Restoration of Root Filled Teeth; Current Opinions and Techniques

Knowledge and Practice of Endocrown Restorations Among Dental Students and Dentists in Sirte, Libya

Background Restoring endodontically treated teeth has long posed a challenge for clinicians. The endocrown (EC) is an innovative and conservative restoration designed for teeth with severely damaged coronal structures. ECs offer performance that is equivalent to or even exceeds that of traditional post-core-crown treatments. Purpose This web-based cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge and practical experience regarding ECs as post-endodontic prostheses among dental students and practitioners in Libya. Methods A 22-item structured questionnaire was created using Google Forms and distributed to final-year students, interns, faculty at the College of Dentistry at Sirte University, and practicing dentists in Libya. The sample comprised 290 participants. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: the first assessed demographic variables such as gender, education level, country of graduation, and workplace; the second evaluated knowledge of ECs through 11 questions; and the third focused on EC practice, also comprising 11 questions. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 50.7% of participants indicated that EC restorations are suitable for molar teeth, 41.4% noted that a butt joint finish line is used for EC preparation, and 66.9% preferred all-ceramic materials for ECs. Nearly 72.8% reported that computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technology is employed for EC fabrication. Additionally, 61.7% agreed that EC designs offer higher fracture resistance compared to conventional crowns. Despite this, 64.5% of participants had not cemented an EC in their clinic in recent years. Significant differences in knowledge and practice regarding ECs were observed across various factors, including gender, education level, country of graduation, and workplace. Conclusion Most participants demonstrated an acceptable level of knowledge and practical experience with EC restorations. Therefore, incorporating ECs as a major topic in the postgraduate prosthodontics curriculum is recommended.

Knowledge and Awareness of Dental Practitioners About the Utilization of Endocrown in Post-endodontic Management

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, and awareness of dentists in Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, regarding the use of endocrown as post-endodontic restorations, utilizing an online questionnaire.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out among dental practitioners working in Ha'il, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Dentists who practice in the Ha'il were included in the current study. The survey study involved a sample size of 245 participants. The researchers employed the snowball sampling technique in this investigation. The validated, closed-ended questionnaires were disseminated to the entire sample of selected dental practitioners using electronic mail. The initial section of the survey encompassed inquiries pertaining to the demographic characteristics of the participants, encompassing variables such as gender, years of professional experience, and workplace. The subsequent section of the survey focused on assessing the participants' knowledge and opinions regarding the endocrown technique. The Chi-square test was employed to assess the associations between categorical variables.

RESULTS

The most of participants 228 (93.1%) had knowledge about endocrown and 94 (38.4%) of them received information from their educational institutions. Among the responses of the participants, 232 (94.7%) expressed their preference for utilizing endocrown restorations specifically for molar teeth. Moreover, 183 (74.7%) of respondents indicated that the endocrown is preferred when there is a restricted amount of inter-arch space available. A majority of respondents 152 (62.0%) indicated that the ferrule does not exert any influence on the endocrown. A majority of participants 135 (55.1%) expressed a preference for utilizing lithium disilicate ceramic in the fabrication of endocrown. The most of participants 209 (85.3%) opted to use resin cement for the purpose of cementation. The characteristics of gender, experience, and working place were found to have a significant relationship with the knowledge of the participants about endocrown (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study participants need to enhance their knowledge and awareness pertaining to the utilization of endocrowns as a post-endodontic treatment.

Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study

The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and t-test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1–2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration.