Options for Intraoperative Repair of a Cut Pilot Balloon on the Endotracheal Tube

Efficacy of using an intravenous catheter to repair damaged expansion lines of endotracheal tubes and laryngeal masks

BACKGROUND

In perioperative care or intensive care units, the expansion lines of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) or laryngeal mask airways (LMAs) may be accidentally cut off during medical procedures. We designed a simple method for repairing damaged ETT and LMA expansion lines.

METHODS

In this in vitro study, ETT (n = 20) or LMA (n = 20) models were each categorized into experimental (n = 10) and control (n = 10) groups. In the experimental groups, the expansion lines were cut in the middle, and a 22G intravenous catheter was inserted into the broken end of each expansion line. The time taken to repair the expansion lines was recorded in both experimental groups. The repaired expansion lines in both groups were tested for visible underwater air leakage with cuffs under high pressure (120 cm H2O). After 15 h, the cuff pressure and tensile strength of the expansion lines were measured.

RESULTS

The overall time required to repair the expansion line was 27.8 ± 1.5 s in the ETT group and 20.4 ± 1.1 s in the LMA group. When the cuff pressure was increased to 120 cmH2O, no air leakage was observed in the experimental LMA and ETT groups. The mean difference in the cuff pressures of the control and experimental groups was insignificant for both, ETT (9.50 ± 1.29 vs. 9.50 ± 1.08 cmH2O, 95% CI =  - 1.11 to 1.11 cmH2O, P = 1.00) and LMA (34.1 ± 1.10 cmH2O vs. 34.5 ± 0.97 cmH2O, 95% CI =  - 0.57 to 1.37 cmH2O, P = 0.40) groups, The tensile strength and the force required to pull apart the expansion lines in the experimental groups were lower than those in the control groups for ETTs (3.32 ± 0.37 N vs. 35.03 ± 4.47 N, 95% CI =  - 34.69 to - 28.72 N, P < 0.0001) and LMAs (36.55 ± 2.20 N vs. 26.18 ± 1.67 N, 95% CI =  - 12.21 to - 8.53 N, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

An intravenous catheter can be directly inserted into the damaged ETT or LMA expansion lines; it is a simple, rapid, and effective repair method.

Perianesthesia emergency repair of a cut endotracheal tube’s inflatable tube: A case report

BACKGROUND

During the perianesthesia period, emergency situations threatening the life and safety of patients can occur at any time. When dealing with some emergencies, occasional confusion is inevitable.

CASE SUMMARY

This case report describes the rare situation wherein a surgeon inadvertently detached the inflatable tube of an endotracheal tube during a tonsillectomy, and positive pressure ventilation could not be provided. While reintubation may increase the risk of respiratory tract infection and aspiration, patients with a difficult airway might die due to apnea. The best treatment method is to optimize the damaged tracheal tube junction to avoid secondary intubation and ensure patient safety. An intravenous needle and cannula were used to repair the damaged gap in the current case. Following the repair, the anesthesia machine showed no indication of low tidal volume, and there was no deflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. Subsequently, the patient was transferred to the post-anesthesia recovery room, and the tracheal tube was removed with satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

Using an intravenous needle to repair a break in the inflatable tube surrounding an endotracheal tube is safe and reliable.