Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: patient selection and special considerations

Upper extremity contact pressure measurement in robot-assisted pelvic surgery

Upper extremity complications are often a problem in robot-assisted pelvic surgery (RAPS) with the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (LT-position). This study focused on upper extremity contact pressure (UEP) and examined the relationship between UEP and upper extremity complications. From May 2020 to April 2022 at the University of Tokyo Hospital, UEP was measured in 155 patients undergoing RARP and 20 patients undergoing RARC. A total of 350 sets of UEP were investigated in this study. UEP was measured using a portable interface pressure sensor (Palm Q, Cape CO., Kanagawa, Japan) in the preoperative lithotripsy position (L-position), preoperative LT-position, and postoperative L-position. UEP was increased in the preoperative LT-position than in the preoperative L-position (right side 5.2 mmHg vs. 17.1 mmHg, left side 5.3 mmHg vs. 17.1 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively), and was decreased in the postoperative L-position than in preoperative LT-position (right side 17.1 mmHg vs. 10.8 mmHg, left side 17.1 mmHg vs. 10.6 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively). Eleven upper extremities developed shoulder pain. UEP of the preoperative LT-position tended to be higher in the upper extremity exhibiting shoulder pain (25.6 mmHg (15.4-30.3) vs. 17.1 mmHg (12.0-24.4) P = 0.0901). UEP measurements may help prevent postoperative shoulder pain.

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review

Over the last decade, the increased utilization of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the surgical treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer has led to an uptrend in intracorporeal urinary diversions (ICUD). However, the operative results comparing ICUD to extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) have varied widely. We performed a meta-analysis to analyze perioperative outcomes and complications of ICUD compared to ECUD following RARC. This study is registered at International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020164074. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases in August 2019. A total of six studies comparing ICUD vs ECUD were identified and meta-analysis was conducted on these studies. In addition, a cumulative analysis was also performed on 83 studies that reported perioperative outcomes after RARC and ICUD or ECUD. The Weighed Mean Difference of operative time and blood loss between ICUD and ECUD group was (16; 95% confidence interval - 34 to 66) and (- 86; 95% confidence interval - 124 to - 48), respectively. ICUD and ECUD had comparable early (30-day) and mid-term (30-90-day) complication rate (RR 1.19; 95% confidence interval 0.71-2.0; p = 0.5) and (RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.71-1.15 p = 0.4) respectively. In the 83 studies that were included in the cumulative analysis, the mean operative time for ileal conduit and neobladders by ICUD were 307 and 428 min, respectively, compared to ECUD 428 and 426 min, respectively. ICUD and ECUD have comparable short- and mid-term complication rate. The ICUD group has lower blood loss and lower rate of blood transfusion compared to ECUD.

Early Postoperative Morbidity of Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Obese Patients

Aims: To compare the 30-day postoperative complications of robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) vs open radical cystectomy (ORC) in obese patients (body mass index ≥30) with bladder cancer (BC). Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify obese BC patients who underwent RRC or ORC between 2005 and 2016. Patient demographics, postoperative mortality rate, morbidity, operating time (OPTIME), length of stay (LOS), readmission, and reoperation rates were recorded and compared between the two groups. Each RRC patient was matched with three ORC patients using a propensity score approach. Results: Four hundred forty-two RRC patients were matched with 1326 ORC patients. No difference in early postoperative mortality rate between RRC and ORC (0.7% vs 1.3%, relative risk, RR [95% confidence interval CI]: 0.27 [0.07-1.02]). Compared with ORC, the RRC group showed shorter mean OPTIME (364.7 [standard deviation, SD = 133.4] vs 387.8 [SD = 129.7] minutes, p = 0.001) and mean LOS (7.1 [SD = 5.6] vs 10.6 [SD = 6.6] days, p < 0.001). Compared with ORC, the RR of developing the following events in RRC group was lower: 30-day postoperative any complication (45%), any wound occurrence (64%), blood transfusion (70%), superficial surgical-site infection (78%), and wound disruption (77%). There was no difference in the RR of any-cause readmission (RR [95% CI]: 0.77 [0.57-1.05]) and reoperation (RR [95% CI]: 0.48 [0.22-1.04]) between the two groups. Conclusions: The study revealed that RRC for obese BC patients is associated with shorter OPTIME, shorter LOS, and lower risk of early postoperative complications when compared with a matched group of patients who received ORC. In addition, no difference in early postoperative mortality rate between RRC and ORC was observed.