1
|
Wongsurakiat P, Rattanawongpaibul A, Limsukon A, Chiewchalermsri C, Wiwatcharagoses K, Kornthatchapong K, Saiphoklang N, Sanguanwit P, Domthong P, Kawamatawong T, Sewatanon T, Reechaipichitkul W, Maneechotesuwan K. Expert panel consensus recommendations on the utilization of nebulized budesonide for managing asthma and COPD in both stable and exacerbation stages in Thailand. J Asthma 2024; 61:1136-1151. [PMID: 38527278 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2334897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated the utilization of nebulized budesonide for acute asthma and COPD exacerbations as well as for maintenance therapy in adults. DATA SOURCES We conducted a search on PubMed for nebulized budesonide treatment. SELECTED STUDIES Selecting all English-language papers that utilize Mesh phrases "asthma," "COPD," "budesonide," "nebulized," "adult," "exacerbation," and "maintenance" without temporal restrictions, and narrowing down to clinical research such as RCTs, observational studies, and real-world studies. RESULTS Analysis of 25 studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of nebulized budesonide in asthma (n = 10) and COPD (n = 15). The panel in Thailand recommended incorporating nebulized budesonide as an additional or alternative treatment option to the standard of care and systemic corticosteroids (SCS) based on the findings. CONCLUSION Nebulized budesonide is effective and well-tolerated in treating asthma and COPD, with less systemic adverse effects compared to systemic corticosteroids. High-dose nebulized budesonide can enhance clinical outcomes for severe and mild exacerbations with slow systemic corticosteroid response. Nebulized budesonide can substitute systemic corticosteroids in some situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phunsup Wongsurakiat
- Division of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Atikun Limsukon
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Chirawat Chiewchalermsri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center Srinakharinwirot University, Nonthaburi, Thailand
| | - Kittiyaporn Wiwatcharagoses
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Narongkorn Saiphoklang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Pitsucha Sanguanwit
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pornanan Domthong
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Khon Kaen Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Theerasuk Kawamatawong
- Associate Professor of Medicine, General Secretariate, Thai Asthma Council (TAC), Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tirachat Sewatanon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
| | - Wipa Reechaipichitkul
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Kittipong Maneechotesuwan
- Division of Respiratory Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng W, Xiong R, Zhao Z, Zeng H, Chen Y. Suboptimal peak inspiratory flow rate: a noticeable risk factor for inhaler concordance in patients with chronic airway diseases. BMJ Open Respir Res 2024; 11:e001981. [PMID: 38642917 PMCID: PMC11033634 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inhaler concordance and the peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) are important determinants of treatment effects in patients with chronic airway diseases. Adequate PIFR is required for driving aerosol medication into the lower respiratory tract. However, the relationship between them has not been discussed previously. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of inhaler concordance and PIFR in Chinese patients with chronic airway diseases and discuss the associated variables and the relationship between them. METHODS In this single-centre, observational study, a total of 680 patients with chronic airway diseases were enrolled from July 2021 to April 2023. We collected data on the socio-demographic and clinical variables of inhaler concordance using the test of adherence to inhalers (TAI) and PIFR. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine variables related to inhaler concordance and PIFR. RESULTS A total of 49.4% of patients had low concordance. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were more concordant than patients with asthma (mean TAI score: 43.60 vs 41.20; p<0.01), while there was no difference in concordance between the asthma-COPD overlap group and the asthma or COPD group. Suboptimal PIFR (adjusted OR, 1.61; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.51) increased the risk of poor concordance among all patients, while triple therapy (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.86) reduced the risk. A total of 54.9% of patients had suboptimal PIFR. Older age, lower educational level, use of dry powder inhalers and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted were significantly correlated with insufficient PIFR. Subgroup analysis revealed a greater proportion of patients with insufficient PIFR during exacerbation than during the stable phase (61.7% vs 43.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Inhaler concordance was low, and suboptimal PIFR was a risk factor for poor concordance among Chinese patients with chronic airway diseases. In addition, current inhalation devices may not be suitable, and PIFR reassessment should be considered for patients with COPD during exacerbation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER The study was registered in chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052527) on 31 October 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Meng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ruoyan Xiong
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhiqi Zhao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Huihui Zeng
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yan Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in Hunan Province, Changsha, China
- Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu HS, Wang Z, Zhao LM, Liu XD. Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:966637. [PMID: 36278148 PMCID: PMC9581123 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.966637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Systematic comparison of the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reported by high-quality, real-world observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from the database creation date to 1 April 2022. Eligible observational studies and randomized controlled trials with changes in lung function and blood gas analysis results as the primary endpoints of interest, and the numbers of deteriorations and adverse events as the secondary endpoints were sought. Results: Of the 2,837 identified studies, 22 were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 5,764 patients). Compared with systemic corticosteroids, nebulized corticosteroids resulted in comparable improvements in predicted FEV1%, FEV1, PaO2, PaCO2, and SaO2 at the treatment endpoint; however, observational studies reported more significant treatment outcomes with nebulized corticosteroids for FEV1 [mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17–0.35; p < 0.005]. In terms of adverse reactions, the risks of gastrointestinal symptoms were 11% [Log risk ratio (LogRR) = 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.15; p < 0.005] higher for systemic corticosteroids than for nebulized corticosteroids in randomized controlled trials, while the risks of hyperglycemia were 6% (LogRR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.11; p = 0.01) and 13% (LogRR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09–0.16; p < 0.005) higher in observational studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. Conclusion: According to our meta-analysis, either study type supported that nebulized corticosteroids can be used as an alternative to systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose of nebulized corticosteroids and the advantages of sequential therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Shuo Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of The Second Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhuo Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of The Second Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Li-Mei Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of The Second Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of The Second Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- *Correspondence: Xiao-Dong Liu,
| |
Collapse
|