Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Plasma for Reversal of Warfarin-Associated Hemorrhage

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an activated four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) versus plasma for the reversal of warfarin-associated hemorrhage.

DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients with warfarin-associated hemorrhage treated with either aPCC or plasma.

PATIENTS

Patients received either aPCC or plasma as treatment for warfarin-associated hemorrhage between January 1, 2011, and July 1, 2013. Patients with missing data points were excluded from the final analysis. Of the 276 patients included in the final analysis, 128 received aPCC and 148 received plasma.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Those patients who received aPCC achieved a lower posttreatment INR (1.1 [0.1] vs 1.6 [0.5]; p<0.05). In addition, patients who received aPCC had a 4.3 times higher odds of achieving an INR of less than 1.4 (97 [75.8%] vs 65 [43.9%]; p<0.05; odds ratio [OR] = 4.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-7.3]). When controlling for vitamin K administration, history of diabetes mellitus, receipt of the recommended reversal agent dose, and pretreatment INR, aPCC administration remained an independent predictor for achieving an international normalized ratio (INR) of less than 1.4 in the first 24 hours after treatment (OR = 3.75 [95% CI 2.11-6.65]; p<0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference between the groups with regard to occurrences of infusion reaction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, stroke, or myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients who received plasma, patients who received aPCC achieved a lower posttreatment INR, had a larger INR change, and were more likely to achieve an INR less than the prespecified goal. Those patients who received aPCC did not have a higher incidence of thromboembolic events.

Reversal of warfarin-induced hemorrhage in the emergency department

Warfarin, an oral vitamin K antagonist, is used to prevent arterial and venous thromboembolism in patients suffering from a multitude of diseases. In 2004, 31 million warfarin prescriptions were dispensed in the United States. Warfarin inhibits the activation of the vitamin K-dependent clotting factors (Factors II, VII, IX, and X) and regulatory proteins (proteins C, S, and Z). It is one of the leading drugs implicated in emergency room visits for adverse drug reactions. Annually the frequency of bleeding complications associated with overanticoagulation is 15% to 20%, with fatal bleeds measuring as high as 1% to 3%. The most effective method of warfarin reversal involves the use of Four Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC), which is widely used throughout Europe but is unavailable in the United States. The current therapies available to emergency room physicians in the United States are fresh frozen plasma, recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa), Factor Eight Inhibitory Bypassing Activity, or Three Factor PCC concomitantly administered with vitamin K. We review the advantages and disadvantages of these therapies and recommend Three Factor PCC with small doses of rFVIIa and with vitamin K in life-threatening situations if Four Factor PCC is unavailable.