consecutive cirrhotics. Muscle quantity and quality were assessed using the computed tomography-based skeletal muscle index (SMI) and intramuscular adipose tissue content, respectively. Frailty phenotype was clarified by a self-reported Frailty Index. Multiple linear regression determined the association between sarcopenia and frailty phenotype.

Results:

A total of 202 cirrhotic patients with 48.5% male were included. The median Frailty Index was 0.13, rendering 17.3% subjects as frail. Among the 16 frail men, 68.8% had sarcopenia and 62.5% exhibited myosteatosis. In contrast, among the 19 frail women, 26.3% had sarcopenia and 15.8% exhibited myosteatosis. Frail patients had a significantly lower median SMI (42.80 cm²/m²) compared with those with pre-frailty (48.23 cm²/m²) and with robust status (50.82 cm²/m²) in the male but not the female group. In male patients, multivariate linear regression implicated age (β = 0.330, p < 0.001), SMI (β = −0.260, p < 0.001), albumin (β = −0.245, p = 0.005), and sodium (β = −0.179, p = 0.037) as independent risk factors for frailty.

Conclusion:

Sarcopenia is associated with multi-dimensional frailty in male patients with cirrhosis. It is tempting to incorporate sex-specific intervention with the purpose of mitigating frailty among inpatients.

A predictive nomogram incorporating gait speed for all-cause mortality in hospitalized cirrhotics

OBJECTIVES

No tailored model incorporating physical frailty for 2-year mortality in cirrhosis is available for practitioners in general practice. Thus we aimed to develop a model based on laboratory results and physical frailty allowing clinicians for stratifying cirrhotics by using individual estimate.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen cases were assigned to the primary cohort, and all other 76 patients were regarded as the validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression was performed, and a nomogram including five-meter gait speed (5MGS) were generated. The performance of the proposed model was assessed by C-index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium, albumin and 5MGS were independent predictors for 2-year mortality in cirrhosis. A nomogram incorporating all these parameters achieved a C-index of 0.804 (95%CI, 0.731-0.877). The calibration curve implied optimal correspondence between the predicted survival and actual outcomes. Our model is useful in the clinical settings based on DCA. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort with a C-index of 0.796 (95%CI, 0.689-0.899). Moreover, 5MGS, as a surrogate of physical performance, significantly correlated with multiple domains of general frailty according to Frailty Index (our published data), including instrumental activities of daily living, self-reported health, social activity and falls.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the nomogram incorporating 5MGS may represent an individualized tool for predicting mortality in cirrhosis for primary care physicians.