Safety of long-term use of linezolid: results of an open-label study

Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment

The long-term tolerability of linezolid is low because of mitochondrial toxicity, whereas tedizolid may represent a better option for suppressive therapy. We report a first presumed case of tedizolid-associated optic neuropathy after a very prolonged (18-month) intake and believe that screening for optic neuropathy should be considered for patients undergoing tedizolid suppression.

Use of oxazolidinones (linezolid or tedizolid) for the treatment of breast infections. A case series from a tertiary referral hospital

OBJECTIVES

Mastitis is mainly caused by Gram-positive bacteria and usually involves treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics and clindamycin. Oxazolidinones show good results in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) due to its pharmacokinetic characteristics. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who received oxazolidinones for the treatment of SSTIs of the mammary tissue.

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study of patients with a diagnosis of breast infection who received treatment with oxazolidinones as initial or salvage therapy between September 2016 and November 2022. Patients were identified through the pharmacy database. The primary outcome was clinical cure.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received oxazolidinones: 27 received linezolid and 2 tedizolid. Median age was 41 years (IQR 31.0-56.5) and 28 patients were female. Ten patients (35%) had a history of breast cancer, while three (10%) had an immunosuppressive condition. Microbiological isolation was obtained in 24 individuals (83%). Predominant isolations were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (8, 28%) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (7, 24%). Twenty-four patients (83%) received oxazolidinones as a salvage therapy, with a median duration of 14 days (IQR 10-17). Clinical cure was achieved in 24 patients (83%), while 4 relapsed after a median of 15 days (IQR 4-34). One was lost to follow-up. Three patients (10%) were taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and one of them concurrently received linezolid for 4 days with no adverse events recorded. Cytopenia during treatment was observed in 2/12 individuals. Oxazolidinones allowed hospital discharge in 11/13 hospitalized patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Oxazolidinones could be considered as an alternative for treating breast infections.

Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Resistant Gram-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections Using an Oral Linezolid-Based Antibiotic Regime

BACKGROUND

Increasing antibiotic resistance has been reported as an issue in the systemic treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Linezolid offers the advantages of high oral bioavailability and little resistance; however, efficacy in the treatment of PJI varies considerably, and studies reporting consistent surgical treatment are scarce.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of two-stage revisions performed between 2008 and 2017. We identified 111 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Oral linezolid was given for 28 days following 14 days of intravenous tailored antibiotics in resistant gram-positive PJI. A total of 64% of the patients had methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. The median follow-up was 43 (interquartile range (IQR) 30-57) months.

RESULTS

22% (24/111) of the patients underwent surgery for subsequent infection. The 5-year infection-free survival probability was 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-85). A total of 5% of the patients (6/111) had the same organism at the time of reinfection. The patients with infections caused by other organisms than Coagulase-negative staphylococci tended to have a worse reinfection-free survivorship at five years (70% vs. 81%, p = 0.09). Furthermore, the patients with obesity tended to have reduced reinfection-free survivorship at five years (69% vs. 84%, p = 0.08). Overall, 5% (6/111) of the patients had blood count abnormalities with no treatment discontinuations.

CONCLUSION

Two-stage revision arthroplasty with systemic oral linezolid treatment for resistant gram-positive PJI results in an infection control of 77% at the mid-term.

Real-World Use of Tedizolid Phosphate for 28 Days or More: A Case Series Describing Tolerability and Clinical Success

Tedizolid has activity against Gram-positive pathogens as well as Mycobacterium spp and Nocardia spp. Real-world evidence supporting long-term tolerability and clinical success of tedizolid is lacking. Prolonged tedizolid therapy (median, 188 days; interquartile range, 62-493 days) appeared to be well tolerated in 37 patients (8.1% experienced adverse effect leading to discontinuation). Clinical success was 81.3% in those evaluated.

Clinical use of linezolid in periprosthetic joint infections - a systematic review

Introduction: The most common causative organism in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is Gram-positive bacteria that are increasingly drug resistant. In these cases the use of linezolid may be warranted. However, there are conflicting reports regarding its role in antibiotic treatment of PJIs. The aim of this review is to gather and analyze clinical results and treatment details on linezolid in patients with PJIs. Methods: In August 2019, a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE (Pubmed and Ovid) and Cochrane Library was performed. A total of 504 records were screened, and a total of 16 studies including 372 patients treated with linezolid for a PJI were included in this review based on the PRISMA criteria and after quality analysis using the MINOR score and Newcastle–Ottawa scale, as well as assessing level of evidence. Pooling analysis as well as descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Based on the results from the studies included, infection control was achieved in 80 % (range 30 %–100 %) of patients after a mean follow-up period of 25 (range 2–66) months. The mean duration of treatment was 58 d intravenous and orally at a median dose of 600 mg bis in die (b.i.d.) (range 400–900 b.i.d.). A combination therapy with rifampicin was used in 53 % of patients. MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infections were present in 29 % and resistant CoNS (coagulase-negative Staphylococcus) in 46 %. Adverse effects occurred in 33 % of cases, mostly anemia, thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal complaints leading to treatment discontinuation in 9 %. However, great heterogeneity was found with respect to surgical treatment, diagnosis of infection and indication for linezolid. Discussion: Linezolid is an appropriate option for treatment of resistant Gram-positive organisms in PJIs. Most commonly 600 mg b.i.d. is used, and a combination with rifampicin appears feasible although one must consider individual increases in doses in these cases. However, adverse effects are common and there are limited data for long-term use and optimal antibiotic combinations or individual doses.

Neonatal and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Following Linezolid for Coagulase-negative Staphylococcal Infection: Real World Evidence

BACKGROUND

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) frequently causes late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Vancomycin is the first-line therapy, but the emergence of reduced vancomycin-susceptibility strains has resulted in linezolid use, of which long-term safety in preterm infants is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the association between linezolid exposure and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) or death at 18-21 months of corrected age, in preterm infants with CoNS sepsis.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective cohort study comparing long-term outcomes of preterm infants exposed to linezolid versus other antistaphylococcal antimicrobials. We included infants ≤28 weeks' gestational age (GA), with CoNS sepsis, admitted between January 2011 and June 2015 in 3 level-3 Canadian NICUs. Primary outcome was a composite of death or significant NDI (sNDI) at 18-21 months of corrected age. Secondary outcomes included NDI and individual components of the primary outcome. We assessed the relationship between linezolid exposure and outcomes using a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 274 infants included, 67 (24.4%) were exposed to linezolid. Median GA was 26 weeks and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in composite outcome of death or sNDI among the infants of both groups, but significantly more death by 18-21 months in the linezolid group (29.9% vs. 17.6%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid exposure was not associated with composite outcome of death or sNDI at 18-21 months. The association between linezolid and death may be due to indication bias. Further studies are warranted.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Oxazolidinones

Oxazolidinones are a class of synthetic antimicrobial agents with potent activity against a wide range of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Oxazolidinones exhibit their antibacterial effects by inhibiting protein synthesis acting on the ribosomal 50S subunit of the bacteria and thus preventing formation of a functional 70S initiation complex. Currently, two oxazolidinones have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: linezolid and more recently tedizolid. Other oxazolidinones are currently under investigation in clinical trials. These antimicrobial agents exhibit a favourable pharmacokinetic profile with an excellent bioavailability and a good tissue and organ penetration. In-vitro susceptibility studies have shown that oxazolidinones are bacteriostatic against enterococci and staphylococci, and bactericidal for the majority of strains of streptococci. In the context of emergence of resistance to glycopeptides, oxazolidinones have become an effective alternative to vancomycin treatment frequently associated with nephrotoxicity. However, oxazolidinones, and linezolid in particular, are associated with significant adverse events, myelosuppression representing the main unfavourable side effect. More recently, tedizolid has been shown to effectively treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. This newer oxazolidinone offers the advantages of once-daily dosing and a better safety profile in healthy volunteer studies (fewer gastrointestinal and haematological side effects). The potential use of tedizolid for other infections that could require longer therapy warrants further studies for positioning this new oxazolidinone in the available antimicrobial armamentarium. Moreover, other oxazolidinones are currently under active investigation.

Neurological and Psychiatric Adverse Effects of Antimicrobials

Antimicrobials are a widely used class of medications, but several of them are associated with neurological and psychiatric side effects. The exact incidence of neurotoxicity with anti-infectives is unknown, although it is estimated to be < 1%. Neurotoxicity occurs with all classes of antimicrobials, such as antibiotics, antimycobacterials, antivirals, antifungals and antiretrovirals, with side effects ranging from headaches, anxiety and depression to confusion, delirium, psychosis, mania and seizures, among others. It is important to consider these possible side effects to prevent misdiagnosis or delayed treatment as drug withdrawal can be associated with reversibility in most cases. This article highlights the different neurotoxic effects of a range of antimicrobials, discusses proposed mechanisms of onset and offers general management recommendations. The effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiome and how they may ultimately affect cognition is also briefly examined.

Revisiting systemic treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis: a review of intravitreal penetration of systemic antibiotics

BACKGROUND

Adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy for treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis is controversial but common practice due to the severity of the disease. In the absence of guidance documents, several antibiotic regimens are being used without applying evidence-based prescribing, leading to inappropriate treatment of this serious eye condition.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize available data on intravitreal penetration of systemically administered antibiotics and to discuss their usefulness from a microbiological and pharmacological point of view.

SOURCES

We performed a systematic PubMed search of studies investigating antibiotic concentrations in the vitreous after systemic administration in humans, and selected animal models.

CONTENT

The best-documented agents achieving therapeutic levels in the vitreous are meropenem, linezolid and moxifloxacin. Vancomycin, cefazoline, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, imipenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole reach levels justifying their use in specific situations. Available data do not support the use of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, aminoglycosides, aminopenicillins, piperacillin, cefepime and clarithromycin. With very limited but available promising data, the use of daptomycin and rifampicin deserves further investigation.

IMPLICATIONS

The choice of the adjunctive systemic antibiotic agent-in situations where it is considered relevant for treatment-must to date be made on an individual basis, considering microbiological aspects as well as operative status and inflammation of the eye. This review gives a systematic overview of antibiotic options and provides guidance to the clinician striving for optimal systemic antibiotic treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis.

Do In Vitro Assays Predict Drug Candidate Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Risk?

In vitro assays are commonly used during drug discovery to try to decrease the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). But how effective are they at predicting risk? One of the most widely used methods evaluates cell cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity assays that used cell lines that are very different from normal hepatocytes, and high concentrations of drug, were not very accurate at predicting idiosyncratic drug reaction risk. Even cytotoxicity assays that use more biologically normal cells resulted in many false-positive and false-negative results. Assays that quantify reactive metabolite formation, mitochondrial injury, and bile salt export pump (BSEP) inhibition have also been described. Although evidence suggests that reactive metabolite formation and BSEP inhibition can play a role in the mechanism of iDILI, these assays are not very accurate at predicting risk. In contrast, inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain appears not to play an important role in the mechanism of iDILI, although other types of mitochondrial injury may do so. It is likely that there are many additional mechanisms by which drugs can cause iDILI. However, simply measuring more parameters is unlikely to provide better predictive assays unless those parameters are actually involved in the mechanism of iDILI. Hence, a better mechanistic understanding of iDILI is required; however, mechanistic studies of iDILI are very difficult. There is substantive evidence that most iDILI is immune mediated; therefore, the most accurate assays may involve those that determine immune responses to drugs. New methods to manipulate immune tolerance may greatly facilitate development of more suitable methods.

Linezolid-Associated Hypoglycemia

Our case describes a 77-year-old, African American male who was experiencing recurrent hypoglycemic episodes, which resulted in two emergency department (ED) visits and a subsequent inpatient admission during his second ED visit. He was prescribed linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 14 days for the treatment of a Staphylococcus hominis urinary tract infection. Nine and a half days into therapy, the patient began having recurrent hypoglycemic episodes. These episodes persisted despite repeated intravenous dextrose boluses. The patient’s linezolid was discontinued during the second day of his inpatient admission. After a brief lag period after the final linezolid administration, the patient’s blood glucose level stabilized within normal limits. He was later discharged home. The Naranjo scale scores the causality of this reaction between 4 and 8, indicating possible to probable causality. The patient had a follow-up appointment with his primary care physician 2 weeks after discharge, with no noted blood glucose complications. Two months after discharge, he entered hospice care for his advancing heart failure and later expired due to causes unrelated to blood glucose complications.