1
|
Wolfenden L, Hall A, Bauman A, Milat A, Hodder R, Webb E, Mooney K, Yoong S, Sutherland R, McCrabb S. Research outcomes informing the selection of public health interventions and strategies to implement them: A cross-sectional survey of Australian policy-maker and practitioner preferences. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:58. [PMID: 38745326 PMCID: PMC11095011 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01144-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A key role of public health policy-makers and practitioners is to ensure beneficial interventions are implemented effectively enough to yield improvements in public health. The use of evidence to guide public health decision-making to achieve this is recommended. However, few studies have examined the relative value, as reported by policy-makers and practitioners, of different broad research outcomes (that is, measures of cost, acceptability, and effectiveness). To guide the conduct of research and better inform public health policy and practice, this study aimed at describing the research outcomes that Australian policy-makers and practitioners consider important for their decision-making when selecting: (a) public health interventions; (b) strategies to support their implementation; and (c) to assess the differences in research outcome preferences between policy-makers and practitioners. METHOD An online value-weighting survey was conducted with Australian public health policy-makers and practitioners working in the field of non-communicable disease prevention. Participants were presented with a list of research outcomes and were asked to select up to five they considered most critical to their decision-making. They then allocated 100 points across these - allocating more points to outcomes perceived as more important. Outcome lists were derived from a review and consolidation of evaluation and outcome frameworks in the fields of public health knowledge translation and implementation. We used descriptive statistics to report relative preferences overall and for policy-makers and practitioners separately. RESULTS Of the 186 participants; 90 primarily identified as policy-makers and 96 as public health prevention practitioners. Overall, research outcomes of effectiveness, equity, feasibility, and sustainability were identified as the four most important outcomes when considering either interventions or strategies to implement them. Scores were similar for most outcomes between policy-makers and practitioners. CONCLUSION For Australian policy-makers and practitioners working in the field of non-communicable disease prevention, outcomes related to effectiveness, equity, feasibility, and sustainability appear particularly important to their decisions about the interventions they select and the strategies they employ to implement them. The findings suggest researchers should seek to meet these information needs and prioritize the inclusion of such outcomes in their research and dissemination activities. The extent to which these outcomes are critical to informing the decision of policy-makers and practitioners working in other jurisdictions or contexts warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Wolfenden
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia.
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Alix Hall
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Adrian Bauman
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Milat
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Hodder
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Emily Webb
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
| | - Kaitlin Mooney
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
| | - Serene Yoong
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Global Nutrition and Preventive Health, Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Sam McCrabb
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bestle SMS, Lassen AD, Biltoft-Jensen AP, Matthiessen J, Gibbons SJ, Christensen BJ, Ersbøll BK, Trolle E. Reduction in intake of discretionary foods and drinks among Danish schoolchildren: dietary results from the real-life cluster-randomised controlled trial 'Are You Too Sweet?'. Public Health Nutr 2024; 27:e111. [PMID: 38528814 PMCID: PMC11036427 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980024000740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of the multicomponent intervention trial 'Are You Too Sweet?' in reducing discretionary foods and drinks intake among young schoolchildren. DESIGN The study was a 3·5-month two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial among primary schoolchildren and their families. School health nurses provided guidance to families regarding discretionary foods and drinks for the children. Moreover, families were given a variety of knowledge- and capability-building materials to utilise at home. Dietary intake was assessed using a web-based 7-d dietary record. Linear mixed regression models were used to estimate intervention effects as changes in child intake of discretionary foods and drinks and sugar between groups. SETTING Six schools from a Danish municipality were randomised to the intervention group (n 4) or the control group (n 2). PARTICIPANTS A total of 153 children aged 5-7 years. RESULTS No significant reduction in the children's intake of total discretionary foods and drinks or discretionary foods alone was observed between the intervention and control group, while a decreased intake of discretionary drinks of 40·9 % (P = 0·045) was observed compared with control. Secondary subgroup analysis showed that children of parents with shorter educational level significantly reduced their intake of added sugar by 2·9 E% (P = 0·002). CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that multicomponent interventions involving school health nurses may have some effects in reducing, especially, discretionary drinks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidse Marie Sidenius Bestle
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Anne Dahl Lassen
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Anja Pia Biltoft-Jensen
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Matthiessen
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Sarah Jegsmark Gibbons
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Bjarne Kjær Ersbøll
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science,
Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby,
Denmark
| | - Ellen Trolle
- Division of Food Technology, National Food Institute,
Technical University of Denmark, Henrik Dams Allé, Building
202, Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ayuso Margañon R, Llistosella M, Ayuso Margañon S, Rojano Navarro M, Bou Gràcia N, Sillero Sillero A. Nursing Practice and Telehealth in School Health Services: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3124. [PMID: 38132014 PMCID: PMC10742839 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled the adoption of telehealth in school settings, emphasising the pivotal role of nurses. This review explores the last decade's evidence on telehealth interventions in school nursing practice; Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a systematic search in PubMed, CINHAL, and Web of Science in March 2023. Out of 518 articles across 21 journals, 32 satisfied the review criteria. The selection process rigorously adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews; Results: The results were categorised into three main areas: (a) the purpose of telehealth and intervention strategies, (b) the role of nursing in school-based telehealth practice, and (c) perceived benefits and limitations of school-based telehealth studies. Telehealth interventions encompass health promotion, mental health management, and early diagnosis. School nurses play a multifaceted role, including management, education, and remote monitoring. While telehealth offers advantages like improved health and cost savings, challenges include digital literacy, device access, and costs; Conclusion: This review underscores the crucial role of telehealth in schools for enhancing healthcare delivery in educational settings. However, more empirical evidence is required to specify nurses' contributions to school-based telehealth interventions. Promoting their leadership through stakeholder collaboration is essential. Further research should address challenges and opportunities in school nursing practice, enriching healthcare in educational settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Ayuso Margañon
- Mar Nursing School (ESIMar), Parc de Salut Mar, University Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (R.A.M.); (M.R.N.); (A.S.S.)
- Social Determinants and Health Education Research Group (SDHEd), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Llistosella
- Primary Health Care, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, 08227 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Mental Health and Perinatal Nursing, Facultat d’Infermeria, Universitat de Barcelona, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - Sonia Ayuso Margañon
- Department of Public Health Nursing, Mental Health and Perinatal Nursing, Facultat d’Infermeria, Universitat de Barcelona, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
- Primary Health Care Florida Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, 08905 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Marta Rojano Navarro
- Mar Nursing School (ESIMar), Parc de Salut Mar, University Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (R.A.M.); (M.R.N.); (A.S.S.)
- Department of School Nursing, Jesuits Education Foundation, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Bou Gràcia
- Department of School Nursing, Sant Gervasi Jesuit Education Foundation, 08006 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Amalia Sillero Sillero
- Mar Nursing School (ESIMar), Parc de Salut Mar, University Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (R.A.M.); (M.R.N.); (A.S.S.)
- Social Determinants and Health Education Research Group (SDHEd), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Nursing, Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat, 08174 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall A, Wolfenden L, Gardner C, McEvoy B, Lane C, Shelton RC, McFadyen T, Lee DC, Shoesmith A, Austin K, Nathan N. A bibliographic review of sustainability research output and investment in 10 leading public health journals across three time periods. PUBLIC HEALTH IN PRACTICE 2023; 6:100444. [PMID: 38028253 PMCID: PMC10654021 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Long-term delivery, or sustainability, of evidence-based interventions is necessary for public health benefits to be realised. However, sustainment of effective interventions is poor. Understanding the evidence-base and identifying potential gaps is necessary to inform where future research efforts are most warranted. Study design We undertook a repeat cross-sectional bibliographic review of research published in 10 public health journals across three time periods (2010, 2015 and 2020/2021). Methods Studies were eligible if they were a data-based study or review article. Studies were assessed as to whether they focused on sustainability. The percentage of public health research studies assessing sustainability overall and by the three time periods was calculated. The association between time period and the proportion of sustainability articles was assessed using logistic regression. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise study characteristics overall and by time period. Results 10,588 data-based articles were identified, of which 1.3 % (n = 136) focused on sustainability. There was a statistically significant association between time period and the proportion of sustainability research, with a slight increase across the three time periods: 0.3 % (95 % CI: 0.1 %, 0.7 %) in 2010, 1.4 % (95 % CI: 1.0 %, 1.9 %) in 2015 and 1.6 % (95 % CI: 1.3 %, 1.9 %) in 2020/2021. Most research was descriptive/epidemiological (n = 69, 51 %), few focused on measurement (n = 2, 1.5 %) and none on cost effectiveness. Only one intervention study assessed the effect of specific sustainability strategies. Conclusions This bibliographic review highlights the need for more public health research on sustainability, particularly in the areas of measurement, sustainability interventions, and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Carly Gardner
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Brydie McEvoy
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Cassandra Lane
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tameka McFadyen
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel C.W. Lee
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Adam Shoesmith
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Karly Austin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Nathan
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McCrabb S, Hall A, Milat A, Bauman A, Hodder R, Mooney K, Webb E, Barnes C, Yoong S, Sutherland R, Wolfenden L. Disseminating health research to public health policy-makers and practitioners: a survey of source, message content and delivery modality preferences. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:121. [PMID: 38012773 PMCID: PMC10680334 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01066-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the views of policy-makers and practitioners regarding how best to communicate research evidence is important to support research use in their decision-making. AIM To quantify and describe public health policy-makers and practitioners' views regarding the source, content and form of messages describing public health research findings to inform their decision-making. We also sought to examine differences in preferences between public health policy-makers and practitioners. METHODS A cross sectional, value-weighting survey of policy-makers and practitioners was conducted. Participants were asked to allocate a proportion of 100 points across different (i) sources of research evidence, (ii) message content and (iii) the form in which evidence is presented. Points were allocated based on their rating of influence, usefulness and preference when making decisions about health policy or practice. RESULTS A total of 186 survey responses were received from 90 policy-makers and 96 practitioners. Researchers and government department agencies were the most influential source of research evidence based on mean allocation of points, followed by knowledge brokers, professional peers and associations. Mean point allocation for perceived usefulness of message content was highest for simple summary of key findings and implications, and then evidence-based recommendations and data and statistical summaries. Finally, based on mean scores, policy-makers and practitioners preferred to receive research evidence in the form of peer-reviewed publications, reports, evidence briefs and plain language summaries. There were few differences in scores between policy-makers and practitioners across source, message content or form assessments or those with experience in different behavioural areas. CONCLUSIONS The findings should provide a basis for the future development and optimization of dissemination strategies to this important stakeholder group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam McCrabb
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| | - Andrew Milat
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Adrian Bauman
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Prevention Research Collaboration, Charles Perkins Centre, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Hodder
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| | - Kaitlin Mooney
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Emily Webb
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Courtney Barnes
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| | - Serene Yoong
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, 3122, Australia
- Global Nutrition and Preventive Health, Institute of Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zeldman J, Salloum RG, Mobley AR. Implementing Successful Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Interventions: The Need for Family-Based Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Studies. J Acad Nutr Diet 2023; 123:1409-1416. [PMID: 37247755 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Zeldman
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Ramzi G Salloum
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Amy R Mobley
- Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wolfenden L, Close S, Finch M, Lecathelinais C, Ramanathan S, De Santis KK, Car LT, Doyle J, McCrabb S. Improving academic and public health impact of Cochrane public health reviews: what can we learn from bibliographic metrics and author dissemination strategies? A cross-sectional study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45:e577-e586. [PMID: 37169549 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To facilitate the development of impactful research dissemination strategies, this study aimed to: (i) survey authors of trials included in a sample of Cochrane reviews to describe strategies to disseminate trial findings, and examine their association with academic and policy impacts and (ii) audit academic and policy impact of CPH reviews. METHODS Authors of 104 trials within identified Cochrane reviews completed survey items assessing the dissemination strategies. Field weighted citation (FWCI) data extracted from bibliographic databases served as a measure of academic impact of trials and CPH reviews. Policy and practice impacts of trials were assessed during the survey of trial authors using items based on the Payback Framework, and for CPH reviews using 'policy mention' data collected via Altmetric Explorer. RESULTS Among the included trials, univariate (but not multivariable) regression models revealed significant associations between the use of dissemination strategies (i.e. posts on social media; workshops with end-users; media-releases) and policy or practice impacts. No significant associations were reported between dissemination strategies and trial FWCI. The mean FWCI of CPH reviews suggest that they are cited 220% more than other reviews in their field. CONCLUSIONS Comprehensive dissemination strategies are likely required to maximize the potential the potential impacts of public health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Wolfenden
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
- Cochrane Public Health, Newcastle, NSW 2318, Australia
| | - Shara Close
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Meghan Finch
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
- Cochrane Public Health, Newcastle, NSW 2318, Australia
| | - Christophe Lecathelinais
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia
| | - Shanthi Ramanathan
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Karina Karolina De Santis
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen 28359, Germany
| | - Lorainne Tudor Car
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Jodie Doyle
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Cochrane Public Health, Newcastle, NSW 2318, Australia
| | - Sam McCrabb
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2318, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
- Cochrane Public Health, Newcastle, NSW 2318, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown A, Nathan N, Janssen L, Chooi A, Lecathelinais C, Hudson N, Wolfenden L, Sutherland R. New models to support parents to pack healthy lunchboxes: Parents acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and adoption of the SWAP IT m-Health program. Aust N Z J Public Health 2023; 47:100043. [PMID: 37087847 DOI: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This report aims to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and adoption of a healthy lunchbox program (SWAP IT), from the parent perspective. METHODS SWAP IT is an mobile health (m-Health) program aimed to support parents in swapping out discretionary foods for healthier alternatives. Following receipt of the program, parents completed validated scales assessing the Acceptability (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness (IAM), and Feasibility (FIM) via a computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI). Parents were asked about their awareness of strategies in SWAP IT and whether the program supported them to make lunchbox swaps from discretionary to everyday foods. RESULTS Of the 679 parents who consented, 413 completed the CATI (61% response rate). Parent's mean AIM score (out of a total score of 5) was 4.22 (SD 0.48); FIM score was 4.27 (SD 0.54); and IAM score was 4.24 (SD 0.54). Most parents reported receiving the lunchbox messages (54%), with 45% reporting opening all 10 messages and 64% of parents reporting the program helped swap out discretionary foods. CONCLUSION The m-Health lunchbox program, SWAP IT, is highly acceptable, easy to adopt, appropriate, and feasible to parents. IMPLICATIONS TO PUBLIC HEALTH Not only is SWAP IT effective, but favourable implementation factors highlight the potential scalability of the program in improving child nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Brown
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Nicole Nathan
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Lisa Janssen
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Amelia Chooi
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Christophe Lecathelinais
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Nayerra Hudson
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cabrera-Ledesma B, Abril-Ulloa V, Pinos-Vélez V, Carpio-Arias V. A Descriptive Qualitative Study of the Perceptions of Regulatory Authorities, Parents, and School Canteen Owners in the South of Ecuador about the Challenges and Facilities Related to Compliance with the National Regulation for School Canteens. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:5313. [PMID: 37047929 PMCID: PMC10094177 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of overweight and obesity in the Ecuadorian school population continues to increase. An important factor in children's nutrition is the food offered in school canteens. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of the challenges faced by and facilities of school canteens in the provinces of southern Ecuador in terms of complying with national regulations. For this qualitative descriptive study, semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2021 with six school canteen owners, six school directors, five health experts, and seven parents of children attending school from three provinces, Cañar, Azuay, and Morona Santiago, in Ecuador. The data were transcribed and subsequently analyzed in ATLAS ti. The participants indicated several challenges to comply with the regulations of school canteens, such as the expenses generated by them, the lack of control of street food vendors in the surroundings of the schools, and the lack of trained personnel. Regarding the facilities, they highlighted that the regulation for cleaning and hygiene are more easily fulfilled. Standards and control of the food stipend in school canteens are required to ensure a supply of healthy food for the children. Multiple challenges and strategies are proposed to improve the eating habits of the school population and to improve the nutrition of schoolchildren.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria Abril-Ulloa
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010201, Ecuador
- Research Group: “Public Health, Food and Physical Activity in the Life Cycle” Career of Nutrition and Dietetic, Medical Sciences Faculty, University of Cuenca, Cuenca 010201, Ecuador
| | | | - Valeria Carpio-Arias
- Research Group GIANH, School of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Public Health, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo, Riobamba 060155, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baffsky R, Ivers R, Cullen P, Wang J, McGillivray L, Torok M. Strategies for Enhancing the Implementation of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs in Schools: A Systematic Review. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2023; 24:337-352. [PMID: 36098892 PMCID: PMC9938015 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-022-01434-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A number of school-based mental health prevention programs have been found to be effective in research trials, but little is known about how to support implementation in real-life settings. To address this translational problem, this systematic review aims to identify effective strategies for enhancing the implementation of mental health prevention programs for children in schools. Four electronic databases were searched for empirical, peer-reviewed articles in English from January 2000 to October 2021 reporting the effects of implementation strategies for school-based universal mental health programs. Twenty-one articles were included in the narrative synthesis and assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Twenty-two strategies were found to be effective at improving program fidelity or adoption. The strategies with the strongest positive evidence base were those that involved monitoring and provision of feedback, engaging principals as program leaders, improving teachers' buy-in and organising school personnel implementation meetings. We recommend school-based practitioners trial strategies with positive findings from this review as part of their continuous quality improvement. This review highlights the pressing need for large-scale, randomised controlled trials to develop and trial more robust strategies to enhance adoption, as the five implementation studies found to measure adoption used qualitative methods limited by small samples sizes and case study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Baffsky
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building F25 Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rebecca Ivers
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building F25 Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Patricia Cullen
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Samuels Building F25 Samuel Terry Ave, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Wang
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Lauren McGillivray
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Michelle Torok
- Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mielke J, Brunkert T, Zúñiga F, Simon M, Zullig LL, De Geest S. Methodological approaches to study context in intervention implementation studies: an evidence gap map. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:320. [PMID: 36517765 PMCID: PMC9749183 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01772-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Within implementation science studies, contextual analysis is increasingly recognized as foundational to interventions' successful and sustainable implementation. However, inconsistencies between methodological approaches currently limit progress in studying context and guidance to standardize the use of those approaches is scant. Therefore, this study's objective was to systematically review and map current methodological approaches to contextual analysis in intervention implementation studies. The results would help us both to systematize the process of contextual analysis and identify gaps in the current evidence. METHODS We conducted an evidence gap map (EGM) based on literature data via a stepwise approach. First, using an empirically developed search string, we randomly sampled 20% of all intervention implementation studies available from PubMed per year (2015-2020). Second, we assessed included studies that conducted a contextual analysis. Data extraction and evaluation followed the Basel Approach for CoNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA), using a color-coded rating scheme. Also based on BANANA and on the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework-an implementation framework that pays ample attention to context- we created visual maps of various approaches to contextual analysis. RESULTS Of 15, 286 identified intervention implementation studies and study protocols, 3017 were screened for inclusion. Of those, 110 warranted close examination, revealing 22% that reported on contextual analysis. Only one study explicitly applied a framework for contextual analysis. Data were most commonly collected via surveys (n = 15) and individual interviews (n = 13). Ten studies reported mixed-methods analyses. Twenty-two assessed meso-level contextual and setting factors, with socio-cultural aspects most commonly studied. Eighteen described the use of contextual information for subsequent project phases (e.g., intervention development/adaption, selecting implementation strategies). Nine reported contextual factors' influences on implementation and/or effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This study describes current approaches to contextual analysis in implementation science and provides a novel framework for evaluating and mapping it. By synthesizing our findings graphically in figures, we provide an initial evidence base framework that can incorporate new findings as necessary. We strongly recommend further development of methodological approaches both to conduct contextual analysis and to systematize the reporting of it. These actions will increase the quality and consistency of implementation science research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Mielke
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thekla Brunkert
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine FELIX PLATTER, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Zúñiga
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Simon
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Leah L. Zullig
- Center for Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System and Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC USA
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Christensen BJ, Bestle SMS, Trolle E, Biltoft-Jensen AP, Matthiessen J, Lassen AD. A Qualitative Evaluation of Social Aspects of Sugar-Rich Food and Drink Intake and Parental Strategies for Reductions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11647. [PMID: 36141910 PMCID: PMC9517337 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Danish children have a much larger intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks than recommended. This study aimed to (1) explore social aspects and practices of pre-school children's intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks and (2) evaluate barriers and parental strategies to reduce their children's intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks employed in connection with the 3.5-month family-centred intervention trial 'Are you too sweet?'. Intervention components included communication of the recommended maximum intake and reduction strategies, supported by resources encouraging and facilitating behavioural changes. A random sample of families (n = 24) from intervention schools participated in post-intervention semi-structured interviews. A thematic content analysis was conducted, revealing three main domains of social practices: (1) 'family treats', including the weekly Danish concept 'Friday sweets', (2) 'everyday treats', such as sweet snacks in lunch packs, between-meals snacks and soft drink habits and (3) 'socialized treats', including treats at special occasions. Parents employed several strategies, most often substitution and portion-size reduction, but also limiting home availability. Families most frequently made changes that were easily adoptable and close to existing routines at home. In conclusion, the intervention components provided families with knowledge and strategies that facilitated behavioural changes towards reducing the intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks.
Collapse
|
13
|
Evaluation of Parental Acceptability and Use of Intervention Components to Reduce Pre-School Children's Intake of Sugar-Rich Food and Drinks. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19137967. [PMID: 35805623 PMCID: PMC9266277 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Knowledge is needed about effective tools that reach public health objectives focused on reducing the intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks. The purpose of this study was to assess the parental acceptability, use and motivational potential of intervention components developed in the randomized family-based trial ‘Are you too sweet?’ aimed at reducing the intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks among children (5–7 y). Intervention components included guidance on sugar-rich foods and drinks at a school health nurse consultation, a box with home-use materials and a digital platform. The methods used were a questionnaire among intervention families (n = 83) and semi-structured interviews with parents in selected intervention families (n = 24). Results showed the good acceptability and usefulness of the components, with reported frequencies of use of materials ranging from 48% to 94% and a high satisfaction rate with the school health nurse consultation. Personalized feedback and guidance from the school health nurse seemed to be a motivational trigger, and components that were compatible with existing practices were most frequently used. However, the components were not considered engaging by all families. Overall, intervention components were well received and hold the potential for enhancing parental knowledge and parenting practices regarding limiting the intake of sugar-rich foods and drinks.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahdi S, Michalik-Denny EK, Buckland NJ. An Assessment of Behavior Change Techniques in Two Versions of a Dietary Mobile Application: The Change4Life Food Scanner. Front Public Health 2022; 10:803152. [PMID: 35284376 PMCID: PMC8904754 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.803152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Change4Life Food Scanner app is a UK Government dietary app designed to provide feedback on the nutritional content of packaged foods to parents and their children. To understand its intended mechanism of behavior change and how Behavior Change Technique (BCT) content evolves with app updates, this research aimed to map out the BCTs of two versions of the Change4Life Food Scanner app. Two coders undertook a descriptive comparative analysis of the use of BCTs in the Food Scanner app using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy [both the outdated (v1.6) and updated (v2.0) versions of the app were coded]. Results showed that both versions encompass the BCTs "goal setting (behavior)", "feedback on behavior", "social support (unspecified)", "instruction on how to perform behavior", "salience of consequences", "prompts/cues" and "credible source". The outdated version contained the BCT "behavior substitution" which had been dropped in the updated version. The updated version featured the additional BCTs "information about social and environmental consequences", "information about emotional consequences", "social reward" and "social incentive" and was comparatively more BCT intensive in terms of content and occurrence. The BCT content of the Food Scanner app resembles that of existing dietary apps and incorporates several BCTs which have previously been found to be effective. Future work to evaluate the effectiveness of the app is recommended. This will provide insight into whether the combination of BCTs used in the Change4Life Food Scanner app are effective in improving dietary choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sundus Mahdi
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Emily K Michalik-Denny
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola J Buckland
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Davis JL, Ayakaka I, Ggita JM, Ochom E, Babirye D, Turimumahoro P, Gupta AJ, Mugabe FR, Armstrong-Hough M, Cattamanchi A, Katamba A. Theory-Informed Design of a Tailored Strategy for Implementing Household TB Contact Investigation in Uganda. Front Public Health 2022; 10:837211. [PMID: 35400072 PMCID: PMC8987305 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Since 2012, the World Health Organization has recommended household contact investigation as an evidence-based intervention to find and treat individuals with active tuberculosis (TB), the most common infectious cause of death worldwide after COVID-19. Unfortunately, uptake of this recommendation has been suboptimal in low- and middle-income countries, where the majority of affected individuals reside, and little is known about how to effectively deliver this service. Therefore, we undertook a systematic process to design a novel, theory-informed implementation strategy to promote uptake of contact investigation in Uganda, using the COM-B (Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior) model and the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework. We systematically engaged national, clinic-, and community-based stakeholders and collectively re-examined the results of our own formative, parallel mixed-methods studies. We identified three core behaviors within contact investigation that we wished to change, and multiple antecedents (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of those behaviors. The BCW framework helped identify multiple intervention functions targeted to these antecedents, as well as several policies that could potentially enhance the effectiveness of those interventions. Finally, we identified multiple behavior change techniques and policies that we incorporated into a multi-component implementation strategy, which we compared to usual care in a household cluster-randomized trial. We introduced some components in both arms, including those designed to facilitate initial uptake of contact investigation, with improvement relative to historical controls. Other components that we introduced to facilitate completion of TB evaluation—home-based TB-HIV evaluation and follow-up text messaging—returned negative results due to implementation failures. In summary, the Behavior Change Wheel framework provided a feasible and transparent approach to designing a theory-informed implementation strategy. Future studies should explore the use of experimental methods such as micro-randomized trials to identify the most active components of implementation strategies, as well as more creative and entrepreneurial methods such as human-centered design to better adapt the forms and fit of implementation strategies to end users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Lucian Davis
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
- Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Section, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- *Correspondence: J. Lucian Davis
| | - Irene Ayakaka
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM) International Multidisciplinary Programme to Address Lung Health and TB in Africa (IMPALA) Program, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph M. Ggita
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Emmanuel Ochom
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Diana Babirye
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Patricia Turimumahoro
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Amanda J. Gupta
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Mari Armstrong-Hough
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Adithya Cattamanchi
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Curry International Tuberculosis Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Achilles Katamba
- Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pearson N, Finch M, Sutherland R, Kingsland M, Wolfenden L, Wedesweiler T, Herrmann V, Yoong SL. An mHealth Intervention to Reduce the Packing of Discretionary Foods in Children's Lunch Boxes in Early Childhood Education and Care Services: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e27760. [PMID: 35297768 PMCID: PMC8972115 DOI: 10.2196/27760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Interventions in early childhood education and care (ECEC) services have the potential to improve children’s diet at the population level. Objective This study aims to test the efficacy of a mobile health intervention in ECEC services to reduce parent packing of foods high in saturated fat, sugar, and sodium (discretionary foods) in children’s (aged 3-6 years) lunch boxes. Methods A cluster randomized controlled trial was undertaken with 355 parent and child dyads recruited by phone and in person from 17 ECEC services (8 [47%] intervention and 9 [53%] control services). Parents in the intervention group received a 10-week fully automated program targeting barriers to packing healthy lunch boxes delivered via an existing service communication app. The program included weekly push notifications, within-app messages, and links to further resources, including websites and videos. The control group did not receive any intervention. The primary outcomes were kilojoules from discretionary foods and associated nutrients (saturated fat, free sugars, and sodium) packed in children’s lunch boxes. Secondary outcomes included consumption of kilojoules from discretionary foods and related nutrients and the packing and consumption of serves of discretionary foods and core food groups. Photography and weights of foods in children’s lunch boxes were recorded by trained researchers before and after the trial to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Outcome assessors were blinded to service allocation. Feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability were assessed via an ECEC service manager survey and a parent web-based survey. Use of the app was assessed via app analytics. Results Data on packed lunch box contents were collected for 88.8% (355/400) of consenting children at baseline and 84.3% (337/400) of children after the intervention. There was no significant difference between groups in kilojoule from discretionary foods packed (77.84 kJ, 95% CI −163.49 to 319.18; P=.53) or the other primary or secondary outcomes. The per-protocol analysis, including only data from children of parents who downloaded the app, also did not find any statistically significant change in primary (−1.98 kJ, 95% CI −343.87 to 339.90; P=.86) or secondary outcomes. Approximately 61.8% (102/165) of parents in the intervention group downloaded the app, and the mean service viewing rate of weekly within-app messages was 26% (SD 14.9). Parents who responded to the survey and participating services agreed that it was appropriate to receive lunch box information via the app (40/50, 80% and 6/8, 75%, respectively). Conclusions The intervention was unable to demonstrate an impact on kilojoules or associated nutrients from discretionary foods packed in children’s lunch boxes. Low app downloads and program message views indicate a need to explore how to improve factors related to implementation before further testing similar mobile health interventions in this setting. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000133235; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374379
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Pearson
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Meghan Finch
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | | | | | - Sze Lin Yoong
- Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Turrini A. Perspectives of Dietary Assessment in Human Health and Disease. Nutrients 2022; 14:830. [PMID: 35215478 PMCID: PMC8877528 DOI: 10.3390/nu14040830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Diet and human health have a complex set of relationships, so it is crucial to identify the cause-effects paths and their management. Diet is crucial for maintaining health (prevention) and unhealthy diets or diet components can cause disease in the long term (non-communicable disease) but also in the short term (foodborne diseases). The present paper aims to provide a synthesis of current research in the field of dietary assessment in health and disease as an introduction to the special issue on "Dietary Assessment and Human Health and Disease". Dietary assessment, continuously evolving in terms of methodology and tools, provides the core information basis for all the studies where it is necessary to disentangle the relationship between diet and human health and disease. Estimating dietary patterns allows for assessing dietary quality, adequacy, exposure, and environmental impact in nutritional surveillance so on the one hand, providing information for further clinical studies and on another hand, helping the policy to design tailored interventions considering individual and planetary health, considering that planetary health is crucial for individual health too, as the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has taught. Overall, dietary assessment should be a core component in One-Health-based initiatives to tackle public health nutrition issues.
Collapse
|
18
|
Barnes C, Sutherland R, Jones J, Brown A, Stacey F, Wolfenden L. Maximising the adoption of a school‐based m‐Health intervention to improve the nutritional quality of student lunchboxes to ensure population‐level impact. Health Promot J Austr 2022; 33 Suppl 1:412-414. [DOI: 10.1002/hpja.579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Barnes
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| | - Jannah Jones
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| | - Alison Brown
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| | - Fiona Stacey
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health Wallsend New South Wales Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton New South Wales Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour The University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cost and Cost Effectiveness of a Pilot m-Health Intervention Targeting Parents of School-Aged Children to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Foods Packed in the Lunchbox. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13114136. [PMID: 34836391 PMCID: PMC8618361 DOI: 10.3390/nu13114136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The SWAP IT program aims to improve the nutritional quality of school lunchboxes via a multicomponent m-health intervention, involving: weekly support messages to parents; physical resources; school nutrition guidelines and lunchbox lessons. SWAP IT has been reported to be effective. This study aims to determine the cost and cost effectiveness of the SWAP IT m-health intervention. The retrospective trial-based economic evaluation was conducted in 12 Catholic primary schools in New South Wales, Australia. Schools were randomised to intervention or usual care. The costs (AUD, 2019) were evaluated from societal perspectives. The direct cost to uptake the intervention and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. ICERS were calculated for two outcomes: reduction in total kJ and reduction in discretionary kJ from the lunchbox. The total cost was calculated to be AUD 55, 467. The mean incremental cost per student to receive the intervention was calculated to be AUD 31/student. The cost per reduction in total lunchbox energy was AUD 0.54. The ICER for the reduction in energy from discretionary foods in the lunchbox was AUD 0.24. These findings suggest that this m-health intervention has potential to be cost effective in reducing the kilojoules from discretionary foods packed in school lunchboxes.
Collapse
|