Spoken and Written Narrative in Persian-Speaking Students Who Received Cochlear Implant and/or Hearing Aid

Comparing Deaf/Hard-of-Hearing Children's Oral Narratives Using Movies and Static Books

Clinicians utilize various methods for narrative sampling, including oral assessments like story generation and retelling, often aided by visual aids. Assessing language skills in deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) children requires careful narrative technique selection. This comparative observational study investigates the narrative outcomes of story generation and retelling tasks in 21 DHH children, using both book and movie contexts. Most microstructural elements (except for the mean length of utterance) were similar across the book and movie conditions. Differences in word choice, such as the use of action verbs, were evident. Macrostructural differences between book and movie conditions were insignificant regarding story grammar elements. However, movies, being visually engaging, potentially enhance the inclusion of characters, settings, plot, and actions. This research illuminates narrative assessment considerations, emphasizing technology's role in enhancing options for assessment for DHH children.

Disparate Oral and Written Language Abilities in Adolescents With Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Narrative Samples

PURPOSE

In spite of improvements in language outcomes for children with hearing loss (HL) arising from cochlear implants (CIs), these children can falter when it comes to academic achievement, especially in higher grades. Given that writing becomes increasingly relevant to educational pursuits as children progress through school, this study explored the hypothesis that one challenge facing students with CIs may be written language.

METHOD

Participants were 98 eighth graders: 52 with normal hearing (NH) and 46 with severe-to-profound HL who used CIs. Oral and written narratives were elicited and analyzed for morphosyntactic complexity and global narrative features. Five additional measures were collected and analyzed as possible predictors of morphosyntactic complexity: Sentence Comprehension of Syntax, Grammaticality Judgment, Expressive Vocabulary, Forward Digit Span, and Phonological Awareness.

RESULTS

For oral narratives, groups performed similarly on both morphosyntactic complexity and global narrative features; for written narratives, critical differences were observed. Compared with adolescents with NH, adolescents with CIs used fewer markers of morphosyntactic complexity and scored lower on several global narrative features in their written narratives. Adolescents with NH outperformed those with CIs on all potential predictor measures, except for Sentence Comprehension of Syntax. Moderately strong relationships were found between predictor variables and individual measures of morphosyntactic complexity, but no comprehensive pattern explained the results. Measures of morphosyntactic complexity and global narrative features were not well correlated, suggesting these measures are assessing separate underlying constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with CIs fail to show writing proficiency at high school entry equivalent to that of their peers with NH, which could constrain their academic achievement. Interventions for children with CIs need to target writing skills, and writing assessments should be incorporated into diagnostic assessments.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.17139059.

Effect of cochlear implantation on language development and assessment of the quality of studies in this field: A systematic review

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an achievement that facilitates the acquisition of language skills in deaf children throughout the world. The use of this technology has a positive effect on all components of language acquisition (syntax, semantic, pragmatic, etc.). However, this positive impact is influenced by various factors. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of studies on the development of language abilities can help improve these studies. Consequently, in the future, it will lead to the improvement of language rehabilitation in these children. Limited studies on children with CI in have been done so far. This article summarized the outcomes of scientific articles on the clinical efficacy of CI on Persian speaking children. This study also provided a clear picture of these studies by examining the quality of their methodologies and tools.

Methods: Articles indexed in Google Scholar, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus and Iranian databases (Danesh Gostar, Magiran, and SID) were searched using keywords "language," "Cochlear implant", "Persian/ Farsi" in English and Persian languages with "and/or". Original articles investigated on children younger than 13 years old with hearing impairment and CI were included.

Results: Five hundred and twenty-three articles were found based on the keywords. Among all of these, 485 were excluded due to the title and the abstract; we selected 38, of which 24 were repeated. Finally, 14 articles remained. We reviewed the articles based on the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and checklist and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE).

Conclusion: Similar to international studies, Persian speaking children with CI have slower language development than their peers with normal hearing, but they are better than their peers who use hearing aids. The results of reviewing on quality of the articles showed that the studies could not meet reasonable quality because of the lack of a standard test in different aspects of Persian language and the absence of patients’ databanks. These results also can be used by other nationalities that recently have started surveys on children with CIs.

The effects of narrative-based language intervention (NBLI) on spoken narrative structures in Persian-speaking cochlear implanted children: A prospective randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Previous research has shown that narrative-based language intervention (NBLI) is a feasible approach increasing the narrative skills of hearing-impaired children.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, the efficacy of NBLI on the macrostructure and microstructure components of the spoken narrative of children with cochlear implants (CI) was evaluated in an experimental study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six CI children between the ages of 5.5 and 7 years were randomly divided in three groups of equal size. Group 1 attended 24 1-h sessions of NBLI group therapy. Group 2 participants each attended 24 1-h private sessions of NBLI instruction. Group 3 attended 24 1-h conventional speech therapy (CST) sessions. The subjects' storytelling skills were prompted using pictures from the Persian version of the Language Sample Analysis test. The results were assessed before treatment (T0), after treatment (T1) and two months after treatment (T2) as follow-up.

RESULTS

Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly better results over Group 3 on all microstructure components of spoken narrative at the T1 (p ≤ 0.04) and T2 (p ≤ 0.04) levels in comparison with T0, but no differences were observed between the NBLI approaches (p > 0.05). All three intervention programs significantly improved the macrostructure of the spoken narrative in CI children.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in spoken narrative structures were observed in CI children that support the efficacy of NBLI over CST for the hearing-impaired population.