Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Figure-of-Eight Harness Versus Anterior Plate Osteosynthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Functional outcomes and complications of plate fixation for midshaft clavicle fractures by type and location: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Various plate types are used in the surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. These plates can be positioned in different locations on the clavicle, although no studies to date have elucidated optimal plate type and location of fixation. This systematic review compares the functional outcomes and complications in the management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using plate fixation by stratifying by both plate type and location.

Methods

A systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted to identify all papers reporting functional outcomes, union rates, and/or complications using plates for the management of midshaft clavicle fractures. Multiple databases and trial registries were searched from inception until March 2022. A meta-analysis was conducted for functional outcomes and type of complication, stratified by plate type (locking, compression, or reconstruction) and location (superior or anteroinferior). Pooled estimates of functional outcome scores and incidence of complications were calculated using a random effects model. Risk of bias and quality were assessed using the risk of bias version 2 and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tools. The confidence in estimates were rated and described according to the recommendations of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) working group.

Results

Forty-five studies were included in the systematic review and 43 were included in the meta-analysis. Depending on plate type and location, pooled Constant-Murley Scores ranged from 89.23 to 93.48 at 12 months. Nonunion rates were 3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1-6) for superior locking plates (GRADE Low). Rates of any complication (nonunion, hardware failure, hardware irritation, wound dehiscence, keloid, superficial infection, deep infection, delayed union, malunion, and/or persistent pain) by plate type and location ranged from 3% to 17% (GRADE Very Low to Moderate). Superior compression plates had the highest incidence of any complications (17% [95% CI 5-44], GRADE Very Low), while anterior inferior compression plates had the lowest incidence of any complication (3% [95% CI 0-15], GRADE Very Low). Hardware irritation was the most reported individual complication for superior locking plates and superior compression plates, 11% (95% CI 7-17, GRADE Low) and 11% (95% CI 3-33, GRADE Very Low), respectively.

Conclusion

Although most studies were of low quality, studies reporting functional outcomes generally showed good functional results and similar incidence of any complication regardless of plate type and location. There is no evidence of a plate and location combination to optimize patient functional outcomes or complications. We were unable to reliably evaluate union rates or individual complications for most plate types stratified by location.

Minimal early functional gains after operative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials including 1333 patients

Background

There is substantial evidence that operative treatment reduces the risk of nonunion but offers no long-term functional gains compared with nonoperative treatment. Despite some studies citing quicker recovery with surgery, the promise of accelerated functional recovery remains under-investigated. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to investigate the possible early functional gains (≤6 months) after operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures compared with nonsurgical treatment.

Methods

A systematic search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing plate osteosynthesis with nonoperative treatment. We evaluated shoulder function outcomes measured by Constant Score or Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Other outcomes of interest were sick leave and return to previous activity (work, leisure).

Results

Ten studies including 1333 patients were included. The mean difference in DASH score after 6 weeks was 9.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.7-5.1) in favor of operative treatment. At 3 months, the difference was 3.6 points (95% CI 6.9-0.4), and at 6 months, the difference was 3.2 points (95% CI 5.2-1.1), both in favor of operative treatment. Results for Constant Score were similar to that of DASH score.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis shows that there is an early functional gain at six weeks following plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures compared with nonoperative treatment. At three and six months, the functional gain is lesser and not clinically relevant.

5-Year Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment of Completely Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Teenagers

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adolescents remains controversial, with some favoring surgical management and others favoring a nonoperative approach. Few studies have comprehensively assessed longer-term nonoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographic remodeling ≥5 years after injury in teenagers undergoing nonoperative treatment of completely displaced clavicular fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Adolescent patients previously enrolled in a prospective study from a single institution with nonoperatively treated, completely displaced midshaft clavicular fractures ≥5 years from injury were eligible for the study. Patients were clinically evaluated for scapular dyskinesia and strength deficits. Bilateral clavicular imaging assessed residual shortening, displacement, and angulation. PROs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Marx Shoulder Activity Scale, cosmesis, and return to sports data.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were available for the follow-up, of whom 17 (71%) consented to additional imaging. The mean cohort age at the time of injury was 14.5 ± 1.1 years, with 88% being male. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, all fractures had healed, with no patient requiring secondary interventions. Significant remodeling was observed across all measurements, with improvements of 70% in shortening (22.8 to 6.8 mm; P < .001), 73% in superior displacement (13.4 to 3.6 mm; P < .001), and 83% in angulation (10.4° to 1.8°; P < .001). Thirteen patients (72%) had a >2-cm initial shortening, and all remodeled to <2 cm. PROs were almost universally excellent, with mean ASES, QuickDASH, and Marx activity scores of 99 ± 3, 1 ± 3, and 20 ± 1, respectively, with 79% of patients reporting perfect scores in all 3 domains. Most patients (58%) were completely satisfied with their shoulder appearance, 38% were more satisfied than not, 1 patient (4%) was neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, and no patients were dissatisfied. All patients except 1 who were interested in sports returned to sporting activities. PROs were not associated with bony remodeling (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Teenaged patients with completely displaced clavicular fractures treated nonoperatively can expect excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes 5 years after injury.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Closed Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative treatment for clavicle fractures has historically been standard of care, but with a concomitant rise in recent operative fixation for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCF), a re-evaluation of treatment modalities is necessary. The purpose of this study was to compare nonunion rates among operative and nonoperative treatment of closed displaced MCF. Specifically, we assessed the following between operative and nonoperative management: (1) 90-day to 1-year nonunion and malunion incidence; (2) 90-day medical complications; and (3) 90-day to 1-year total costs of care.

METHODS

An all-payer national database was retrospectively reviewed for closed displaced MCF from 2010 to 2020 (n = 173 188). Of these, patients undergoing operative fixation within 30 days of a displaced MCF were identified (n = 17 452). Nonoperative displaced MCF patients were matched with operative patients at a 3:1 ratio. Outcomes at 90 days and 1 year included: nonunion, total cost, and complications.

RESULTS

Closed displaced MCF with operative fixation resulted in significantly increased nonunion rates at 1 year compared with nonoperative treatment (3.97% vs 1.63%, odds ratio = 2.50 [2.26-2.77], P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survivorship and log-rank score demonstrated the same for a 1-year nonunion endpoint (P < .001). As expected, the operative cohort incurred higher median total costs of care at 90 days ($3255.00 vs $1024.00, P < .001) and 1 year ($1978.00 vs $4799.50, P < .001) compared with nonoperative treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study found higher nonunion incidence after operative fixation of displaced MCF. These results may serve as a catalyst for future high-quality prospective studies comparing treatment options for closed displaced MCF.

Do multiple fractures affect risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fracture? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures is associated with quick recovery and low risk of non-union. However, fixation failure may occur in case of severe comminution fractures. Moreover, clinical outcomes may be affected when clavicle fractures occur in combination with other injuries, particularly those involving the lower extremities, as the use of crutches or walkers may hinder the process of rehabilitation by adding strain on the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, resulting in possible fixation failure. This study aims to identify risk factors for fixation failure of midshaft clavicle fractures and elucidate the role of combined fractures in treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study included patients diagnosed with midshaft clavicle fractures who underwent initial surgery between January 2012 and November 2021 at a designated regional trauma center hospital. Retrospective evaluation of fixation failure was carried out in 352 patients with midshaft clavicle fractures using standard clinical evaluation protocols and conventional radiographs. The prevalence of fixation failure and the effects of several demographic variables on the risk of fixation failure and non-union were examined. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for fixation failure.

RESULTS

Fixation failure occurred in 40 patients (11.4%). Multivariate analysis identified comminution [odds ratio (OR) 3.532, p value = 0.003, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-8.05)] and fewer number of screws (OR 0.223, p value = 0.022, 95% CI 0.06-0.80) as risk factors for fixation failure. Surgical techniques using wire cerclage reduced the chances of fixation failure in comminuted fractures (OR 0.63, p value = 0.033, 95% CI 0.05-0.80). Combined fractures that required rehabilitation using walkers or crutches increased the risk of non-union (OR 19.043, p value = 0.032, 95% CI 1.28-282.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional fixation of comminuted fractures using cerclage can reduce the risk of treatment failure, while multiple fractures or rehabilitation for ambulation increases the risk of the same.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Dual Mini-Fragment Plate Fixation of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Reduces Risk of Reoperation Compared With Single-Plate Fixation Techniques

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have highlighted dual plating as a method of reducing high rates of postoperative complication after operative management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. However, few studies have reliably characterized reoperation rates and magnitude of risk reduction achieved when using dual versus anterior and superior single-plate techniques.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be lower rates of reoperation among patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures via dual plating.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ORIF for a displaced midshaft clavicular fracture between 2010 and 2021 at a level 1 trauma center with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts based on fixation type: (1) orthogonal dual mini-fragment plate fixation, (2) superior plate fixation, and (3) anterior plate fixation. Data on patient characteristics, fracture pattern, and reoperations were documented. All-cause reoperation rates and hazard ratio (HR) estimates of dual, superior, and anterior plating were calculated using a multivariate multilevel mixed-effects parametric survival model. Significant confounders including high-risk fracture morphology and smoking status were controlled for in the final model.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 256 patients was identified with mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 3.8 years. In total, 101 patients underwent superior plating, 92 underwent anterior plating, and 63 underwent dual plating. Overall, 31 reoperations took place (18 in superior, 12 in anterior, 1 in dual plating) among 22 patients. Major contributors to reoperation included symptomatic hardware (n = 11), nonunion (n = 8), deep infection (n = 7), and wound dehiscence (n = 2). Superior plating revealed the highest reoperation rate of 0.031 per person-years, followed by anterior plating with 0.026 per person-years and dual plating with 0.005 per person-years. Overall, single plating (either anterior or superior placement) had a nearly 8-fold greater risk of reoperation than dual plating (HR, 7.62; 95% CI, 1.02-56.82; P = .048). Further broken down by technique, superior plating had an 8-fold greater risk of reoperation than dual plating (HR, 8.36; 95% CI, 1.10-63.86; P = .041), but anterior plating did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference compared with dual plating (HR, 6.79; 95% CI, 0.87-52.90; P = .068).

CONCLUSION

Dual-plate fixation represents an excellent treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, with low rates of nonunion and reoperation. When compared with single locked superior or anterior plate fixation, dual mini-fragment plate fixation has a nearly 8-fold lower risk of reoperation.

An Institutional Standardised Protocol for the Treatment of Acute Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures (ADMCFs): Conservative or Surgical Management for Active Patients?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (ADMCFs) is still under debate. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness of our institutional protocol by comparing the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two groups of patients with ADMCFs treated operatively and non-operatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

active patients with a traumatic, isolated non-pathological ADMCF with at least 1-year clinical and radiographic follow up were included. Surgical treatment was performed in the cases where the residual displacement was higher than 140% after the application of a figure-of-eight bandage (F8-B). All other cases were treated conservatively with a F8-B. A total of 134 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups: surgical and conservative groups, with 59 and 75 patients, respectively. Radiological and clinical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Good clinical (Constant-Murley Score, the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and VAS satisfaction) and radiographic outcomes (initial and residual shortening, initial and residual displacement) were obtained for ADMCFs in both groups. Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated conservatively had better clinical outcomes compared to surgically treated patients (p < 0.001). Return to sports was longer in those treated with surgery. Initial shortening was found to impact clinical outcomes as well as initial displacement. None of the patients showed signs of non-union in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Very good mid-term clinical results can be obtained in adult patients with ADMCFs, conservatively or operatively managed, by applying our institutional treatment protocol based on objective radiographic parameters evaluated in the ER.

Plate fixation using parallelogram prism iliac bone grafts for clavicle oblique nonunion with shortening deformity: a case report

BACKGROUND

Plate fixation using a tricortical iliac bone graft can provide a high ratio of bone union and restore clavicle length in cases of atrophic nonunion. However, the surgical treatment of clavicle oblique nonunions with marked shortening deformity remains challenging and unresolved. Here, we describe a case of clavicle oblique nonunion with shortening that was treated using plate fixation with parallelogram prism iliac bone grafts.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 46-year-old man presented to our hospital with severe medial scapular pain. He had been diagnosed with a right clavicle mid-shaft fracture in a motorcycle accident 9 months earlier. He underwent conservative treatment, but radiographs and computed tomography showed clavicle oblique nonunion with marked shortening. Physical examination revealed no pain at the nonunion site; however, tenderness was noted on the medial side of the right scapula and protrusion of the inferior scapular angle was prominent. His symptoms interfered with daily life and required surgery. After release of the nonunion, we harvested the parallelogram prism bone grafts from the iliac crest. We inserted these bone grafts into the fracture ends and fixed them with lag screws, after which we performed plate fixation. Immediately after surgery, right medial scapular pain and scapula winging subsided. Bone union was achieved, and the length of the clavicle was restored at 9 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report provides new information on the surgical treatment of clavicle oblique nonunion with shortening deformity. The presence of medial scapular pain and winging scapula can be clinically problematic in cases of clavicle nonunion with marked shortening. Our case revealed that reliable bone union and clavicle length recovery can be achieved with plate fixation and iliac bone grafts.

Traumatic brain injuries are ignored or discriminated in prospective clinical trials on shoulder fractures: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Current literature suggests a significant epidemiological association between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and proximal upper limb fractures in addition to major clinical consequences. A systematic review was conducted to assess how TBI is taken into consideration in interventional studies on shoulder fractures.

METHODS

The following data sources were used: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, CINAHL, and OpenGrey databases. Study selection included interventional randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies on shoulder fractures published in English or French between 2008 and 2020. Studies on pathologic fractures, chronic fracture complications, nonhuman subjects, and biomechanics were excluded. Articles were reviewed by two independent authors according to the PRISMA guidelines. Baseline characteristics, exclusion criteria, and input relevant to TBI were recorded. Methodological quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.

RESULTS

One-hundred-thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. None discussed the possible impact of TBI on their results. Only three (2.7%) studies considered TBI relevant and included these patients in their cohort. Furthermore, 43/113 (38.1%) excluded patients with injuries or mechanisms strongly related to traumatic brain injuries: head injuries (4); moderate and/or severe TBI (7); high energy traumas (3); Polytrauma subjects (33).

CONCLUSION

TBI are ignored or discriminated in prospective clinical trials on shoulder fractures. The exclusion of these cases impacts generalizability as their prevalence is significant. Considering the major impact of TBI on important outcomes, its presence should always be assessed to ensure high quality evidence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review, Therapeutic Level II.

Risk factors for complications and reoperation following operative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture remains controversial. This study assessed demographic factors, fracture pattern, and surgical technique as potential predictors of surgical complications. Smoking, diabetes, obesity, polytrauma, high-energy mechanism, inpatient status, transverse or comminuted fractures, and single-plating technique were hypothesized to be associated with an increased risk of complications following clavicle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with minimum 12-week follow-up from the trauma and sports medicine divisions at a single tertiary institution who presented with a midshaft clavicle fracture and underwent ORIF between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics, fracture pattern, plating technique, and postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications were classified into major (reoperation) and minor (no reoperation) complications. Chi-squared statistics, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis test, and multivariate logistic regression modeling were utilized with a significance level set to P < .05.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-eight patients (average = 39.5 ± 14.6 years) were identified with an average follow-up of 9.1 ± 10.7 months. The cohort consisted of 155 males (78.3%), 62 smokers (31.3%), and 12 diabetics (6.1%). Injury characteristics revealed 80 transverse fractures (40.4%), 87 oblique fractures (43.9%), and 31 Z-type fractures (15.7%). Seventy-nine patients (39.9%) underwent superior plating, 72 (36.4%) underwent anterior plating, and 47 (23.7%) underwent dual plating. Overall, postoperative complications occurred in 47 patients (23.7%), 29 minor (14.6%) and 18 major (9.1%). Major complications requiring reoperation were symptomatic hardware, nonunion, deep infection, wound dehiscence, and broken hardware. Minor complications consisted of sensory deficit or paresthesia beyond peri-incisional numbness, superficial infections, postoperative pain and/or stiffness, and delayed union. Smoking status (P = .008), obesity (P = .009), and transverse or Z-type fractures (P = .002) were significant prognostic factors for overall complication risk. Only manual labor was predictive of minor complications (P = .019). Transverse or Z-type fractures and single plating were predictive of major complications (P = .004 and P = .008, respectively). No reoperations occurred in patients who underwent dual plating. Smokers (P = .027) with transverse/Z-type fractures (P = .022) were at the highest risk of reoperation with single plating.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of complications following ORIF of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture was 27.3%, with 9.1% requiring reoperation. Given relatively high complication rates, in instances when nonoperative vs. operative management is equivocal, nonoperative management should be strongly considered in obese patients, smokers, and patients who present with transverse or Z-type fracture. If operative management is indicated, use of dual plating may decrease reoperation rates.

Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

To date, the optimal management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains unknown. Operatively, plate or nail fixation may be used. Nonoperatively, the options are sling or harness. Given the equivocal effectiveness between approaches, the costs to the health care system and the patient become critical considerations. A decision tree model was constructed to study plate and sling management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Primary analysis used 6 randomized controlled trials that directly compared open reduction and internal fixation with a plate to sling. Secondary analysis included 18 studies that studied either plate, sling, or both. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Second-order Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was subsequently conducted. In primary analysis, at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000, operative management was found to be less cost-effective relative to nonoperative management, with an ICER of $606,957/QALY (0.03 additional QALYs gained for an additional $16,120). In PSA, sling management was cost-effective across all WTP ranges. In secondary analysis, the ICER decreased to $75,230/QALY. Primary analysis shows that plate management is not a cost-effective option. In secondary analysis, the incremental effectiveness of plate management increased enough that the calculated ICER is below the WTP threshold of $100,000; however, the strength of evidence in secondary analysis is lower than in primary analysis. Thus, because neither option is dominant in this model, both plate and sling remain viable approaches, although the cost-conscious decision will be to treat these fractures with a sling until future data suggest otherwise. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(5):e243-e251.].

Two-Year Functional Outcomes of Operative vs Nonoperative Treatment of Completely Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents: Results From the Prospective Multicenter FACTS Study Group

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures is controversial. Few previous comparative functional outcome studies have investigated these fractures in adolescents, the most commonly affected epidemiologic subpopulation.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to prospectively compare the outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment in adolescents with completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The study hypothesis was that surgery would yield superior outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients aged 10 to 18 years treated for a midshaft clavicle fracture over a 5-year period at 1 of 8 pediatric centers were prospectively screened, with independent treatment decisions determined by individual musculoskeletal professionals. Demographics, radiographic clinical features, complications, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were prospectively recorded for 2 years. Regression and matching techniques were utilized to adjust for potential age- and fracture severity-based confounders for creation of comparable subgroups for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 416 adolescents with completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, 282 (68) provided 2-year PRO data. Operative patients (n = 88; 31%) demonstrated no difference in sex (78% male) or athletic participation but were older (mean age, 15.2 vs 13.5 years; P < .001), had more comminuted fractures (49.4% vs 26.3%; P < .001), and had greater fracture shortening (25.5 vs 20.7 mm; P < .001) than nonoperative patients (n = 194; 69%). There was no difference in mean PRO scores or rates of "suboptimal" scores (based on threshold values established a priori) between the operative and nonoperative treatment groups (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, 96.8 vs 98.4; shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, 3.0 vs 1.6; EuroQol [EQ] visual analog scale, 93.0 vs 93.9; EQ-5 Dimensions index, 0.96 vs 0.98), even after regression and matching techniques adjusted for confounders. Operative patients had more unexpected subsequent surgery (10.4% vs 1.4%; P = .004) and clinically significant complications (20.8% vs 5.2%; P = .001). Overall, nonunion (0.4%), delayed union (1.9%), symptomatic malunion (0.4%), and refracture (2.6%) were exceedingly rare, with no difference between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Surgery demonstrated no benefit in patient-reported quality of life, satisfaction, shoulder-specific function, or prevention of complications after completely displaced clavicle shaft fractures in adolescents at 2 years after injury.

REGISTRATION

NCT04250415 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Comparison of 3 treatment methods for midshaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to evaluate the fracture nonunion rate and the functional score of plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment in midshaft clavicle fractures patients using a network meta-analysis of data from clinical randomized controlled trials.

MATERIAL/METHODS

The studies were abstracted from Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata software, version 14.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).

RESULTS

24 randomized controlled trials involving 2161 participants were included. The studies were published between 2007 and 2019. A total of 3 treatment methods-plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing and non-surgical treatment- were included in the literature. The treatments were ranked based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) probability. In terms of the constant score, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the DASH index, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment. In terms of the nonunion rate, the treatment methods were ranked as follows: intramedullary nailing, plate and screw fixation and non-surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Non-surgical treatment has a high rate of nonunion for clavicular fractures with obvious displacement and notable comminution. Surgical treatment reduces the nonunion rate leads to better functional scores at long-term follow-up, although there may be no significant clinical differences. The fracture nonunion rate of plate screw fixation group and intramedullary nail group was low and the functional prognosis was similar. More RCTs focused on clavicular fractures are needed to further substantiate this conclusion.

Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures with Figure-of-Eight Bandage: The Impact of Residual Shortening on Shoulder Function

The treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs) is still controversial. The aims of our study were to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients with displaced MCFs managed nonoperatively and to identify potential predictive factors of worse clinical outcomes. Seventy-five patients with displaced MCFs were enrolled and treated nonoperatively with a figure-of-eight bandage (F8-B). Initial shortening (IS) and displacement (ID) of fragments were radiographically evaluated at the time of diagnosis and immediately after F8-B application by residual shortening (RS) and displacement (RD). The clavicle shortening ratio was evaluated clinically at last follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using Constant (CS), q-DASH, DASH work and DASH sport scores. Cosmetic outcomes and rate of complications were evaluated. Good to very good mid-term clinical results were achieved by using the institutional treatment protocol. Multiple regression identified RS as an independent predictor of shoulder function, while RD affects fracture healing. These findings support the efficacy of our institutional protocol and thus could be useful for orthopedic surgeons during the decision-making process.

Operative management of midshaft clavicle fractures demonstrates better long-term outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Introduction

Midshaft clavicular fractures are common amongst young adults. Conservative or surgical treatment for definitive fracture management has been widely debate, both with their pros and cons. Previous meta-analyses compared the clinical outcomes between conservative and surgical treatment options of midshaft clavicular fractures but failed to elucidate any difference in functional improvement. We postulate that functional improvement after fracture union plateaus and the clinical outcome after treatment varies at different time points. This meta-analysis will focus on the synthesis comparison of outcomes at early, short-term results (3 months), intermediate-term (6 to 12 months) and long-term (>24 months) clinical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was done on databases (Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane) in June 2021. Search keywords were: midshaft clavicular fractures and clinical trials. Clinical trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for comparison and the clinical outcomes of midshaft clavicular fractures using surgical and non-surgical interventions in terms of improvement in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), time to union and risk ratio of treatment related complications were analysed in correlation with post-treatment timeframe.

Results

Of the 3094 patients of mean age 36.7 years in the 31 selected studies, surgical intervention was associated with improved DASH score (standard-mean difference SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.07, p = 0.003; mean difference MD -1.72, 95% CI -2.93 to -0.51, p = 0.005), CMS (SMD 0.44, 95% CI 0.17–0.72, p = 0.001; MD 3.64, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.19, p = 0.005), time to union (non-adjusted SMD -2.83, 95% CI -4.59 to -1.07, p = 0.002; adjusted SMD -0.69, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.41, p<0.001) and risk ratio of bone-related complications including bone non-union, malunion and implant failure (0.21, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.42; p<0.001). Subgroup analysis based on time period after treatment showed that surgical intervention was far superior in terms of improved DASH score at the intermediate-term results (6–12 months later, SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.02, p = 0.02; and long term results (>24 months SMD -4.24, 95% CI -7.03 to -1.45, p = 0.003) and CMS (>24 months, SMD 1.03, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.68, p = 0.002; MD 5.77, 95% CI 1.63 to 9.91, p = 0.006). Surgical outcome is independent of fixation with plates or intra-medullary nails.

Conclusion

Surgical intervention was associated with better clinical outcomes compared with non-surgical approach for midshaft clavicular fractures in terms of improvement in functional scores DASH, CMS, time to union and fracture related complications, although not to the minimal clinically significant difference. Benefits in the long-term functional improvements are more pronounced.

Kinesiotaping therapy for midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomised trial study

Midshaft clavicle fractures with shortening by less than 2 cm or minimal displacement without neurovascular injury can be treated conservatively. We hypothesized that kinesiotaping reduces the disadvantages of conservative treatment, such as early-phase pain, high nonunion rates, and a prolonged time to return to work, and yields better clinical and functional outcomes. Forty patients were randomly divided into the arm slings only (group S) or arm sling with kinesiotaping therapy group (group K). The outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, union time, magnitude of shortening, and time to return to work. The mean follow-up period of the study was 8.5 (6- 10) months. The ASES and Constant scores were significantly better in group K than in group S in the 3rd month. The mean union time was 8.60 (8-12) weeks in group S and 8.25 (6-12) weeks in group K. The mean time to return to work was 7.23 (4-12) weeks in group S and 5.37 (2-10) weeks in group K, and the difference was statistically significant (p <0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of shortening between the two groups. Compared with an arm sling only, an arm sling with kinesiotaping can yield better clinical functional results, higher union rates, and a shorter the time to return to work due to the early control of pain and edema.

Functional outcomes and adverse effects following three interventions for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of the most commonly used interventions for clavicle fractures remains controversial. These interventions are: open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF), non-surgical intervention (NSI), and use of an intramedullary nail (IMN). In adult patients with clavicle fractures, choosing which intervention might be best is challenging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Journals@Ovid Full Text, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase were performed to search English-language studies from the inception to February 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any of these three interventions were included. Patient and baseline characteristics, nonunion, major complications, Constant-Murley score (CMS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) were extracted. Then, we evaluated the functional outcomes and adverse effects after use of these three interventions for the management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A Bayesian random-effects model was conducted, and nonunion and major complications were evaluated with: risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidential interval (CI); while CMS and DASH were evaluated with mean differences (MD) and the corresponding 95% confidential interval CI. The rank probability of each endpoint was assessed on the basis of the surface area under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

DISCUSSION

ORPF is most likely to be successful in achieving objective functional outcomes as captured by the CMS, and IMN demonstrates significant efficacy for subjective functional outcomes, as captured by DASH scores. Compared with the other interventions examined, IMN was associated with decreased risk for adverse effects.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

I; meta-analysis.

Protocol of BRICS: Brazilian multicentric pragmatic randomised trial of surgical interventions for displaced diaphyseal clavicle fracture study: MIPO versus ORIF for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures

INTRODUCTION

Fractures of the diaphysis of the clavicle are common; however, treatment guidelines for this condition are lacking. Surgery is associated with a lower risk of non-union and better functional outcomes but a higher risk of complications. Open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws are the most commonly performed techniques, but they are associated with paraesthesia in the areas of incisions, extensive surgical exposure and high rates of implant removal. Minimally invasive techniques for treating these fractures have a lower rate of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate which surgical treatment option (minimally invasive osteosynthesis or open reduction and internal fixation) has better prognosis in terms of complications and reoperations.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study proposed is a multicentric, pragmatic, randomised, open-label, superiority clinical trial between minimally invasive osteosynthesis and open reduction and internal fixation for surgical treatment of patients with displaced fractures of the clavicle shaft. In the proposed study, 190 individuals with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, who require surgery as treatment, will be randomised. The assessment will occur at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The primary outcome of the study will be the number of complications and reoperations. For sample size calculation, a moderate effective size between the techniques was considered in a two-tailed test, with 95% confidence and 90% power. Complications include cases of infection, hypertrophic scarring, non-union, refracture, implant failure, hypoesthesia, skin irritation and shoulder pain. Reoperations are defined as the number of surgeries for pseudoarthrosis, implant failure, infection and elective removal of the implant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Study approved by the institutional ethics committee (number 34249120.9.0000.5505-V.3). The results will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations in medical meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

RBR-3czz68)/UTN U1111-1257-8953.

Factors Associated With Surgical Treatment of Isolated, Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

Given the current available evidence, surgical treatment of isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is discretionary. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are identifiable factors associated with the surgical treatment of isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. A retrospective cohort study of 150 patients who underwent nonoperative treatment and 290 patients who underwent surgical treatment of isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures from January 2010 to March 2019 at 2 level I trauma centers was performed. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99), absence of diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.045; 95% CI, 0.003-0.79), nonsmoking status (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.75), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.7-9.2), fracture comminution (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9), and fracture displacement (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1) were associated with surgical treatment of an isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. Furthermore, lower social deprivation (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and private insurance compared with Medicare (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-27) were associated with surgical treatment. The authors conclude that surgical treatment of discretionary midshaft clavicle fractures is influenced by patient factors, fracture characteristics, and socioeconomic factors. Further study is needed to understand the etiology of social disparities in clavicle surgery and rectify unintended trends in treatment. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e515-e520.].

Comparative effectiveness of treatment options for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures : a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Aims

The aims of this network meta-analysis (NMA) were to examine nonunion rates and functional outcomes following various operative and nonoperative treatments for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures.

Methods

Initial search strategy incorporated MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four treatment arms were created: nonoperative (NO); intramedullary nailing (IMN); reconstruction plating (RP); and compression/pre-contoured plating (CP). A Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare all treatment options for outcomes of nonunion, malunion, and function using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome scores.

Results

In all, 19 RCTs consisting of 1,783 clavicle fractures were included in the NMA. All surgical options demonstrated a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) of nonunion in comparison to nonoperative management: CP versus NO (OR 0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04 to 0.17); IMN versus NO (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.19); RP versus NO (OR 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.24). Compression plating was the only treatment to demonstrate significantly lower DASH scores relative to NO at six weeks (mean difference -10.97; 95% CI -20.69 to 1.47).

Conclusion

Surgical fixation demonstrated a lower risk of nonunion compared to nonoperative management. Compression plating resulted in significantly less disability early after surgery compared to nonoperative management. These results demonstrate possible early improved functional outcomes with compression plating compared to nonoperative treatment. Surgical fixation of mid-shaft clavicle fractures with compression plating may result in quicker return to activity by rendering patients less disabled early after surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):646–654.

Displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures: state of the art for athletes and young active people

INTRODUCTION

Fractures ofthe clavicle are frequent injuries (between 4 and 10% of adult fractures) and mid-shaft diaphyseal fractures represent more than 80% of clavicle fractures. In a recent study from the USA in 2019, an incidence of 22.4 fractures per year per 100,000 people was reported. Multiple injury mechanisms are recognised, with sport accounting for 50 to 85% of these injuries. There is little or no consensus as to the optimal treatment but in recent years multiple studies have suggested operative management should be favoured in athletes and young active patients.

OBJECTIVES

These are (1) to present the anatomy and the anatomical-pathology of the fractures of the clavicle as well as the mechanisms of injury, (2), (3) to describe non-operative and operative treatment methods, (4) to review the literature around different treatment modalities and (5) to attempt to describe the best treatment for athletes.

METHODS

To collect and analyse the most recent articles of the literature regarding the management of displaced mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle for athletes and young active people.

RESULTS

Looking at studies of the general population, the results tend to favour surgical treatment with a smaller incidence of non-union and faster return to function. These results are mirrored in the athlete population where several studies have shown excellent anatomic restoration and functional recovery after plate fixation.

CONCLUSION

Based on this analysis, with the exception of patients who refuse operative management after an informed discussion, the treatment of choice in displaced clavicle fractures in athletes seems to be operative treatment with a plate and screws. However, prospective randomised studies comparing non-surgical treatment and plate osteosynthesis are missing and it is not possible to state that the latter is the best treatment.

Clavicle Fractures With Associated Acute Neurovascular Injury

Descriptions of acute neurovascular injury after clavicle fracture are limited to case reports. The objectives of this study were to assess both the prevalence of acute neurovascular injury after midshaft clavicle fracture and the outcomes of early fracture stabilization. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all adult patients with midshaft clavicle fracture who were treated surgically at 2 tertiary care referral centers from January 2010 to March 2019. The records of patients who were identified as having clinical or radiographic evidence of neurovascular compromise were reviewed to assess for deficits on physical examination on presentation, relevant radiographic and electro-diagnostic findings, timing and type of fixation, and time until resolution of symptoms and radiographic union postoperatively. Of the 443 adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture, 3 (1%) experienced acute neurovascular compromise and underwent early fixation. In all cases, fracture displacement caused compression of adjacent neurovascular structures in the costoclavicular space. No lacerations of underlying neurovascular structures were encountered intraoperatively, suggesting a pattern of nerve contusion or vascular compression from the initial injury and fracture displacement. Postoperatively, 2 patients had full recovery of preoperative neurologic deficits and 1 patient experienced partial recovery of motor deficits with persistent neuropathic pain. There were no instances of symptomatic vascular insufficiency at final follow-up. Acute neurovascular injury as a result of compression of underlying structures in the costoclavicular space is a rare complication of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. Early surgical decompression of compressed neurovascular structures and rigid clavicle osteosynthesis can lead to significant postoperative functional improvement. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(3):e390-e394.].

Skin Tenting in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to (1) identify factors associated with skin tenting in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures and (2) analyze individual surgeon variation in this diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed at two Level I trauma centers of 396 patients with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated by 47 surgeons with open reduction internal fixation from January 2010 to March 2019. Our main outcome measure was skin tenting, as diagnosed by the treating surgeon and used as an indication for surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Skin tenting was diagnosed by the treating surgeon in 34 out of 396 patients (9%) with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that lower BMI (P=0.002) and fracture shortening (P=0.03) were independently associated with skin tenting in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. There was wide variation among surgeons in the rate of diagnosis of skin tenting, ranging from 0% to 41% prevalence of skin tenting depending on the treating surgeon (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although lower BMI and greater fracture shortening were associated with skin tenting, the diagnosis is subjective. We found wide variation in the diagnosis of skin tenting, even among surgeons within a single metropolitan area.

Acute plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is not associated with earlier return of normal shoulder function when union is achieved

Aims

It is unclear whether acute plate fixation facilitates earlier return of normal shoulder function following a displaced mid-shaft clavicular fracture compared with nonoperative management when union occurs. The primary aim of this study was to establish whether acute plate fixation was associated with a greater return of normal shoulder function when compared with nonoperative management in patients who unite their fractures. The secondary aim was to investigate whether there were identifiable predictors associated with return of normal shoulder function in patients who achieve union with nonoperative management.

Methods

Patient data from a randomized controlled trial were used to compare acute plate fixation with nonoperative management of united fractures. Return of shoulder function was based on the age- and sex-matched Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores for the cohort. Independent predictors of an early recovery of normal shoulder function were investigated using a separate prospective series of consecutive nonoperative displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures recruited over a two-year period (aged ≥ 16 years). Patient demographics and functional recovery were assessed over the six months post-injury using a standardized protocol.

Results

Data from the randomized controlled trial consisted of 86 patients who underwent operative fixation compared with 76 patients that united with nonoperative treatment. The recovery of normal shoulder function, as defined by a DASH score within the predicted 95% confidence interval for each respective patient, was similar between each group at six weeks (operative 26.7% vs nonoperative 25.0%, p = 0.800), three months (52.3% vs 44.2%, p = 0.768), and six months post-injury (86.0% vs 90.8%, p = 0.349). The mean DASH score and return to work were also comparable at each timepoint. In the prospective cohort, 86.5% (n = 173/200) achieved union by six months post-injury (follow-up rate 88.5%, n = 200/226). Regression analysis found that no specific patient, injury, or fracture predictor was associated with an early return of function at six or 12 weeks.

Conclusion

Return of normal shoulder function was comparable between acute plate fixation and nonoperative management when union was achieved. One in two patients will have recovery of normal shoulder function at three months, increasing to nine out of ten patients at six months following injury when union occurs, irrespective of initial treatment.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):522–529.

Variation in Treatment Approaches to Adolescent Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Pediatric Versus Adult Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to identify differences in the treatment approach for isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescent patients 15-18 years of age at adult versus pediatric hospitals. The secondary objective of this study was to identify factors associated with the surgical treatment of these fractures in this age group.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two adult and one pediatric tertiary care referral hospitals.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Adolescent patients 15-18 years of age with isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated at 2 adult tertiary care referral hospitals and one pediatric tertiary care referral hospital were identified. A total of 214 patients, 105 from the adult hospitals and 109 from the pediatric hospital, were included.

INTERVENTION

Nonoperative versus surgical treatment of clavicle fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Surgical treatment.

RESULTS

A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that superior-inferior fracture displacement [odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.20], dominant upper extremity injury (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.19-5.67), and treatment at an adult hospital (OR 5.28, 95% CI 2.28-12.2) were independently associated with the surgical treatment of adolescent displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

After controlling for relevant demographic and fracture characteristics, adolescent patients treated at adult hospitals for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures have more than 5 times the odds of surgical treatment than those treated at a pediatric hospital. Significant practice variation across institutions reflects ongoing controversy in surgical indications and underscores the need for high-quality prospective outcome studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Neither operative nor nonoperative approach is superior for treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a partially blinded randomized controlled clinical trial

AIMS

To compare the functionality of adults with displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures treated either operatively or nonoperatively and to compare the relative risk of nonunion and reoperation between the two groups.

METHODS

Based on specific eligibility criteria, 120 adults (median age 37.5 years (interquartile range (18 to 61)) and 84% males (n = 101)) diagnosed with an acute displaced mid-shaft fracture were recruited, and randomized to either the operative (n = 60) or nonoperative (n = 60) treatment group. This randomized controlled, partially blinded trial followed patients for 12 months following initial treatment. Functionality was assessed by the Constant score (CS) (assessor blinded to treatment) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Clinical and radiological evaluation, and review of patient files for complications and reoperations, were added as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

At 12 months, 87.5% of patients (n = 105) were available for analysis. The two groups were well balanced based on demographic and fracture-related characteristics. At six weeks of follow-up a significant difference in DASH score (p < 0.001) was found in favour of operative treatment. The functionality at 12 months of follow-up based on CS and DASH was excellent in both groups (CS > 90 points and DASH < 10 points) with no significant difference (p = 0.277 for DASH and p = 0.184 for CS) between the two groups. The risk of symptomatic nonunion was significantly higher in the nonoperative group (p = 0.014), with a relative risk of 9.47 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 71.53) in this group compared to the operative group. The number-needed-to-treat to avoid one symptomatic nonunion was 6.2. Initial treatment and age were factors significantly associated with nonunion in a logistic analysis. There were 26% in both groups (n = 14 in operative group and n = 15 in nonoperative group) who required secondary surgery, with most indications in the nonoperative group mandatory due to nonunion compared to most relative indications in the operative group requiring intervention due to implant irritation.

CONCLUSION

Superiority was not identified with either an all-operative or all-nonoperative approach. The functionality at short term (within six weeks) seems igreater following operative treatment but was not found at one year. The risk of nonunion is significantly higher with nonoperative treatment. However, an all-operative approach to lower the nonunion risk may result in unnecessary surgery and is not recommended. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):762-768.

Plate Osteosynthesis or Figure-of-Eight Brace: Which One Is Better in Midshaft Clavicle Fractures?

Introduction

Fracture of the clavicle bone is a very common injury owing to its subcutaneous location. Controversy exists about the optimal treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in the presence of significant displacement and comminution of the fracture. Traditionally, non-surgical management was considered the first treatment option for most clavicle fractures. However, recent evidence shows that the non-surgical option causes more complications than previously reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment and surgical treatment for midshaft clavicle fractures.

Materials and methods

A total of 45 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this randomized study. The patients were allocated to two groups: conservative and operative on an alternate basis. Patients in the conservative group were managed with figure-of-eight bandage, whereas patients in the operative group were treated surgically by plate fixation. Primary outcome was recorded at six weeks, three months, six months, and 12 months follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. We also assessed patient’s satisfaction after the treatment, fracture union, and complication rates among the study cohort.

Results

The ASES scores were significantly better in the operative group at three months and six months follow-up; however, at 12 months follow-up, there was no significant difference in the score between the groups. Although not statistically significant, the DASH score was better in the operative group than in the conservative group at all the follow-ups. This study showed that the time to union was lesser, rate of non-union was lower, and return to work was faster on the operative group. The mean satisfaction score in the operative and conservative groups was 4.16±0.76 and 4.05±1.24, respectively (p = 0.76).

Conclusion

This study suggests that open reduction and internal fixation with plate reduced the incidence of mal-union and non-union; however, surgical treatment showed no significant difference in the functional outcome as compared to conservative treatment.

Clavicle nonunion: plate and graft type do not affect healing rates-a single surgeon experience with 71 cases

BACKGROUND

Clavicle nonunions often result after nonoperative treatment for the acute fracture. Those that require >1 surgical procedure in order for a nonunion to heal are termed recalcitrant. The aims of the present study were to (1) determine healing rates of clavicle nonunions after plate osteosynthesis using either a conventional or locked plate, (2) compare iliac crest bone graft vs. bone morphogenetic protein on nonunion healing, and (3) identify risk factors for the development of a recalcitrant nonunion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 78 clavicle nonunions treated with open reduction and plate fixation with or without graft augmentation by a single surgeon over 25 years. Seventy-one patients over the age of 18 with at least 12 months of follow-up comprised the study group. We analyzed healing rates after the index clavicle nonunion surgery comparing plate type and graft technique as well as identifying risk factors for developing a recalcitrant nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients (87.3%) healed after their index nonunion surgery at our institution. Three patients (4.2%) required additional surgery but healed, and 6 patients (8.5%) remain un-united; these 9 patients (12.7%) were defined as recalcitrant. There was no statistically significant difference in healing rates between plate type (P = .633) or type of bone graft (P = .157). There were no identifiable risk factors for the development of a recalcitrant nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Plate fixation of clavicle nonunions remains a successful method of treatment. The type of plate or the method of bone graft did not produce different results. There were no demographic, patient, or injury characteristics associated with the development of a recalcitrant nonunion.

Can Upstream Patient Education Improve Fracture Care in a Digital World? Use of a Decision Aid for the Treatment of Displaced Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures

BACKGROUND

The increasing proportion of telemedicine and virtual care in orthopaedic surgery presents an opportunity for upstream delivery of patient facing tools, such as decision aids. Displaced diaphyseal clavicle fractures (DDCFs) are ideal for a targeted intervention because there is no superior treatment, and decisions are often dependent on patient's preference. A decision aid provided before consultation may educate a patient and minimize decisional conflict similarly to inperson consultation with an orthopaedic traumatologist.

METHODS

Patients with DDCF were enrolled into 2 groups. The usual care group participated in a discussion with a trauma fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon. Patients in the intervention group were administered a DDCF decision aid designed with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Primary comparisons were made based on a decisional conflict score. Secondary outcomes included treatment choice, pain score, QuickDASH, and opinion toward cosmetic appearance.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients were enrolled. Decisional conflict scores were similar and low between the 2 groups: 11.8 (usual care) and 11.4 (decision aid). There were no differences in secondary outcomes between usual care and the decision aid.

DISCUSSION

Our decision aid for the management of DDCF produces a similarly low decisional conflict score to consultation with an orthopaedic trauma surgeon. This decision aid could be a useful resource for surgeons who infrequently treat this injury or whose practices are shifting toward telemedicine visits. Providing a decision aid before consultation may help incorporate patient's values and preferences into the decision-making process between surgery and nonoperative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Sonographic bridging callus at six weeks following displaced midshaft clavicle fracture can accurately predict healing

AIMS

To evaluate if union of clavicle fractures can be predicted at six weeks post-injury by the presence of bridging callus on ultrasound.

METHODS

Adult patients managed nonoperatively with a displaced mid-shaft clavicle were recruited prospectively. Ultrasound evaluation of the fracture was undertaken to determine if sonographic bridging callus was present. Clinical risk factors at six weeks were used to stratify patients at high risk of nonunion with a combination of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) ≥ 40, fracture movement on examination, or absence of callus on radiograph.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients completed follow-up at six months with a nonunion incidence of 16.7% (n = 18/112). Sonographic bridging callus was detected in 62.5% (n = 70/112) of the cohort at six weeks post-injury. If present, union occurred in 98.6% of the fractures (n = 69/70). If absent, nonunion developed in 40.5% of cases (n = 17/42). The sensitivity to predict union with sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was 73.4% and the specificity was 94.4%. Regression analysis found that failure to detect sonographic bridging callus at six weeks was associated with older age, female sex, simple fracture pattern, smoking, and greater fracture displacement (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.48). Of the cohort, 30.4% (n = 34/112) had absent sonographic bridging callus in addition to one or more of the clinical risk factors at six weeks that predispose to nonunion. If one was present the nonunion rate was 35%, 60% with two, and 100% when combined with all three.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound combined with clinical risk factors can accurately predict fracture healing at six weeks following a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):113-121.

Prospective evaluation of early functional recovery of displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle whether operated or not

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have analyzed the functional recovery after plate fixation of a displaced fracture of the middle third of the clavicle beyond the 6th week. The aim of this study was to assess the early functional recovery in the first 6 weeks, which has not yet been investigated.

HYPOTHESIS

Functional recovery in the first 6 weeks after surgical treatment is better than in the first 6 weeks of functional (non-operative) treatment.

METHODS

Any patient who had a closed displaced fracture of the middle third of the clavicle - Edinburgh types 2B1 or 2B2 - was informed of the treatment options within a week of their fracture: surgical fixation by anatomic plate or functional treatment. A QuickDASH score was filled out weekly for 6 weeks and at 3 and 6 months. Similarly, the Constant score was determined at 3 and 6 weeks and at 3 and 6 months. Any complications were documented and time to union was determined.

RESULTS

Sixty-five fractures in 65 patients were followed for 6 months. Twenty-six patients chose surgical treatment (S) and 39 chose functional treatment (F). The Constant and QuickDASH scores were significantly better in the S group from the 2nd to the 6th week. At 3 weeks, we found a Constant score of 57.7 in group F versus 74.9 in group S (p<0.01) and a QuickDASH of 55.9 in group F versus 27.4 in group S (p<0.001). At 6 weeks, the Constant score was 71.3 versus 86.1 (p<0.001) and the QuickDASH was 28.3 versus 10.6 (p<0.01), respectively. At 3 and 6 months, the recovery was comparable in both groups for these two scores. Return to work was earlier in the S group (34.3 versus 59.7 days; p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study reporting the functional results during the first 6 weeks after a displaced fracture of the middle third of the clavicle in adults. Further studies should be conducted to better identify target patients for whom fracture fixation may be beneficial.

CONCLUSION

This study supports open reduction and internal fixation with an anatomical plate of displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle since the functional recovery is better in the first 6 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective case-control study.

Minimal Pain Decrease Between 2 and 4 Weeks After Nonoperative Management of a Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Is Associated with a High Risk of Symptomatic Nonunion

BACKGROUND

The main long-term benefit of operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is the reduction in nonunion risk, and as this risk is generally low, the ideal approach would be to operate only patients at high risk of nonunion. However, most current surgical decision models use baseline variables to estimate the nonunion risk, and the value of these models remains unclear. Pain in the early weeks after fracture could be potentially be an indirect measurement of fracture healing, and so it is a potential proxy variable that could lead to simpler prediction models.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is pain a possible proxy variable for the development of symptomatic nonunion after nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures? (2) How reliable is the model we created that uses pain as a proxy variable for symptomatic nonunion of nonoperatively treated clavicle fractures?

METHODS

In this secondary retrospective analysis of an earlier randomized trial, we studied prospectively collected data from 64 nonoperatively treated patients aged 18 years to 60 years. In the original randomized trial, we compared operative and nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. In all, 150 patients were included in the study, of whom 71 received nonoperative treatment. Patients were predominantly males (75%, 48 of 64) with a mean age of 38 ± SD 12 years; most fractures were comminuted and shortened more than 1 cm. All 71 patients who were nonoperatively treated were potentially eligible for this secondary analysis; of those, 11% (8 of 71) were lost to follow-up, leaving 63 patients from the nonoperative treatment arm and one patient from the operative treatment arm (who declined surgical treatment after randomization but was followed in this group according to the intention-to-treat principle) for analysis here. Nonunion was defined as lack of callus formation, persistent fracture lines and/or sclerotic edges of the bones at the fracture site on plain radiographs at 6 months follow-up. Nonunions were regarded as symptomatic if pain, tenderness, and local crepitation were present at the fracture site. Seventeen percent (11 of 64) of patients had symptomatic nonunions. After investigating differences in early pain scores between the union and nonunion groups, we defined the VASratio as the VAS pain score at 4 weeks divided by the VAS pain score at 2 weeks. Week 2 VAS pain score was chosen as baseline after visual inspection of a linear mixed model that showed increased divergence in pain scores between union and nonunion group at 2 weeks after fracture. Week 4 was chosen as the cutoff because we wanted a reasonable time frame for the detection of pain reduction and did not want to delay surgical treatment more than necessary. Odds ratios for various risk factors were calculated using logistic regression analyses. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify cutoff values for the VASratio.

RESULTS

An increase in absolute pain score at 4 weeks after fracture (odds ratio 1.8 per 1 point increase [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.4]) was associated with an increased risk of nonunion 6 months after fracture. Likewise, we found that an increasing VASratio (OR 1.02 per 0.01 point increase [95% CI 1.002 to 1.06]) was also associated with nonunion. Receiver operating curve analysis found that the best cutoff value of VASratio was about 0.6. Patients with a VASratio above 0.6 had a relative risk of developing nonunion of 18 (95% CI 2 to 130) compared with patients with a VASratio below 0.6. Sparse-data bias could be present, as is evident from this wide confidence interval, though even at the low end of the confidence interval, the relative risk was 2, which may still improve surgical decision-making.

CONCLUSION

A pain score that exhibits no or minimal change from 2 to 4 weeks after nonoperative treatment of a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle is associated with a high risk that symptomatic nonunion will develop. Patients with no or minimal change in pain in the early weeks may be candidates for surgery to reduce the risk of symptomatic nonunion. As this was a retrospective study, with a risk of sparse-data bias, the predictive value of the VASratio needs to be further investigated in large prospective studies before clinical use.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Treated Nonoperatively Using Figure-of-Eight Bandage: Are Fracture Type, Shortening, and Displacement Radiographic Predictors of Failure?

As there are no clear and unique radiographic predictors of healing disturbances for acute midshaft clavicle fractures, their treatment is still controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate in midshaft clavicle fractures treated nonoperatively if fracture type (FT), shortening, and displacement, assessed before and after figure-of-eight bandage (F8-B) application, could be considered prognostic factors of delayed union and nonunion. One hundred twenty-two adult patients presenting a closed displaced midshaft clavicle fracture, managed nonoperatively with an F8-B, were enrolled. FT, initial shortening (IS), and initial displacement (ID) were radiographically evaluated at diagnosis, and both residual shortening (RS) and displacement (RD) were measured after F8-B application. The patients were followed up 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RD should be considered as radiological predictor of sequelae. Further, an RD equal to 104% of clavicle width was identified as an optimal cut-off point to distinguish between healed and unhealed fractures, and 140% between delayed union and nonunion. Our data pointed out the effectiveness of the F8-B in reducing fracture fragments and restoring clavicular length. In midshaft clavicle fractures of adults, fracture comminution and clavicular shortening did not influence bone healing. On the contrary, RD has been shown as the most likely predictor of both delayed union and nonunion.

Surgical or non-surgical treatment of traumatic skeletal fractures in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive overview of treatments of common fractures is missing, although it would be important for shared decision-making in clinical practice. The aim was to determine benefits and harms of surgical compared to non-surgical treatments for traumatic skeletal fractures.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and CENTRAL until November 2018, for randomized trials of surgical treatment in comparison with or in addition to non-surgical treatment of fractures in adults. For harms, only trials with patient enrollment in 2000 or later were included, while no time restriction was applied to benefits. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data from full-text trials, and performed risk of bias assessment. Outcomes were self-reported pain, function, and quality of life, and serious adverse events (SAEs). Random effects model (Hedges' g) was used.

RESULTS

Out of 28375 records screened, we included 61 trials and performed meta-analysis on 12 fracture types in 11 sites: calcaneus, clavicula, femur, humerus, malleolus, metacarpus, metatarsus, radius, rib, scaphoideum, and thoraco-lumbar spine. Seven other fracture types only had one trial available. For distal radius fractures, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.31 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.53, n = 378 participants) for function, favoring surgery, however, with greater risk of SAEs (RR = 3.10 (1.42 to 6.77), n = 436). For displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures, SMD was 0.64 (0.13 to 1.16) for function (n = 244) and 0.19 (0.01 to 0.36) for quality of life (n = 506) favoring surgery. Surgery was associated with a smaller risk of SAE than non-surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (RR = 0.62 (0.42 to 0.92), n = 1394). None of the other comparisons showed statistical significance differences and insufficient data existed for most of the common fracture types.

CONCLUSIONS

Of 12 fracture types with more than one trial, only two demonstrated a difference in favor of surgery (distal radius fractures and displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures), one of which demonstrated a greater risk of harms in the surgical group (distal radius fractures). Our results highlight the current paucity of high-quality randomized trials for common fracture types and a considerable heterogeneity and risk of bias in several of the available trials.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015020805.

Factors explaining heterogeneity in studies comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality observational studies

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses comparing the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures have demonstrated extensive heterogeneity, that is, treatment effect variation, in different pooled outcomes. We aimed to investigate the amount of heterogeneity seen in pooled treatment effects and to explore which moderator variables serve to explain this heterogeneity.

METHODS

A follow-up literature search, based a previous study, was conducted. All randomized controlled trials and high-quality observational studies with suitable treatment cohorts were identified and included in this systematic review and meta-regression analysis. The proportions of male patients, patients with the dominant hand injured, and smokers, as well as fracture type and mean age, were included as covariates in meta-regression analyses investigating the effect on the pooled estimate of treatment effect heterogeneity. The pooled treatment effects assessed were nonunion rate, malunion rate, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Constant score at 1 year, as well as revision surgery rate.

RESULTS

High heterogeneity was observed in 4 of 8 pooled treatment effects and moderate, in 2 of 8. An association between any of the covariates, including smoking, with the pooled treatment effect for the nonunion rate could not be established. Regarding malunion, the proportion of patients with the dominant hand injured showed linear dependency with the risk ratio. The proportion of male patients correlated with the pooled mean difference in both the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Constant score. Mean age and fracture type correlated with the pooled mean difference in the Constant score.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our results, several potential moderators influence the treatment effect when comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. These findings have implications for shared decision making and when making treatment recommendations.

Dual Mini-Fragment Plating Is Comparable With Precontoured Small Fragment Plating for Operative Diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare precontoured (Pc) small fragment plating to dual mini-fragment plating (DmF) for open reduction and internal fixation of diaphyseal clavicle fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 133 patients with displaced fractures of the diaphyseal clavicle (OTA/AO 15-B1, -2, and -3) treated with open reduction and internal fixation with a minimum of 1 year follow-up or until radiographic and clinical union.

INTERVENTION

Two patient cohorts were identified: (1) patients treated with orthogonal DmF plate constructs and (2) patients treated with Pc clavicle-specific plates.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Union rate and implant removal were assessed using standard descriptive statistics. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and P values (P) were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 60 DmF and 74 Pc patients. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, sex, surgeon, body mass index, or mode of fixation. There was no significant difference in union (98.3% DmF; 100% Pc, P = 0.45) or maintenance of reduction (98.3% DmF; 100% Pc, P = 0.45). A total of 8% of DmF patients had symptomatic implant removal compared with 20% of Pc patients (odds ratio 0.36, confidence interval 0.12-1.05, P = 0.061).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective comparative study found no difference in union or maintenance of reduction for diaphyseal clavicle fractures fixed with DmF compared with Pc plating. Patients treated with DmF plates may have lower rates of symptomatic implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The majority of clavicle fractures are midshaft injuries, although fractures of the distal or medial fragment also occur. The aim of this study was to review the current evidence on these injuries to help inform future treatment plans.

Methods

We searched for studies comparing interventions for medial, midshaft, or distal clavicle fractures; however, we did not identify any comparative studies on medial fractures and performed a secondary search on this topic. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analyses, although this was not feasible with studies on medial fractures and we described their results qualitatively.

Results

For midshaft fractures, we found statistically significant improvements in function and time to radiographic union with plating, an elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), and the Sonoma CRx intramedullary nail over nonoperative treatments. Both plating and an ESIN also showed significantly lower risks of nonunion and malunion relative to nonoperative methods. For distal fractures, a locking plate (LP) with or without coracoclavicular (CC) suturing yielded significantly better outcomes over K-wires with or without tension bands, CC suturing alone, an LP with a CC screw, a hook plate, and a sling. For medial fractures, plating may result in more favorable functional and union-related outcomes, although implant irritation may occur. In addition, K-wires, tension bands, and a screw with sutures demonstrated success when plating was technically not feasible in a few cases, whereas treatment with a sling may result in reduced function and a higher risk of complications relative to surgery.

Conclusion

This study can provide guidance on the management of medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures. The current evidence suggests that plating, an ESIN, and a CRx intramedullary nail are all good options for midshaft fractures; an LP with or without CC suturing should be preferred for distal fractures; and plating is also acceptable for medial fractures, provided that the patient is deemed suitable for surgery and has the adequate bone stock and sufficiently sized medial fragment necessary to implant the device. Patient preferences for certain outcomes should be considered, which may result in different treatment recommendations.

Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fracture Union Can Be Accurately Predicted with a Delayed Assessment at 6 Weeks Following Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if clinical recovery following a midshaft clavicle fracture can accurately predict fracture-healing. The additional information that can be assessed at 6 weeks after injury may have superior predictive value compared with information available at the time of the injury.

METHODS

A prospective study of all patients (≥16 years of age) who sustained a fully displaced midshaft clavicle fracture was performed. We assessed patient demographic characteristics, injury factors, functional scores, and radiographic predictors with a standardized protocol at 6 weeks. Conditional stepwise regression modeling was used to assess which factors independently predicted nonunion at 6 months after the injury as determined by computed tomography (CT). The nonunion predictor 6-week model was compared with a previously validated model based on factors available at the time of the injury, which included smoking, comminution, and fracture displacement.

RESULTS

At 6 months, 200 patients completed follow-up. The CT-defined nonunion rate was 14% (27 of 200). Of the functional scores, the QuickDASH (the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) had the highest accuracy on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with a 39.8-point threshold, above which was associated with nonunion (area under curve [AUC], 76.8%; p < 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of the cohort had a QuickDASH score of <40 points at 6 weeks, and 95% (131 of 138) of these patients had fracture union. On regression modeling, a QuickDASH score of ≥40 points (p = 0.001), no callus on radiographs (p = 0.004), and fracture movement on examination (p = 0.001) were significant predictors of nonunion. If none were present, the predicted nonunion risk was 3%, found in 40% (80 of 200) of the cohort. Conversely, if ≥2 of the predictors were present, found in 23.5% of the cohort, the predicted nonunion risk was 60%. The nonunion predictor model at 6 weeks appeared to have superior accuracy (AUC, 87.3%) when compared with the nonunion predictor model at the time of injury (AUC, 64.8%) for fracture-healing on ROC curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed assessment at 6 weeks following displaced midshaft clavicle fracture enables an accurate prediction of patients who are likely to have union with nonoperative management. One in 4 patients are at an increased risk of nonunion and may benefit from operative intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What Is the Best Evidence for Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Displaced mid-third clavicle fractures are common, and their management remains unclear. Although several meta-analyses have compared specific operative techniques with nonoperative management, it is not possible to compare different operative constructs with one another using a standard meta-analysis. Conversely, a network meta-analysis allows comparisons among more than two treatment arms, using both direct and indirect comparisons between interventions across many trials. To our knowledge, no network meta-analysis has been performed to compare the multiple treatment options for displaced clavicle fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) to determine from among the approaches used to treat displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: (1) the intervention with the highest chance of union at 1 year, (2) the intervention with the lowest risk of revision surgery, and (3) the intervention with the highest functional outcome scores. Secondarily, we also (4) compared the surgical subtypes in the available RCTs on the same above endpoints.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were reviewed for relevant randomized controlled trials published up to July 25, 2018. Two hundred and eighty four papers were reviewed, with 22 meeting inclusion criteria of RCTs with appropriate randomization techniques, adult population, minimum of 1 year follow-up and including at least one operative treatment arm. In total, 1002 patients were treated with a plate construct, 378 with an intramedullary device, and 585 patients were managed nonoperatively. Treatment subtypes included locked intramedullary devices (56), unlocked intramedullary devices (322), anterior plating (89), anterosuperior plating (150), superior plating (449) or plating not otherwise specified (314). We performed a network meta-analysis to compare and rank the treatments for displaced clavicle fractures. We considered the following outcomes: union achievement, revision surgery risk and functional outcomes (DASH and Constant Scores). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was considered for both Constant and DASH scores to be at 8 points, representing the average of MCID scores reported for both DASH and Constant in the evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

Union achievement was lower in patients treated nonoperatively (88.9%), and higher in patients treated operatively (96.7%, relative risk [RR] 1.128 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.17]; p < 0.001), Number needed to treat (NNT) = 10). Union achievement increased with any plate construct (97.8%, RR 1.13 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.7]; p < 0.0001, NNT = 9) and with anterior or anterosuperior plates (99.3%, RR 1.14 [95% CI 1.1 to 1.8]; p < 0.0001, NNT = 8). Risk of reoperation, when considering planned removal of hardware, was similar across all treatment arms. Lastly, operative treatment outperformed nonoperative treatment with minor improvements in DASH and Constant scores, though not approaching the MCID. At the subtype level, anterosuperior plating ranked highest in DASH and Constant functional scores with mean differences reaching 10-point improvement for Constant scores (95% CI 4.4 to 2.5) and 7.6 point improvement for DASH (95% CI 5.2 to 20).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that surgical treatment led to a greater likelihood of union at 1 year of follow-up among adult patients with displaced mid-third clavicle fractures. In aggregate, surgical treatment did not increase functional scores by amounts that patients were likely to consider clinically important. Use of specific subtypes of plating (anterior, anterosuperior) resulted in improvements in the Constant score that were slightly above the MCID but did not reach the MCID for the DASH score, suggesting that any outcomes-score benefits favoring surgery were likely to be imperceptible or small. In light of these findings, we believe patients can be informed that surgery for this injury can increase the likelihood of union incrementally (about 10 patients would need to undergo surgery to avoid one nonunion), but they should not expect better function than they would achieve without surgery; most patients can avoid surgery altogether with little absolute risk of nonunion. Patients who opt for surgery must be told that the decision should be weighed against complications and the possibility of undergoing a second procedure for hardware removal. Patients opting not to have surgery for acute midshaft clavicle fractures can be told that nonunion occurs in slightly more than 10% of patients, and that these can be more difficult to manage than acute fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Screw-plate fixation for displaced middle-third clavicular fractures with three or more fragments: A report of 172 cases

BACKGROUND

Although mid-shaft clavicular fractures are generally thought to be non-serious injuries that nearly always heal with non-operative treatment, recent studies found non-union rates of 3%-7% in simple fractures and 20%-33% in complex fractures. The primary objective of this study was to report the functional and anatomical outcomes after screw-plate fixation of displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures with three or more fragments.

HYPOTHESIS

Screw-plate fixation in this indication is an excellent treatment option that minimises the risk of complications.

METHODS

A search of our database from 6 January 2012 to 27 December 2016 identified 410 cases of clavicular fracture, of which 250 were managed surgically, including 172 meeting our inclusion criteria and having complete data. These 172 patients were managed using a curved pelvic reconstruction plate with 3.5-mm non-locking screws positioned over the antero-superior aspect of the clavicle. All 172 patients were re-evaluated at least 1 year after surgery by an independent assessor, who determined the UCLA score.

RESULTS

We studied 172 patients, 154 (89.5%) males and 18 females with a mean age of 34.5±14.5 years (range, 13-69 years). In 84.5% of cases, the fracture was a sports injury, and the most common sports were skiing (26%), cycling (21%), and mountain biking (18.5%). Of the 172 fractures, all but 1 healed, within a mean of 87 days (range, 45-120 days). After removal of the fixation material, 8 (4.5%) patients experienced a recurrent fracture, within a mean of 90 days (range, 2-210 days); 4 of these recurrent fractures were caused by high-energy traumas occurring 6 months after implant removal. The UCLA score determined at re-evaluation indicated that the outcome was excellent in 164 (95.5%), good in 5 (3%), and fair in 3 patients.

CONCLUSION

Internal fixation using a curved pelvic reconstruction plate fixed with 3.5-mm screws provides excellent functional and anatomical outcomes in patients who have displaced mid-shaft clavicular fractures with three or more fragments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort study.

Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: Surgery Provides Better Results as Compared With Nonoperative Treatment: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no agreement on the best treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs), which are currently addressed by nonoperative or surgical approaches.

PURPOSE

To compare fracture healing and functional outcome after surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of MCFs, to help specialists in deciding between these different strategies by providing a synthesis of the best literature evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic research of the literature was performed in different online databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and grey literature. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used. The risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Collaboration's "risk of bias" tool, and the quality of evidence was graded according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials investigating differences between surgery and nonoperative treatment for displaced MCFs were included. The primary outcome was the nonunion rate. Other outcomes analyzed were time to union and to return to activities, Constant score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) index. Patients' satisfaction, secondary operations, and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Out of 832 records found, 14 randomized controlled trials with 1546 patients were included. A significantly lower risk ratio was found for nonunion (10%; 95% CI, 6%-18%, P < .001) favoring surgery. Time to union was 5.1 weeks shorter with surgery (P = .007). The complication rate (including the number of reinterventions) was higher in the surgical group (31.3% vs 20.5%, P < .001). Shoulder function at short-term follow-up was significantly better in the surgical group (DASH index mean difference = 4.0 points), while no statistical difference was found in the Constant score and in the DASH index at midterm follow-up (P = .41 and .80, respectively). At long-term follow-up, both shoulder functional scores were significantly better in the surgery group: the overall Constant score mean difference was 5.3 points (95% CI, 2.3-8.4 points; P < .001), and the DASH index mean difference was 4.3 points (95% CI, 0.2-8.4 points; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of MCFs significantly reduces the nonunion rate and shortens the time to union as compared with the nonoperative approach and, despite a slightly higher incidence of complications, leads to better shoulder functional scores at short- and long-term follow-up. Further studies should address the clinical significance of the documented improvement.

Open reduction and internal fixation of clavicular fractures after a delay of three months is associated with an increased risk of complications and revision surgery

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to determine if delayed clavicular fixation results in a greater risk of operative complications and revision surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series was undertaken of all displaced clavicular fractures that underwent plate fixation over a ten-year period (2007 to 2017). Patient demographics, time to surgery, complications, and mode of failure were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors contributing towards operative complications. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine if a potential 'safe window' exists from injury to delayed surgery. Propensity score matching was used to construct a case control study for comparison of risk.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were included in the analysis. Postoperative infection occurred in 3.9% of all patients (n = 10); the only variable associated was a greater time interval from injury to fixation (p = 0.001). Failed primary surgery requiring revision fixation was required in 7.7% of the cohort (n = 20), with smoking (p < 0.001), presence of a postoperative infection (p < 0.001), increasing age (p = 0.018), and greater time delay from injury to surgery (p = 0.015) identified as significant independent predictors on regression analysis. ROC analysis revealed that surgery beyond 96 days from injury increased the rate of major complications and revision surgery. Using a matched case cohort of cases before (n = 67) and after (n = 77) the 'safe window', the risk of postoperative infection increased (odds ratio (OR) 7.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 62.9; p = 0.028), fixation failure (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.2 to 12.1; p = 0.017) and revision surgery (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 15.0; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

A delay to primary fixation of up to three months following injury may be acceptable, beyond which there is an increased risk of major operative complications and revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1385-1391.

Routine fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is not cost-effective: a cost analysis from a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

The primary aim of this study was to establish the cost-effectiveness of the early fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cost analysis was conducted within a randomized controlled trial comparing conservative management (n = 92) versus early plate fixation (n = 86) of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to express the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The Six-Dimension Short-Form Health Survey (SF-6D) score was used as the preference-based health index to calculate the cost per QALY at 12 months after the injury.

RESULTS

The mean 12-month SF-6D was 0.9522 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9355 to 0.9689) following conservative management and 0.9607 (95% CI 0.9447 to 0.9767) following fixation, giving an advantage for fixation of 0.0085, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.46). The mean cost per patient was £1322.69 for conservative management and £5405.32 for early fixation. This gave an ICER of £480 309.41 per QALY. For a threshold of £20 000 per QALY, the benefit of fixation would need to be present for 24 years to be cost-effective compared with conservative treatment. Linear regression analysis identified nonunion as the only factor to adversely influence the SF-6D at 12 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Routine plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is not cost-effective. Nonunion following conservative management has an increased morbidity with comparable expense to early fixation. This may suggest that a targeted approach of fixation in patients who are at higher risk of nonunion would be more cost-effective than the routine fixation of all displaced fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:995-1001.

Is shortening of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures associated with inferior clinical outcomes following nonoperative management? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is controversial. Nonoperative treatment can lead to shortening, a risk factor for nonunion and poor functional outcomes. These inferior results have resulted in authors recommending surgical fixation for fractures with significant shortening. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the effect of fracture shortening on shoulder function and nonunion rates in nonoperatively managed displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

METHODS

A review of the online databases MEDLINE and Embase was conducted on February 16, 2018, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered prospectively in the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies with midshaft clavicle fractures treated nonoperatively reporting an evaluation of the degree of clavicle shortening and either shoulder function or nonunion were included. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 16 studies eligible for inclusion, comprising 4 randomized controlled trials and 12 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies. Of the 12 case series, 11 failed to demonstrate any correlation between shortening and shoulder outcome scores. Of the 4 randomized controlled trials, 3 reported no significant association between fracture shortening and shoulder outcome scores. The studies also failed to demonstrate a significant association between nonunion and the presence of clavicle shortening.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant association between fracture shortening and nonunion rates or shoulder outcome scores in displaced midshaft clavicle fractures managed nonoperatively.

Open reduction and plate fixation compared with non-surgical treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUNDS

There is no consensus concerning whether surgery or non-surgical treatment is preferred for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare healing effects and cosmetic results between surgery and non-surgery.

METHODS

We retrieved RCTs regarding open reduction and plate fixation (ORPF) and non-surgical method for the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fracture published before June 2018 from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The difference between the two treatments was comparatively discussed in aspects of nonunion, malunion, functional outcome, cosmetic results, and complications.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included. The results showed that ORPF is advantageous over the non-surgical treatment in terms of nonunion rate (RR, 0.11[95%CI, 0.06-0.23]), malunion rate (RR, 0.16[95%CI, 0.08-0.35]), appearance dissatisfaction rate (RR, 0.35[95%CI 0.23-0.55]), and shoulder appearance defect rate (RR, 0.06[95%CI, 0.02-0.17]). The non-surgical treatment showed lower rate of complication (RR, 1.60[95%CI, 1.02-2.53]) and no significant differences were found between the 2 treatment groups with respect to functional outcome (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire score) (MD, -4.17[95%CI, -9.35 to 1.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis updated previous results. The current findings suggested that ORPF yielded better efficacy than conservation treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fracture from perspectives of fracture healing and appearance.

The Effectiveness of a Flexible Locked Intramedullary Nail and an Anatomically Contoured Locked Plate to Treat Clavicular Shaft Fractures: A 1-Year Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Displaced and shortened clavicular shaft fractures can be treated operatively with intramedullary or extramedullary fixation. The aim of the present study was to compare the union rates and functional outcomes of displaced and/or shortened clavicular shaft fractures treated with a flexible locked intramedullary nail or with an anatomically contoured locked plate.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with acute displaced and/or shortened clavicular shaft fractures underwent randomly assigned management with either an intramedullary locked nail or an anatomically contoured locked plate. The same surgeon performed all surgical procedures, and all patients underwent identical postoperative treatment regimens. Incision length, surgical time, and union rate were recorded, and the functional outcome of the shoulder was assessed with use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant Shoulder (CS) scores. Data were analyzed with use of traditional statistical methods as well as Cohen effect sizes, which were based on the minimal clinical important differences.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were managed with an anatomically contoured locked plate, and 35 patients were managed with a Sonoma CRx intramedullary flexible locked nail. There were no differences in general patient characteristics, fracture type, or displacement between treatment groups. The nailing group had significantly better outcomes (p < 0.001) than the locked plating group for surgical time (mean and standard deviation [SD], 45 ± 12 compared with 65 ± 21 minutes, respectively) and incision size (mean and SD, 37 ± 9 compared with 116 ± 18 mm). A union rate of 100% was observed in both groups. DASH scores were similar between groups at 1.5, 3, and 6 months, whereas the nailing group had significantly better DASH scores at 12 months (p = 0.022); however, this difference had only a moderate effect size. Overall, individual variation in DASH and CS scores was substantially higher in the plating group compared with the nailing group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the precontoured locked plate and the flexible locked intramedullary nail effectively treated displaced and/or shortened clavicular shaft fractures. Similar outcomes were achieved at 1.5, 3, and 6 months after surgical intervention, and better DASH scores were found in the nailing group at 12 months. Cohen effect sizes suggested that slightly better outcomes were potentially achieved in the nailing group.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clavicle fractures in adults; current concepts

BACKGROUND

For decades, clavicle fractures have been treated conservatively. In the last 20 years, however, non-union rates after conservative treatment appear higher than previously reported and more evidence regarding operative treatment has become available. This has led to a paradigm shift towards an increase in operative treatment. The aim of this review is to present the current concepts and available evidence regarding clavicle fracture treatment.

METHODS

Conservative and operative treatment options together with their indications for medial, shaft and lateral clavicle fractures are discussed. For all three anatomical locations, a treatment algorithm is proposed.

CONCLUSION

In general, non-displaced fractures are treated conservatively. Operative treatment has to be discussed with patients with displaced clavicle fractures, especially in the young and active patient.

Adolescent Clavicle Fractures: Is There a Role for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past ten years, there has been a change in the management of adolescent clavicle fractures. Utilizing data from the adult population, clinicians have become more aggressive in terms of surgical fixation. The purpose of this paper is to critically analyze the recent literature in regard to adolescent clavicle fractures, and to determine the role of open reduction and internal fixation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although there have been many case series that demonstrate that open reduction and internal fixation can be done safely and with predictable healing, studies which compare operative versus non-operative intervention suggest there may not be functional outcome differences between the two treatment options. Further study is necessary to determine the specific indications for fixation of clavicle fractures in the adolescent population. Shared decision-making between patient, family, and clinicians is essential to determine the specific fracture patterns and patients who might benefit from fixation to improve functional outcome.

Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle

BACKGROUND

Clavicle fractures are common, accounting for 2.6% to 4% of all fractures. Eighty per cent of clavicle fractures are located in the middle third of the clavicle. Although treatment of these fractures is usually non-surgical, displaced clavicle fractures may be considered for surgical treatment because of their greater risk of non-union. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus conservative interventions for treating middle third clavicle fractures.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, trials registries and reference lists updated to December 2017. We did not apply any language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures in the middle third of the clavicle. The primary outcomes were shoulder function or disability, pain and treatment failure, defined as the number of participants who had been given a non-routine secondary surgical intervention (excluding hardware removal), for symptomatic non-union, malunion or other complications.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors selected eligible studies, independently assessed risk of bias and cross-checked data. Where appropriate, we pooled results of comparable studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 studies involving 1469 participants with acute middle third clavicle fractures. All studies included adults, with the overall range from 17 to 70 years. Of the studies that reported gender, men were over-represented. Ten studies compared plate fixation with sling or figure-of-eight bandage, or both, and four studies compared intramedullary fixation with wearing either a sling or a figure-of-eight bandage. Almost all studies had design features that carry a high risk of bias, thus limiting the strength of their findings.Low-quality evidence from 10 studies (838 participants), showed that, compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment of acute middle third clavicle fractures may not improve upper arm function at follow-up of one year or longer: standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.02 to 0.67. We downgraded the quality of the evidence because of risk of bias and high statistical heterogeneity (I² = 83%). This corresponds to a mean improvement of 2.3 points in favour of surgery (0.14 points worse to 4.69 points better), on the 100-point Constant score; this does not represent a clinically important difference. There may be no difference in pain measured using a visual analogue scale (0 to 100 mm; higher scores mean worse pain) between treatments (mean difference (MD) -0.60 mm, 95% CI -3.51 to 2.31; 277 participants, 3 studies; low-quality evidence reflecting risk of bias and imprecision). Surgery may reduce the risk of treatment failure, that is, number of participants who had non-routine secondary surgical intervention (excluding hardware removal), for symptomatic non-union, malunion or other complication (risk ratio (RR) 0.32, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.50; 1197 participants, 12 studies; low-quality evidence, downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision). The main source of treatment failure was mechanical failure (3.4%) in the surgery group and symptomatic non-union (11.6%) in the conservative-treatment group.We are uncertain whether surgery results in fewer people having one or more cosmetic problems, such as deformities, which were more common after conservative treatment, or hardware prominence or scarring, which only occurred in the surgery group (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.98; 1130 participants, 11 studies; I² = 63%; very low-quality evidence downgraded for risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency). We are uncertain whether there is any difference between surgery and conservative treatment in the risk of incurring an adverse outcome that includes local infection, dehiscence, symptomatic malunion, discomfort leading to implant removal, skin and nerve problems: RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.64; 1317 participants, 14 studies; I² = 72%; very low-quality evidence, downgraded for risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency). Hardware removal for discomfort was a common adverse outcome in the surgery group (10.2%) while symptomatic malunion was more common in the conservative-treatment group (11.3% versus 1.2% in the surgery group). Infection occurred only in the surgery group (3.2%). There may be no between-group difference in quality of life at one year (SF-12 or SF-36 physical component scores: 0 to 100 scale, where 100 is the best score): MD 0.30 (95% CI -1.95 to 2.56, 321 participants, 2 studies; low-quality evidence downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-quality evidence that surgical treatment has no additional benefits in terms of function, pain and quality of life compared with conservative treatment, but may result in fewer treatment failures overall. Very low-quality evidence means that we are very uncertain of the findings of a slightly better cosmetic result after surgery and of no difference between surgical and conservative treatment in the risk of adverse events. For both composite outcomes, there is a need to consider the balance of risks between the individual outcomes; for example, surgical adverse events, including wound infection or dehiscence and hardware irritation, against risk of adverse events that may be more commonly associated with conservative treatment such as symptomatic malunion and shoulder stiffness.Treatment options must be chosen on an individual patient basis, after careful consideration of the relative benefits and harms of each intervention and of patient preferences.