Findings from a pilot study of buprenorphine population pharmacokinetics: A potential effect of HIV on buprenorphine bioavailability

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is widely used in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). There are few pharmacokinetic models of buprenorphine across diverse populations. Population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) allows for covariates to be included in pharmacokinetic studies, thereby opening the potential to evaluate the effect of comorbidities, medications, and other factors on buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. This pilot study used POPPK to explore buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in patients with and without HIV receiving buprenorphine for OUD.

METHODS

Plasma buprenorphine levels were measured in 54 patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD just prior to and 2-5 h following regular buprenorphine dosing. A linear one-compartment POPPK model with first-order estimation was used to evaluate buprenorphine clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Covariates included weight and HIV status.

RESULTS

All HIV+ patients reported complete past-month adherence to taking antiretroviral therapy that included either efavirenz or nevirapine. Buprenorphine CL/F was 76% higher in HIV+ patients (n = 17) than HIV- patients (n = 37). Buprenorphine V/F was 41% higher in the HIV+ patients.

CONCLUSIONS

POPPK can be used to model buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in a real-world clinical population. While interactions between ART and buprenorphine alter buprenorphine CL/F, we also found alteration in V/F. Proportionate changes in CL/F and V/F might indicate a primary effect on bioavailability (F) rather than two separate effects. These findings indicate reduced buprenorphine bioavailability in patients with HIV.

Characterization, in vitro dissolution, and pharmacokinetics of different batches of efavirenz raw materials

OBJECTIVE

To perform the solid-state characterization and the in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) of three batches of efavirenz (EFV) active pharmaceutical ingredients.

SIGNIFICANCE

EFV is an effective anti-HIV drug. Due to the poor aqueous solubility, the rate and extent of EFV absorption deeply depend on its dissolution characteristics.

METHODS

Thermal analyses, x-ray diffraction, and particle size distribution were performed. The saturation solubility and dissolution profiles were assessed in 0.5% (w/v) sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), fasted-state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF), and fed-state simulated intestinal fluid (FeSSIF) using a flow-through cell. Each batch was orally administered to Wistar rats and the pharmacokinetic parameters were correlated with those obtained from in vitro dissolution.

RESULTS

All batches of EFV consisted polymorph I. EFV-A presented the lowest particle size distribution [d(v,0.5) = 197.8 µm; d(v,0.9) = 444.6 µm] followed by EFV-B [d(v,0.5) = 223.9 µm; d(v,0.9) = 481.1 µm], and EFV-C [d(v,0.5) = 240.8 µm; d(v,0.9) = 497.3 µm]. The saturated solubility in FaSSIF was 36% and 40% of that in FeSSIF and SLS, respectively. EFV-A presented the fastest rate and largest extension of dissolution than EFV-B and C (79.15%, 69.93% and 54.22%, respectively, as well as the highest maximum plasma concentration. Levels B, C, and multiple-C of IVIVC models were achieved.

CONCLUSION

The FaSSIF medium discriminated the dissolution profiles of EFV APIs. Small differences in particle size distribution had a significant impact on the biopharmaceutical parameters of EFV, suggesting that strict control of such parameter is an important aspect during API development and drug formulation.

Evaluation of the effects of atazanavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine in patients living with HIV in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, South-Western Nigeria

PURPOSE

Atazanavir-ritonavir (ATVr)-based antiretroviral therapy and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) are commonly used drugs for the treatment of human immune deficiency virus (HIV) infection and malaria respectively. However, interaction of both drugs, with Cytochrome P 3A4 (CYP 3A4) isoenzyme, may spawn clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions. This study evaluated the effects of atazanavir-ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine.

METHOD

In a case-control study, twenty participants having Plasmodium falciparum malaria were recruited and divided into two groups (ATVr-arm, n=10; and control-arm, n= 10). All the participants were administered six oral doses of AL 80-480 mg (Coartem). Thereafter, their blood samples were collected at different time intervals over seven days. The concentration of lumefantrine in each sample was quantified with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and used to determine its pharmacokinetic parameters which were compared between the test and control groups.

RESULTS

ATVr increased the mean day 7 concentration of lumefantrine (ATVr 3847.09 ± 893.35 ng/mL, control 1374.53 ± 265.55 ng/mL, p = 0.016) and the area under its plasma concentration-time curve (ATVr 670529.57 ± 157172.93 ng.h/mL, control 447976.28 ± 80886.99 ng.h/mL, p = 0.224) by 179.88 % and 49.68 %, respectively, but decreased its mean maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) (ATVr 13725.70 ± 2658.44 ng/mL, control 15380.48 ± 2332.62 ng/mL, p = 0.645) by 10.76 %.

CONCLUSION

ATVr increased drug exposure and day 7 plasma concentration of lumefantrine. AL is therefore considered effective for the treatment of malaria in patients taking ATVr-based regimen. However, the safety associated with the interaction requires further elucidation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clin ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04531072, August 27, 2020. "Retrospectively registered".

Early or deferred initiation of efavirenz during rifampicin-based TB therapy has no significant effect on CYP3A induction in TB-HIV infected patients

Background and Purpose

In TB‐HIV co‐infection, prompt initiation of TB therapy is recommended but anti‐retroviral treatment (ART) is often delayed due to potential drug–drug interactions between rifampicin and efavirenz. In a longitudinal cohort study, we evaluated the effects of efavirenz/rifampicin co‐treatment and time of ART initiation on CYP3A induction.

Experimental Approach

Treatment‐naïve TB‐HIV co‐infected patients (n = 102) were randomized to efavirenz‐based‐ART after 4 (n = 69) or 8 weeks (n = 33) of commencing rifampicin‐based anti‐TB therapy. HIV patients without TB (n = 94) receiving efavirenz‐based‐ART only were enrolled as control. Plasma 4β‐hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol (4β‐OHC/Chol) ratio, an endogenous biomarker for CYP3A activity, was determined at baseline, at 4 and 16 weeks of ART.

Key Results

In patients treated with efavirenz only, median 4β‐OHC/Chol ratios increased from baseline by 269% and 275% after 4 and 16 weeks of ART, respectively. In TB‐HIV patients, rifampicin only therapy for 4 and 8 weeks increased median 4β‐OHC/Chol ratios from baseline by 378% and 576% respectively. After efavirenz/rifampicin co‐treatment, 4β‐OHC/Chol ratios increased by 560% of baseline (4 weeks) and 456% of baseline (16 weeks). Neither time of ART initiation, sex, genotype nor efavirenz plasma concentration were significant predictors of 4β‐OHC/Chol ratios after 4 weeks of efavirenz/rifampicin co‐treatment.

Conclusion and Implications

Rifampicin induced CYP3A more potently than efavirenz, with maximum induction occurring within the first 4 weeks of rifampicin therapy. We provide pharmacological evidence that early (4 weeks) or deferred (8 weeks) ART initiation during anti‐TB therapy has no significant effect on CYP3A induction.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Oxysterols, Lifelong Health and Therapeutics. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v178.16/issuetoc

Prevalence of ABCC3-1767G/A polymorphism among patients with antiretroviral-associated hepatotoxicity

Background

Plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals (ARVs) regimens have considerably varied in individuals of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) because of variations in the expression of drug‐metabolizing and transporter genes. Transporter genes play an important role in the disposition of drugs. Polymorphism in transporter gene (ABCC3) affects the MRP3 expression and varies the treatment outcome.

Method

We examined the polymorphism of ABCC3‐1767G/A gene in a total of 165 HIV patients (out of 165 HIV patients, 34 were with and 131 were without hepatotoxicity) and 156 healthy individuals using the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism method.

Results

In univariate analysis, we found a decreased prevalence of ABCC3 1767GA, 1767GA+AA genotypes, and 1767A allele in patients with hepatotoxicity as compared to patients without hepatotoxicity (23.5% vs. 28.2% and 23.5% vs. 30.53%; 11.76% vs. 16.41%), while a higher prevalence of 1767AA genotype was observed in HIV patients in comparison with healthy controls (2.3% vs. 1.3%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23–15.03, p = .89). The frequency of ABCC3‐1767AA genotype was dispersed higher in individuals with early and advanced HIV disease stage in comparison with healthy controls (5.3% vs. 1.3%, OR = 4.73, p = .70; 8.9% vs. 1.3%, OR = 1.89, p = .91). A higher occurrence of ABCC3‐1767AA genotype was found in tobacco using HIV patients without hepatotoxicity compared with nonusers (4.7% vs. 1.1%, OR = 4.28, p = .52). The distribution of ABCC3‐1767GA genotype was higher in nevirapine receiving HIV patients irrespective of their hepatotoxicity status as compared to nonusers (30.4% vs. 9.1%, OR = 3.34, p = .22; 29.4% vs. 16.7%, OR = 1.69, p = .77). In multivariate analysis, HIV patients receiving nevirapine and with hepatotoxicity was found to have a significant risk for severity of hepatotoxicity (OR = 4.56, 95% CI: 1.60–12.99, p = .004).

Conclusion

ABCC3 1767G/A polymorphism was not significantly associated with susceptibility to ARV‐associated hepatotoxicity, although ABCC3 1767AA genotype designated a risk for acquisition of hepatotoxicity and advancement of the disease. Nevirapine usage emerged as an independent risk factor for hepatotoxicity severity.

Role of pharmacogenetics in rifampicin pharmacokinetics and the potential effect on TB–rifampicin sensitivity among Ugandan patients

Background

Suboptimal anti-TB drugs exposure may cause multidrug-resistant TB. The role of African predominant SLCO1B1 variant alleles on rifampicin pharmacokinetics and the subsequent effect on the occurrence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis–rifampicin sensitivity needs to be defined. We describe the rifampicin population pharmacokinetics profile and investigate the relevance of SLCO1B1 genotypes to rifampicin pharmacokinetics and rifampicin-TB sensitivity status.

Methods

Fifty patients with TB (n=25 with rifampicin-resistant TB and n=25 with rifampicin-susceptible TB) were genotyped for SLOC1B1 rs4149032 (g.38664C>T), SLOC1B1*1B (c.388A>G) and SLOC1B1*5 (c.521 T>C). Steady state plasma rifampicin levels were determined among patients infected with rifampicin-sensitive TB. Data were analysed using NONMEM to estimate population rifampicin pharmacokinetics as well as the effect of SLOC1B1 genotypes on rifampicin pharmacokinetics and on rifampicin-TB sensitivity status.

Results

Overall allele frequencies of SLOC1B1 rs4149032, *1B and *5 were 0.66, 0.90 and 0.01, respectively. Median (IQR) Cmax and Tmax were 10.2 (8.1–12.5) mg/L and 1.7 (1.125–2.218) h, respectively. Twenty-four percent of patients exhibited Cmax below the recommended 8–24 mg/L range. SLOC1B1 genotypes, gender and age did not influence rifampicin pharmacokinetics or TB-rifampicin sensitivity.

Conclusions

Although SLOC1B1 genotype, age and gender do not influence either rifampicin pharmacokinetics or rifampicin-TB sensitivity status, one in every four Ugandan TB patients achieve subtherapeutic plasma rifampicin concentrations.

Intraindividual and Interindividual Variability of Olanzapine Trough Concentrations in Patients Treated With the Long-Acting Injectable Formulation

BACKGROUND

A long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of olanzapine has been developed as an alternative to oral regimens. A therapeutic range of 20 to 80 ng/mL for oral olanzapine trough concentrations has been proposed. Here, we sought to investigate the intraindividual and interindividual variability of olanzapine concentrations with time in patients on maintenance therapy with the LAI formulation carried out in the routine clinical practice.

METHODS

To address this issue, we carried out a retrospective analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine concentrations in 21 schizophrenic patients on maintenance LAI olanzapine. Drug concentrations were correlated with LAI olanzapine doses, duration of treatment, and main clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of the patients had olanzapine trough concentrations lower than 20 ng/mL. Only drug doses significantly correlated with olanzapine exposure. Mean interindividual and intraindividual coefficients of variations of olanzapine concentrations were 56% (range, 21%-97%) and 34% (range, 15%-69%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have documented that, in a real-life setting, a large proportion of patients treated with olanzapine LAI had drug trough concentrations of less than 20 ng/mL; wide intraindividual and interindividual variability of olanzapine concentrations has been also observed. Our results could provide the rationale for the design of larger prospective, concentration-controlled clinical trials specifically designed with the goal to identify ad hoc therapeutic ranges of drug concentrations for olanzapine LAI.

Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Combining Antiretroviral Therapy, Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C Virus, and Addiction Treatment Medications

There are many factors that can affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs. Pathophysiological changes from disease states can alter the mechanisms that control the PK of antiretrovirals (ARVs), direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), and addiction treatment medications. Drug-drug interaction pathways of certain ARVs and DAAs can be very complex, with agents being substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of multiple metabolic and transporter pathways. Buprenorphine and methadone may be used in HIV- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients and may also be affected by drug interactions. Current research is focused on novel PK analyses, which aim to describe the PK of agents within organs that host the infection of interest, such as within hepatocytes during treatment for HCV. Modeling techniques allow for the prediction of drug PK in specific organs and the plasma compartment. This review will provide a summary of these areas while exploring PK considerations for ARVs, DAAs, and addiction treatment medications.

Severe Hyperbilirubinemia in an HIV-HCV-Coinfected Patient Starting the 3D Regimen That Resolved After TDM-Guided Atazanavir Dose Reduction

The combination of ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and paritaprevir/ritonavir (considered as the 3D regimen) has proven to be associated with high sustained virologic response and optimal tolerability in hepatitis C virus-infected patients. Here, we describe an HIV-HCV-coinfected patient who experienced a grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia and a 2.5-fold increase in the atazanavir plasma trough concentrations few days after the start of 3D-based antiviral therapy who benefited from an atazanavir dose reduction guided by therapeutic drug monitoring.

Prediction of plasma efavirenz concentrations among HIV-positive patients taking efavirenz-containing combination antiretroviral therapy

We investigated the predictors of plasma mid-dose concentrations (C12) of efavirenz by enrolling 456 HIV-positive patients who had received 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors plus efavirenz (600 mg daily) for 2 weeks or longer and had their CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism and efavirenz C12 determined. The median efavirenz C12 was 2.41 mg/L (IQR, 1.93–3.14). In analysis of covariance models, patients with CYP2B6 516GT and TT genotypes compared to those with GG genotype had higher efavirenz C12 (for GT genotype, an increase by 0.976 mg/L [95%CI, 0.765–1.188], and TT genotype, 4.871 mg/L [95%CI, 4.126–5.616]), while per 10-kg increment in weight decreased C12 by 0.199 mg/L (95%CI, 0.111–0.287). Models incorporating CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism and weight had moderate predictive values in predicting efavirenz C12 ≥ 2 mg/L (ROC area under curve = 0.706 [95%CI, 0.656–0.756]). In the absence of CYP2B6 516G>T polymorphism, weight ≤58 kg provided better predictabilities for efavirenz C12 ≥ 2 mg/L (probability, 77.1% [95%CI, 69.0–83.5%] for weight = 50 kg and 70.6% [95%CI, 64.1–76.4%] for weight = 58 kg).

Population Pharmacokinetic Model Linking Plasma and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Concentrations of Efavirenz and Its Metabolite, 8-Hydroxy-Efavirenz, in HIV Patients

The objectives of this study were to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of efavirenz (EFV) and 8-hydroxy-efavirenz (8OHEFV) in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and to explore covariates affecting the PK parameters. Fifty-one patients had steady-state 0-to-24-h concentrations of EFV and 8OHEFV in plasma with corresponding concentrations in PBMCs, while 261 patients had one or two sparse concentrations at 16 ± 1 h postdose at weeks 4 and/or 16. The pharmacogenetic markers CYP2B6*6, CYP3A5*3, CYP3A5*6, UGT2B7*2, ABCB1 (3435C→T, 3842A→G), OATP1B1*1B, and OATP1B1*5, the presence of a rifampin-based antituberculosis (anti-TB) regimen, baseline body weight and organ function values, and demographic factors were explored as covariates. EFV concentration data were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption (K_a ) and absorption lag time (A_lag) (K_a = 0.2 h^-1; A_lag = 0.83 h; central compartment clearance [CL_c/F] for CYP2B6*1/*1 = 18 liters/h, for CYP2B6*1/*6 = 14 liters/h, and for CYP2B6*6/*6 = 8.6 liters/h) and PBMCs as a peripheral compartment. EFV transfer from plasma to PBMCs was first order (CL_p/F = 32 liters/h), followed by capacity-limited return (V_max = 4,400 ng/ml/h; K_m = 710 ng/ml). Similarly, 8OHEFV displayed a first-order elimination and distribution to PBMCs, with a capacity-limited return to plasma. No covariate relationships resulted in a significant explanation of interindividual variability (IIV) on the estimated PK parameters of EFV and 8OHEFV, except for CYP2B6*6 genotypes, which were consistent with prior evidence. Both EFV and 8OHEFV accumulated to higher concentrations in PBMCs than in plasma and were well described by first-order input and Michaelis-Menten kinetics removal from PBMCs. CYP2B6*6 genotype polymorphisms were associated with decreased EFV and 8OHEFV clearance.

Dolutegravir plasma concentrations according to companion antiretroviral drug: unwanted drug interaction or desirable boosting effect?

BACKGROUND

Studies in healthy volunteers have shown that the recently approved HIV integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has limited drug-to-drug interaction profile. Here we carried out a pharmacokinetic survey in HIV-infected patients given dolutegravir as part of their antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations were measured in 78 HIV-infected patients given the drug in combination with a protease inhibitor, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or abacavir/lamivudine. Drug concentrations were assessed by high performance liquid chromatography method with UV-detection.

RESULTS

All patients were given dolutegravir at 50 mg once daily, with median trough drug concentrations of 1,096 (664-2,356) ng/ml (interindividual coefficient of variation: 85.3%). Patients given dolutegravir with atazanavir had significantly higher drug concentrations compared with those given darunavir, rilpivirine or abacavir/lamivudine (2,399 [1,929-4,070] versus 738 [552-1,048], 603 [432-1,373] or 1,045 [856-1,115] ng/ml; P<0.001 for all comparisons). By multivariate analyses, only companion antiretroviral drug resulted in significant association with dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations (P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Atazanavir coadministration significantly inhibited dolutegravir metabolism, ultimately resulting in a two- to fourfold increase in drug disposition compared with other antiretroviral drugs. This boosting effect of atazanavir could be used to optimize dolutegravir dosing in particular clinical settings.

Pharmacokinetics of fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, and efavirenz: results of a randomized, crossover, bioequivalence study

The objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence between a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine/efavirenz 300/300/600 mg and the individual innovator products. A randomized, balanced, open-label, two-sequence, two-treatment, two-period, single dose, crossover study in 48 healthy adults was conducted. Dosing was separated by a washout period of 32 days. Twenty-seven blood samples were collected in each period from pre-dose to 72 h post-dose. The data of 45 subjects were analyzed for pharmacokinetics and safety. Ninety percent CIs of geometric mean ratio on Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0-inf for tenofovir and lamivudine and on Cmax and AUC0-72 for efavirenz were within the acceptance criteria (80–125%). For tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, the Tmax, Kel, and t1/2 values for the test and reference products were 1.02 versus 0.91 h, 0.04 versus 0.04/h, 18.67 versus 18.46 h, respectively. For lamivudine, the Tmax, Kel, and t1/2 values were: 1.38 versus 1.30 h, 0.21 versus 0.19/h, 3.44 versus 3.91 h, respectively. For efavirenz, the Tmax values for the test and reference products were 3.71 and 3.65 h, respectively. Both the treatments were well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the tested formulation is bioequivalent to the innovators’ formulations, and both treatments were well tolerated.

HIV-1 Alters Intestinal Expression of Drug Transporters and Metabolic Enzymes: Implications for Antiretroviral Drug Disposition

This study investigated the effects of HIV-1 infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART) on the expression of intestinal drug efflux transporters, i.e., P-glycoprotein (Pgp), multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs), and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), and metabolic enzymes, such as cytochrome P450s (CYPs), in the human upper intestinal tract. Intestinal biopsy specimens were obtained from HIV-negative healthy volunteers, ART-naive HIV-positive (HIV(+)) subjects, and HIV(+) subjects receiving ART (10 in each group). Intestinal tissue expression of drug transporters and metabolic enzymes was examined by microarray, real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qPCR), and immunohistochemistry analyses. Microarray analysis demonstrated significantly lower expression of CYP3A4 and ABCC2/MRP2 in the HIV(+) ART-naive group than in uninfected subjects. qPCR analysis confirmed significantly lower expression of ABCC2/MRP2 in ART-naive subjects than in the control group, while CYP3A4 and ABCG2/BCRP showed a trend toward decreased expression. Protein expression of MRP2 and BCRP was also significantly lower in the HIV(+) naive group than in the control group and was partially restored to baseline levels in HIV(+) subjects receiving ART. In contrast, gene and protein expression of ABCB1/Pgp was significantly increased in HIV(+) subjects on ART relative to HIV(+) ART-naive subjects. These data demonstrate that the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes and efflux transporters is significantly altered in therapy-naive HIV(+) subjects and in those receiving ART. Since CYP3A4, Pgp, MRPs, and BCRP metabolize or transport many antiretroviral drugs, their altered expression with HIV infection may negatively impact drug pharmacokinetics in HIV(+) subjects. This has clinical implications when using data from healthy volunteers to guide ART.

CYP2B6 genotype, but not rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatments, explains variability in long-term efavirenz plasma exposure

AIM

We investigated the effects of rifampicin-based anti-TB treatment on plasma efavirenz exposure and the implications of CYP2B6 genotype.

PATIENTS & METHODS

Antiretroviral therapy-naive Ugandan HIV patients without (n = 157) or with TB coinfection (n = 106) were enrolled and treated with efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy alone or with rifampicin-based anti-TB therapy, respectively. Efavirenz plasma concentration was determined on day 3 and weeks 1, 2, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28 and 32.

RESULTS

Rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatment reduced plasma efavirenz exposure during the first 2 weeks (p < 0.05), but no significant effect was observed afterwards. Although not significant, rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatment inconsistently increased efavirenz exposure over time, which was reduced immediately after completing anti-TB therapy. CYP2B6*6, *11 and ABCB1 c.4036A>G genotypes were significant predictors of efavirenz plasma exposure.

CONCLUSION

Plasma efavirenz exposure is mainly influenced by CYP2B6 genotype, but not by rifampicin cotreatment. Therefore, no efavirenz dosage adjustment during rifampicin cotreatment is required in Ugandans.

Is there a need to increase the dose of efavirenz during concomitant rifampicin-based antituberculosis therapy in sub-Saharan Africa? The HIV-TB pharmagene study

AIMS

The current HIV treatment guidelines are inconsistent about the need for weight-based efavirenz dose adjustment during rifampicin containing antituberculosis (anti-TB) cotreatment. We investigated effect of rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatment on plasma efavirenz exposure and treatment outcome, considering effect of CYP2B6 genotype and bodyweight.

PATIENTS & METHODS

HIV-only (arm 1, n = 285) or TB-HIV (arm 2, n = 208) coinfected patients were enrolled and received efavirenz-based ART alone or with rifampicin-based anti-TB therapy, respectively. Plasma efavirenz concentrations at 4th and 16th weeks, viral load and CD4 cell count at 24th and 48th weeks were determined.

RESULTS

The mean plasma efavirenz concentration at weeks 4 (p = 0.03) and 16 (p = 0.08) was inconsistently higher in arm 2 than arm 1, mainly in CYP2B6*6 carriers. Effect of bodyweight on efavirenz pharmacokinetics was significant only in arm 1, but not in arm 2. Proportion of patients with nondetectable viral load (≤50 copies/ml) at week 24 was higher in arm 1 than arm 2 patients (91.0 vs 76.3%; p = 0.002), but no significant difference was observed at week 48 (89.5 vs 87.8%; p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatment has no significant influence on long-term efavirenz plasma exposure and efficacy. Hence, there is no need to increase the dose of efavirenz during concomitant rifampicin-based anti-TB cotreatment in the sub-Saharan African population.

Antiretroviral drugs for prevention of mother-to-child transmission: pharmacologic considerations for a public health approach

OBJECTIVE

Efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy is recommended for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV with two programmatic options: lifelong therapy for all women or treatment until cessation of breastfeeding. However, the risk of HIV resistance emerging after discontinuing efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy is unclear. We review present knowledge surrounding the emergence of resistance after stopping efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens.

DESIGN

An expert review.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to identify studies assessing risk for emergence of efavirenz-related resistance following discontinuation of efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens containing either lamivudine and zidovudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and lamivudine. Discontinuation strategies including the use of 'pharmacologic tails' are discussed in the light of what is known about the pharmacology of the drugs.

RESULTS

We found no head-to-head comparisons between zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine and efavirenz. The risk for HIV resistance exists, even with a 5-7 day tail of zidovudine and lamivudine. For tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine and efavirenz, we found no clinical data to inform a recommendation for a tail.

CONCLUSION

In order to prevent emergence of resistance, a tail of at least 2 weeks in duration may be required when discontinuing efavirenz in a regimen containing zidovudine and lamivudine. Studies are needed to characterize the risk of resistance among women who discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine and efavirenz.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons

INTRODUCTION

Combination antiretroviral therapy has enabled HIV-infected persons to reach older ages in high numbers. Hepatic and renal changes that normally occur with advancing age occur earlier and with higher incidence in HIV-infected individuals. A limited number of prospective controlled studies have demonstrated small reductions (17 to 41%) in lopinavir, atazanavir and lamivudine clearance in older versus younger adults. A much larger number of retrospective studies in adults (age range ∼ 20 to 60 years), including all antiretroviral drugs, have evaluated age as a covariate for pharmacokinetics. Most studies did not detect substantial associations between drug exposures and age.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics in older persons. The authors review articles from PubMed (search terms: elderly, antiretroviral, pharmacokinetics) in addition to the bibliographies of those selected.

EXPERT OPINION

The evidence to date does not support major pharmacokinetic changes in adults between ∼ 20 and 60 years of age. However, additional prospective, well-controlled studies are needed in more persons > 60 years, including those with frailty and comorbidities, with assessment of unbound drug clearance, and incorporation of adherence, pharmacogenetics and concomitant medications. Until then, guidelines for drug-drug interactions and dosing in renal and hepatic impairment should be followed in older HIV-infected individuals.

Fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling: validation methods

Population pharmacokinetic modelling is widely used within the field of clinical pharmacology as it helps to define the sources and correlates of pharmacokinetic variability in target patient populations and their impact upon drug disposition; and population pharmacokinetic modelling provides an estimation of drug pharmacokinetic parameters. This method's defined outcome aims to understand how participants in population pharmacokinetic studies are representative of the population as opposed to the healthy volunteers or highly selected patients in traditional pharmacokinetic studies. This review focuses on the fundamentals of population pharmacokinetic modelling and how the results are evaluated and validated. This review defines the common aspects of population pharmacokinetic modelling through a discussion of the literature describing the techniques and placing them in the appropriate context. The concept of validation, as applied to population pharmacokinetic models, is explored focusing on the lack of consensus regarding both terminology and the concept of validation itself. Population pharmacokinetic modelling is a powerful approach where pharmacokinetic variability can be identified in a target patient population receiving a pharmacological agent. Given the lack of consensus on the best approaches in model building and validation, sound fundamentals are required to ensure the selected methodology is suitable for the particular data type and/or patient population. There is a need to further standardize and establish the best approaches in modelling so that any model created can be systematically evaluated and the results relied upon.

Pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic aspects of CYP3A induction by efavirenz in HIV patients

We investigated the effects of pharmacogenetic variations and efavirenz pharmacokinetics on inter-individual differences in the extent of CYP3A induction by efavirenz using 4β-hydroxycholesterol/cholesterol (4β-OHC/Chol) as a marker for CYP3A induction. Plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol and cholesterol concentrations were determined at baseline, and at the 4th, 16th and 48th week of efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV patients (n=77). Efavirenz plasma concentrations were quantified at weeks 4 and 16. CYP2B6, CYP3A5, ABCB1, UGT2B7 genotyping were done. Compared with baseline, the median plasma 4β-OHC/Chol ratio increased at the 4th (257%), 16th (291%) and 48th (165%) week (P<0.0001). CYP2B6*6 genotype significantly influenced 4β-OHC/Chol ratio at weeks 16 (P=0.02) and 48 (P=0.04) being highest in CYP2B6*6/*6>*1/*6>*1/*1. There were positive correlations between plasma efavirenz and 4β-OHC/Chol ratios (week 4: P=0.02, week 16: P=0.001). CYP3A enzyme induction by efavirenz is pronounced in CYP2B6 slow metabolizers who have high efavirenz plasma exposure.

Pharmacokinetics of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz among HIV-infected Ugandans

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic variability of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz has been documented, and high variation in trough concentrations or clearance has been found to be a risk for virological failure. Africans population exhibits greater variability in efavirenz concentrations than other ethnic groups, and so a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of the drug is needed in this population. This study characterized efavirenz pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected Ugandans.

METHODS

Efavirenz plasma concentrations were obtained for 66 HIV-infected Ugandans initiating efavirenz- based regimens, with blood samples collected at eight time-points over 24 h on day 1 of treatment, and at a further eight time-points on day 14. Noncompartmental analysis was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz.

RESULTS

The mean steady-state minimum plasma concentration (C(min) ) of efavirenz was 2.9 µg/mL, the mean area under the curve (AUC) was 278.5 h µg/mL, and mean efavirenz clearance was 7.4 L/h. Although overall mean clearance did not change over the 2 weeks, 41.9% of participants showed an average 95.8% increase in clearance. On day 14, the maximum concentration (C(max) ) of efavirenz was >4 µg/mL in 96.6% of participants, while C(min) was <1 µg/mL in only 4.5%. Overall, 69% of participants experienced adverse central nervous system (CNS) symptoms attributable to efavirenz during the 2-week period, and 95% of these participants were found to have efavirenz plasma concentrations >4 µg/mL, although only half maintained a high concentration until at least 8 h after dosing.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that HIV-infected patients on efavirenz may exhibit autoinduction to various extents, and this needs to be taken into consideration in the clinical management of individual patients. Efavirenz CNS toxicity during the initial phase of treatment may be related to C(max) , regardless of the sampling time.