CT perfusion imaging can detect residual lung tumor early after radiofrequency ablation: a preliminary animal study on both tumoral and peri-tumoral region assessment

Diagnostic value of dual-layer spectral detector CT in differentiating lung adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma

Background and objective

The pathological type of non–small cell lung cancer is considered to be an important factor affecting the treatment and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of spectral parameters of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography (DLCT) in determining efficacy to distinguish adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SC), and their combined diagnostic efficacy was also analyzed.

Methods

This is a single-center prospective study, and we collected 70 patients with lung SC and 127 patients with lung AC confirmed by histopathological examination. Morphological parameters, plain scan CT value, biphasic enhanced CT value, and spectral parameters were calculated. The diagnostic efficiency of morphological parameters, spectral parameters, and spectral parameters combined with morphological parameters was obtained by statistical analysis.

Results

In univariate analysis, seven morphological CT features differed significantly between SC and AC: tumor location (distribution), lobulation, spicule, air bronchogram, vacuole sign, lung atelectasis and/or obstructive pneumonia, and vascular involvement (all p < 0.05). In the arterial phase and the venous phase, the spectral parameters of AC were higher than those of SC (AP-Zeff: 8.07 ± 0.23 vs. 7.85 ± 0.16; AP-ID: 1.41 ± 0.47 vs. 0.94 ± 0.28; AP-NID: 0.13 ± 0.04 vs. 0.09 ± 0.03; AP-λ: 3.42 ± 1.10 vs. 2.33 ± 0.96; VP-Zeff: 8.26 ± 0.23 vs. 7.96 ± 0.16; VP-ID: 1.18 ± 0.51 vs. 1.16 ± 0.30; VP-NID: 0.39 ± 0.13 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08; VP-λ: 4.42 ± 1.28 vs. 2.85 ± 0.72; p < 0.001). When conducting multivariate analysis combining CT features and DLCT parameters with the best diagnostic efficacy, the independent predictors of AC were distribution on peripheral (OR, 4.370; 95% CI, 1.485–12.859; p = 0.007), presence of air bronchogram (OR, 5.339; 95% CI, 1.729–16.484; p = 0.004), and presence of vacuole sign ( OR, 7.330; 95% CI, 1.030–52.184; p = 0.047). Receiver operating characteristic curves of the SC and AC showed that VP-λ had the best diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864 and sensitivity and specificity rates of 85.8% and 74.3%, respectively; the AUC was increased to 0.946 when morphological parameters were combined, and sensitivity and specificity rates were 89.8% and 87.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

The quantitative parameters of the DLCT spectrum are of great value in the diagnosis of SC and AC, and the combination of morphological parameters and spectral parameters is helpful to distinguish SC from AC.

Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect

One of the major fields of application of ablation treatment is liver tumors. With respect to HCC, ablation treatments are considered as upfront treatments in patients with early-stage disease, while in colorectal liver metastases (CLM), they can be employed as an upfront treatment or in association with surgical resection. The main prognostic feature of ablation is the tumor size, since the goal of the treatment is the necrosis of all viable tumor tissue with an adequate tumor-free margin. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are the most employed ablation techniques. Ablation therapies in HCC and liver metastases have presented a challenge to radiologists, who need to assess response to determine complication-related treatment. Complications, defined as any unexpected variation from a procedural course, and adverse events, defined as any actual or potential injury related to the treatment, could occur either during the procedure or afterwards. To date, RFA and MWA have shown no statistically significant differences in mortality rates or major or minor complications. To reduce the rate of major complications, patient selection and risk assessment are essential. To determine the right cost-benefit ratio for the ablation method to be used, it is necessary to identify patients at high risk of infections, coagulation disorders and previous abdominal surgery interventions. Based on risk assessment, during the procedure as part of surveillance, the radiologists should pay attention to several complications, such as vascular, biliary, mechanical and infectious. Multiphase CT is an imaging tool chosen in emergency settings. The radiologist should report technical success, treatment efficacy, and complications. The complications should be assessed according to well-defined classification systems, and these complications should be categorized consistently according to severity and time of occurrence.