Risankizumab: an anti-IL-23 antibody for the treatment of psoriasis

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the cause of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is unknown, and the effectiveness of current drug treatments is unsatisfactory. In March 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, for the treatment of PsA in adults. This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe PsA.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search of relevant databases from the establishment of the databases to October 1, 2023. We conducted a meta-analysis using Stata 12.0 and utilized I2 and Egger tests to assess heterogeneity and publication bias among the studies. Bias assessment was performed using the risk bias map and bias risk summary diagram generated by Revman5.4 software. The review protocols were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023451894) and adhered to the preferred reporting item of system evaluation (PRISMA) guideline.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5038 patients with PsA treated with either risankizumab or placebo were included in the analysis. At 24 weeks, the risankizumab group demonstrated a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology-20 (ACR20) response rate compared to the placebo group (RR 1.760, 95% CI 1.568-1.977, P < 0.001). Additionally, the risankizumab group showed a significantly higher Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) response rate compared to the placebo group (RR 1.827, 95% CI 1.048-3.184, P < 0.05). The risankizumab group also exhibited improvement in Short Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) score (SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.69, P < 0.001), with significantly lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score (SMD - 0.27, 95% CI - 0.37 to - 0.17, P < 0.001) and higher Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) score (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.20-0.35, P < 0.001) compared to the placebo group. Moreover, the risankizumab group had a significantly lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (SMD - 6.12, 95% CI - 10.02 to 2.23, P < 0.001). A study by Mease et al. indicated that patients receiving risankizumab generally demonstrated numerical improvements in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), although the small sample size limits the evidence. Further research is necessary to provide evidence-based guidelines. There were no significant differences in the incidence of serious adverse events (SAE) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (STEAE) between the risankizumab and placebo groups (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.45-1.28, P = 0.31; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.49-1.99, P = 0.97, respectively), and the overall incidence of adverse events (AE) was not comparable (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.63-1.94, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Risankizumab showed superior efficacy across multiple outcome measures compared to placebo, with no significant increase in adverse events. Our findings endorse risankizumab as an excellent treatment option for PsA, offering valuable insights for clinicians and patients when choosing appropriate therapeutic interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered (CRD42023451894, 16 August 2023).

Risankizumab for the Treatment of the Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis During a 24-Week Period: Real-Life Experience

Introduction

Several authors have reported their experiences in real-world clinical practice, confirming the therapeutic efficacy of risankizumab in plaque psoriasis. We aimed to reflect our experience with risankizumab treatment in patients with psoriasis.

Materials and Methods

Patients who presented to the dermatology outpatient clinics of two tertiary care centers between November 2021 and August 2022, diagnosed with psoriasis and treated with risankizumab, constituted the target population. Data including gender, age, weight, type of psoriasis, affected body sites, disease duration, previous treatments, duration of risankizumab treatment, psoriasis area and severity index scores, comorbidities, the reasons for drug discontinuation, adverse effects, and the patients' naïve or non-naïve status were obtained from electronic patient folders.

Results

Overall, 120 cases were included. While 73 (60.8%) cases were male, 47 (39.2%) were female. Eighty-six (68.3%) of all cases were biologic non-naive. A total of 49 patients (40.8%) had comorbidities. No significant correlations existed between biologic-naïve or non-naïve status, comorbidity status, and the PASI 75-90-100 responses.

Conclusion

Risankizumab is an effective treatment option for both biologic naive or non-naive patients with or without comorbidities. However, long-term studies, including more extensive patient series, are needed to validate its efficacy and safety in real-life clinical settings.

Management Strategies for Pediatric Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Spotlight on Biologics

Although psoriasis onset has been reported at any ages, in up to one-third of cases, it begins during childhood, with an estimated prevalence of about 2% in pediatric population. The management of moderate-to-severe forms of childhood psoriasis may represent a challenge for dermatologists, especially for parents' concerns about the need of systemic treatments. However, a prompt safe and effective treatment is mandatory in these patients, due to the significative impact that psoriasis may have on their quality of life, with well-known consequences on psychological health of both patients and caregivers. Due to the relatively frequent parents' refusal of systemic treatments, probably due to the fear of eventual adverse events, difficulties of oral or injective route, the management of moderate-to-severe forms still represents a challenge. Herein, we report a narrative review, aiming to resume the systemic treatments for pediatric psoriasis, focusing on the use of biologics and small molecules in the pediatric ages. The most widely used therapeutic strategies today for the pediatric population with moderate-severe psoriasis are traditional systemic therapies, while more innovative drugs such as biologics and small molecules now represent a somewhat unexplored but certainly promising field for unresponsive patients.

Improved Production of Anti-FGF-2 Nanobody Using Pichia pastoris and Its Effect on Antiproliferation of Keratinocytes and Alleviation of Psoriasis

Fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) is not only an angiogenic factor, but also a mitogen for epidermal keratinocytes. FGF-2 has been shown to be positively immunoreactive in the basal layer of psoriatic lesions. In previous work, we used the Escherichia coli (E. coli) expression system to biosynthesize a biologically active anti-FGF-2 nanobody (Nb) screened by phage display technology, but the low yield limited its clinical application. In this study, we aimed to increase the yield of anti-FGF-2 Nb, and evaluate its therapeutic potential for psoriasis by inhibiting FGF-2-mediated mitogenic signaling in psoriatic epidermal keratinocytes. We demonstrated a 16-fold improvement in the yield of anti-FGF-2 Nb produced in the Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) compared to the  E. coli expression system. In vitro, the FGF-2-induced HaCaT cell model (FHCM) was established to mimic the key feature of keratinocyte overproliferation in psoriasis. Anti-FGF-2 Nb was able to effectively inhibit the proliferation and migration of FHCM. In vivo, anti-FGF-2 Nb attenuated the severity of imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriatic lesions in mice, and also improved the inflammatory microenvironment by inhibiting the secretion of inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, and TNF-α), chemokines (CXCL1 and CCL20), and neutrophil infiltration in skin lesions. These were mainly related to the suppression of FGF-2-mediated mitogenic signaling in psoriatic keratinocytes. In conclusion, we have improved the production of anti-FGF-2 Nb and demonstrated the modality of attenuating the abnormal proliferative behavior of psoriatic keratinocytes by inhibiting FGF-2-mediated mitogenic signaling, which offers the possibility of treating psoriasis.

Repurposing clinically available drugs and therapies for pathogenic targets to combat SARS-CoV-2

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected a large portion of the global population, both physically and mentally. Current evidence suggests that the rapidly evolving coronavirus subvariants risk rendering vaccines and antibodies ineffective due to their potential to evade existing immunity, with enhanced transmission activity and higher reinfection rates that could lead to new outbreaks across the globe. The goal of viral management is to disrupt the viral life cycle as well as to relieve severe symptoms such as lung damage, cytokine storm, and organ failure. In the fight against viruses, the combination of viral genome sequencing, elucidation of the structure of viral proteins, and identifying proteins that are highly conserved across multiple coronaviruses has revealed many potential molecular targets. In addition, the time- and cost-effective repurposing of preexisting antiviral drugs or approved/clinical drugs for these targets offers considerable clinical advantages for COVID-19 patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of various identified pathogenic targets and pathways as well as corresponding repurposed approved/clinical drugs and their potential against COVID-19. These findings provide new insight into the discovery of novel therapeutic strategies that could be applied to the control of disease symptoms emanating from evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Adverse events with risankizumab in the real world: postmarketing pharmacovigilance assessment of the FDA adverse event reporting system

Background

Risankizumab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits IL-23, is currently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The real-world safety study of risankizumab in a large- sample population is currently lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate risankizumab-associated adverse events (AEs) and characterize the clinical priority through the data mining of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

Disproportionality analyses were performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios (RORs), deemed significant when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was greater than 1, to quantify the signals of risankizumab-related AEs from the second quarter (Q2) of 2019 to 2022 Q3. Serious and non-serious cases were compared, and signals were prioritized using a rating scale.

Results

Risankizumab was recorded in 10,235 reports, with 161 AEs associated with significant disproportionality. Of note, 37 PTs in at least 30 cases were classified as unexpected AEs, which were uncovered in the drug label, such as myocardial infarction, cataract, pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, stress, and nephrolithiasis. 74.68%, 25.32%, and 0% PTs were graded as weak, moderate, and strong clinical priorities, respectively. A total of 48 risankizumab-related AEs such as pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, cataract, loss of consciousness, cardiac disorder, hepatic cirrhosis, and thrombosis, were more likely to be reported as serious AEs. The median TTO of moderate and weak signals related to risankizumab was 115 (IQR 16.75-305) and 124 (IQR 29-301) days, respectively. All of the disproportionality signals had early failure type features, indicating that risankizumab-associated AEs gradually decreased over time.

Conclusion

Our study found potential new AE signals and provided valuable evidence for clinicians to mitigate the risk of risankizumab-associated AEs based on an extensive analysis of a large-scale postmarketing international safety database.

Perspective insights of small molecules, phytoconstituents and biologics in the management of psoriasis: A focus on targeting major inflammatory cytokine pathways

Psoriasis is an enduring, pruritic and papulosquamous skin ailment that poses a significant burden on public health. It is mainly characterized by hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, parakeratosis, scaly and erythematous plaques. Biomarkers like interleukin-17, interleukin-12 and -23 and tumor necrosis factor-α serve as key drivers of psoriatic pathogenesis. Triggered release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from various up-regulated pathways leads to psoriatic inflammation. Several target moieties like biologics, small molecules and herbal moieties play a fundamental role in the repression of pathogenesis of psoriasis. Biologics and small molecules engaged in the management of psoriasis have been emphasized in detail. An insight into nano-carrier interventions on herbal moieties and clinical aspects of psoriasis are also highlighted. This review emphasizes various pathological targets involved in psoriasis.

Applications of single-cell RNA sequencing in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a novel technology that characterizes molecular heterogeneity at the single-cell level. With the development of more automated, sensitive, and cost-effective single-cell isolation methods, the sensitivity and efficiency of scRNA-seq have improved. Technological advances in single-cell analysis provide a deeper understanding of the biological diversity of cells present in tissues, including inflamed skin. New subsets of cells have been discovered among common inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis. ScRNA-seq technology has also been used to analyze immune cell distribution and cell-cell communication, shedding new light on the complex interplay of components involved in disease responses. Moreover, scRNA-seq may be a promising tool in precision medicine because of its ability to define cell subsets with potential treatment targets and to characterize cell-specific responses to drugs or other stimuli. In this review, we briefly summarize the progress in the development of scRNA-seq technologies and discuss the latest scRNA-seq-related findings and future trends in AD and psoriasis. We also discuss the limitations and technical problems associated with current scRNA-seq technology.

Therapy of PsO in Special Subsets of Patients

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that may occur at any age, with a bimodal peak of incidence around the age of 16-20 years of age (early onset) and 57-60 years (late-onset). It is estimated that roughly 70% of patients develop the disease before the age of 40, which coincides with the reproductive years. Moreover, psoriasis is a chronic disease, meaning that, with increased life-duration expectancy, the number of patients affected with psoriasis aged over 65 years is going to increase and represent a big therapeutic challenge. Actually, no specific drug recommendation is available, based only on the age of the patients, while therapeutic prescription should take into account that elderly patients have more comorbidities than younger patients, with polypharmacy and an increased risk of drug interactions. Women with psoriasis are more likely to report a worse influence of the disease on their quality of life, and they are more susceptible to the development of depression. Furthermore, pregnancy and lactation represent a major contraindication to several systemic agents, and only a few studies exist providing the safety of certain drugs during these periods of life of a woman, such as certolizumab pegol. In this paper, we discuss systemic therapeutic strategies, including conventional and biological therapies, in a special subset of patients affected with moderate-to-severe psoriasis focusing on elderly patients and on female patients in fertile age, pregnancy, and lactation.

Anti-IL-17A ssDNA aptamer ameliorated psoriasis skin lesions in the imiquimod-induced psoriasis mouse model

OBJECTIVES

IL-17 is an important player in the psoriasis pathogenesis, which recruits inflammatory cells to the psoriatic lesions, induced keratinocyte proliferation and plaque formation. Three monoclonal antibodies that block IL-17 have been approved for psoriasis treatment in the last decade. Compared to monoclonal antibodies, aptamers which are single-stranded DNA or RNA, bind with high affinity to proteins or other molecules and are more cost-effective. We previously showed that M2 and M7 anti-IL17A ssDNA aptamers could block IL-17 in vitro. The current study evaluated the therapeutic effects of M2 and M7 anti-IL17A ssDNA aptamers in the imiquimod (IMQ)-induced psoriasis mouse model.

METHODS

IMQ cream and Vaseline (Vas) were administered on the back skin of C57BL/6 mice as IMQ-induced psoriasis and Vas control groups, respectively. In addition, hydrogel-containing aptamers were topically administered on the back skin of the mice, 10 min before IMQ treatment. Psoriatic lesions were evaluated by histology, clinical factors, and psoriasis area severity index (PASI) score. The mRNA expression levels of inflammatory factors, including IL-17A, IL-1β, and S100a9, were assessed with quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in the mice back skin.

RESULTS

Application of anti-IL-17A aptamers significantly ameliorated IMQ-induced keratinocyte proliferation, psoriatic lesions cumulative PASI score, IL-17A, IL-β, and S100a9 inflammatory factors mRNA expression levels (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to our results, it seems that M2 in high concentration and M7 in low concentration can be appropriate candidates to alleviate psoriasis lesions.

Oversight and Management of Women with Psoriasis in Childbearing Age

Psoriasis is a complex disease with many associated comorbidities, all of which have a negative impact on a patient's personal, social, and sexual life. There are some unique considerations in the effects of this disease among women. The average age of diagnosis in women with psoriasis is 28 years, and this onset corresponds to the fertile life of women. There is conflicting information about the effects of psoriasis on female fertility. Some studies suggest that this condition's associated comorbidities, personal behaviors, and reduced ovarian reserve, especially due to chronic inflammation, affect women's fertility. Another possible reason women with psoriasis are less likely to become pregnant is that their sexual intercourse frequency decreases after the condition's onset. The available information on the effects of pregnancy on women with psoriasis is limited. According to current evidence, most women will experience an improvement in their skin condition. Studies show that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis are more prone to experience pregnancy complications. The management of pregnant and lactating women with psoriasis is also difficult, as the safety profile of commonly used drugs in patients with psoriasis is not entirely known.

Gut–Skin Axis: Unravelling the Connection between the Gut Microbiome and Psoriasis

Evidence has shown that gut microbiome plays a role in modulating the development of diseases beyond the gastrointestinal tract, including skin disorders such as psoriasis. The gut–skin axis refers to the bidirectional relationship between the gut microbiome and skin health. This is regulated through several mechanisms such as inflammatory mediators and the immune system. Dysregulation of microbiota has been seen in numerous inflammatory skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis, rosacea, and psoriasis. Understanding how gut microbiome are involved in regulating skin health may lead to development of novel therapies for these skin disorders through microbiome modulation, in particularly psoriasis. In this review, we will compare the microbiota between psoriasis patients and healthy control, explain the concept of gut–skin axis and the effects of gut dysbiosis on skin physiology. We will also review the current evidence on modulating gut microbiome using probiotics in psoriasis.

New and Emerging Targeted Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory skin disease deriving from the hair follicles. The formation of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, fistulas, and sinus tracts is characterized by a large inflow of key pro-inflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-17, and IL-12/23. Adalimumab is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biologic therapy for moderate to severe HS in adults and adolescents. However, the long-term effectiveness of this TNF-α inhibitor in HS patients has shown to be highly variable. This review aims to review the evidence for emerging therapies that target the main pro-inflammatory cytokines in HS pathogenesis. A review of the literature was conducted, using the PubMed and Google Scholar repositories, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov. Presently, the most promising biologics in phase III trials are anti-IL-17 antibodies, secukinumab, and bimekizumab. Furthermore, an anti-IL-1 biologic, bermekimab, is currently in phase II trials, and shows encouraging results. Overall, the clinical efficacies of all new targeted therapies published up to this point are limited. More studies need to be performed to clarify the precise molecular pathology, and assess the efficacy of biological therapies for HS.

Considerations and challenges for sex-aware drug repurposing

Sex differences are essential factors in disease etiology and manifestation in many diseases such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and neurodegeneration [33]. The biological influence of sex differences (including genomic, epigenetic, hormonal, immunological, and metabolic differences between males and females) and the lack of biomedical studies considering sex differences in their study design has led to several policies. For example, the National Institute of Health's (NIH) sex as a biological variable (SABV) and Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) policies to motivate researchers to consider sex differences [204]. However, drug repurposing, a promising alternative to traditional drug discovery by identifying novel uses for FDA-approved drugs, lacks sex-aware methods that can improve the identification of drugs that have sex-specific responses [7, 11, 14, 33]. Sex-aware drug repurposing methods either select drug candidates that are more efficacious in one sex or deprioritize drug candidates based on if they are predicted to cause a sex-bias adverse event (SBAE), unintended therapeutic effects that are more likely to occur in one sex. Computational drug repurposing methods are encouraging approaches to develop for sex-aware drug repurposing because they can prioritize sex-specific drug candidates or SBAEs at lower cost and time than traditional drug discovery. Sex-aware methods currently exist for clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic information [1, 7, 155]. They have not expanded to other data types, such as DNA variation, which has been beneficial in other drug repurposing methods that do not consider sex [114]. Additionally, some sex-aware methods suffer from poorer performance because a disproportionate number of male and female samples are available to train computational methods [7]. However, there is development potential for several different categories (i.e., data mining, ligand binding predictions, molecular associations, and networks). Low-dimensional representations of molecular association and network approaches are also especially promising candidates for future sex-aware drug repurposing methodologies because they reduce the multiple hypothesis testing burden and capture sex-specific variation better than the other methods [151, 159]. Here we review how sex influences drug response, the current state of drug repurposing including with respect to sex-bias drug response, and how model organism study design choices influence drug repurposing validation.

Real world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab and risankizumab: Results from an Italian retrospective study

IL‐23‐inhibitors, such as guselkumab and risankizumab, represent the newest class of biologics approved for psoriasis. Phase III trials have shown their efficacy and safety. However, real life data are still scant. to indirectly compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of guselkumab and risankizumab in real world practice. An Italian single‐center retrospective cohort study enrolling moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients from September 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 was performed to indirectly compare guselkumab and risankizumab efficacy and safety. Sixty eight patients were included (36 received guselkumab and 32 risankizumab). The groups were comparable for all analyzed characteristics, except for mean psoriasis duration (p < 0.01) which was higher for guselkumab. In guselkumab group, mean PASI reduced from 16.1 ± 6.4 (baseline) 2.1 ± 0.9 (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.8 (week‐44) (p < 0.001). In risankizumab group mean PASI decreased from 13.5 ± 4.9 (baseline) 1.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001), (week‐28) (p < 0.001) up to 0.9 ± 0.4 (week‐40) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in mean PASI and BSA were observed between the treatments. No cases of serious AEs, injection site reaction, candida, malignancy, cardiovascular events were reported in both groups. Guselkumab and risankizumab showed favorable efficacy and safety profile, being comparable in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses as well as in AEs frequency and discontinuation rates.

Plaque-type psoriasis inhibitors

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory skin disorder, which is mediated by the immune system and affects 1-4% of the world's population. Psoriasis is caused by a complex interaction between the immune system, autoantigens, psoriasis-associated genetic factors, and various environmental factors. As a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment, psoriasis is associated with follow-up costs and an economic burden on the patients, their families, and healthcare systems. The current treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis include topical therapy, phototherapy, and systemic drugs consisting of biological/non-biological drugs. Within the past two decades, recent biological therapies for psoriasis have rapidly advanced. Moreover, new bispecific agents have the potential for better disease control, while small molecule drugs offer a future alternative to biological drugs and the more cost-effective, long-term treatment of the disease. The present study aimed to review updated data regarding the inhibitors used to improve plaque psoriasis that contain biologics, bispecific agents, small molecules, and aptamers (either approved or in the research phase).

Palmoplantar Psoriasis Successfully Treated With Risankizumab

Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis that affects the palms and soles. Despite the small body surface area affected, palmoplantar psoriasis can have significant implications on a patient's mental health, justifying the urgency in treating this condition. Palmoplantar psoriasis is also known to be challenging to treat. In this case report, we present a male who presented with a 15-year history of psoriasis with significant palmoplantar involvement, managed with topical and systemic therapies, achieving a minimal response. After trying other therapies including acitretin and adalimumab, we eventually started the patient on risankizumab, an anti-IL-23 antibody. Following the fourth dose of risankizumab, the patient's palmoplantar lesions completely resolved. We further discuss why risankizumab may be considered a treatment option in resistant palmoplantar psoriasis cases.

Anti-Psoriatic Effects of Antimony Compounds In Vitro

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperproliferation of keratinocytes and a pro-inflammatory milieu in the skin. While patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are treated using targeted therapies (small molecules and monoclonal antibodies), patients suffering from milder forms are still in need of effective topical products without adverse effects. Antimony compounds (ACs) are regularly used as anti-inflammatory compounds in traditional and anthroposophic medicine and as antiprotozoan drugs. Here, we examined the effect of metallic antimony, natural antimony(III) sulfide and potassium antimonyl(III) tartrate in vitro on psoriasis-like keratinocytes and the human dendritic cell line THP-1 using qPCR, immunocytochemistry, ELISA and flow cytometry. In psoriatic keratinocytes, ACs inhibited the overexpression of the antimicrobial peptide β-defensin 2 and glucose transporter 1, as well as the hyperproliferation marker keratin 17. Furthermore, ACs mediated anti-inflammatory effects by reducing nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB and pSTAT3 and inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion by keratinocytes. In addition, ACs displayed anti-psoriatic effects by reducing the activation of IFN-α-treated THP-1 cells as well as the expression of the psoriasis-promoting master cytokine IL-23 by these cells. While all ACs showed anti-psoriatic effects, the most prominent results were seen with potassium antimonyl(III) tartrate. In summary, ACs display numerous anti-psoriatic effects in vitro at subtoxic concentrations. We conclude that ACs are interesting compounds for the topical treatment of psoriasis that warrant further investigation in clinical studies.

An updated guide in the management of psoriasis for every practitioner

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is one of the most common chronic cutaneous skin disorders, having genetic and immunological components. It is currently unknown what exactly triggers it, or how far reaching are the etiological factors, although great strides have been made in uncovering the pathophysiological cascade. Presently, there is a wide diversity of treatment methods for psoriasis, yet not all are applicable for each patient. Selection of both drug and dosage depends on both the knowledge and experience of the treating dermatologist and also on the specific characteristics of each patient. Therefore, the treating physicians should be made aware of the management possibilities, their advantages and their side effects.

METHODS

We have performed a non-systematic literature review on the current treatment methods for psoriasis. We have included the studies, articles, and prescription information that provided the most relevant information regarding each therapeutic agent. Afterward, we divided the treatment methods according to delivery and illustrated the management protocols for adult, paediatric, and pregnant patients.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Current therapies are divided into topical drugs, phototherapy, systemic and biological agents. Topical therapies and phototherapy are generally the first and second line of management respectively, being typically effective in treating mild to moderate forms of psoriasis. On the other hand, the chronic moderate to severe forms usually benefit from systemic drugs, whereas biologic agents are reserved for severe or unremitting cases, especially those suffering from psoriatic arthritis. Also of importance is the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in psoriasis and how the selected drugs interfere in the pathological cascade. Furthermore, physicians should be able to recommend the appropriate therapy not only for adults but also for paediatric and pregnant patients as well. In the following manuscript, we present an updated version of these management options, alongside their indications, posology and most common side effects, a guide that may be useful for every practitioner in this field.

IL-23/Th17 Axis: A Potential Therapeutic Target of Psoriasis

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated skin disease that leads to the initiation of abnormal production of inflammatory mediators and keratinocytes hyper-proliferation. Th-1 cell expressing cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α have been the important hallmarks in the management of psoriasis. However, investigations carried out in the previous few years underline the involvement of another subset of T helper cells, i.e. Th-17 in psoriasis exacerbation, and hence become the point of focus now. The immunopathogenesis of Th-17 is the result of the IL-23/Th-17 axis. It involves the release of IL-17 and IL-22 in response to the activated NF-kβ dependent activation of IL-23. The function of human Th-17 cells as well as the crucial role of IL-23/Th-17 axis in the exacerbation of psoriasis and treatment have been well explored. Therefore, considering IL-23/Th17 axis as a pertinent therapeutic target in immune driven disorders, extensive investigations are now highlighting the utility of biopharmaceuticals and/or biological agents acting on these targets. Here, we review the IL-23/Th-17 axis based therapeutic targets, different types of active moieties based on their source of availability and most useful USFDA approved Mabs targeting the IL-23/Th17 axis in psoriasis for a better understanding of the future possibilities in this area.

Single-cell RNA sequencing of psoriatic skin identifies pathogenic Tc17 cell subsets and reveals distinctions between CD8+ T cells in autoimmunity and cancer

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is an inflammatory, IL-17-driven skin disease in which autoantigen-induced CD8⁺ T cells have been identified as pathogenic drivers.

OBJECTIVE

Our study focused on comprehensively characterizing the phenotypic variation of CD8⁺ T cells in psoriatic lesions.

METHODS

We used single-cell RNA sequencing to compare CD8⁺ T-cell transcriptomic heterogeneity between psoriatic and healthy skin.

RESULTS

We identified 11 transcriptionally diverse CD8⁺ T-cell subsets in psoriatic and healthy skin. Among several inflammatory subsets enriched in psoriatic skin, we observed 2 Tc17 cell subsets that were metabolically divergent, were developmentally related, and expressed CXCL13, which we found to be a biomarker of psoriasis severity and which achieved comparable or greater accuracy than IL17A in a support vector machine classifier of psoriasis and healthy transcriptomes. Despite high coinhibitory receptor expression in the Tc17 cell clusters, a comparison of these cells with melanoma-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells revealed upregulated cytokine, cytolytic, and metabolic transcriptional activity in the psoriatic cells that differed from an exhaustion program.

CONCLUSION

Using high-resolution single-cell profiling in tissue, we have uncovered the diverse landscape of CD8⁺ T cells in psoriatic and healthy skin, including 2 nonexhausted Tc17 cell subsets associated with disease severity.

Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines during COVID-19 Pandemic in Patients Treated with Biological Drugs in a Dermatological Setting

The BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines, consisting of mRNA, have recently become available. The absolute novelty of these vaccines introduces questions about their safety and efficacy, especially in patients who are treated with biological drugs in dermatology. The aim of our review was to provide a broad overview of the current use of all available vaccinations in concomitance with biological therapy and to suggest indications for the new mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. We conducted a narrative review of the literature regarding the indications and safety of the various types of vaccines currently available in dermatological patients treated with biological therapy. The safety and efficacy of administering inactivated vaccines in patients undergoing biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, and IL-4/13 was confirmed. Inactivated vaccines can be administered during therapy with inhibitors of IL-23 and IgE, taking into account that the level of evidence is lower due to the lack of specific studies. Live attenuated vaccines were contraindicated in concomitance with all biological therapies considered, except omalizumab. According to this evidence, we assume that there are currently no contraindications to the administration of the new Covid-19 BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines during biological therapy with inhibitors of TNF-α, IL-17, IL-12/23, IL-23, and IL-4/13, since these vaccines are comparable to inactivated ones. For patients with chronic urticaria or allergic asthma treated with omalizumab, we currently recommend caution in using the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines (30 min observation). The only contraindications were a previous history of hypersensitivity to the Covid-19 vaccines themself or to their excipients. In conclusion, further randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the antibody response in these patients.

Comparative safety and benefit-risk profile of biologics and oral treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A network meta-analysis of clinical trial data

BACKGROUND

The comparative safety and benefit-risk profiles of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatment have not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term (12-16 weeks) and long-term (48-56 weeks) safety and benefit-risk profiles of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatments.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of phase II-IV randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatments was conducted (cutoff: July 1, 2020). Any adverse events (AEs), any serious AEs, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were compared using Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs).

RESULTS

Fifty-two and 7, respectively, randomized controlled trials were included in the short- and long-term NMAs, respectively. In the short-term NMA, the rates of any AEs were the lowest for tildrakizumab (posterior median: 46.0%), certolizumab (46.2%), and etanercept (49.1%). The rates of any serious AE were the lowest for certolizumab (0.8%), risankizumab (1.2%), and etanercept (1.6%). The rates of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were the lowest for risankizumab (0.5%), tildrakizumab (1.0%), and guselkumab (1.5%). In the long-term NMA, risankizumab had the lowest rates of all 3 outcomes (67.5%, 4.4%, and 1.0%, respectively) and the most favorable benefit-risk profile.

LIMITATIONS

The results may not be generalizable to real-world populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-interleukin 23 agents were associated with low rates of safety events. Risankizumab had the most favorable benefit-risk profile in the long term.

Sputum IL-25, IL-33 and TSLP, IL-23 and IL-36 in airway obstructive diseases. Reduced levels of IL-36 in eosinophilic phenotype

INTRODUCTION

Alarmins ((IL-25, IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP)) are known to promote Th2 inflammation and could be associated with eosinophilic airway infiltration. They may also play a role in airway remodeling in chronic airway obstructive diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). IL-23 and IL-36 were shown to mediate the neutrophilic airway inflammation as seen in chronic airway obstructive diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this project was to determine the expression and the production of these cytokines from induced sputum (IS) in patients with chronic airway obstructive diseases including asthmatics and COPD. The relationship of the mediators with sputum inflammatory cellular profile and the severity of airway obstruction was assessed.

METHODS

The alarmins (IL-25, IL-33 and TSLP) as well as IL-23 and IL-36 concentrations were measured in IS from 24 asthmatics and 20 COPD patients compared to 25 healthy volunteers. The cytokines were assessed by ELISA in the IS supernatant and by RT-qPCR in the IS cells.

RESULTS

At protein level, no difference was observed between controls and patients suffering from airway obstructive diseases regarding the different mediators. IL-36 protein level was negatively correlated with sputum eosinophil and appeared significantly decreased in patients with an eosinophilic airway inflammation compared to those with a neutrophilic profile and controls. At gene level, only IL-36, IL-23 and TSLP were measurable but none differed between controls and patients with airway obstructive diseases. IL-36 and IL-23 were significantly increased in patients with an neutrophilic inflammatory profile compared to those with an eosinophilic inflammation and were correlated with sputum neutrophil proportions. None of the mediators were linked to airway obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of our study is that patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation exhibited a reduced IL-36 level which could make them more susceptible to airway infections as IL-36 is implicated in antimicrobial defense. This study showed also an implication of IL-36 and IL-23 in airway neutrophilic inflammation in chronic airway obstructive diseases.

The effects of selected biologics and a small molecule on Health-Related Quality of Life in adult plaque psoriasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is commonly used to assess the quality of life of patients with skin diseases. Clinical trials confirm the positive effect of the use of biologics and new molecules on the quality of life of patients with plaque psoriasis.

MAIN OBJECTIVES

Investigation of the effect of infliximab, adalimumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and tofacitinib on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measured by the DLQI in adult plaque psoriatic patients with respect to the patients' race, type of used agent/placebo, agent's dosage and treatment duration as well as the DLQI score prior to and after commencement of treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature searching for referential papers written in English using four databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov as well as and manual searching (Google) Cochran's (Q) and I2 tests were used for evaluation of heterogeneity or the degree of variation in the true effect size estimates between the analysed studies. The standardized mean difference (the SMD; Hedge's g score) was applied to measure the differences between the two means (i.e. two groups: treated vs non-treated or treated vs placebo). The data coding and Hedge's g values were calculated according to the guidance of MetaXL software version 5.3.

MAIN RESULTS

43 studies, in total 25,898 individuals, were evaluated by the DLQI and weighted mean scores were derived for the analysis. The mean DLQI scores ranged from 6.83 to 17.8 with the overall DLQI score of 12.12 (95%CI: 11.24 to 13.06). A random-effects model demonstrated significant considerable heterogeneity of the study results (I2 = 98%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Infliximab, adalimumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and tofacitinib in adult plaque psoriatic patients improved HRQOL measured by the DLQI. The patients with lower quality of life before treatment obtained better results.

Current and emerging biologics for the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by erythematous lesions, pruritus, and a skin barrier defect. Long-term treatment in children is challenging, as there is only one Food and Drug Administration-approved systemic medication. Current treatments may have limited efficacy or serious side effects in children. With a deeper understanding of AD pathogenesis and the advent of target-specific medications, several biologics are undergoing clinical trials for future use in pediatric AD.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the current and emerging biologic therapies for treatment of pediatric AD. It allows for comprehensive comparison of medications and their clinical trials to help providers optimize patient treatment plans while providing expert insight into upcoming advancements in the treatment of pediatric AD.

EXPERT OPINION

Treating pediatric AD is complicated given the variety of disease severity, psychosocial impact, and relative lack of approved medications for severe disease. Given the safety data on dupilumab, newer biologics will likely be second-line. We do not yet understand the long-term impact of newer biologics on an immature immune system, nor do we fully understand their risks and toxicities. We should proceed optimistically, yet cautiously, with the study of biologics in children.

Comparison of Biologics and Oral Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis

Importance

The clinical benefits of novel treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis are well established, but wide variations exist in patient response across different therapies. In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, meta-analyses synthesizing data from multiple studies are needed to assess comparative efficacy among psoriasis treatments.

Objective

To estimate the relative short-term and long-term efficacy of biologics and oral agents for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis.

Data Sources

A systematic literature review was conducted on December 4, 2017, and updated on September 17, 2018. The Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register databases were included.

Study Selection

Phase 2, 3, or 4 randomized clinical trials of treatments licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for adults with moderate to severe psoriasis with data on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index assessment of 75%, 90%, and 100% reductions (PASI 75, 90, and 100) at 10 to 16 weeks (short-term efficacy) or 44 to 60 weeks (long-term efficacy) from baseline.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to estimate short-term PASI response rates; to account for variation across trials, an ordinal model that adjusted for reference arm response was implemented. The long-term PASI rates were estimated via a traditional meta-analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

PASI 75, 90, and 100 response rates at 10 to 16 weeks and 44 to 60 weeks from baseline.

Results

Sixty trials meeting all inclusion criteria were included. At weeks 10 to 16, the highest PASI 90 rates were seen with risankizumab-rzaa (71.6%; 95% credible interval [CrI], 67.5%-75.4%), brodalumab (70.8%; 95% CrI, 66.8%-74.6%), ixekizumab (70.6%; 95% CrI, 66.8%-74.6%), and guselkumab (67.3%; 62.5%-71.9%). At weeks 44 to 60, the treatments with the highest PASI 90 rates were risankizumab-rzaa (79.4%, 95% CI, 75.5%-82.9%), guselkumab (76.5%; 95% CI, 72.1%-80.5%), brodalumab (74.0%; 95% CI, 69.3%-78.1%), and ixekizumab (73.9%; 95% CI, 69.9%-77.5%). Findings were consistent for short-term and long-term PASI 75 and 100 responses.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study provides an assessment of the comparative efficacy among treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The meta-analysis suggests that brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab-rzaa were associated with the highest PASI response rates in both short-term and long-term therapy.

New era of therapy for endocrine autoimmune disorders

The new era of immune and reconstitution therapy of autoimmune disorders is ongoing. However, endocrine autoimmune diseases comprise a group of elaborating pathologies where the development of new treatment strategies remains slow. Substitution of the missing hormones is still standard practice, taking care of the devastating symptoms but not the cause of disease. As our knowledge of the genetic contribution to the aetiology of endocrine disorders increases and early diagnostic tools are available, it is now possible to identify persons at risk before they acquire full-blown disease. This review summarizes current knowledge and treatment of endocrine autoimmune disorders, focusing on type 1 diabetes, Addison's disease, autoimmune thyroid diseases and primary ovarian insufficiency. We explore which new therapies might be used in the different stages of the disease, focus on legalized therapy and elaborate on the ongoing clinical studies for these diseases and the research front, before hypothesizing on the way ahead.

Impact of current antipsoriatic systemic treatments on male and female fertility: what endocrinologists need to know

Fertility is a function of the body that is often overlooked as a site for the expression of the side effects of certain drugs. With the approval of new drugs with a totally innovative mechanism of action, the risk assessment on fertility both in male and female is more difficult. This is particularly true in psoriasis, an invalidating inflammatory skin disease. The estimated prevalence of psoriasis in adults ranged from 0.51% to 11.43%, and in children from 0% to 1.37%, with frequent diagnosis in young patients of childbearing age. With the increasing use of new, predominantly immunosuppressive or biologic drugs for psoriasis, questions frequently arise in clinical practice as to their safety in men and women wishing to procreate. Both psoriatic patients and their physicians are concerned about adverse effects of the disease and its treatment on their future fertility, causing additional concerns in the therapeutic management of these patients. Among antipsoriatic drugs, conventional therapies are mainly involved in the onset of infertility in both sexes, exerting in some cases toxic effects against reproductive organs. Conversely, biologic agents appear to improve male and female fertility especially when gonadal impairment is related to inflammatory phenomena. There is a lack of review articles of commonly used medications in psoriasis with respect to their potential effects on fertility. The aim of this paper was to provide a practical guide for both dermatologist and endocrinologist in therapeutic management of psoriatic patients of childbearing age, considering the impact of prescribed drugs on their current and future fertility.

Interleukin 23p19 inhibitors in chronic plaque psoriasis with focus on mirikizumab: A narrative review

Psoriasis, a T-cell mediated chronic dermatosis, has a complex etiopathogenesis. There has been extensive research into the aberrant immune response, which leads to the formation of clinical lesions, and the need for developing better and safer drugs has been unrelenting. The past two decades of research has opened up new areas of the immune pathway that can be targeted in order to control the disease. Therefore, we have seen the emergence of biologics which either target T-cell receptors or inhibit Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) or inhibit interleukins (IL) like IL-12, IL-17, IL-17 receptor, and more recently IL-23. Drugs specifically targeting the p19 subunit of IL-23 have shown promising results in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis. This has given way to the development of a new class of biologics, that is, the IL-23p19 inhibitors that have a better safety profile as compared to its predecessors. In this review, we shall scrutinize the role of IL-23 and Th17 cell signaling in the evolution of the psoriatic lesions and summarize the clinical experience with IL-23p19 inhibitors especially mirikizumab in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis.

Glycoconjugation as a Promising Treatment Strategy for Psoriasis

Despite the progress in the development of novel treatment modalities, a significant portion of patients with psoriasis remains undertreated relative to the severity of their disease. Recent evidence points to targeting the glucose transporter 1 and sugar metabolism as a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of psoriasis and other hyperproliferative skin diseases. In this review, we discuss glycoconjugation, an approach that facilitates the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic molecules and ensures their preferential influx through glucose transporters. We propose pathways of glycoconjugate synthesis to increase effectiveness, cellular selectivity, and tolerability of widely used antipsoriatic drugs. The presented approach exploiting the heightened glucose requirement of proliferating keratinocytes bears the potential to revolutionize the management of psoriasis. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Recent findings concerning the fundamental role of enhanced glucose metabolism and glucose transporter 1 overexpression in the pathogenesis of psoriasis brought to light approaches that proved successful in cancer treatment. Substantial advances in the emerging field of glycoconjugation highlight the rationale for the development of glucose-conjugated antipsoriatic drugs to increase their effectiveness, cellular selectivity, and tolerability. The presented approach offers a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of psoriasis and other hyperproliferative skin diseases.

Molecular control of pathogenic Th17 cells in autoimmune diseases

IL-17A-producing CD4⁺ T helper cells (Th17) are crucial for the development of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and thus are exploited for clinical immunotherapies. Emerging evidence suggests Th17 cells are heterogeneous and able to adopt both pathogenic and non-pathogenic phenotypes which are shaped by environmental and genetic factors. On one hand, IL-6 in concert with TGFβ1 can induce non-pathogenic Th17 cells (non-pTh17), which are not effective in inducing tissue inflammation. On the other hand, IL-6, IL-1β with IL-23 induce pathogenic Th17 cells (pTh17) to induce immune pathologies in various tissues. Th17 cells could be both pathogenic and non-pathogenic in a content-dependent manner in vivo. Understanding how the generation and pathogenicity of pTh17 cells are regulated will aid us to devise more effective immunotherapy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the differentiation and regulation of Th17 cells especially pTh17 cells in vitro and in vivo. The emerging results revealing the specific molecular control of pTh17 cells are highlighted.

Exposure-Response Relationships for Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Phase II and III Trials in Psoriasis Patients

Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy in phase III trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The exposure-response relationships for risankizumab efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75, PASI90, PASI100, and static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA)0/1) at week 16 (N = 1,732) and week 52 (N = 598) as well as safety (incidence of any adverse event, serious adverse event, infection and infestation, or serious infection) over up to 52 weeks were characterized using the data from risankizumab phase II and III clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Impact of clinically relevant covariates was evaluated. Risankizumab phase III regimen (150 mg subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks thereafter) achieved the plateau of the exposure-efficacy relationships with model-estimated PASI90 and sPGA0/1 response probabilities of 77%, and 87%, respectively, at week 16 and 85%, and 88%, respectively, at week 52. There was no apparent relationship between risankizumab plasma exposure and the evaluated safety variables.

Psoriatic arthritis: From pathogenesis to pharmacologic management

The pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PSA) is still a matter of debate. A favourable genetic background is interwoven with environmental triggering factors in a complex network. Shared antigens and the recirculation of immune cells may account for the clinical manifestations, involving both cutaneous and articular sites. A favourable genetic background has been demonstrated in many genomic and proteomic studies, being associated to polymorphic variants of the genes coding for Major Histocompatibility Complex I and cytokine pathways. In genetic-predisposed individuals, triggering factors, like infections, dysbiosis or mechanic stress may promote the development of the disease. The subsequent activation of the innate and adaptive immune system, following the stimulation of Toll-like Receptors, culminates in the expansion of dendritic cells, macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, monocytes, Natural Killer lymphocytes and other cells with the final inflammation and damage of skin, joint and enthesis. Particularly, the activation of CD4+ T helper 17 lymphocytes represents a crucial point in the pathogenesis of the disease. The participation of the visceral adipose tissue may amplify the inflammatory process by means of the synthesis of pro-inflammatory adipokines. Current therapeutic algorithms address the variety of clinical manifestations with a tailored strategy aiming to achieve the best control of the symptoms with minimal side effects. Conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologic agents and synthetic small molecules offer different attack routes and may be chosen individually or in combination according to the phenotype of the disease.

Risankizumab for the treatment of psoriasis

Introduction: The interleukin （IL）-23 and IL-17 pathway is closely related to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. This pathway is considered to be an important target for treating psoriasis. Risankizumab can selectively inhibit IL-23p19 subunit and for the treatment of psoriasis. This article aims to review risankizumab and provides reference for clinicians. Areas covered: The chemical property, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety of risankizumab was introduced in this paper. A PubMed search using the terms 'risankizumab,' 'IL-23,' 'p19 subunit,' and 'psoriasis,' was performed, and the results were screened for the most relevant English language publications. Expert opinion: Risankizumab is a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23 and inhibits its interaction with the IL-23 receptor. Clinical trials showed that risankizumab was significantly more effective than ustekinumab. Risankizumab was well tolerated, upper respiratory tract infection was the common adverse reactions. Therefore, the market of risankizumab provides an important therapeutic means for psoriasis.

Risankizumab: First Global Approval

Risankizumab (Skyrizi^®), a humanised IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23, was developed by AbbVie in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim for the treatment of immunological and inflammatory disorders. In March 2019, risankizumab received its first global approval in Japan for the treatment of adults with psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis. Risankizumab has also received approval in the USA, Canada and the EU for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and is in phase 3 development for this indication as well as psoriatic arthritis in several countries worldwide. Phase 2 and 3 clinical evaluation of risankizumab is ongoing in several countries in the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Risankizumab is also in phase 2 development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis globally. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of risankizumab leading to this first approval for psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis.

Guselkumab for the treatment of psoriasis - evidence to date

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory, and debilitating skin disease with significant impact on patients’ quality of life. Its pathogenesis is complex and not yet fully understood. However, the IL-23/IL-17 axis is currently considered the main pathogenic pathway in psoriasis. Guselkumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 λ (IgG1λ) monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23. It is the first of its class, already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as well as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for either systemic therapy or phototherapy. Several clinical trials have demonstrated potential benefits of guselkumab over other already approved immunomodulators in terms of safety and efficacy. The results of the head-to-head trial ECLIPSE were recently released and are addressed in this review. They contribute to the increasing confidence in guselkumab, demonstrating great potential for long-term treatment of psoriasis. However, further long-term data and additional comparative studies will be essential for positioning guselkumab in the therapeutic armamentarium for psoriasis.

Risankizumab: First Global Approval

Risankizumab (Skyrizi^®), a humanised IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the p19 subunit of IL-23, was developed by AbbVie in collaboration with Boehringer Ingelheim for the treatment of immunological and inflammatory disorders. In March 2019, risankizumab received its first global approval in Japan for the treatment of adults with psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis. Risankizumab has also received approval in the USA, Canada and the EU for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, and is in phase 3 development for this indication as well as psoriatic arthritis in several countries worldwide. Phase 2 and 3 clinical evaluation of risankizumab is ongoing in several countries in the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Risankizumab is also in phase 2 development for the treatment of atopic dermatitis globally. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of risankizumab leading to this first approval for psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis, generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis.