Determination at the Last Cell Cycle before Fate Restriction

Ascidian embryonic development: An emerging model system for the study of cell fate specification in chordates

The ascidian tadpole larva represents the basic body plan of all chordates in a relatively small number of cells and tissue types. Although it had been considered that ascidians develop largely in a determinative way, whereas vertebrates develop in an inductive way, recent studies at the molecular and cellular levels have uncovered several similarities in the way developmental fates are specified. In this review, we describe ascidian embryogenesis and its cell lineages, introduce several characteristics of ascidian embryos, describe recent advances in understanding of the mechanisms of cell fate specification, and discuss them in the context of what is known in vertebrates and other organisms.

An FGF signal from endoderm and localized factors in the posterior-vegetal egg cytoplasm pattern the mesodermal tissues in the ascidian embryo

The major mesodermal tissues of ascidian larvae are muscle, notochord and mesenchyme. They are derived from the marginal zone surrounding the endoderm area in the vegetal hemisphere. Muscle fate is specified by localized ooplasmic determinants, whereas specification of notochord and mesenchyme requires inducing signals from endoderm at the 32-cell stage. In the present study, we demonstrated that all endoderm precursors were able to induce formation of notochord and mesenchyme cells in presumptive notochord and mesenchyme blastomeres, respectively, indicating that the type of tissue induced depends on differences in the responsiveness of the signal-receiving blastomeres. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), but not activin A, induced formation of mesenchyme cells as well as notochord cells. Treatment of mesenchyme-muscle precursors isolated from early 32-cell embryos with bFGF promoted mesenchyme fate and suppressed muscle fate, which is a default fate assigned by the posterior-vegetal cytoplasm (PVC) of the eggs. The sensitivity of the mesenchyme precursors to bFGF reached a maximum at the 32-cell stage, and the time required for effective induction of mesenchyme cells was only 10 minutes, features similar to those of notochord induction. These results support the idea that the distinct tissue types, notochord and mesenchyme, are induced by the same signaling molecule originating from endoderm precursors. We also demonstrated that the PVC causes the difference in the responsiveness of notochord and mesenchyme precursor blastomeres. Removal of the PVC resulted in loss of mesenchyme and in ectopic notochord formation. In contrast, transplantation of the PVC led to ectopic formation of mesenchyme cells and loss of notochord. Thus, in normal development, notochord is induced by an FGF-like signal in the anterior margin of the vegetal hemisphere, where PVC is absent, and mesenchyme is induced by an FGF-like signal in the posterior margin, where PVC is present. The whole picture of mesodermal patterning in ascidian embryos is now known. We also discuss the importance of FGF induced asymmetric divisions, of notochord and mesenchyme precursor blastomeres at the 64-cell stage.

Suppression of muscle fate by cellular interaction is required for mesenchyme formation during ascidian embryogenesis

The tadpole larva of the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi has several hundred mesenchyme cells in its trunk. Mesenchyme cells are exclusively derived from the B8.5 and B7.7 blastomere pairs of the 110-cell embryo. It has been believed that specification of mesenchyme cells is an autonomous process. In the present study, we have demonstrated that presumptive-mesenchyme blastomeres isolated from early 32-cell embryos did not express mesenchyme-specific features, whereas those isolated after the late 64-cell stage developed mesenchyme markers autonomously. Results of experiments involving coisolation and recombination of blastomeres showed that cellular interaction with adjacent presumptive-endoderm blastomeres during the late 32- and early 64-cell stages is required for mesenchyme formation. When such interaction was absent, the presumptive-mesenchyme blastomeres developed into muscle cells. Therefore, a signal from endoderm precursor blastomeres promotes mesenchyme fate, suppressing the muscle fate that is specified by ooplasmic muscle determinants. In Halocynthia, the muscle actin gene was precociously activated in mesenchyme-muscle precursor blastomeres at the 32-cell stage, and the mesenchyme and muscle fates were separated into two daughter blastomeres at the next cleavage. In presumptive-mesenchyme blastomeres at the 64-cell stage, expression of the muscle actin gene was immediately down-regulated by the signal from the neighboring endoderm precursor blastomeres. Thus, mesenchyme formation involves a novel mechanism of fate specification in ascidians, where formation of mesenchyme cells requires cellular interaction that suppresses muscle fate in the mesenchyme precursor blastomeres.

Cell fate specification by localized cytoplasmic determinants and cell interactions in ascidian embryos

Tadpole larvae of ascidians show the basic body plan of chordates. An ascidian larva consists of only a few types of cells and has a relatively small number of cells. Cell lineages are invariant among individuals and have been described in detail. These advantages facilitate the analysis of how the fate of each blastomere becomes specified during development. Over a century of research on ascidian embryogenesis has uncovered many interesting features concerning cellular mechanisms responsible for the fate specification. During embryogenesis, the developmental fate of a blastomere is specified by one of three different mechanisms: localized maternal cytoplasmic determinants, inductive interactions, or lateral inhibition in an equivalence cell group.