Cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs adjuvant radiation in stage IB/IIA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors, treated with radical surgery: a retrospective study

A novel predictor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors

Objective

For early-stage cervical cancer patients experiencing radical surgery, postoperative radiotherapy was recommended for patients with a combination of intermediate-risk factors. However, there was no consensus on whether to administer concurrent chemotherapy. The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical value of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in guiding the use of concurrent chemotherapy during postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 969 patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between different group. A Cox proportional hazards regression test was used to conduct multivariate analyses.

Results

For the patients in the high CONUT group (≥3), the addition of concurrent chemotherapy had better 5-year DFS (91.2 % vs. 72.8 %, P = 0.005) and CSS (93.8 % vs. 77.4 %, P = 0.013) than those without it. Meanwhile, the patients with concurrent chemotherapy had less rate of locoregional recurrence (8.5 % vs 16.7 %, P = 0.034) and distant metastases (11.7 % vs 30.4 %, P = 0.015). The multivariate analysis showed that concurrent chemotherapy was detected to be a factor significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.011), local control (P = 0.041), distant metastasis (P = 0.005) and CSS (P = 0.023). For the patients in low CONUT group (<3), there was no difference in prognosis between patients.

Conclusion

Pretreatment CONUT score may be a predictive factor for the use of concurrent chemotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk factors during postoperative radiotherapy, and it can be helpful to determine the adjuvant treatment scheme.

Impact of different postoperative adjuvant therapies on the survival of early-stage cervical cancer patients with one intermediate-risk factor: A multicenter study of 14 years

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival outcomes of different postoperative adjuvant therapies (PATs) for early-stage cervical cancer (ECC) patients with one intermediate-risk pathological factor (IPF).

METHODS

A total of 2889 patients with stage IA1 to IIA2 cervical cancer were included in this study. Three PAT groups were identified, namely a no adjuvant therapy (NAT) group (n = 773), an adjuvant radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy (ART) group (n = 1648) and an adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) group (n = 468). Kaplan-Meier analysis and COX regression analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among the three groups, before and after propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The recurrence and mortality rate rates in the NAT, ART and ACT groups were 9.2%, 8.6%, and 7.9%, respectively (p = 0.737). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the NAT, ART, and ACT groups in 5-year OS rates (92.8% vs. 93.6% vs. 94.7%, p = 0.594) and DFS rates (88.7% vs. 89.6% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.772). Post-hoc tests yielded similar results, with no differences in 5-year OS and DFS (NAT vs. ART, before and after matching, p > 0.05); (NAT vs. ACT, before and after matching, p > 0.05); and (ACT vs. ART, before and after matching, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and chemotherapy are not associated with survival outcomes of ECC patients with one IPF. Considering the side effects and impact on patients' quality of life, the PATs should be carefully considered.

Risk assessment in the patients with uterine cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk factors after radical hysterectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy is usually considered for surgically treated patients with uterine cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk (IR) factors such as large tumor diameter, stromal invasion to the outer half, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). However, the indications and types of adjuvant therapy for the IR group remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the differences in patient outcomes in the IR group to provide novel insights for tailoring adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Data from 6192 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy at 116 institutions belonging to the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group were reviewed.

RESULTS

In total, 1688 patients were classified into the IR group, of whom 37.3% did not receive adjuvant therapy. Conversely, approximately equal proportions of the remaining patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Patients with all three risk factors showed worse overall survival than those with one or two risk factors. In addition to LVSI, non-squamous cell carcinoma histology, and vaginal invasion were identified as independent risk factors for both recurrence and mortality in multivariate analyses. Tumor diameter greater than 40 mm and surgical center volume were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence. Stromal invasion to the outer half and ovarian metastasis were identified as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the significant differences in prognosis in the IR group. The indications for adjuvant therapy should be further studied, focusing on conventional risk factors and other pathological findings.

Postoperative treatment of intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer: results of a survey from the Gynecology Study Group in the AIRO Gyn and MITO Groups

This survey investigated prognostic factors, treatment modalities, references followed and radiation oncologists' opinions to prescribe adjuvant therapy in early intermediate-risk cervical cancer. All but one recommended pelvic radiotherapy ± vaginal boost (45%) with or without chemotherapy (20%). 88% believed other prognostic factors could integrate classic risk criteria. 66% considered chemo-radiation indicated in case of lymphovascular invasion and suboptimal node dissection, high grade, size ≥ 4cm, non squamous histology and risk factors combination. This wide heterogeneity of treatments reflects the different guideline options due to the lack of defined indications. The need of integrating the classic prognostic factors with others factors was unanimously expressed by radiation oncologists. The best local and systemic therapy should be established through new studies. These results highlighted the need of a position paper to standardize adjuvant treatment in Italy and to design collaborative studies to clarify the controversial aspects.

Comparison of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The presence of intermediate risk factors reduces the predictability of radical hysterectomy, demanding the use of adjuvant therapy for treatment of Early stage cervical cancer (ESCC) patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been widely used with varied efficacy and safety issues. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to update the available evidence and assess the effect of post-surgical adjuvant RT versus adjuvant CRT on survival rate and complications/toxicities in management of ESCC patients with intermediate risk factors. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science (WOS) and CENTRAL were searched using a combination of relevant keywords. All studies comparing outcomes of adjuvant RT versus CRT in ESCC patients with intermediate-risk factors in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities/complications were included. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis was carried out. The risk of bias assessment was done using Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for retrospective cohort studies and Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was used for randomized clinical trials. Eleven retrospective cohort studies and two randomized clinical trials were included in this review. Adjuvant CRT was found to have better RFS with ESCC patients with multiple intermediate risk factors with OR 3.11 95% CI [1.04, 4.99], p < 0.0001; i2 = 6%. However, similar benefit was observed between both regimens in presence of a single intermediate risk factor OR 1.80 95% CI [0.96, 3.36], p = 0.07; i2 = 0%. Grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity among patients receiving post-surgical adjuvant RT versus adjuvant CRT showed increased association of toxicity with adjuvant CRT with OR 7.73 95%CI [3.40, 17.59], p < 0.0001; i2 = 62%. Adjuvant CRT shows favourable RFS and OS in ESCC patients with multiple intermediate risk factors. CRT also showed greater incidence of grade 3 or 4 haematological and non-haematiological toxicity, however, the same could be well tolerated when used within the recommended dosage.

Clinical Implication of Simultaneous Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Boost to Tumor Bed for Cervical Cancer with Full-thickness Stromal Invasion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to retrospectively explore the clinical implications of simultaneous intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) boost to the tumor bed in cervical cancer with full-thickness stromal invasion (FTSI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB and IIA cervical cancer with confirmed FTSI were included. Patients received pelvic IMRT from a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with (or without) a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to 58.8 Gy in 28 fractions for the tumor bed. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pelvic-PFS (p-PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were explored by Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Patients without a tumor bed boost had a poor prognosis. The 5-year OS was 81.3% versus 58.3% and the 5-year PFS rates were 75.0% versus 57.6% (boost vs non-boost). The FIGO stage, pathology, adjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor bed boost were independent factors affecting both the 5-year OS and PFS. Subgroup analysis showed that the SIB group had a higher 5-year OS, PFS, and p-PFS for different stages, lymph node status, and risk groups than the non-SIB group. Recurrence occurred in 268 of 910 (29.5%) patients without SIB and 49 of 293 (16.7%) with SIB. Among patients with recurrence, 113 of 282 (40.1%) in the non-boost group compared with 14 of 51 (23.0%) patients in the boost group had a pelvic recurrence. Tumor bed boost resulted in an increase in the mean radiation dose to the intestine, rectum, and bladder, although there were no differences in the rates of acute and late toxicities between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Tumor bed boost by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an effective and safe method for patients with FTSI and risk factors. Compared with the standard prophylactic radiation, tumor bed boost by EBRT was not associated with increased acute and late toxicities.

Impact of different therapies on the survival of patients with stage I-IIA cervical cancer with intermediate risk factors

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different therapies on patients with cervical cancer (CC) with intermediate risk factors.

Methods

Clinicopathological data of 596 patients diagnosed with stage I–IIA CC at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between January 2013 and November 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Of the patients, 500 patients received adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT + RT). Patients who displayed at least one intermediate risk factor number were screened.

Results

The median follow-up was 62 months. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 90.4% and 90.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that tumor stage, tumor size, pathological type, lymphovascular space invasion, and numbers of medium risk factors were not risk factors for early-stage CC. Compared with the control group, patients who received CT, RT, or CT + RT showed improved PFS and OS (P<0.05). The RT group had lower PFS and OS than the CT and CT + RT groups (P<0.05). Among the 318 patients with a single intermediate risk factor, 297 patients received CT, RT, and CT + RT benefit from adjuvant therapy (P<0.05). Of the 253 patients with high-risk factors, 220 patients received CT, RT and CT + RT get improved PFS and OS (P<0.05).

Conclusions

Patients who received adjuvant therapy had better postoperative outcomes than those who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Patients had CT alone or CT combined with RT had better efficacy than those had RT alone.

Is Adjuvant Therapy Necessary for Patients with Intermediate-Risk Cervical Cancer after Open Radical Hysterectomy?

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant therapy is usually recommended for patients with intermediate-risk cervical cancer (deep stromal invasion [DSI], lymphovascular space invasion [LVSI], and bulky tumor) after radical hysterectomy. However, we previously reported that DSI, LVSI, and bulky squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were not correlated with prognosis in multivariate analysis; therefore, the indications we use for adjuvant therapy include complete stromal invasion, not DSI or LVSI or bulky SCC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of our therapeutic strategy for cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.

METHODS

We performed 321 type III open radical hysterectomies for cervical cancer between 2001 and 2013. Eighty-two patients with DSI, LVSI, or bulky SCC did not receive adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy under informed consent. We retrospectively evaluated the prognosis of these 82 patients.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients had >2/3 DSI and 35 patients had 1/3-2/3 DSI. Five patients had LVSI alone. The mean patient age was 43 years (range, 27-72). Six patients (7%) experienced recurrence during a median follow-up period of 84 months (range, 1-206). Two of the 6 patients with recurrence suffered cervical cancer-related deaths, but the remaining 4 cases are alive without evidence of disease after treatment during a follow-up period of 87-165 months. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 92.6%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 96.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy for DSI, LVSI, or bulky SCC after open radical hysterectomy might not be necessary. Further data collection is warranted to determine the standard of care for patients with intermediate-risk cervical -cancer.