A pilot study of centrifugal leukocyte apheresis for corticosteroid-resistant active ulcerative colitis

Apheresis: A cell-based therapeutic tool for the inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a hallmark of leukocyte infiltration, followed by the release of cytokines and interleukins. Disease progression to Ulcerative Colitis (UC) or Crohn’s Disease (CD) remained largely incurable. The genetic and environmental factors disrupt enteral bacteria in the gut, which hampers the intestinal repairing capability of damaged mucosa. Commonly practiced pharmacological therapies include 5-aminosalicylic acid with corticosteroids and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. New interventions such as CDP571 and TNF-blocking RDP58 report the loss of patient response. This review discusses the non-pharmacologic selective granulocyte–monocyte-apheresis (GMA) and leukocytapheresis (LCAP) that have been proposed as treatment modalities that reduce mortality. GMA, an extracorporeal vein-to-vein technique, presents a strong safety profile case for its use as a viable therapeutic option compared to GMA's conventional medication safety profile. GMA reported minimal to no side effects in the pediatric population and pregnant women. Numerous studies report the efficacious nature of GMA in UC patients, whereas data on CD patients is insufficient. Its benefits outweigh the risks and are emerging as a favored non-pharmacological treatment option. On the contrary, LCAP uses a general extracorporeal treatment that entraps leukocytes and suppresses cytokine release. It has been deemed more efficacious than conventional drug treatments, the former causing better disease remission, and maintenance. Patients with UC/CD secondary to complications have responded well to the treatment. Side effects of the procedure have remained mild to moderate, and there is little evidence of any severe adverse event occurring in most age groups. LCAP decreases the dependence on steroids and immunosuppressive therapies for IBD. The review will discuss the role of GMA and LCAP.

Cytapheresis (CAP) with leukocyte removal filter/bead column as one therapeutic option for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) like Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory disorders that affect the bowel. The disease is characterized by periods of clinical remission and relapse due to severe intestinal inflammation. Drug therapy of IBD is associated with unpleasant side effects. Further, efficacies of conventional drugs decrease with chronic use and this can represent a major difficulty in the long term management of IBD. However, in active IBD, leukocytes are elevated in the lesion they may be able to be a factor of IBD aggravation. Membrane filters column and leukocyte adsorbing beads have been developed which are direct blood perfusion systems for removing any desired level of leukocytes. Clinical studies with these two new models have shown good effects for active IBD. Clinical data suggest that leukocytapheresis might be an effective adjunct to therapy of IBD, to promote remission, taper conventional drug dosage and potentially should reduce the number of patients who require colectomy. The results may further understandings of the pathophysiology of IBD and this in turn should contribute to a more effective treatment of this disorder.

The efficacy and safety of selective leukocytapheresis in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The use of selective leukocytapheresis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) has been evaluated in several open and controlled trials, with varying outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed to better assess the efficacy and safety of selective leukocytapheresis as supplemental therapy compared with conventional pharmacotherapy in patients with UC.

METHODS

All randomized trials comparing selective leukocytapheresis supplementation with conventional pharmacotherapy were included from electronic databases and reference lists. A meta-analysis that pooled the outcome effects of leukocytapheresis and pharmacotherapy was performed. A fixed effect model or random effect model was selected depending on the heterogeneity test of the trials.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria contributing a total of 686 participants. Compared with conventional pharmacotherapy, leukocytapheresis supplementation presented a significant benefit in promoting a response rate (OR, 2.88, 95% CI: 1.60-5.18) and remission rate (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.36-3.07) together with significant higher steroid-sparing effects (OR, 10.49; 95% CI, 3.44-31.93) in patients with active moderate-to-severe UC by intention-to-treat analysis. Leukocytapheresis was more effective in maintaining clinical remission for asymptomatic UC patients than conventional therapy (OR, 8.14; 95% CI, 2.22-29.90). The incidence of mild-moderate adverse effects was much less frequent in the leukocytapheresis groups than conventional pharmacotherapy groups (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.60). Few severe adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data indicate that leukocytapheresis supplementation may be more efficacious on improving response and remission rates and tapering corticosteroid dosage with excellent tolerability and safety than conventional pharmacotherapy in patients with UC. In addition, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the higher efficacy of leukocytapheresis in patients with UC.

Leukocytapheresis for the treatment of IBD

Leukocytapheresis is a controversial nonpharmacologic treatment for IBD, in which white blood cells--the effector cells of the inflammatory process--are mechanically removed from the circulation. Current controversy centers on the uncontrolled nature of the leukocytapheresis trials performed and their use of different outcome measures in patient groups that have very variable disease activity and severity. Nonetheless, the efficacy data obtained are generally quite consistent: an excellent response (remission >80%) has been achieved in corticosteroid-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis and an average remission rate of more than 50% has been achieved in patients who have steroid-dependent or refractory ulcerative colitis. Interestingly, the largest randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis failed to demonstrate efficacy for the induction of clinical remission or response. Regardless, leukocytapheresis seems to be remarkably safe. The precise positioning of leukocytapheresis in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is uncertain at present and will vary according to geography and patient preference for a safe, nonpharmacologic treatment. Further efficacy studies are required to assess what the optimal number and frequency of treatments is, in addition to the need for head-to-head comparisons with established drugs.

Selective leukocyte apheresis for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not completely understood, thus current therapies have been empirical and directed at treating symptoms rather than addressing the cause. In IBD, the overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, leads to a persistent intestinal inflammatory response that damages the intestinal mucosa. Recent advances in pharmacologic therapies that target specific cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules have proved successful in alleviating symptoms for some patients. There are 2 selective adsorption apheresis devices that remove leukocytes from whole blood, which are currently available in Japan and Europe-the Cellsorba leukocytapheresis column and the Adacolumn adsorptive extracorporeal granulocyte/monocyte apheresis device. The purported mechanisms of action of these devices have been extensively reviewed and are believed to exert an immunomodulatory and/or anti-inflammatory effect on patients with systemic inflammatory disease. The clinical trials presented here indicate that selective leukocyte apheresis effectively removes activated granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages from peripheral blood while maintaining an excellent safety profile. Despite these findings, large controlled trials of selective leukocyte apheresis in the treatment of IBD are needed to determine the true efficacy of this approach.

A Case Report of Long-term Remission of Ulcerative Colitis After Lymphocyto-plasmapheresis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease of the colorectum, with mucosal infiltration by activated leukocytes, which are the result of complex interactions between lymphocytes, antigen, and dendritic cells (DCs). We carried out lymphocyto-plasmapheresis (LCPA) in a UC patient with the aim of removing lymphocytes, DCs and inflammatory cytokines (ICKs). A 42-year-old female with UC in moderate activity phase was submitted to 5 weekly LCPA treatments. Before and after LCPA we monitored: (i) the percentage of T, B, NK lymphocytes, monocytes, and peripheral blood lymphoid and myeloid DCs; (ii) the T lymphocyte subpopulations; (iii) the ICKs; and (iv) the immune complexes (IC). We achieved the interruption of all pharmacological therapies, and so far the clinical and histological remission has lasted for 24 months. The flow cytometric assessment of the leukocyte subpopulations did not show any relevant variation of their numbers after LCPA, while TNFalpha, IL-6, IL-12 and serum IgG-C1q ICs decreased. In the present case, the contemporary depletion of plasma, lymphocytes and DCs, allowed LCPA to emerge as an efficient alternative to UC pharmacological therapy without affecting the number of white blood cells, DCs and leukocyte subpopulations that were assessed. Further studies are needed both to address LCPA mechanism of action and optimal apheresis protocol, and to compare this form of therapy to a placebo control group.

Centrifugal Leukocytapheresis Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis Without Concurrent Corticosteroid Administration

Corticosteroid administration is an important therapy for active ulcerative colitis. However, long-term corticosteroid use is associated with serious complications such as osteoporosis, diabetes, and growth retardation. The effect of combination therapy corticosteroid plus leukocytapheresis has been previously reported, but that of leukocytapheresis with no corticosteroid is unknown. We carried out a preliminary study of six patients (two men and four women) with active ulcerative colitis (severe in two, moderately severe in four) who did not respond to 5-aminosalicylate derivatives, but refused corticosteroid use. Centrifugal leukocytapheresis was carried out once per week totaling four sessions per course. Treatment was considered effective when patients experienced clinical remission, which was defined as a frequency of diarrhea of four times or less and absence of visible blood in the stool, after one course. Leukocytapheresis was effective in five of six patients(83%). With cases stratified by severity, both severe cases and three of four moderately severe cases showed effectiveness. Clinical activity scores according to Lichtiger et al. in cases where leukocytapheresis was effective decreased from 9.8 to 6.6 at 1 week (P < 0.0001), declining further 2.4 at the end of the course. No obvious complications of leukocytapheresis were noted except for a decrease in hemoglobin by 1 g/dL. Centrifugal leukocytapheresis without corticosteroid treatment can induce remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis, and might be particularly beneficial for patients in whom adverse effects preclude the use of corticosteroids.

The logics of leukocytapheresis as a natural biological therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are debilitating idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) with symptoms that impair ability to function and quality of life. The aetiology of IBD is inadequately understood and, therefore, drug therapy has been empirical instead of based on sound understanding of the disease mechanisms. This has been a major factor for poor drug efficacy and treatment-related side effects that often add to disease complications. The development of biologicals, notably infliximab, to block TNF-alpha reflects some progress, but there is major concern about their side effects and lack of long-term safety and efficacy profiles. However, IBD by its very nature is exacerbated and perpetuated by inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-12, for which activated peripheral blood lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages and granulocytes are major sources. Hence, activated leukocytes should be appropriate targets of therapy. At present, three strategies are available for removing excess and activated leukocytes by leukocytapheresis: centrifugation, Adacolumn and Cellsorba. Centrifugation can deplete lymphocytes or total leukocytes, whereas Adacolumn selectively adsorbs granulocytes and monocytes together with a smaller fraction of lymphocytes (FcgammaR- and complement receptor-bearing leukocytes), and Cellsorba non-selectively removes all three major leukocyte populations. Efficacy has ranged from 'none' to an impressive 93% together with excellent safety profiles and downmodulation of inflammation factors. Furthermore, leukocytapheresis has shown strong drug-sparing effects and reduced the number of patients requiring colectomy or exposure to unsafe immunosuppressants, such as cyclosporin A. Leukocytapheresis removes from the body cells that contribute to IBD and, therefore, unlike drugs, it is not expected to induce dependency or refractoriness.

Evolving knowledge and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease

With recent advances in the understanding of its pathophysiology, inflammatory bowel disease has become a very active area for the development of novel therapeutic agents. New targets for biologics include cytokines involved in T-cell activation, with antibodies directed against IL-12 and interferon-gamma. Selective adhesion molecule blockade has produced promising, though mixed, results. Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor might be effective in active Crohn's disease, presumably through stimulation of intestinal innate immune responses. With increasing evidence for a crucial role for luminal flora in maintaining the health of the bowel, strategies to manipulate intestinal bacteria using probiotics and prebiotics are being actively investigated as well.

Leukocytapheresis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparative Study of Anticoagulant (Nafamostat Mesilate vs. Dalteparin Sodium) for Reducing Clinical Complications

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a therapeutic strategy for extra corporeal immunomodulation that has been used to treat several immunological disorders, including ulcerative colitis (UC), with encouraging results, inducing remission in steroid-resistant patients. However, we have experienced some complications during or after LCAP therapy. Common adverse effects include fever, chills, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. One of the reasons for these adverse effects might be the use of nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an anticoagulant. In the present study, 75 patients with UC were divided into two groups, an NM group and a dalteparin sodium (DS) group. The clinical efficacy of these treatments, improvement after treatment, changes in leukocyte differential count, and adverse effects after LCAP therapy were then compared. The clinical efficacy, improvement after treatment, and changes in leukocyte classification were not significantly different between the two groups, while some adverse effects were observed in the NM group but not in the DS group. In conclusion, LCAP therapy is a useful therapy for patients with moderate to severe UC who fail to respond to glucocorticoid therapy, however, a safe anticoagulant should be used to avoid its related adverse effects.

Leukocytapheresis is effective in inducing but not in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by dense infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and monocyte-macrophages into the colonic mucosa. Leukocytapheresis is a procedure for selectively removing white blood cells from withdrawn blood. It is used for the treatment of several autoimmune diseases. This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of leukocytapheresis for inducing and maintaining remission in corticosteroid-resistant UC, as compared with corticosteroid-responsive UC.

STUDY

Forty-five patients with active UC who were treated with a dose of 1 mg/kg per day or more of prednisolone given systemically for at least 2 weeks were evaluated. Twenty patients (6 males, 14 females) in whom improvement was induced only by high doses of prednisolone were allocated as the corticosteroid-responsive group. The other 25 patients (11 males, 14 females) who did not respond to the above-mentioned dose of prednisolone therapy were allocated as the corticosteroid-resistant group and received leukocytapheresis therapy once a week for 5 weeks. Of patients who had a remission, the corticosteroid-responsive group continued to have the conventional therapy and the corticosteroid-resistant group were given leukocytapheresis once every 4 weeks for at least 2 years as maintenance therapy.

RESULTS

Remission was induced by 5 weeks of leukocytapheresis in 23 of the 25 (92%) patients with corticosteroid-resistant active UC. The number of days required to achieve remission of UC was fewer in patients who received leukocytapheresis than in those who did not. Follow-up study of the patients who had remission showed similar relapse rates at 2 years in the patients who received leukocytapheresis and those given high doses of prednisolone alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Leukocytapheresis is an effective treatment of acute corticosteroid-resistant UC but does not prevent the recurrence of UC.

Leukocytapheresis therapy for steroid-naïve patients with active ulcerative colitis: its clinical efficacy and adverse effects compared with those of conventional steroid therapy

BACKGROUND

Steroid administration currently plays a central role in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC); however, long-term steroid usage causes adverse effects, which necessitates stoppage of drug intake, leading to worsening of the disease. A steroid-sparing, well-tolerated treatment is therefore required. As several investigators have reported the efficacy of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) combined with steroid therapy, we investigated the clinical usefulness and safety of LCAP for steroid-naïve patients with active UC for comparison with those of conventional steroid therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-nine Japanese patients with active UC without a history of steroid usage were selected to be treated with LCAP (n = 9) or prednisolone (PSL) (n = 20). LCAP administration continued for 10 weekly cycles. In the PSL group, patients with moderately severe disease received 0.5 mg/kg per day of PSL and those with severe disease 1.0 mg/kg per day. The PSL dosage was gradually tapered in accordance with improvement.

RESULTS

Eight (88.9%) of the LCAP group and 16 (80.0%) of the PSL group showed clinical improvement and three (33.3%) of the LCAP group and seven (35.0%) of the PSL group achieved remission. As for the treatment complications, three major adverse effects were observed in the PSL group, but none were observed in the LCAP group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that the efficacy and safety of LCAP are equivalent, and in terms of severe adverse effects, superior to those of steroid therapy. LCAP therapy may thus be a promising candidate therapy for steroid-naïve patients with active UC.

Leukocytapheresis in ulcerative colitis: results of a multicenter double-blind prospective case-control study with sham apheresis as placebo treatment

OBJECTIVE

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) is a method of therapeutic apheresis that removes peripheral leukocytes. Previous studies showed that in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), LCAP was more effective than high-dose steroid therapy, and it had few adverse effects. We investigated LCAP in a multicenter study using active and sham devices in a double-blind study in order to elucidate the placebo effect of extracorporeal treatment including anticoagulant medication.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with active UC of severe or moderately severe grade were enrolled and assigned to the active group or the sham group. Six patients were excluded from the study and 19 (10 in the active group and nine in the sham group) were evaluated. LCAP (treatment using an active device or a sham device) was performed once a week for 5 wk, followed by two additional sessions during the next 4 wk at 2-wk intervals. Steroids and other medications were continued at the same dosage for 4 wk, which included a 2-wk pre-observation period and the first 2 wk after the start of the LCAP treatment. New medications or increase in the dosage of previous medication were prohibited until evaluation was conducted.

RESULTS

The clinical activity index (CAI) value of UC, indicated that the active group showed a significantly greater improvement (80%, 8/10) than the sham group (33%, 3/9; p<0.05). Adverse effects were observed in five patients (one in the active group and four in the sham group). None of these effects was severe and none of the sessions was terminated as a consequence of the adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The results confirmed that LCAP is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with active UC.

Stool decay-accelerating factor as a marker for monitoring the disease activity during leukocyte apheresis therapy in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We have shown previously that concentrations of stool decay-accelerating factor (DAF; CD55), a complement regulatory protein, in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are increased in relation to the severity of the colonic mucosal inflammation. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of stool DAF as a marker for monitoring disease activity in patients with steroid-resistant active UC being treated with leukocyte apheresis performed with a centrifugal cell separator.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with active and steroid-resistant UC were treated with leukocyte apheresis once a week for 4 weeks, and stool DAF concentrations were determined weekly by immunoassay.

RESULTS

After treatment, 11 (52%) of the 21 UC patients went into remission. Stool DAF concentrations decreased promptly and steadily in the responsive group. The difference reached statistical significance as soon as after the second apheresis session (P < 0.003), compared with values before the therapy and corresponding values in the non-responsive group (P = 0.024). The reduction in stool DAF concentrations after the second apheresis session was significantly greater in the responsive group (median 90%, range 22-90%) than in the non-responsive group (median -13%, range -307-94%) (P = 0.008). Hematological tests, that is, white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein, declined significantly during the apheresis therapy, but not in relation to therapeutic response.

CONCLUSION

Stool DAF concentration is a useful marker in the clinical response of UC patients to treatment with leukocyte apheresis.

Medical management of severe ulcerative colitis

The medical management of patients with severe ulcerative colitis requires initial stabilization, careful and repeated evaluations to exclude confounding or coexisting diagnoses, and timely delivery of appropriate medications. Medical therapies for these patients are potent but may be toxic, and administration must be done by experienced medical professionals, with adequate access to appropriate laboratory, radiographic, endoscopic, and surgical facilities. Patients who fail to respond to high-dose intravenous corticosteroids in a timely basis should be evaluated for cyclosporin therapy, or proceed to surgery. The promise of newer, investigational therapies to induce and maintain remission must be borne out by large controlled trials.

Current concept of pathophysiological understanding and natural course of ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

According to the current paradigm both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) result from a complex interplay of genetic susceptibility factors, environmental factors, alterations of the physiological intestinal flora and a defective regulation of the intestinal immune system.

DISCUSSION

The objective of this review is to give an overview of these factors and mechanisms, including genetic, environmental and microbial factors, with special alterations of relevant cellular components of the intestinal immune system such as T cells, macrophages and epithelial cells will then be addressed. In addition, the most relevant animal model systems that have contributed to our current pathogenetic understanding will be introduced. Clinically, the natural course of UC with special reference to the risk of colorectal cancer will be addressed.

CONCLUSION

The elucidation of pathomechanisms at the level of the intestinal immune system provides the potential for novel, effective treatment strategies. Best surgical management of patients with UC, however, still remains a challenge.

Minute findings by magnifying colonoscopy are useful for the evaluation of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy has an important role in the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. However, colonoscopic findings are inadequate for the prediction of relapse without histologic examination. In this study, the role of magnifying colonoscopy in ulcerative colitis was evaluated.

METHODS

One hundred sixteen magnifying colonoscopy observations were made in 61 patients with ulcerative colitis between January 1994 and October 1998. A simple classification of magnifying colonoscopic findings into 5 categories was devised as follows: regularly arranged crypt openings, villous-like, minute defects of epithelium, small yellowish spots, and coral reef-like appearance. The colonoscopic findings by classification were compared with histopathologic findings, and the usefulness of the classification for predicting relapse was prospectively analyzed in 18 patients.

RESULTS

Compared with grade as determined by conventional colonoscopy, there was a better correlation between the classification of findings by magnifying colonoscopy and histopathologic findings (r(2) = 0.665, 0.807, respectively). Of 18 patients studied prospectively, 7 of 9 with minute defects of epithelium relapsed within 6 months, and the cumulative nonrelapsing rate was significantly lower in patients with minute defects of epithelium compared with those without minute defects of epithelium (p = 0.0059). Moreover, minute defects of epithelium was found to be a significant independent predictive factor for relapse (multivariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards model; p = 0.0203).

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed classification of magnifying colonoscopic findings in patients with ulcerative colitis is useful for the evaluation of disease activity and for the prediction of periods of remission.

Quantitative analysis for human glucocorticoid receptor alpha/beta mRNA in IBD

We have previously reported that in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), the augmented expression of the beta isoform of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGRbeta), as a putative dominant negative regulator of glucocorticoid action, is associated with glucocorticoid (GC) unresponsiveness of UC patients. In this study, we quantified the levels and serial changes of hGR transcripts in PBMC of IBD patients by a real-time fluorescence monitoring of PCR. As results, relative hGRbeta mRNA expression was significantly higher in the active stage of UC than in inactive periods of UC or CD patients. Longitudinal analysis revealed that hGRbeta mRNA expression in UC was increased after the relapse of inflammation, suggesting that the overproduction of cytokines during inflammation may be responsible. In in vitro culture experiments of human lymphoid cell (CEM) and human PBMC, IL-7, and IL-18 increased hGRbeta mRNA expression in these cells but GC itself did not. Through these analyses, it is indicated that the inflammatory cytokines altered the splicing condition of the primary transcript of hGR gene in IBD patients.

Leukocyte apheresis using a centrifugal cell separator in refractory ulcerative colitis: a multicenter open label trial

Recently, successful results of ulcerative colitis (UC) treatments with leukocyte apheresis have been reported by several institutes. To certify the efficacy of leukocyte apheresis in refractory UC patients, a multicenter open label trial was conducted, and results were analyzed. Fifty patients diagnosed with active steroid-resistant UC were enrolled in this study from 14 medical centers. Using a centrifugal cell separator (Component Collection System, Haemonetics), leukocyte apheresis was performed once a week for 5 weeks. General conditions and abdominal symptoms were recorded daily, and laboratory tests were followed weekly. Changes of colonoscopic and histological manifestations of luminal activity through the study period were evaluated. At the end of the study period, stool frequency was decreased to less than 4 times a day in 68.4% (26 of 38) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was normalized in 56.7% (17 of 30) of the patients. Colonoscopic remission was achieved in 57.7% (26 of 45), and histological improvement was noted in 54.1% (20 of 37) of the patients tested. Improved disease activity was demonstrated in 74% (37 of 50) of the patients by general assessment criteria. Analysis of the trial data confirmed the valid clinical efficacy of leukocyte apheresis by centrifugal cell separator in refractory UC patients.

A review of leukofiltration therapy for decreasing the morbidity associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and acute inflammatory bowel disease

Complications of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and acute inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are associated with increased morbidity and cost. During reperfusion post-CPB, activated neutrophils adhere to microvascular endothelial cells mediated by cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) and cytokines/chemokines with subsequent myocardial damage caused by activated neutrophil-derived oxidants and enzymes. Leukofiltration was shown to reduce myocardial reperfusion injury and improve gas exchange as suggested by improvements in surrogate markers of inflammation and clinical end points. In acute IBD, characterized by rectal bleeding and protracted hospital stays, circulating neutrophils emigrate to the inflamed colon and adhere to microvascular endothelial cells by CAMs. Multiple treatments with leukofiltration in IBD were shown to induce long-term remission of acute IBD. Hence, leukofiltration may reduce reperfusion injury and rectal bleeding in CPB and IBD, respectively, and therefore decrease the morbidity and cost associated with these diseases.

Effective maintenance leukocytapheresis for patients with steroid dependent or resistant ulcerative colitis

We prospectively examined the effect of leukocytapheresis (LA) on the maintenance of remission in 7 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who were initially refractory to corticosteroid therapy (steroid resistant or steroid dependent). The patients with refractory UC had been in remission due to LA (induction LA) in combination with the steroid therapy. They were then treated with LA once or twice a month for the purpose of maintaining remission (maintenance LA). The maintenance LA was performed by either a centrifuge method in 5 patients or a polyester adsorbent column method in 2 patients. Steroid dosage was gradually tapered as little as possible without recurrence based on clinical and/or colonoscopical judgments. Four patients were maintained in remission without steroids over 12 months. Recurrence was observed in 3 patients at 3, 3, and 6 months after the beginning of the maintenance LA, respectively. Two of the 3 patients were again conducted to remission by the second induction LA and maintained in remission by the second maintenance LA. Two patients finally underwent total colectomy because of recurrence of UC in a severe form. It is concluded that the maintenance LA therapy might be effective in some patients with steroid dependent or resistant UC for the maintenance of remission without steroids.

Preliminary experience with plasma exchange in patients with ulcerative colitis

We decided to test the effect of plasma exchange (PE) in selected patients with inflammatory bowel disease in which conventional medical treatment proved insufficient. Twenty-six patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) were treated with PE, six patients with fulminant colitis and 20 with long lasting severe colitis. After very promising results initially, 17 patients with long lasting severe colitis were selected in a careful prospective study. Twelve patients completed the treatment protocol. Two litres of plasma were exchanged every second or third day, 5-6 times in two weeks. The replacement fluid was fresh frozen plasma. The activity indices and histological evaluation were used as criteriae for treatment response. A reduction of 35% in the activity index is considered a significant improvement. In all but three patients (out of 12), the activity indices were reduced two weeks after end of treatment. Six patients had a reduction of more than 35%, three patients had a reduction between 22-28% and three had a reduction less than 10%. None became worse. In this carefully studied group, the immediate beneficial effects of PE was only demonstrable by the activity indices and not evident by blind evaluation of biopsies from the mucosa. In two of the six patients with fulminant colitis, PE was followed by an immediate dramatic clinical improvement. In the follow up period (2-14 years) 14 of the 26 patients reported marked and long lasting improvement of inflammatory bowel disease. We conclude that PE might be beneficial in subsets of patients with UC.

Expression of glucocorticoid receptor beta in lymphocytes of patients with glucocorticoid-resistant ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recently, the glucocorticoid receptor beta (hGRbeta) was suggested to play a role as a dominant negative regulator for determining glucocorticoid response. The aim of this study was to clarify whether reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of hGRbeta messenger RNA (mRNA) can predict the response to glucocorticoids in patients with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Total RNA obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 23 patients with ulcerative colitis and 20 healthy volunteers was reverse transcribed; the resulting complementary DNA was amplified using specific primers for hGRalpha and hGRbeta. Protein expression of hGR in PBMCs was confirmed by immunoprecipitation-Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

The expression of hGRalpha mRNA (477 base pairs) was detected in all patients and all healthy volunteers. In contrast, a hGRbeta mRNA (366 base pairs) was detected in 1 (9.1%) of 11 glucocorticoid-sensitive patients, 10 (83.3%) of 12 glucocorticoid-resistant patients, and 2 (10%) of 20 healthy volunteers. The positive rate of hGRbeta mRNA in the resistant group was significantly higher than that in the sensitive group (P = 0.0019). The hGRbeta band could be detected by immunoprecipitation-Western blotting in hGRbeta mRNA-positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that the expression of hGRbeta mRNA in PBMCs examined by RT-PCR may serve as a novel predictor of glucocorticoid response in ulcerative colitis.

Novel therapies for inflammatory bowel disease

Looking back at successes and failures in newer approaches to treating IBD, it is tempting--although still difficult--to draw conclusions about pathogenesis. When a therapy proves effective, do clinicians truly know how it works? Even with a therapy as specific as anti-TNF antibody, it is not clear if the benefit is attributable to simple binding and clearance of TNF-alpha or to binding on the cell surface and subsequent deletion of the activated macrophage. When a drug appears to be less effective than preclinical models suggest, can failures in effectiveness from delivery or dosing be differentiated? The disappointing results of clinical trials with IL-10--so at odds with the prediction of benefit from animal models--bring into question the validity of those models as well as the soundness of design of the clinical trials on which efficacy of IL-10 is judged. The variability of response even to the most narrowly targeted agents suggests that these diseases are far more heterogeneous in humans than in their murine counterparts. Clinicians are only just beginning to recognize subclinical markers of response, and it may soon be possible to predict response on the basis of genetic composition. For the moment, however, the field of pharmacogenetics is embryonic. Challenges in developing new therapeutic strategies include not only identifying novel agents, but also improving the definitions of clinical endpoints and defining efficacy at the biologic level. Only through considered evaluation of clinical evidence may clinicians determine which therapies should remain novelties and which should become an accepted part of the armamentarium.

Tc-99m leukocyte imaging for evaluating disease severity and monitoring treatment response in ulcerative colitis: comparison with colonoscopy

The diagnostic value of Tc-99m leukocyte imaging for evaluating disease activity and monitoring treatment response in ulcerative colitis was compared with that of colonoscopy. A total of 48 studies were performed in 28 patients with ulcerative colitis. Forty-six studies had both Tc-99m leukocyte imaging and colonoscopy within 2 weeks of each other, and the remaining two studies had only Tc-99m leukocyte imaging. In 46 studies, semiquantitative grading of colonic radioactivity by comparison with iliac crest marrow activity on radionuclide imaging correlated well with macroscopic grading based on Matts' criteria on colonoscopy. Fourteen (82%) of 17 studies with slight colonoscopic change showed a negative result on the radionuclide image. In 15 patients treated with glucocorticoids or leukapheresis, radionuclide imaging showed nearly the same statistical results as colonoscopy in monitoring treatment response. Tc-99m leukocyte imaging could be used as an alternative to colonoscopy to evaluate the disease activity of ulcerative colitis or to monitor the treatment response, although it is insensitive for detecting disease with only slight macroscopic changes.

Predictive factors of response to leukocytapheresis therapy for ulcerative colitis

Leukocytapheresis (LCAP) using a leukocyte removal filter was performed for 8 patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Significant clinical improvement was attained in 5 of 8 patients (62.5%). All of them had been suffering from moderately active colitis and received corticosteroid therapy. On the other hand, 3 patients with severely active disease and treated with little or no corticosteroid were resistant to LCAP. This result indicates that LCAP is an effective treatment for steroid-resistant cases of UC when combined with steroid therapy. LCAP alone, however, seems to have little efficacy for severely active UC.

Centrifugal leukocyte apheresis for ulcerative colitis

Corticosteroids are effective in bringing about clinical remission for ulcerative colitis. However, relapsed cases are frequently refractory to corticosteroids. In addition, the long-term use of corticosteroids often causes serious side effects. We have already reported that leukocyte apheresis using a centrifugal procedure was effective for patients with corticosteroid-resistant ulcerative colitis after conducting a pilot study in 14 patients. In the present paper, the clinical efficacy of leukocyte apheresis using a centrifugal procedure was evaluated again for corticosteroid-resistant ulcerative colitis. Twenty-three patients with corticosteroid-resistant severely active ulcerative colitis were treated by centrifugal leukocyte apheresis. Eighteen patients (78.3%) achieved clinical remission which was evaluated by the clinical activity index within 4 weeks after apheresis. Both colonoscopic and histological examinations confirmed the beneficial effect of this procedure. No significant side effects were noticed throughout the therapy.

Therapeutic cytapheresis for inflammatory bowel disease

Cytapheresis therapy has recently been investigated as a treatment for several diseases, especially autoimmune related diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and inflammatory bowel disease. The removal of leukocyte components has been performed by the centrifugal method; however, using fiber technology or column technology, leukocyte components can be removed simply, and these technologies are more effective than the centrifugal method in removing numbers of cells. Each of 3 types of leukocytapheresis methods removes a different kind of cell in its therapeutic principle. Thus, if we understand what kind of cells should be removed, we can choose the best method for removing leukocytes. For this reason, the authors propose an international standard for unifying names. The therapy that makes use of a centrifuge to selectively remove about 40% of neutrophils and more than 60% of lymphocytes may be called a lymphocyte removal therapy, lymphocytapheresis (LCA). Using cellulose acetate beads in a G-1 granulocyte removal column, granulocytes and monocytes are removed but not lymphocytes, so we suggest calling this granulocytapheresis (GCAP). In addition, using a leukocyte removal filter, the Cellsorba leukocyte removal filter, 99% of both granulocytes and monocytes and about 70% of lymphocytes are removed. We propose calling this leukocytapheresis (LCAP). In the near future, we hope that we will be able to select one of these methods for cytapheresis for each disease pathogenesis or cellular immune abnormality. Presently, a lot of research is on-going to analyze how cytapheresis is effective for the immune related diseases. The mechanism of cytapheresis will be clarified by investigators. We strongly believe that cytapheresis therapies offer good news to those patients suffering from incurable diseases as well as their physicians.