Acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current strategies with pharmacological therapy

Compound Ipratropium Bromide plus Budesonide Inhalation in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Effect on Heparin-Binding Protein

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of compound ipratropium bromide combined with budesonide atomization inhalation on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and its effect on the heparin-binding protein.

Methods

A total of 110 patients with AECOPD who were admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and January 2021 were enrolled and assigned into control group (conventional treatment + compound ipratropium bromide) and combined group (conventional treatment + compound ipratropium bromide + budesonide) in a 1 : 1 ratio according to different treatment methods. The clinical effects, pulmonary function indexes, and heparin-binding protein levels before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

The treatment with oxygen-driven nebulization of ipratropium bromide combined with budesonide led to a significantly higher total effective rate versus the treatment with ipratropium bromide alone (P < 0.001). After treatment, remarkably higher arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC in the combined group vs. the control group were observed (P < 0.001). The carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) levels in the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the decrease in the combined group was greater (P < 0.001). A significantl reduction was observed in heparin-binding protein in both groups after treatment, and the decrease in the combined group was greater versus the control group (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Compound ipratropium bromide plus budesonide via aerosol inhalation therapy might be a preferable approach for AECOPD patients. It exhibits a synergistic effect on inhibiting inflammatory mediators and cytokine networks, significantly reduces airway hyperresponsiveness, and improves blood gas indicators and lung function.

Effect of formoterol, tiotropium, and their combination in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A pilot study

The aim of our study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of 1-day treatment with formoterol, tiotropium and their combination in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Twenty-one (19 males, mean age 72+/-8 years, mean FEV1 38+/-14% of predicted values) patients with mild to moderate AECOPD were enrolled. Patients received formoterol (12 microg deliver via Modulite b.i.d.), tiotropium (18 microg dry powder capsules delivered via HandiHaler once daily), and their combination, in randomized sequence. Serial measurements of FEV1, FVC, IC, SpO2 and HR were performed over 24h. Formoterol, tiotropium, and their combination significantly improved the area under curves (AUCs) for FEV1, FVC and IC over 12 and 24h. The mean FEV1, FVC and IC AUC(0-12h) and AUC(0-24h) after formoterol and tiotropium combination were significantly higher than formoterol and tiotropium alone, whereas the differences between the two single drugs were not statistically significant. Formoterol, either alone or in combination with tiotropium, elicited a significantly faster onset of action, and combination elicited a greater maximum bronchodilation than both single drugs in terms of FEV1 and FVC. After 24h the bronchodilating effect of the three treatments disappeared, with the exception of the combination on FEV1. The results of this study have documented that, although the time course of the effects of evaluated drugs differs significantly from that in stable COPD, with a shorter bronchodilation both for tiotropium and formoterol, these two long-acting bronchodilators appear to also be complementary in mild to moderate AECOPD.

Is there an optimal corticosteroid regimen for the management of an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Systemic corticosteroids are standard of care for the management of an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Several prospective, randomized trials demonstrated modest improvements in patient outcomes when short courses of systemic corticosteroids were used. However, the most appropriate dosage regimen remains controversial, as the corticosteroid regimens used in these trials differed greatly, and no studies have directly compared medium-, high-, and low-dose regimens. In addition, data are lacking on the safety, efficacy, and appropriate dosing of systemic corticosteroids in women and in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD and concomitant pneumonia or severe respiratory failure. Systemic corticosteroid use is associated with several adverse effects that are dose and/or duration dependent. Evidence suggests that higher dose corticosteroid regimens may place patients at increased short-term and long-term risk, without additional clinical benefit. Tapering of systemic corticosteroid regimens, although a common practice, is unnecessary in most circumstances. The risk for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis suppression is negligible when low-dose, short-course corticosteroid regimens are used, and no evidence exists to suggest that abruptly stopping a low-dose steroid regimen will increase the risk of disease relapse. Still, no studies have directly compared tapered and non-tapered regimens in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Consistent with clinical guideline recommendations, safety and efficacy data support the use of low-dose corticosteroid regimens such as prednisone 40 mg orally once/day for 10-14 days in most patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal systemic corticosteroid regimen for an acute exacerbation of COPD.

Retrospective evaluation of systemic corticosteroids for the management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

PURPOSE

The use of systemic corticosteroids for the management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) was studied.

METHODS

Medical charts of patients admitted to the hospital between July 2002 and November 2003 with a primary diagnosis of AECOPD were retrospectively reviewed. The primary objective was to characterize the drug, dosage, route, frequency, and duration of systemic corticosteroids prescribed for the management of AECOPD. The secondary objective was to compare the mean length of stay (LOS) and 30-day relapse rate between patients who received lower and higher dosages of corticosteroids.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five admissions (123 patients) for AECOPD (mean +/- S.D. age, 65 +/- 11 years) were evaluated. Higher dosages of systemic corticosteroids (>80 mg of prednisone equivalent [PE] per day) were prescribed for 51% and i.v. therapy for 56% of admissions. The mean +/- S.D. total systemic corticosteroid exposure during hospitalization for all admissions was 759 +/- 971 mg of PE (mean +/- S.D. daily exposure = 134 +/- 111 mg of PE per day). The mean LOS was significantly longer for the higher-dosage group than for the lower-dosage group (6.1 versus 4.2 days, p = 0.0004). A tapered regimen was prescribed for 79% of discharges. Twenty-seven percent of the discharges with routine follow-up care had a relapse of disease within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective observational study confirmed a wide variability in the dosages of systemic corticosteroids for the inpatient management of AECOPD, including the use of higher dosages and tapered regimens. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the most effective regimen of systemic corticosteroids in patients with AECOPD.

[Acute exacerbation of COPD]

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) often develop into emergency situations that are associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is still a lack of a generally accepted definition for the risk stratification in AECOPD to guide an optimal diagnosis and treatment. In this article we propose a classification based on 4 degrees of severity, depending on whether outpatient treatment can be done by the patient himself or is provided by a physician and whether inpatient treatment is carried out on a general ward or on an intensive care unit. The pharmacological therapy of AECOPD relies on short acting bronchodilators, systemic corticosteroids and in case of purulent sputum on antibiotics. Longacting beta(2)-agonists or anticholinergics, theophyllin, mucolytic drugs or mechanical percussion to the chest by a physiotherapist have no proven value in the emergency treatment of AECOPD. In respiratory failure the use of oxygen therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) can often prevent the need for endotracheal intubation and controlled mechanical ventilation, thus preventing associated risks like the development of nosocomial pneumonia.