Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion of the distal part of the radius

An image fusion system for corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion

Background

To provide surgical support for corrective osteotomy, we developed an image fusion system for three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning and fluoroscopy. To assess the utility of this image fusion system, we evaluated the reproducibility of preoperative planning for corrective osteotomy of dorsally angulated distal radius malunion using the system and compared reproducibility without using the system.

Methods

Ten wrists from 10 distal radius malunion patients who underwent corrective osteotomy were evaluated. 3D preoperative planning and the image fusion system were used for the image fusion group (n = 5). Only 3D preoperative planning was used for the control group (n = 5). 3D preoperative planning was performed for both groups in order to assess reduction, placement, and the choice of implants. In the image fusion group, the outline of the planned image was displayed on a monitor and overlapped with fluoroscopy images during surgery. Reproducibility was evaluated using preoperative plan and postoperative 3D images. Images were compared with the 3D coordinates of the radial styloid process (1), the volar and dorsal edges of the sigmoid notch (2) (3), and the barycentric coordinates of the three reference points. The reproducibility of the preoperative plan was evaluated by the distance of the coordinates between the plan and postoperative images for the reference points.

Results

The distances between preoperative planning and postoperative reduction in the image fusion group were 2.1 ± 1.1 mm, 1.8 ± 0.7 mm, 1.9 ± 0.9 mm, and 1.4 ± 0.7 mm for reference points (1), (2), (3), and the barycenter, respectively. The distances between preoperative planning and postoperative reduction in the control group were 3.7 ± 1.0 mm, 2.8 ± 2.0 mm, 1.7 ± 0.8 mm, and 1.8 ± 1.2 mm for reference points (1), (2), (3), and the barycenter, respectively. The difference in reference point (1) was significantly smaller in the image fusion group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Corrective osteotomy using an image fusion system will become a new surgical support method for fracture malunion.

Trial registration Registered as NCT03764501 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Early Correction of Distal Radius Partial Articular Malunion Leads to Good Long-term Functional Recovery at Mean Follow-up of 4 Years

Background: Distal radius articular step-off or deformity may cause posttraumatic arthritis and poor functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain and functional outcomes in patients with malunited partial articular distal radius fractures who underwent corrective osteotomy. We hypothesized that anatomic restoration of distal radius articular surface after a malunited partial articular distal radius fracture results in improvement in pain and functional measures and delays the development of posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: Seven consecutive patients with mean age of 38 years underwent corrective osteotomy via either a standard dorsal approach or combined dorsal and volar approach. Mean time from injury to corrective osteotomy was 10 weeks. Patients were assessed with respect to Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), forearm and wrist range of motion, pain, and grip strength. Results: At mean follow-up of 44 months, significant improvements in pain scores (7.1-0.9, P < .001), QuickDASH (38.7-11.6, P < .001), grip strength (21.4-30.0 kg, P = .01) were achieved. All range of motion measurements demonstrated significant improvements except forearm pronation. One patient demonstrated radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis but had no pain at final follow-up. No patients required secondary surgery for removal of symptomatic hardware. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that early corrective osteotomies should be considered in young patients with intra-articular distal radius malunions before considering salvage procedures such as partial or complete wrist arthrodesis.

Complications in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures: How Do We Avoid them?

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the upper extremity. The purpose of this review is to outline common complications that may arise when caring for distal radius fractures and to describe the treatment strategies when faced with such complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tendon complications are not uncommon after distal radius fractures. Recent literature highlights new plating technology for dorsal plating techniques. Moreover, new literature has outlined parameters for flexor tendon complications when using volar locking plates in an effort to avoid flexor tendon irritation and rupture. In summary, it is important to understand the various complications that can arise when treating distal radius fractures in an effort to avoid suboptimal outcomes.

Best Approaches in Distal Radius Fracture Malunions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malunion remains a common complication in the treatment of distal radius fractures. The purpose of this review was to discuss the various approaches in planning and surgical management for extra- and intra-articular distal radius malunions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have reported good results with surgical correction of distal radius malunions utilizing a number of preoperative planning methods and surgical approaches. Three-dimensional models and custom cutting guides have recently become more popular, but their benefit in comparison to other methods remains unclear. Regardless of preoperative planning method or surgical approach, good results can be achieved with correction of distal radius malunion with careful attention to patient selection, indications, and surgical technique.

Three-dimensional virtual planning of corrective osteotomies of distal radius malunions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to summarize and evaluate results of three-dimensional (3D-) planned corrective osteotomies of malunited distal radius fractures. 3D-planning techniques provide the possibility to address 3D-deformity that conventional planning methods might not address. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library for studies that performed a 3D-planned corrective osteotomy on patients with a malunited distal radius fracture. Fifteen studies with a total of 68 patients were included in the analysis. In 96% of cases, the preoperatively present palmar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance showed statistically significant improvement postoperatively with restoration to within 5° or 2 mm of their normal values. Mean flexion–extension, pro-supination and grip strength showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05). Complications were reported in 11 out of 68 patients (16%). With the current advances in 3D printing technology, 3D-planned corrective osteotomies seem a promising technique in the treatment of complex distal radius malunions.

Level of evidence IV Systematic review of case series, Level IV.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Intra-articular osteotomy for malunited articular fractures of the distal end of the humerus

BACKGROUND

The precarious anatomy of the articular surface of the distal humerus, as well as its meager subchondral bony support and limited soft-tissue attachments, presents enormous challenges for the operative correction of post-traumatic intra-articular deformities. This study presents 8 patients who underwent articular osteotomy with a mean follow-up period of 10.6 years, with an emphasis on functional, patient-rated, and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Eight patients (mean age, 39 years; range, 17-60 years) were followed up for a mean period of 10.6 years. The original fracture was a type C variant in 4 patients, a type B unicondylar fracture in 2, and a type B articular shearing fracture in 2. The initial injury was treated operatively in 5 patients and nonoperatively in 3. The osteotomy and reconstruction were performed on average 8 months after injury (range, 6-11 months). The mean preoperative elbow arc of motion was 37°. Two patients had ulnar nerve dysfunction.

RESULTS

All the osteotomies healed after the index procedure without evidence of avascular necrosis. Two patients required a second procedure for stiffness. At follow-up, the mean arc of elbow motion improved to 104° (P = .001), with a mean flexion contracture of 26°. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at follow-up was 13 (range, 1-37); the mean patient satisfaction rating on a Likert scale (from 0 to 10) was 9.1; and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 83 points (range, 70-100 points). Grade II osteoarthritic changes were seen in 3 patients, grade I in 3, and grade 0 in 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with a defined intra-articular malunion, the results of our experience support corrective osteotomy.

Three-dimensional correction of distal radius intra-articular malunions using patient-specific drill guides

PURPOSE

To analyze the feasibility of combining computer-assisted 3-dimensional planning with patient-specific drill guides and to evaluate this technology's surgical outcomes for distal radius intra-articular malunions.

METHODS

Six symptomatic patients with intra-articular malunions of the distal radius with a stepoff of more than 2 mm were treated with an outside-in corrective osteotomy. The described cases consist of 2 malunited volar Barton fractures, 2 radial styloid fractures, 1 AO-type C1 fracture, and 1 die-punch fracture. The osteotomies were guided by 3-dimensionally generated aiming guides that allowed precise cutting and the reduction of up to 2 fragments. All 6 patients were examined clinically and radiologically after 1 year. The surgical outcomes were quantitatively analyzed by comparing the preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic data.

RESULTS

In all 6 cases, the osteotomies were consolidated 8 weeks postoperatively. After 1 year, 4 patients were pain-free, 1 had mild pain, and 1 experienced moderate pain during heavy work. Wrist motion and grip strength were improved in all patients. The postoperative radiographs showed no articular stepoff or degenerative changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-specific aiming guides provided a reliable method to correct intra-articular malunions of the distal radius. This technique allows the surgeon to safely perform difficult intra-articular osteotomies and may help limit the need for salvage procedures such as partial or complete wrist arthrodesis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Accuracy of 3D Virtual Planning of Corrective Osteotomies of the Distal Radius

Corrective osteotomies of the distal radius for symptomatic malunion are time-tested procedures that rely on accurate corrections. Patients with combined intra- and extra-articular malunions present a challenging deformity. Virtual planning and patient-specific instruments (PSIs) to transfer the planning into the operating room have been used both to simplify the surgery and to make it more accurate. This report focuses on the clinically achieved accuracy in four patients treated between 2008 and 2012 with virtual planning and PSIs for a combined intra- and extraarticular malunion of the distal radius. The accuracy of the correction is quantified by comparing the virtual three-dimensional (3D) planning model with the postoperative 3D bone model. For the extraarticular malunion the 3D volar tilt, 3D radial inclination and 3D ulnar variance are measured. The volar tilt is undercorrected in all cases with an average of -6 ± 6°. The average difference between the postoperative and planned 3D radial inclination was -1 ± 5°. The average difference between the postoperative and planned 3D ulnar variances is 0 ± 1 mm. For the evaluation of the intraarticular malunion, both the arc method of measurement and distance map measurement are used. The average postoperative maximum gap is 2.1 ± 0.9 mm. The average maximum postoperative step-off is 1.3 ± 0.4 mm. The average distance between the postoperative and planned articular surfaces is 1.1 ± 0.6 mm as determined in the distance map measurement. There is a tendency to achieve higher accuracy as experience builds up, both on the surgeon's side and on the design engineering side. We believe this technology holds the potential to achieve consistent accuracy of very complex corrections.

Vascularized graft from the metatarsal base for reconstructing major osteochondral distal radius defects

PURPOSE

To present our experience of reconstructing distal radius articular defects with a vascularized osteochondral graft from the metatarsal base and to present the mid-term outcomes.

METHODS

Seven patients (average age, 36 y; range, 26-55 y) who had reconstruction of major defects of the articular surface of the radius are presented. In 5, the lunate facet and sigmoid notch were reconstructed; in 1, an isolated defect on the surface of the lunate facet was reconstructed; and in 1, the scaphoid facet was reconstructed. In 6, the base of the third metatarsal was transferred, and in 1, the base of the second was transferred.

RESULTS

All flaps survived without complications. At the latest follow-up (range, 20 mo to 8 y), the flexion-extension arc improved an average of 50°, and the pain on a visual analog scale decreased from 8 to 1 on average. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 54 to 11 on average. One patient did not improve. No major complaints related to the donor site were mentioned (average American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score of 96/100).

CONCLUSIONS

Our mid-term results are promising; however, the decision-making process and the operation are complex. The operation is not indicated when the carpals are devoid of cartilage or when the defect involves the whole radius surface.

Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius following failed internal fixation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to quantify the clinical and radiographic outcomes after corrective osteotomy for malunions of the distal radius following failed internal fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of 18 patients (8 women, 10 men; mean age 41 years) are presented an average of 7 years after osteotomy of a malunited distal radius fracture. We assessed active range of motion, grip strength, radiographic alignment, pain and disability. Subjective and objective data were summarized using the modified Mayo Wrist Score and the point-score system of Fernandez.

RESULTS

Wrist motion, pain and deformity improved with the operation in all cases. The modified Mayo Wrist Score averaged 79 points. The scale of Fernandez indicated ten good, two fair and six poor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the operative correction of a distal radius malunion following an unsuccessful internal fixation can be achieved with outcomes comparable to those reported after initial nonoperative treatment.

Positioning evaluation of corrective osteotomy for the malunited radius: 3-D CT versus 2-D radiographs

The authors retrospectively investigated the postoperative position of the distal radius after a corrective osteotomy using 2-dimensional (2-D) and 3-dimensional (3-D) imaging techniques to determine whether malposition correlates with clinical outcome. Twenty-five patients who underwent a corrective osteotomy were available for follow-up. The residual positioning errors of the distal end were determined retrospectively using standard 2-D radiographs and 3-D computed tomography evaluations based on a scan of both forearms, with the contralateral healthy radius serving as reference. For 3-D analysis, use of an anatomical coordinate system for each reference bone allowed the authors to express the residual malalignment parameters in displacements (Δx, Δy, Δz) and rotations (Δφx, Δφy, Δφz) for aligning the affected bone in a standardized way with the corresponding reference bone. The authors investigated possible correlations between malalignment parameters and clinical outcome using patients' questionnaires. Two-dimensional radiographic evaluation showed a radial inclination of 24.9°±6.8°, a palmar tilt of 4.5°±8.6°, and an ulnar variance of 0.8±1.7 mm. With 3-D analysis, residual displacements were 2.6±3 (Δx), 2.4±3 (Δy), and -2.2±4 (Δz) mm. Residual rotations were -6.2°±10° (Δφx), 0.3°±7° (Δφy), and -5.1°±10° (Δφz). The large standard deviation is indicative of persistent malalignment in individual cases. Statistically significant correlations were found between 3-D rotational deficits and clinical outcome but not between 2-D evaluation parameters. Considerable residual malalignments and statistically significant correlations between malalignment parameters and clinical outcome confirm the need for better positioning techniques.

Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty for malunited intra-articular distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

Cartilage damage of the carpals is a contraindication for corrective osteotomy of the malunited intra-articular distal radius fracture and typically is treated in the symptomatic patient with a salvage procedure. Here, we present our experience and early results with arthroscopic resection arthroplasty of the radiocarpal joint.

METHODS

We treated 10 patients (age, 17-68 y; average, 53 y) who had intra-articular malunion of the distal radius with mirror erosion on the carpals. The original fracture occurred 4 to 36 months (average, 9 mo) before our intervention. We performed arthroscopic arthrolysis and resected the offending portion of the radial malunited fragment, eliminating the stepoff and creating a smoother joint surface. Range of motion was started immediately after the operation, except in 2 patients.

RESULTS

The locations of the malunions were evenly distributed between the scaphoid fossa, the lunate fossa, or both. Stepoffs varied from 2 to 6 mm. We resected up to 60% of the entire radial articular surface to obtain a smooth surface (average, 28%; range, 20% to 60%). All patients reported immediate relief of pain and improvement in motion (particularly extension). At the latest follow-up (average, 28 mo; range, 13-42 mo), average extension improved from 24° to 54°, average grip strength improved from 47% to 89% of the contralateral wrist, average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 74 to 18, and average Patient-Rated Wrist Hand Evaluation score improved from 79 to 15.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of the operation was to relieve patients' pain by providing a smooth, although fibrocartilaginous, surface for the carpus to glide on the radius. The follow-up was short and the results may be short-lived. However, for the younger patient, it may provide a temporary alternative to partial wrist arthrodesis with minimal morbidity, and for the less demanding patients, it may be a definitive procedure.

Corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular distal radius malunion

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the functional outcome of corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular malunions of the distal radius using multiple outcome scores.

METHODS

We evaluated 18 skeletally mature patients at an average of 78 months after corrective osteotomy for a combined intra- and extra-articular malunion of the distal part of the radius. The indication for osteotomy in all patients was the combination of an extra-articular deformity (≥ 15° volar or ≥ 10° dorsal angulation or ≥ 3 mm radial shortening) and intra-articular incongruity of 2 mm or greater (maximum stepoff or gap), as measured on lateral and posteroanterior radiographs. The average interval from the injury to the osteotomy was 9 months. The average maximum stepoff or gap of the articular surface before surgery was 4 mm.

RESULTS

All 18 patients healed uneventfully and the final articular incongruity was reduced to 2 mm or less. Final range of motion and grip strength significantly improved, averaging 89% and 84% of the uninjured side and 185% and 241% of the preoperative measures, respectively. The rate of excellent or good results was 72% according to the validated rating system Mayo Modified Wrist Score, and 89% according to the unvalidated system of Gartland and Werley. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11, which corresponds to mild perceived disability. Of the 18 cases, 11 normalized upper limb function. Five patients had complications; all were successfully treated. According to the rating system of Knirk and Jupiter, 4 had grade 1 and 1 had grade 2 osteoarthritis of the radiocarpal joint on radiographs. Two of those patients reported occasional mild pain. Radiographic osteoarthritis did not correlate with strength, motion, and wrist scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular malunions were comparable to those of osteotomy for isolated intra- and extra-articular malunions. A successful corrective osteotomy for the treatment of complex intra- and extra-articular distal radius malunions can improve wrist function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Malunion of the distal radius

Fractures of the distal radius are extremely common injuries, which are steadily becoming a public health issue. One of the most common complications following distal radius fractures is still malunion of the distal radius. This review of the literature surrounding distal radius malunion covers the biomechanics of distal radial malunion, treatment options, indications for surgery, surgical techniques, and results.

Management of malunions of the distal radius

Despite encouraging results from small case series, correction of distal radius malunion remains a challenging procedure with uncertain outcomes. The most appropriate treatment for a distal radius malunion is prevention. If a symptomatic malunion is discovered, correction should be undertaken as early as possible. It is recommended that action be taken within six months of the primary injury to decrease the negative impact of soft-tissue contracture on the eventual reconstruction. Although some patients complain about residual problems after malunion surgery, corrective surgery has been shown to improve both radiographic and functional outcomes, and may prevent future secondary problems.

Three-dimensional assessment of bilateral symmetry of the radius and ulna for planning corrective surgeries

PURPOSE

The contralateral unaffected side is often used as a reference in planning a corrective osteotomy of a malunited distal radius. Two-dimensional radiographs have proven unreliable in assessing bilateral symmetry, so we assessed 3-dimensional configurations to assess bilateral symmetry.

METHODS

We investigated bilateral symmetry using 3-dimensional imaging techniques. A total of 20 healthy volunteers without previous wrist injury underwent a volumetric computed tomography of both forearms. The left radius and ulna were segmented to create virtual 3-dimensional models of these bones. We selected a distal part and a larger proximal part from these bones and matched them with a mirrored computed tomographic image of the contralateral side. This allowed us to calculate the relative displacements (Δx, Δy, Δz) and rotations (Δφx, Δφy, Δφz) for aligning the left bone with the right bone segments. We investigated the relation between longitudinal length differences in radiuses and ulnas.

RESULTS

Relative differences of the radiuses were (Δx, Δy, Δz): -0.81 ± 1.22 mm, -0.01 ± 0.64 mm, and 2.63 ± 2.03 mm; and (Δφx, Δφy, Δφz): 0.13° ± 1.00°, -0.60° ± 1.35°, and 0.53° ± 5.00°. The same parameters for the ulna were (Δx, Δy, Δz): -0.22 ± 0.82 mm, 0.52 ± 0.99 mm, 2.08 ± 2.33 mm; and (Δφx, Δφy, Δφz): -0.56° ± 0.96°, -0.71° ± 1.51°, and -2.61° ± 5.58°. There is a strong relation between absolute length differences (Δz) between the radiuses and ulnas of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed substantial length and rotational differences around the longitudinal bone axis in healthy individuals. Surgical planning using the unaffected side as a reference may not be as useful as previously assumed. However, including the length difference of the adjacent forearm bones can be useful in improving length correction in computer-assisted planning of radius or ulna osteotomies and in other reconstructive surgery procedures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Bilateral symmetry is important in reconstructive surgery procedures where the contralateral unaffected side is often used as a reference for planning and evaluation.

Computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomy for extra-articular distal radius malunions: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Malunion is the most common complication of distal radius fracture. It has previously been demonstrated that there is a correlation between the quality of anatomical correction and overall wrist function. However, surgical correction can be difficult because of the often complex anatomy associated with this condition. Computer assisted surgical planning, combined with patient-specific surgical guides, has the potential to improve pre-operative understanding of patient anatomy as well as intra-operative accuracy. For patients with malunion of the distal radius fracture, this technology could significantly improve clinical outcomes that largely depend on the quality of restoration of normal anatomy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare patient outcomes after corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunion with and without preoperative computer-assisted planning and peri-operative patient-specific surgical guides.

Methods/Design

This study is a multi-center randomized controlled trial of conventional planning versus computer-assisted planning for surgical correction of distal radius malunion. Adult patients with extra-articular malunion of the distal radius will be invited to enroll in our study. After providing informed consent, subjects will be randomized to two groups: one group will receive corrective surgery with conventional preoperative planning, while the other will receive corrective surgery with computer-assisted pre-operative planning and peri-operative patient specific surgical guides. In the computer-assisted planning group, a CT scan of the affected forearm as well as the normal, contralateral forearm will be obtained. The images will be used to construct a 3D anatomical model of the defect and patient-specific surgical guides will be manufactured. Outcome will be measured by DASH and PRWE scores, grip strength, radiographic measurements, and patient satisfaction at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Discussion

Computer-assisted surgical planning, combined with patient-specific surgical guides, is a powerful new technology that has the potential to improve the accuracy and consistency of orthopaedic surgery. To date, the role of this technology in upper extremity surgery has not been adequately investigated, and it is unclear whether its use provides any significant clinical benefit over traditional preoperative imaging protocols. Our study will represent the first randomized controlled trial investigating the use of computer assisted surgery in corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunions.

Trial registration

NCT01193010

Volar radioscapholunate arthrodesis for malunited distal radius fracture with unsalvageable wrist articular degeneration: case report

Fractures of the distal radius occur commonly, and volar plating has emerged as a current, successful, and popular treatment for this injury. When this technology fails, salvage procedures must be selected that aim to maximize wrist motion and minimize pain. We present a case of volar radioscapholunate wrist arthrodesis in the setting of unfeasible intraoperative volar osteotomy to treat a malunited distal radius fracture.

Arthroscopically guided osteotomy for management of intra-articular distal radius malunions

PURPOSE

A malunion with a step-off of 1 mm or more after an intra-articular distal radius fracture may cause pain and arthritic changes at midterm follow-up. We present our technique for treating intra-articular distal radius malunions by carrying out an osteotomy from inside the joint outward under arthroscopic guidance using the dry arthroscopy technique, with emphasis on the clinical and radiologic outcomes.

METHODS

We performed surgery on 11 patients for intra-articular malunion of the distal radius 1 to 5 months after the injury. Preoperative step-offs ranged from 2 to 5 mm (average, 2.5 mm) on plain radiographs. Original fracture patterns involved 1 radial styloid fracture, 1 radiocarpal fracture-dislocation, and 9 comminuted intra-articular fractures. In 5 cases an anterior-ulnar or radial styloid fragment was repositioned. In the rest, more than 1 fragment (up to 3) was osteotomized. In 1 patient the articular osteotomy was combined with an ulnar shortening osteotomy.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 12 to 48 months. Step-offs were reduced in most cases to 0 mm; however, localized gaps (<2 mm) and cartilage defects were commonly seen intraoperatively because the fragments did not accurately fit. According to the Gartland and Werley score, there were 4 excellent and 7 good results (mean score of 2.8). The Modified Green and O'Brien system achieved a mean score of 83, with 3 excellent, 5 good, and 3 fair results. One patient showed radiolunate narrowing on follow-up radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopically assisted osteotomy permits direct visualization of the osteotomy site with good midterm clinical and radiologic outcomes. The technique can be used in irregularly defined fragments.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Management of post-traumatic malunion of fractures of the distal radius

Distal radius malunions are a common cause of patient morbidity. This review of the literature surrounding distal radius malunion covers the demographics, pathologic anatomy, and indications for surgery, surgical techniques, and salvage options. Particular emphasis is placed on subject areas that have not been reviewed as extensively in previous articles, including: intra-articular malunion, computer-assisted techniques, bone graft alternatives, and volar fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis.

Corrective osteotomy for malunited intra-articular fracture of the distal radius using a custom-made surgical guide based on three-dimensional computer simulation: case report

We report a case of malunited intra-articular fracture of the distal radius successfully treated with corrective osteotomy through an extra-articular approach using a custom-made surgical guide that was designed based on preoperative three-dimensional computer simulation.

Management of post-traumatic malunion of fractures of the distal radius

Distal radius malunions are a common cause of patient morbidity. This review of the literature surrounding distal radius malunion covers the demographics, pathologic anatomy, and indications for surgery, surgical techniques, and salvage options. Particular emphasis is placed on subject areas that have not been reviewed as extensively in previous articles, including: intra-articular malunion, computer-assisted techniques, bone graft alternatives, and volar fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis.

Malunion of the distal radius

Fractures of the distal radius are common injuries. Acceptable results typically can be obtained with appropriate surgical or nonsurgical management. However, a small percentage of these fractures can progress to symptomatic malunion, which traditionally has been treated with osteotomy of the distal radius. Proper understanding of anatomy, biomechanics, indications, and contraindications can help guide patient selection for surgery. In formulating a treatment plan, the surgeon also must consider such technical variables as the type of osteotomy, the use of bone graft or bone-graft substitute, and the means of fixation to stabilize the osteotomy. Simultaneous implementation of an ulnar-side procedure, an intra-articular osteotomy, and soft-tissue releases also may be necessary. Some cases may be more appropriate for wrist fusion or other salvage procedures.

Outcomes using an internal osteotomy and distraction device for corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunions requiring correction in multiple planes

PURPOSE

Many different methods have been proposed for correction of distal radius malunions; however, precise correction of a severe malunion that requires simultaneous adjustment of displacement, angulation, and rotation in multiple planes is difficult. This prospective study measured radiographic and functional outcomes using an adjustable osteotomy, distraction, and fixation system for distal radius malunions that required correction in multiple planes.

METHODS

Five consecutive patients with symptomatic distal radius malunions requiring correction in multiple planes were recruited into this study. All patients had correction of the malunion with an adjustable osteotomy, distraction, and fixation device. Radiographic parameters and objective and subjective functional outcomes were measured before surgery and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

All radiographic measurements improved after surgery. Grip strength, pinch strength, and the Jebsen-Taylor test showed only marginal improvement. Ulnar deviation of the wrist and forearm pronation-supination improved, but the wrist extension-flexion arc did not. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire showed improvement in all domains, and significant improvement was seen in the overall, work, aesthetic, and satisfaction domains. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, however, also indicated a substantial amount of residual impairment in all domains, including activities of daily living and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Corrective osteotomy with the adjustable osteotomy, distraction, and fixation device resulted in improvement in distal radius anatomy and function. However, not all improvements were statistically significant, and anatomy and function did not returned to baseline levels. Despite residual disability, patients noted substantial improvement in subjective outcomes. This system is useful for improving anatomy and function in distal radius malunions that require correction in multiple planes, but patients should be informed that they cannot expect to regain normal anatomy or function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Correction of malunited intra-articular distal radius fractures with an inside-out osteotomy technique

PURPOSE

To present an inside-out osteotomy technique under arthroscopic guidance to correct an intra-articular malunion.

METHODS

The joint is explored with a 2.7-mm arthroscope through the standard portals without infusing any water. To allow room to introduce the curettes and the osteotomes (4-mm wide), the instrumentation portals are made slightly larger than usual. Malunited fragments are cut with the osteotomes from inside the joint and advanced out. Fragments are mobilized, and granulating tissue and/or new bone is removed with curettes and synoviotomes. After disimpaction and reduction, fixation with plates or screws via the appropriate open approach is performed under arthroscopic control. No water is used throughout the procedure except at the end of the surgery to clear out debris.

RESULTS

Steps were corrected to 0 mm in all patients. Gaps of less than 1 mm were common.

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure allows us to define each cartilage-containing fragment and to re-create the original articular fracture line without the fear of creating new fracture lines on the articular surface. This technique can be used for patients with irregularly defined fragments that are not amenable to classic techniques. The key to the procedure is to perform the arthroscopic exploration without water infusion (dry technique).

Reconstruction of the distal radius facet by a free vascularized osteochondral autograft: anatomic study and report of a patient

PURPOSE

Large chondral defects of the distal radius after fractures present a reconstructive challenge. The purpose of this study was to present the anatomic findings from a cadaver of a vascularized osteochondral autograft taken from the third metatarsal appropriate for reconstructing the distal radius articular facet. A patient is presented in whom 70% of the scaphoid fossa was reconstructed with this technique.

METHODS

The base of the third metatarsal was studied in the feet of 20 cadavers. The size and shape of the cartilage were measured. Additionally vessel distribution was recorded and the diameters of vascular foramina were measured with Juch's method.

RESULTS

The base of the third metatarsal is pear shaped and is wider dorsally than plantarly. It averages 19.2 mm long on its main axis. Its cartilaginous surface is minimally concave or flat and it is slanted slightly proximal-dorsal to distal-plantar and proximal-peroneal to distal-tibial. Nutrient foramina were found in every case in the dorsum and on both sides of the proximal shaft. At least 1 nutrient vessel could be tracked back to the dorsalis pedis in every dissected specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomic features of the base of the third metatarsal make it a potential vascularized autograft to consider for osteochondral defects of the distal radius.