Clinical utility of ultrasonographic evaluation in acute kidney injury

Diagnostic value of multi-parameter ultrasound evaluation in sepsis complicated by acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to discuss the diagnostic value of multi-parameter ultrasound evaluation in sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

Patients were divided into an AKI group (n = 50) and a non-injury group (n = 50) based on the presence of AKI. The clinical characteristics were collected, and renal function parameters between the two groups were compared, including 24-h urine volume, serum creatinine, urea, serum cystatin C (CysC), renal parenchymal thickness (RPT), renal artery resistance index (RI), and multi-parameter ultrasound scoring (MPUS). Additionally, logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the influencing factors of sepsis complicated with AKI. The prediction value was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

In the AKI group, creatinine, CysC, urea, MPUS score, RPT, and RI values were significantly higher, while the 24-h urine volume was lower than those in the non-injury group (p < 0.01). Moreover, multivariate logistic analysis indicated that high CysC and RI values were independent risk factors, whereas high 24-h urine volume and low MPUS were independent protective factors for sepsis-induced AKI. The ROC curve demonstrated that RI (AUC = 0.906) was more effective than 24-h urine volume (AUC = 0.797), CysC (AUC = 0.730), and MPUS (AUC = 0.794) in identifying sepsis-induced AKI.

CONCLUSION

High RI values increase the risk of sepsis-induced AKI, whereas low MPUS may reduce it. RI showed high diagnosis values for sepsis complicated with AKI.

Risk stratification framework to improve the utility of renal ultrasound in acute kidney injury

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common among hospitalised patients and can lead to significant morbidity or mortality if not properly managed. Renal ultrasound (RUS) is often requested in the initial workup of AKI to rule out obstructive uropathy despite pre-renal aetiologies being implicated in most cases, especially in patients without risk factors for obstruction.

Objectives

Determine the utility of RUS in detecting bilateral hydronephrosis in the context of AKI, and identify risk factors that can be used to stratify patients to better guide patient management.

Method

Adults who underwent RUS for AKI between January 2019 and December 2021 were reviewed. Renal ultrasound studies that identified bilateral hydronephrosis and the patient characteristics associated with these studies were recorded.

Results

Seven hundred and fifty-eight RUS reports were included. Bilateral hydronephrosis was diagnosed in 43 patients (5.7%). Of these 43 patients, 39 (90.7%) had at least one risk factor for urinary tract obstruction. Bilateral hydronephrosis was only diagnosed in 4 (9.3%) patients without any risk factor for obstruction. The risk factors with the highest odds for being diagnosed with bilateral hydronephrosis included a history of previous ureteric stenting or nephrostomy tube insertion (OR 10.37), previous bilateral hydronephrosis (OR 14.56), or multiple risk factors (OR 23.06).

Conclusion

Renal ultrasound has limited utility in the evaluation of AKI in low-risk patients.

Contribution

These risk factors can be used to assign patients to high- or low-risk categories to better guide management and reduce the number of unnecessary studies performed while still identifying clinically significant disease.

Renal and Genitourinary Ultrasound Evaluation in Emergency and Critical Care: An Overview

Renal and genitourinary ultrasound are fundamental resources employed by emergency and critical care healthcare providers to make prompt diagnoses and perform ultrasound-guided procedures. At the bedside, ultrasound can aid in the diagnosis of relevant pathologies, such as post-renal obstruction or kidney stones, and life-threatening conditions such as aortic dissection or hemoperitoneum. A narrative overview was performed, providing an updated review of renal and genitourinary ultrasound for emergency and critical care healthcare providers, emphasizing its advantages and the latest advances in the field. A thorough summary that can be utilized as a guide for emergency and critical care healthcare providers is presented. The daily hemodynamic management of critically ill patients involves the implementation of new protocols, such as VexUS or the evaluation of the renal resistance index. The role of ultrasound in managing acute nephropathy and genitourinary issues is increasingly crucial given its bedside availability, thus this imaging modality not only facilitates the initiation of therapeutic interventions but also provides swift prognostic insights that are vital to provide tailored patient care. As further advances in ultrasound will arise, it is important for healthcare providers to foster the use of these technologies capable of improving patient outcomes.

Prediction of acute kidney injury using a combined model of inflammatory vascular endothelium biomarkers and ultrasound indices

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of sepsis, with the burden of long hospital admission. Early prediction of AKI is the most effective strategy for intervention and improvement of the outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

In our study, we aimed to investigate the predictive performance of the combined model using ultrasound indices (grayscale and Doppler indieces), endothelium injury (E-selectin, VCAM-1, ICAM1, Angiopoietin 2, syndecan-1, and eNOS) as well as inflammatory biomarkers (TNF-a, and IL-1β) to identify AKI.

METHODS

Sixty albino rats were divided into control and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) groups. Renal ultrasound, biochemical and immunohistological variables were recorded 6 hrs, 24 hrs, and 48 hrs after AKI.

RESULTS

Endothelium injury and inflammatory markers were found to be significantly increased early after AKI, and correlated significantly with kidney size reduction and renal resistance indices elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

Using area under the curve (AUC), the combined model was analyzed based on ultrasound and biochemical variables and provided the highest predictive value for renal injury.

Renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in burn patients, an international survey and a qualitative review of current controversies

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in critically ill burn patients and is associated with a number of serious adverse outcomes. The clinical decision-making process related to the management of AKI in burn patients is complex and has not been sufficiently standardized. The main aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic approach and clinician's attitudes toward the management of AKI and RRT in burn patients around the world.

METHODS

The questionnaire was widely distributed among the members of International Society for Burn Injury (ISBI), who were invited to complete the survey. Data collection and report was compliant with the the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) Web-survey guidelines. The survey form with multiple-choice questions was divided into 3 parts: a. physician and institutional demographics, b. AKI diagnostic information, c. technical aspects of RRT.

RESULTS

A total of 44 respondents worldwide submitted valuable data in the 2-month period. Of all respondents, 43.2% were from Europe, 30% from North America, 7% from South-East Asia 2.3% from Africa and 18.2% from other regions. 93.1% of participants declare that they use specific definitions to detect AKI, while 11.4% declare the use of renal ultrasonography for AKI diagnosis. CRRT appeared to be the most preferred option by 43.2% of participants, followed by intermittent hemodialysis (25%), and prolonged intermittent RRT (6.8%). The expertise to deliver a modality and the availability of resources were considered important factors when selecting the optimal RRT modality by 20.5% and 29.6% of respondents. The use of specific serum biomarkers for AKI diagnosis are stated by 16% of respondents; 25% of specialists refer to the use of biomarkers of AKI as a criterium for discontinuing the RRT. Femoral vena and right jugular vena were the most frequently used location for RRT temporary catheter placement, 54.6% of respondents declared using ultrasound guidance for catheter placement.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of burn specialists use specific consensus classifications to detect acute kidney injury. Continuous renal replacement therapy appeared to be the most preferred option, while the expertise to deliver a particular modality and resources availability play a significant role in modality selection. The use of ultrasound and specific biomarkers for AKI evaluation is infrequent in routine clinical practice.

Ultrasonography in Acute Kidney Injury

Advances in the use of ultrasonography can enhance our ability to better characterize acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI is a clinical syndrome characterized by a rapid decrease in kidney excretory function with the accumulation of products of nitrogen metabolism and other clinically unmeasured waste products, and may proceed to include clinical manifestations including decreased urine output, development of metabolic acidosis, and electrolyte abnormalities [1]. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria defines AKI (Table 1). Staging severity of AKI guides the physician in respect to medical management and prognosis. The overall incidence of AKI is around 20% of patients hospitalized worldwide, and around 50% in intensive care unit (ICU) patients [2, 3]. AKI has been found to have increasing morbidity and mortality, no matter the cause of admission, as well as an in-hospital mortality of close to 50% [4]. In a large study of 8 ICUs over 8 years, Kellum et al. found that AKI was associated with increasing mortality rate with worsening AKI stage. A decrease in urine output alone, without an increase in serum creatinine, was associated with decreased 1-year survival [5]. Recurrent AKI has also been associated with increased mortality, further demonstrating the importance of detecting, monitoring, and diagnosing AKI [6].

Clinical and experimental approaches for imaging of acute kidney injury

Complex molecular cell dynamics in acute kidney injury and its heterogeneous etiologies in patient populations in clinical settings have revealed the potential advantages and disadvantages of emerging novel damage biomarkers. Imaging techniques have been developed over the past decade to further our understanding about diseased organs, including the kidneys. Understanding the compositional, structural, and functional changes in damaged kidneys via several imaging modalities would enable a more comprehensive analysis of acute kidney injury, including its risks, diagnosis, and prognosis. This review summarizes recent imaging studies for acute kidney injury and discusses their potential utility in clinical settings.