The influence of methods of bariatric surgery for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The effect of surgical gastric plication on obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

All the bariatric procedures have evolved greatly over the past decades and laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is one of the quite recently introduced techniques lacking systematic evaluation.

Aim

To compare and summarize the current data in the literature in regard to the effect of gastric plication on obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2.

Material and methods

The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered at PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42018114314. The literature in English and German was searched using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and BJS databases for studies published in the last 10 years. A meta-analysis was performed focusing on the effects of this operation on weight loss, glycemia control and improvement of comorbidities.

Results

Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) ranged from 34.42 to 46.3 kg/m². Most of the patients were female. The operation time was in the range from 50 to 192.23 min. Mean follow-up was from one month to 12 years, with most studies having a follow-up of less than 2 years. The postoperative BMI ranged from 28.59 to 38, with reported excess weight loss (EWL%) in the range 20-70%. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) values decreased by up to 5.1% after surgery, ranging from 5.1% to 7.5%.

Conclusions

Despite the quality of most of the included studies being low, the present meta-analysis revealed that, in the short term, gastric plication is an effective measure for weight loss, while the effect on diabetes mellitus type 2 is not statistically significant.

Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGP) has recently emerged as a new bariatric procedure. This surgery provides gastric restriction without resection, which could potentially provide a lower risk alternative, with fewer complications. The real benefit of this technique in the short and long term is unknown. This systematic review aims to compare laparoscopic gastric plication and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity treatment.

METHODS

Clinical trials were identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACS, BVS, SCOPUS, and CINAHL databases. Comparison of LGP and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) included hospital stay, operative time, loss of hunger feeling, body mass index loss (BMIL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), complications, symptoms in the postoperative period, and comorbidity remission or improvement.

RESULTS

This systematic review search included 17,423 records. Eight studies were selected for meta-analysis. There is no difference in operative time, hospital stay, and complications. Patients in the SG group had improved loss of hunger feeling. BMIL was better in the SG group at 12 and 24 months [mean difference (MD) - 2.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 3.10 to - 1.28, and MD - 4.59, 95% CI - 5.55 to - 3.63, respectively]. SG showed improved %EWL compared with gastric plication in 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. However, no difference was found in %EWL long-term results (24 and 36 months). Patients who underwent LGP had more sialorrhea. SG showed better results in diabetes remission.

CONCLUSIONS

SG showed improved weight loss when compared with LGP, with better satiety, fewer symptoms in the postoperative period, and improved diabetes remission.

The efficacy of selected bariatric surgery methods on lipid and glucose metabolism: a retrospective 12-month study

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 25% of the Czech population is currently obese. Obesity rates are expected to increase in the future. Obesity not only raises the risk of health complications for individuals, but increasing rates also represent a significant and steadily growing economic burden for healthcare systems and society as a whole. The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of three methods of bariatric surgery: laparoscopic greater curve plication (LGCP), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). This study examined the influence of bariatric surgery on body weight and BMI, changes in serum glucose and markers of lipid metabolism.

METHODS

This study evaluated outcomes in 74 patients with type 2 DM who underwent LGCP, LSG or RYGB. Patient selection followed guidelines of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity, i.e. BMI≥40 kg/m² or BMI≥35 kg/m² with associated comorbidities or BMI<35 kg/m². For each of the procedures, the hypotheses were tested with the Bonferroni method.

RESULTS

Statistically significant weight loss, 20.2±9.3 kg on average, occurred by 12 months after surgery, with maximum weight reduction of 38 kg. Over the 12-month period, average fasting glycaemia decreased by 2.58 mmol/L after LGCP, by 2.01 mmol/L after LSG, and by 4.64 mmol/L after RYGB. Triacylglycerol (TGC) values decreased significantly with all procedures. The mean decrease was 1.35 mmol/L after LGCP and 1.06 mmol/L after LSG. The greatest TGC concentration decrease, 1.92 mmol/L, occurred after RYGB. Average concentrations decreased below 1.7 mmol/L. There was a statistically significant difference in body weight and BMI reduction between LGCP and LSG groups, as well as between LGCP and RYGB groups. A significant difference in the glucose decrease was observed between the LSG and RYGB groups, which can be explained by the fact that glycaemia and HbA1c levels were different between these groups prior to surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The best results from the carbohydrate metabolism point reached the malabsorption method RYGB. However, the other two restrictive methods also achieved very good results. In particular, the LGCP method has not only the effect on weight reduction but also on metabolic functions and consequently points to potential healthcare expenditure savings.