1
|
Yang X, Zhang S, Su J, Guo S, Ibrahim Y, Zhang K, Tian Y, Wang L, Yuan S, Liu X. Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A Follow-up Exceeding 5 Years. Neurospine 2024; 21:303-313. [PMID: 38317550 PMCID: PMC10992631 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347026.513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) versus microdiscectomy (MD). METHODS The data of 154 patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent TELD (n = 89) or MD (n = 65) were retrospectively analyzed. The patients' clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scales for leg and low back pain, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The evolution of radiographic manifestations was observed during follow-up. Potential risk factors for a poor clinical outcome were investigated. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 5.5 years (range, 5-7 years), the recurrence rate was 4.49% in the TELD group and 1.54% in the MD group. All scores significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.01). The improvement in the ODI and JOA scores was significantly greater in the TELD than MD group (p < 0.05). Forty-seven patients (52.8%) in the TELD group and 32 (49.2%) in the MD group had Modic changes before surgery, most of which showed no changes at the last follow-up. The degeneration grades of 292 discs (71.0%) were unchanged at the last follow-up, while 86 (20.9%) showed improvement, mostly at the upper adjacent segment. No significant difference was observed in the intervertebral height index or paraspinal muscle-disc ratio. CONCLUSION Both TELD and MD provide generally satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for patients with LDH. TELD can be used as a reliable alternative to MD with less surgical trauma. Modic type II changes, decreased preoperative intervertebral height, and a high body mass index are predictors of a poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Yang
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shijun Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Junxiao Su
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Sai Guo
- Photography Department, School of Journalism and Communication, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yakubu Ibrahim
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yonghao Tian
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Lianlei Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Suomao Yuan
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xinyu Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu Q, Wu W, Liu J, Xie S, Tang T. Predictive Factors for Residual Low Back Pain Following Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation. Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942231. [PMID: 38183217 PMCID: PMC10777582 DOI: 10.12659/msm.942231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a mature and popular surgery for treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). The main objective of our study was to identify risk factors for residual low back pain after PELD and to improve postoperative management. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of 251 patients who underwent PELD for LDH. We defined residual LBP as visual analog scale (VAS) score for LBP ≥3 at 2 years postoperatively, and severe LBP was defined as VAS for LBP ≥7.5. The clinical and imaging data were analyzed by comparing patients with VAS scores ≥3 and <3, and univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were applied to predict the risk factors for residual LBP. RESULTS There were 56 (22.3%) patients with LBP VAS ≥3 at 2 years postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that severe baseline VAS for LBP (P<0.001), MCs type I (P=0.006), and severe fatty infiltration of the paravertebral muscles (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for residual LBP after PELD. CONCLUSIONS In patients with LDH, MCs type I, severe baseline LBP, and fatty infiltration of the paravertebral muscles were predictive factors for residual LBP after PELD. Our study suggests that spine surgeons should pay more attention to these imaging parameters, which may be a helpful indicator for the choice of surgical modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianqin Hu
- First Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, PR China
| | - Wenjing Wu
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial Chest Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, PR China
| | - Jiahao Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, PR China
| | - Shuihua Xie
- First Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, PR China
| | - Tao Tang
- First Department of Orthopedics, Jiangxi Province Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanchang, Jiangxi, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saghebdoust S, Khadivar F, Ekrami M, Mehrizi MAA, Lajimi AV, Zahmatkesh MRR, Pak N, Jouibari MF, Mirsaeed SSG, Boustani MR. Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy versus Open Microdiskectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Comparative Cohort Study on Costs and Long-Term Outcomes. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023. [PMID: 37879346 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (TELD) is considered an effective treatment for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). There is a paucity of studies comparing in detail the costs and long-term clinical outcomes of TELD and open microdiskectomy (MD), especially in developing countries. Thus, we sought to provide a multidimensional insight into this matter by comparing the direct costs and long-term outcomes of TELD with those of MD. METHODS The electronic health records of 434 patients with LDH who underwent either TELD or MD were collected from February 2011 to October 2014. Within a 7-year follow-up period, 412 patients, comprising 203 patients treated with TELD and 209 patients treated with MD, were fully evaluated. Patient characteristics, operative time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), postoperative hospital stay, time to return to work (RTW), perioperative complications, and direct costs were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS The postoperative ODI and VAS scores improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). In accordance with the modified MacNab criteria, the rate of excellent and good outcomes was 88.67 and 88.03% in the TELD and MD groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in the clinical outcomes and perioperative complications. However, IBL, hospital stay, and RTW were significantly reduced in the TELD group (p < 0.05). Twenty-one cases in the TELD group and nine in the MD group underwent reoperation due to recurrence (p < 0.05). Total inpatient cost per patient was $1,596 in the TELD group and $1,990 in the MD group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION TELD for the treatment of symptomatic LDH could be an affordable strategy, providing certain advantages of minimally invasive procedures such as shorter hospital stay and earlier recovery along with comparable clinical outcomes to the conventional surgical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajjad Saghebdoust
- Department of Neurosurgery, Razavi Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Farshid Khadivar
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehran Ekrami
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | - Amir Valinezhad Lajimi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Rouhbakhsh Zahmatkesh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Razavi Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Neda Pak
- Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Faghih Jouibari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Mohammad Reza Boustani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Golestan Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mu G, Yue L, Sun H. Long-Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Study. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3019-3027. [PMID: 37674818 PMCID: PMC10478952 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s406071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Our study aims to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic effects of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) on lumbar disc herniation. Patients and Methods Radiographic and clinical data of patients undergoing TELD in our institution from January 2015 to January 2019 were retrospectively collected. LDH outpatients who had not received surgical treatment during the same period were 1:1 matched by propensity score matching as the conservative group. The radiographic parameters of the two groups at baseline and at the last follow-up (≥24 months) were analyzed. Results The study included 47 patients in the TELD group, matched with 47 patients in the conservative group. The disc height of the TELD group at the last follow-up was lower than that at the baseline (P < 0.001), and lower than that of the conservative group at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). The disc degeneration grade of the TELD group at the last follow-up was greater than that at the baseline, and greater than that of the conservative group at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the facet joint degeneration in the TELD group between the baseline and the last follow-up, and between the TELD group and the conservative group at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). The pain intensity and disability score in the TELD group at 3-month follow-up and at the last follow-up were significantly lower than those at the baseline (P < 0.001). Six patients in the TELD group required additional surgery during the follow-up period. Conclusion Our long-term follow-up data shows that the disc height of the operated level was significantly reduced and the disc degeneration was significantly aggravated in TELD-treated patients; in contrast, the facet joint degeneration did not show significant aggravation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanzhang Mu
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Yue
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Haolin Sun
- Orthopaedic Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Z, Zhang L, Dong J, Xie P, Liu B, Chen R, Li S, Liu Z, Yang B, Feng F, He L, Yang Y, Pang M, Rong L. Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disk Herniation: Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:79-88. [PMID: 36083850 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective randomized controlled study. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety between percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and microendoscopic discectomy (MED). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Two kinds of minimally invasive discectomy, PTED and MED, are now widely used for treating lumbar disk herniation (LDH). The long-term comparative results of these two techniques still remained uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial, patients were included if they had persistent signs and symptoms of radiculopathy with corresponding imaging-confirmed LDH and were randomly allocated to PTED or MED groups. The primary outcome was the score of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the secondary outcomes included the score of Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain (SF36-BP) and physical function (SF36-PF), European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Visual Analog Scales for back pain (VAS-back) and leg pain (VAS-leg). RESULTS A total of 241 patients were accepted to enroll in our randomized controlled trial, of which 119 were randomly assigned to the PTED group, and the rest 122 were assigned to the MED group. A total of 194 out of 241 patients (80.5%) completed the five-year follow-up. PTED group was associated with shorter postoperative in-bed time and length of hospital stay. Both primary and secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups at each follow-up time point. During the five-year follow-up, seven recurrent cases occurred in PTED and MED groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Over the five-year follow-up period, PTED and MED were both efficacious in the treatment of LDH. The long-term clinical outcomes and recurrent rates were comparable between the treatment groups. PTED represents a more minimally invasive technique with the advantages of rapid recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihao Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangming Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianwen Dong
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peigen Xie
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruiqiang Chen
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shangfu Li
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhongyu Liu
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bu Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Feng
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei He
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mao Pang
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| | - Limin Rong
- Department of Spine Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Quality Control of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Center for Engineering and Technology Research of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang J, Li Y, Wu C, Xie W, Li X, Gan X, Lu Q. Clinical efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar degenerative diseases: A minimum 6-year follow-up. Front Surg 2022; 9:1004709. [PMID: 36189389 PMCID: PMC9520066 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (TELD) is widely applied for lumbar degenerative disease (LDDs) and satisfactory short-term outcomes have been achieved. However, the mid-term and long-term follow-up of this technique is still lacking. Objective To retrospectively analyze the mid-term clinical efficacy of TELD for single-level LDD and its effect on intervertebral disc degeneration with a minimum of 6-year follow-up. Methods 64 patients with single-level LDDs (lumbar disc herniation, lumbar spinal stenosis) who underwent TELD under local anesthesia in our department from December 2014 to December 2015 were observed. Visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association evaluation treatment (JOA) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were calculated and compared before operation, 3 months after operation, 6 months after operation, 1 year after operation and at the last follow-up. Disc Height (DH), disc range of motion (ROM) and disc degeneration on standard lumbar lateral radiographs before operation and at the last follow-up were determined. Recurrence rate and operation-related complications during follow-up were recorded. Results 64 cases were followed up for 6.4 ± 0.1 years. There were no complications such as infection, epidural hematoma and nerve root injury. 1 patient (1.67%) was found to have dural rupture and cauda equina hernia during the operation. There were significant differences in VAS, JOA, ODI between preoperative and postoperative 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and last follow-up (P < 0 01), VAS, JOA, ODI at 3 months after operation were different from 6 months after operation (P < 0 05), and there were significant differences compared with preoperative, 1 year after operation and last follow up (P < 0 01). VAS, JOA and ODI at 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation (P < 0.01), but not significantly different from those at 1 year after operation and the last follow-up (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in DH, ROM and the Pfirrmann grade of intervertebral disc preoperative and the last follow-up. During the follow-up period, 3 patients (4.69%) were recurrent, 13 patients (20.31%) had various degrees of postoperative dysesthesia (POD), and 3 patients (4.69%) had various degrees of muscle weakness. Conclusion TELD has a satisfactory mid-term efficacy, and has no significant effect on the DH, the stability of the intervertebral disc space, or on intervertebral disc degeneration. However, as expected, TELD was associated with some complications including recurrent disc herniation and POD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Tang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
- Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Congjun Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Xie
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Xugui Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Xuewen Gan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Qilin Lu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hubei 672 Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Chinese / Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
- Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China
- Correspondence: Qilin Lu
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu H, Zhu B, Song Q, Liu X. Evaluation of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of obese adolescents with lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:562. [PMID: 34147091 PMCID: PMC8214765 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04449-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Obese patients are at risk of complications after spinal surgery. Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) has advantages over conventional open surgery in the treatment of obese adult patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) because it can decrease perioperative complications and enhance the degree of patient satisfaction. However, no clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of FELD in obese adolescents with LDH (ALDH). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FELD for the treatment of obese ALDH. Methods We retrospectively collected clinical data from 208 patients with single-segment ALDH who underwent FELD in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2019. According to the WHO classification of obesity, the patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) groups (control group). Based on the preoperative baseline data of the two groups, propensity score matching was performed to select patients from these groups for a comparative study. Perioperative data included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospitalization. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria were recorded as the main indicators of the surgical outcome. Recurrence rate and incidence of complications were recorded as minor indicators. Results Twenty-eight patients and 80 patients were included in the obese and non-obese groups, respectively, after 1:4 propensity score matching. Both groups showed improvements in VAS and ODI scores after surgery and at each follow-up time point (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant statistical difference in the surgical outcomes between the two groups at each follow-up time point (p > 0.05). The differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of postoperative hospitalization were not statistically significant between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion FELD is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for treating obese patients with ALDH. The efficacy of FELD in obese and non-obese patients with ALDH was comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haijiang Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Bin Zhu
- Department of Orthopedics, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qingpeng Song
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|