The efficacy and safety of apatinib in Ewing's sarcoma: a retrospective analysis in one institution

Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Recurrent and Unresectable Bone Sarcomas

Bone sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare tumors with a predominance in the young population. Few options of systemic treatment are available once they become unresectable and resistant to conventional chemotherapy. A better knowledge of the key role that tyrosine kinase receptors (VEGFR, RET, MET, AXL, PDGFR, KIT, FGFR, IGF-1R) may play in the pathogenesis of these tumors has led to the development of multi-target inhibitors (TKIs) that are progressively being incorporated into our therapeutic arsenal. Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most frequent primary bone tumor and several TKIs have demonstrated clinical benefit in phase II clinical trials (cabozantinib, regorafenib, apatinib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib). Although the development of TKIs for other primary bone tumors is less advanced, preclinical data and early trials have begun to show their potential benefit in advanced Ewing sarcoma (ES) and rarer bone tumors (chondrosarcoma, chordoma, giant cell tumor of bone, and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma). Previous reviews have mainly provided information on TKIs for OS and ES. We aim to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the use of TKIs in all bone sarcomas including the most recent studies as well as the potential synergistic effects of their combination with other systemic therapies.

Regorafenib for the Treatment of Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Sarcomas are a rare group of tumors with many subtypes, conventionally classified into soft-tissue sarcomas and bone sarcomas. Chemotherapeutic regimens form the mainstay of systemic therapy but are not well defined beyond the first-line setting and clinical outcomes are variable. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with a broad inhibition profile which have been shown to target tumor angiogenesis, have an established role in the treatment of sarcomas without characteristic driver alterations. One such TKI, regorafenib, has been evaluated in sarcomas and clinical data are discussed in this review. An overview of regorafenib data from five phase 2 and one phase 1b clinical trials in over 10 sarcoma subtypes (both soft-tissue and bone) in adult and pediatric patients is reviewed. Regorafenib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcomas, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma who had progressed on prior therapy. Patients with otherwise limited treatment options may therefore benefit from regorafenib therapy.

Quality of life and Q-TWiST were not adversely affected in Ewing sarcoma patients treated with combined anlotinib, irinotecan, and vincristine: (Peking University People's Hospital Ewing sarcoma trial-02, PKUPH-EWS-02)

BACKGROUND

Combined treatment with anlotinib, irinotecan, as well as vincristine for advanced Ewing sarcoma (EWS) has been verified been effective in the prospective trial of Peking University People's Hospital EWS trial-02. We aimed to assess the dynamic changes in health-related quality of life (QoL) and the benefit-risk in quality-adjusted survival in current study.

METHODS

Twelve "pediatric" patients and 23 "adult" patients were enrolled. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 for adults and PedsQL 3.0 Cancer Module for children and adolescents. The quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis was used to describe treatment results.

RESULTS

Progression-free survival was not accompanied by diminished QoL. Differences in scores on the QoL global health status and specific functioning before, during, and after treatment were not significantly different with time (P = .14 for adults and .91 for children). During treatment, there was a statistically insignificant trend towards improved QoL with reduced tumor burden (P = .14 for adults and .10 for children), but QoL significantly declined with progression of disease (P = .05 for adults and .04 for children). The most common adverse events were neutropenia (12.1%), leukopenia (16.6%), anemia (12.7%), and diarrhea (4.93%). Results across the trial analyses showed that the median time of Q-TWiST was 0.73 (interquartile range, 0-1.57) months, whereas the median time with toxicity before disease progression was 3.9 (interquartile range, 2.3, 6.1).

CONCLUSION

QoL exhibited a trend towards improvement in accordance with high objective response in this trial with the receipt of combination therapy of anlotinib, vinsristine, and irinotecan for advanced EWS. The toxicity profile did not translate into significantly worse overall scores during treatment.

Genotypes versus phenotypes: The potential paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of pediatric neoplasms

The gold standard of cancer diagnosis has long been based on histological characteristics. With the rapid advancement of genetic medicine, such standard algorithm of diagnostic approach is facing a challenge. The genetic findings have been changed from being a “supporting character” into the role of a “main character”. More and more disease diagnosis and classification has to be defined by genetic basis. In this article, we focus on the challenges in the field of pediatric oncology. We cited 2 scenarios where genetic information plays a pivotal role in identifying the underlying pathology. The first scenario is that same genetic mutation can lead to variable clinical phenotypes, this includes EWSR1‐PATZ1 fusion related neoplasms; BCOR neoplasms; and GATA‐2 deficiency related immunodeficiency and myelodysplastic syndrome. Another scenario is relatively more common that is the same clinical and histopathological phenotype with different underlying genotypes. The genotypes actually impact on the treatment response and outcome. We used medulloblastoma as an example. In fact, we can also find similar scenario in many pediatric cancers such as Ewing sarcoma, ependymoma, etc. The essence of this article is to remind clinicians of the rapid development in genetic medicine and it has been reshaping the landscape of the modern disease classification and therapeutic approach. In the near future, it may even lead to a paradigm shift in our disease diagnostic algorithm.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib in ovarian cancer patients with platinum-resistance or platinum-refractoriness: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib with a low dose of 250 mg/d in the treatment of platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian carcinoma treated with 250 mg/d apatinib in our institution from November 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The tumor response and progression were evaluated according to the standard by incorporating the levels of CA125 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. CTCAE 4.03 was used to evaluate adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Fifty-two eligible patients were enrolled in per-protocol (PP) analysis and 65 patients (including 13 lost to follow-up) were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. In PP analysis, 18 patients (34.6%) had partial response (PR), 22 patients (42.3%) had stable disease (SD), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.83-5.17 m), and median overall survival (OS) was 25.33 months (95% CI, 17.74-32.92 m). The objective response rate and DCR for patients in ITT analysis were 27.7% and 49.2%, respectively. The top three treatment-related AEs were hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, and leukopenia. Eight patients (15.4%) in PP population had grade 3 treatment-related AEs. Previous chemotherapy lines, number of recurrences, and AEs did not affect the efficacy of apatinib. Age older than 60 was associated with higher rates of disease control and prolonged PFS (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib 250 mg/d is a feasible treatment in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

Apatinib as targeted therapy for advanced bone and soft tissue sarcoma: a dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance while suffering drug resistance itself

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 50 distinct subtypes and differ in pathological features and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed diseases. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis, and VEGF/VEGFR pathway is considered as the most prominent player in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy to retard neovascularization. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and revealed their favorable anti-neoplastic effects in various cancers, but such desirable anti-tumor effects are not obtained in advanced sarcomas because of multiple reasons, such as drug tolerance, short duration of response, and severe adverse effects. Fortunately, preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Especially, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, and enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas. Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are rare but malignant tumors originated from mesenchymal tissues. They harbor more than 100 distinct subtypes and differ in features of pathologies and clinical courses. Despite the significant improvements in modern multi-modality treatment, the outcomes and overall survival rates remain poor for patients with advanced, refractory, metastatic, or relapsed lesions. The growth and metastasis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma largely depend on angiogenesis and VEGF/VEGFR pathways play a pivotal role in angiogenesis. Therefore, blockade of VEGF/VEGFR pathways is a promising therapeutic strategy. Several VEGFR inhibitors have been developed and verified in clinical trials but with unfavorable outcomes. Fortunately, preclinical studies and clinical trials have indicated that apatinib is a novel promising VEGFR2 inhibitor showing potent anti-angiogenic and anti-neoplastic activities in advanced sarcomas. Actually, apatinib has showed notable characteristics in multidrug resistance reversal, tumor regression, vascular normalization, immunosuppression alleviation, enhancement of chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic effects. However, apatinib also gets struck in dilemma of reversing multidrug resistance of chemotherapeutic agents while suffering drug resistance itself, and several difficulties should be tackled before full use of apatinib. In this review, we discuss the outstanding characteristics and main predicaments of apatinib as targeted therapy in advanced sarcomas.