Comparison of contrast-enhanced sonography and MRI in displaying anatomic features of cystic pancreatic masses

Abdominal ultrasound in the characterization of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A new tool for surveillance of low-risk patients?

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as gold-standard for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) follow-up. Given the low risk of transformation and the increasing population under surveillance, there is growing interest in identifying optimal follow-up strategies.

AIM

To evaluate reliability of abdominal ultrasound (US) for characterization of low-risk IPMN, compared to MRI.

METHODS

Prospective monocentric study among 79 consecutive patients with a suspected BD-IPMN on US. Each patient underwent confirmatory MRI. We evaluated Cohen's kappa statistic and concordance rate (CR) between MRI and US.

RESULTS

Of 79 suspected IPMNs on US, MRI confirmed 71 BD-IPMNs. There was high agreement for cyst location and number (CR and kappa of 77.5 % and 81.7 % and 0.66±0.08 and 0.62±0.11 respectively). We found high agreement for cyst size (CR=96.5 %, kappa=0.93±0.05) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (CR=100 %, kappa=1). There was a good agreement for thickened septa (CR=80.3 %, kappa=0.38±0.12). US seems inferior to MRI for the identification of mural nodules < 5 mm (CR=97.2 %, kappa=0).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of low-risk BD-IPMN, US presented high agreement rate with MRI regarding location, number, and size. There was a good agreement for MPD dilatation and thickened septa, while US underperform for detection of mural nodules < 5 mm.

Protocol for a Multi-Center Confirmatory Trial to Evaluate the Differential Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Using Perflubutane in Patients with a Pancreatic Mass: A Multicenter Prospective Study

For pancreatic masses, an evaluation of their vascularity using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can help improve their characterization. This study was designed to evaluate the utility and safety of contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasonography (CE-TUS) and endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) in the diagnosis of pancreatic masses including solid or cystic masses. This multi-center comparative open-label superiority study is designed to compare Plain (P)-TUS/EUS alone with P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS. Three hundred and one patients with a total of 232 solid pancreatic masses and 69 cystic masses were prospectively enrolled. The primary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for both the TUS and EUS of solid pancreatic masses, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between P-EUS alone and P-EUS plus CE-EUS in cystic pancreatic masses. The secondary endpoints are to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of P-TUS/P-EUS alone and P-TUS/P-EUS plus CE-TUS/CE-EUS for pancreatic solid/cystic masses, and the accuracy of P-TUS alone and P-TUS plus CE-TUS for pancreatic cystic masses. Other secondary endpoints included comparing the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE-TUS, CE-EUS and CE-computed tomography (CT) for solid/cystic pancreatic masses. The safety, degree of effective enhancement, and diagnostic confidence obtained with CE-TUS/CE-EUS will also be assessed.

Radiomics Based on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Serous Cystadenoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a radiomics model by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) data for pre-operative differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs), especially pancreatic serous cystadenoma (SCA).

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed PCNs who underwent CEUS examination at Chinese PLA hospital from May 2015 to August 2022 were retrospectively collected. Radiomic features were extracted from the regions of interest, which were obtained based on CEUS images. A support vector machine algorithm was used to construct a radiomics model. Moreover, based on the CEUS image features, the CEUS and the combined models were constructed using logistic regression. The performance and clinical utility of the optimal model were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were randomly split into the training (n = 79) and test cohorts (n = 34). These patients were pathologically diagnosed with SCA, mucinous cystadenoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and solid-pseudopapillary tumor. The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.875 and 0.862 in the training and test cohorts, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the radiomics model were 81.5% and 86.5% in the training cohort and 81.8% and 91.3% in the test cohort, respectively, which were higher than or comparable with that of the CEUS model and the combined model.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model based on CEUS images had a favorable differential diagnostic performance in distinguishing SCA from other PCNs, which may be beneficial for the exploration of personalized management strategies.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of including contrast-enhanced ultrasound in management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms

PURPOSE

Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) management consists of non-invasive imaging studies (CT, MRI), with a high resource burden. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of including contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the management of PCN without risk features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By using a decision-tree model in a hypothetical cohort of patients, we compared management strategy including CEUS with the latest Fukuoka consensus, European and Italian guidelines. Our strategy for BD-IPMN/MCN < 1 cm includes 1 CEUS annually. For those between 1 and 2 cm, it includes CEUS 4 times/year during the first year, then 3 times/year for 4 years and then annually. For those between 2 and 3 cm, it comprises MRI twice/year during the first one, then alternating 2 CEUS and 1 MRI yearly.

RESULTS

CEUS surveillance is the dominant strategy in all scenarios. CEUS surveillance average cost is 1,984.72 €, mean QALY 11.79 and mean ICER 181.99 €. If willingness to pay is 30,000 €, 45% of patients undergone CEUS surveillance of BDIPMN/MCN < 1 cm would be within budget.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines strategies are very effective, but costs are relatively high from a policy perspective. CEUS surveillance may be a cost-effective strategy yielding a nearly high QALYs, an acceptable ICER, and a lower cost.

Focal Pancreatic Lesions: Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the characterization of a pancreatic mass. CEUS, by using a blood pool contrast agent, can provide dynamic information concerning macro- and micro-circulation of focal lesions and of normal parenchyma, without the use of ionizing radiation. On the basis of personal experience and literature data, the purpose of this article is to describe and discuss CEUS imaging findings of the main solid and cystic pancreatic lesions with varying prevalence.

SIUMB recommendations for focal pancreatic lesions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is increasingly being performed in Italy and Europe, particularly in the field of hepato-gastroenterology. Initially, it was mainly carried out to characterize focal hepatic lesions, but, since then, numerous studies have demonstrated its efficacy in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic pathologies (D’Onofrio et al. in Expert Rev Med Devices 7(2):257–273, 2010; Vidili et al. in J Ultrasound 22(1):41–51, 2019). The purpose of this paper is to provide Italian Medical Doctors with recommendations and thereby practical guidelines on the management of these patients. The present paper reports the final conclusions reached by the SIUMB guideline commission. This paper addresses particularly percutaneous ultrasound (US) examination (transabdominal US) and is drawn up specifically for publication.

Comparative Diagnostic Evaluation with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs).

Methods

A total of 90 patients (66 women, 24 men) aged 18–71 years were studied prospectively. CEUS was performed in all patients, whereas MRI was performed in 85 patients and CT in 69 patients. We analyzed the sensitivity and accuracy of these three imaging modalities to diagnose the PCNs. Neoplasm size, location, shape, intralesional mural nodules, septa and duct dilatation were also assessed by different radiologists.

Results

There were no significant differences in sensitivity for discriminating PCNs from pancreatic cystic lesions between CEUS and MRI (p=0.614) or between CEUS and CT (p=0.479). The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for classifying PCNs was 64.4% (58/90), which was higher than that of CT (53.6%, 37/69, P=0.017), and lower than that of MRI (70.6%, 60/85, p=0.791). Regarding tumor size for lesions larger than 3 cm, CEUS was superior to CT in differentiating the specific type of PCN (p=0.041), and CEUS had the same value as MRI (p=0.774). Furthermore, CEUS is valuable for precisely characterizing internal structures, for instance, septa (p=0.003, compared with CT; p=0.443, compared with MRI) and nodules (p= 0.018, compared with CT; p=0.033, compared with MRI). The number of septa (p=0.033) and cyst morphology (p=0.016) were meaningful indicators in differentiating serous and mucinous adenoma. There was no significant difference in evaluating size and detecting duct dilatation among the three imaging methods.

Conclusion

CEUS compares favorably with MRI in displaying the inner structure of PCNs and offers advantages over CT. CEUS can contribute in an important way to the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Classification in Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Objective

To compare the consistency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) classification results with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to investigate the diagnostic value of CEUS classification in pancreatic cystic lesions.

Methods

84 cases of pancreatic cystic lesions were enrolled in this study. According to the CEUS classification methods of previous study in our center, all the lesions were classified into four types: type I, unilocular cysts; type II, microcystic lesions; type III, macrocystic lesions; and type IV, cystic lesions with enhanced solid components. The consistency of CEUS and MRI typing results was analysed. Among the 84 cases, 45 cases had pathological results. The CEUS results were compared with the pathological results, and the diagnostic value of CEUS classification in diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions was explored.

Results

Among the 84 cases, CEUS diagnosed 8 cases of type I, 24 of type II, 8 of type III, and 45 of type IV. MRI diagnosed 10 cases of type I, 25 of type II, 7 of type III, and 43 of type IV. The classification typing results of CEUS were highly consistent with that of enhanced MRI (kappa value: 0.852). Among the 45 cases with pathological results, the diagnostic accuracy of each type was 91.1%, 95.6%, 93.3%, and 88.9%. The accuracy of CEUS and MRI in diagnosing pancreatic cystic lesions was 75.56% (34/45) and 80% (36/45), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CEUS had no significant difference from that of MRI (P=0.687).

Conclusion

The classification results by CEUS and MRI are in excellent agreement. The classification of pancreatic cystic lesions by CEUS is significantly helpful for clinical diagnosis.

Clinical use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound beyond the liver: a focus on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a relatively novel, but increasingly used, diagnostic imaging modality. In recent years, due to its safety, quickness, and repeatability, several studies have demonstrated the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of CEUS. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology has recently updated the previous guidelines from 2012 for the use of CEUS in non-hepatic applications. This review deals with the clinical use and applications of CEUS for the evaluation of non-hepatic abdominal organs, focusing on renal, splenic, and pancreatic applications.

Role of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are incidental findings that are being increasingly identified because of recent advancements in abdominal imaging technologies. PCLs include different entities, with each of them having a peculiar biological behavior, and they range from benign to premalignant or malignant neoplasms. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is important to determine the best treatment strategy. As transabdominal ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive, inexpensive, and widely available, it is considered to be the most appropriate imaging modality for the initial evaluation of abdominal diseases, including PCLs, and for follow-up assessment. We present a review of the possibilities and limits of US in the diagnosis of PCLs, the technical development of US, and the ultrasonographic characteristics of PCLs.

Pancreatic Ultrasound: State of the Art

An ultrasound (US) study is often the first imaging approach in patients with abdominal symptoms or signs related to abdominal diseases, and it is often part of the routine workup. The pancreatic gland, despite its retroperitoneal site, can be efficiently examined with US thanks to advances in US technologies. Nowadays, a pancreatic US study could be considered complete if multiparametric, including the use of Doppler imaging, US elastography, and contrast-enhanced imaging for the study of a pancreatic mass. A complete US examination could contribute to a faster diagnosis, especially if the pancreatic lesion is incidentally detected, addressing second-step imaging modalities correctly.

Non-enhanced Pattern on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Local Efficacy Assessment of Irreversible Electroporation Ablation of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of the local efficacy after irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma 1 mo after ablation. Fifteen patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with IRE and then examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound 1 mo after ablation. The contrast agent was SonoVue. Technical efficacy was assessed at 3 mo after IRE and classified as technical efficiency (TE) and technical inefficiency (TIE). Diagnostic performance was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Ten patients were considered as having TE, and five, TIE. Complete non-enhancement was observed in seven ablation zones (70.0%) in the TE group, and peripheral heterogeneous enhancement, in all five ablation zones (100.0%) in the TIE group. The non-enhancement pattern differed significantly between the TE and TIE groups (p = 0.026), with significant correlation with technical efficacy (p = 0.007). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (p = 0.008, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.05). A non-enhancement pattern using contrast-enhanced ultrasound was useful in the assessment of local efficacy after IRE ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for pancreatic neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is essential to optimize treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Retrospective or prospective studies.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

INTERVENTION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic risk ratio, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals; summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve; a Fagan nomogram.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 641 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 91% (95% CI: 87%, 93%), 87% (95% CI: 78%, 93%), 7.2 (95% CI: 4.3, 12.3), and 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.15), respectively; and the odds ratio for diagnosis was 67 (95% CI: 34, 113). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound had good diagnostic ability and accuracy. Pre- and post-test probability of disease was 50% and 88%, respectively, when the positive likelihood ratio was 7.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be used for qualitative diagnosis of benign and malignant pancreatic neoplasms.

IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

CEUS should be considered as an important imaging tool for the characterization of pancreatic tumors.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017070434 (PROSPERO).

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of incidental pancreatic lesions are being detected each year. Accurate characterisation of pancreatic lesions into benign, precancerous, and cancer masses is crucial in deciding whether to use treatment or surveillance. Distinguishing benign lesions from precancerous and cancerous lesions can prevent patients from undergoing unnecessary major surgery. Despite the importance of accurately classifying pancreatic lesions, there is no clear algorithm for management of focal pancreatic lesions.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of various imaging modalities in detecting cancerous and precancerous lesions in people with focal pancreatic lesions.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Science Citation Index until 19 July 2016. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies. We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include studies reporting cross-sectional information on the index test (CT (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PET (positron emission tomography), EUS (endoscopic ultrasound), EUS elastography, and EUS-guided biopsy or FNA (fine-needle aspiration)) and reference standard (confirmation of the nature of the lesion was obtained by histopathological examination of the entire lesion by surgical excision, or histopathological examination for confirmation of precancer or cancer by biopsy and clinical follow-up of at least six months in people with negative index tests) in people with pancreatic lesions irrespective of language or publication status or whether the data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently searched the references to identify relevant studies and extracted the data. We planned to use the bivariate analysis to calculate the summary sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) to compare the tests and assess heterogeneity, but used simpler models (such as univariate random-effects model and univariate fixed-effect model) for combining studies when appropriate because of the sparse data. We were unable to compare the diagnostic performance of the tests using formal statistical methods because of sparse data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 54 studies involving a total of 3,196 participants evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of various index tests. In these 54 studies, eight different target conditions were identified with different final diagnoses constituting benign, precancerous, and cancerous lesions. None of the studies was of high methodological quality. None of the comparisons in which single studies were included was of sufficiently high methodological quality to warrant highlighting of the results. For differentiation of cancerous lesions from benign or precancerous lesions, we identified only one study per index test. The second analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous versus benign lesions, provided three tests in which meta-analysis could be performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer were: EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 1.00), specificity 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.95 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.99), specificity 0.53 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.74); PET: sensitivity 0.92 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97), specificity 0.65 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.84). The third analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous lesions from benign lesions, only provided one test (EUS-FNA) in which meta-analysis was performed. EUS-FNA had moderate sensitivity for diagnosing precancerous or cancerous lesions (sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.00) and high specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.00), the extremely wide confidence intervals reflecting the heterogeneity between the studies). The fourth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (dysplasia) provided three tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing invasive carcinoma were: CT: sensitivity 0.72 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.87), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97); EUS: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.94), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.98); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.66 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.99), specificity 0.92 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.98). The fifth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) versus precancerous (low- or intermediate-grade dysplasia) provided six tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivities and specificities for diagnosing cancer (high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) were: CT: sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00), specificity 0.96 (95% CI 0.00 to 1.00); EUS: sensitivity 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96); EUS-FNA: sensitivity 0.47 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70), specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.32 to 1.00); EUS-FNA carcinoembryonic antigen 200 ng/mL: sensitivity 0.58 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.83), specificity 0.51 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81); MRI: sensitivity 0.69 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.86), specificity 0.93 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.00); PET: sensitivity 0.90 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.96), specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.99). The sixth analysis, of studies differentiating cancerous (invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided no tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The seventh analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) provided two tests in which meta-analysis was performed. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cancer were: CT: sensitivity 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.92), specificity 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93) and MRI: sensitivity 0.80 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.92), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.95), respectively. The eighth analysis, of studies differentiating precancerous or cancerous (intermediate- or high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma) from precancerous (low-grade dysplasia) or benign lesions provided no test in which meta-analysis was performed.There were no major alterations in the subgroup analysis of cystic pancreatic focal lesions (42 studies; 2086 participants). None of the included studies evaluated EUS elastography or sequential testing.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to arrive at any firm conclusions because of the differences in the way that study authors classified focal pancreatic lesions into cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions; the inclusion of few studies with wide confidence intervals for each comparison; poor methodological quality in the studies; and heterogeneity in the estimates within comparisons.

Discrimination of serous cystadenoma from mucinous cystadenoma in the pancreas with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: a prospective study in 61 patients

Objectives

The preoperative diagnosis between serous cystadenomas (SCAs) and mucinous cystadenomas (MCAs) in pancreas is significant due to their completely different biological behaviors. The purpose of our study was to examine and compare detailed contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) images of SCAs and MCAs and to determine whether there are significant findings that can contribute to the discrimination between these two diseases.

Methods

From April 2015 to June 2016, 61 patients (35 patients with SCAs and 26 patients with MCAs) were enrolled in this study. Forty-three cases were confirmed by surgical pathology and 18 by comprehensive clinical diagnoses. All of the CEUS characteristics of these lesions were recorded: size, location, echogenicity, shape, wall characteristics, septa characteristics, and the presence of a honeycomb pattern or nodules. CEUS examinations were performed by two ultrasound physicians.

Results

Location (P=0.003), shape (P=0.000), thickness of the wall (P=0.005), the number of septa (P=0.001), and the honeycomb pattern (P=0.001) were statistically significantly different. A head–neck location, a lobulated shape, an inner regular honeycomb pattern, and a thin wall (<3 mm thick) were significant in diagnosing patients with SCAs. When two of these four findings were combined, we could achieve a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 80.8% to diagnose SCA; when three of these four findings were combined, the specificity was 100%. A body–tail location, a round/oval shape, 0–2 septa, and a thick wall (≥3 mm thick) were most often detected in patients with MCAs. When two of these four findings were combined, we could achieve a sensitivity of 88.5% and a specificity of 65.7% to diagnose MCA; when three of these four findings were combined, the area under the curve (Az) was highest at 0.832, with a sensitivity of 80.8% and a specificity of 85.7%.

Conclusions

The characteristics of tumor location, shape, thickness of the wall, the number of septa, and the honeycomb pattern by CEUS play an important role in the diagnosis of SCAs and MCAs. A combination of these findings can provide better diagnostic performance in the discrimination of SCAs from MCAs.

Imaging in pancreatic disease

Pancreatic diseases, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and diabetes mellitus, taken together, occur in >10% of the world population. Pancreatic diseases, as with other diseases, benefit from early intervention and appropriate diagnosis. Although imaging technologies have given clinicians an unprecedented toolbox to aid in clinical decision-making, advances in these technologies and development of molecular-based diagnostic tools could enable physicians to identify diseases at an even earlier stage and, thereby, improve patient outcomes. In this Review, we discuss and identify gaps in the use of imaging techniques for the early detection and appropriate treatment stratification of various pancreatic diseases, including diabetes mellitus, acute and chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Imaging techniques discussed are MRI, CT, PET and ultrasonography. Additionally, the identification of new molecular targets for imaging and the development of contrast agents that are able to give molecular information in noninvasive radionuclear imaging and ultrasonography are emerging areas of innovation that could lead to increased diagnostic accuracy and improved patient outcomes.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of pancreatic tumours

Indication/purpose: To review contrast‐enhanced ultrasound features of the most common pancreatic tumours.

Methods: Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can provide distinctive features of pancreatic tumours that are reported in the present paper, providing radiologic‐pathological correlations and clarifying the main differential diagnosis.

Conclusion: Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound plays a well‐established role in the evaluation of pancreatic tumours. When possible, CEUS should be always performed after the initial US diagnosis, in order to improve the accuracy of the first line examination.

CEUS of the pancreas: Still research or the standard of care

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) improves the characterization of pancreatic masses. CEUS is in fact a safe and accurate imaging method to evaluate the vascularity of pancreatic lesions. CEUS should be performed when possible immediately after the ultrasound (US) detection of a pancreatic mass. CEUS is accurate in the characterization of ductal adenocarcinoma. The use of CEUS in studying pancreatic lesions found at US, especially in the same session of ultrasound examination, is therefore recommendable to promote faster diagnosis mainly of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Management of Incidental Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are common. They are increasingly detected as an incidental finding of transabdominal ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging. In contrast to other parenchymal organs, dysontogenetic pancreatic cysts are extremely rare. In symptomatic patients the most frequent PCL are acute and chronic pseudocysts. The majority of incidental cystic lesions, however, are neoplasias which have different risks of malignancy.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for studies, reviews, meta-analyses, and guidelines using the following key words: ('pancreatic cystic lesions' OR 'cystic pancreatic lesions' OR 'intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia' OR 'mucinous cystic neoplasia' OR 'pancreatic cyst' OR 'pancreatic pseudocyst') AND (management OR treatment OR outcome OR prognosis OR diagnosis OR imaging OR 'endoscopic ultrasound' EUS-FNA OR EUS OR 'endoscopic ultrasonography' OR CT OR MRI). Retrieved papers were reviewed with regard to the diagnostic and therapeutic management of incidental PCL.

RESULTS

In addition to clinical criteria, transabdominal ultrasonography including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, cross-sectional radiological imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are used for diagnostic characterization and risk assessment. EUS plays an outstanding role in differential diagnosis and prognostic characterization of incidental PCL. In a single examination it is possible to perform high-resolution morphological description, perfusion imaging, as well as fine-needle aspiration of cyst content, cyst wall, and solid components. An international consensus guideline has defined worrisome and high-risk criteria for the risk assessment of mucinous pancreatic cysts, which are mainly based on the results of EUS and cross-sectional imaging. Nevertheless, despite diagnostic progress and guideline recommendations, differential diagnosis and management decisions remain difficult. This review will discuss problems in and approaches to the diagnosis of incidental PCL.

CONCLUSION

An evidence-based algorithm for the diagnosis of incidental PCL is proposed.

Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: Findings from routine screening sonographic examination and the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are rare neoplasms of the pancreas. We describe the features of these small tumors identified on routine screening sonographic (US) examination and the potential value of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) scanning.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records from 17 patients who had undergone screening via US examination at Peking University Third Hospital between January 2000 and June 2011. Each of these patients had been confirmed by a pathologist to have an SPT. Six patients had undergone CEUS prior to surgery. We recorded all features on both gray-scale US and CEUS.

RESULTS

All patients (4 men and 13 women; ages 23-35 years; mean age, 27.2 years) were initially screened by US. The largest mass identified was 5.0 cm in diameter (mean diameter, 4.2 cm), and most tumors showed homogeneous hypoechogenicity. A hyperechoic rim was detected in four masses. CEUS showed peripheral-rim hyperenhancement in the arterial phase of all six masses.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine screening US examinations are capable of identifying small (<5.0 cm) SPTs. These screening examinations allow diagnosis on the basis of typical imaging features, such as a homogeneously hypoechoic mass with a hyperechoic rim. CEUS shows greater detail of the rim and cystic areas in the tumor, which significantly improves the proper diagnosis.

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Cystic Pancreatic Lesions Using a Simplified Classification Diagnostic Criterion

Objective. Classification diagnosis was performed for cystic pancreatic lesions using ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to explore the diagnostic value of CEUS by comparison with enhanced CT. Methods. Sixty-four cases with cystic pancreatic lesions were included in this study. The cystic lesions of pancreas were classified into four types by US, CEUS, and CT: type I unilocular cysts; type II microcystic lesions; type III macrocystic lesions; and type IV cystic lesions with solid components or irregular thickening of the cystic wall or septa. Results. Eighteen type I, 7 type II, 10 type III, and 29 type IV cases were diagnosed by CT. The classification results by US were as follows: 6 type I; 5 type II; 4 type III; and 49 type IV cases. Compared with the results by enhanced CT, the kappa value was 0.36. Using CEUS, 15, 6, 12, and 31 cases were diagnosed as types I–IV, respectively. The kappa value was 0.77. Conclusion. CEUS has obvious superiority over US in the classification diagnostic accuracy in cystic pancreatic lesions and CEUS results showed substantial agreement with enhanced CT. CEUS could contribute to the differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic diseases.

Recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic ultrasound imaging

Ultrasound (US) imaging is an exquisite tool for the non-invasive and real-time diagnosis of many different diseases. In this context, US contrast agents can improve lesion delineation, characterization and therapy response evaluation. US contrast agents are usually micrometer-sized gas bubbles, stabilized with soft or hard shells. By conjugating antibodies to the microbubble (MB) surface, and by incorporating diagnostic agents, drugs or nucleic acids into or onto the MB shell, molecular, multimodal and theranostic MBs can be generated. We here summarize recent advances in molecular, multimodal and theranostic US imaging, and introduce concepts how such advanced MB can be generated, applied and imaged. Examples are given for their use to image and treat oncological, cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Furthermore, we discuss for which therapeutic entities incorporation into (or conjugation to) MB is meaningful, and how US-mediated MB destruction can increase their extravasation, penetration, internalization and efficacy.

Italian consensus guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms

This report contains clinically oriented guidelines for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms in patients fit for treatment. The statements were elaborated by working groups of experts by searching and analysing the literature, and then underwent a consensus process using a modified Delphi procedure. The statements report recommendations regarding the most appropriate use and timing of various imaging techniques and of endoscopic ultrasound, the role of circulating and intracystic markers and the pathologic evaluation for the diagnosis and follow-up of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.

Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (3D-CEUS) with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with IPMN were studied.

RESULTS

Three patients (10.0%) did not undergo diagnostic 3D-CEUS because of technical problems. Three dimensional CEUS identified 12 (44.4%) main-duct IPMNs versus no cases by MRI (P < 0.001). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm localization showed poor agreement between 3D-CEUS and MRI (κ = 0.058), whereas good agreement was found in detecting the pancreatic calcifications (κ = 1.000). Significant differences between 3D-CEUS and MRI were found regarding the number of lesions detected (1.4 ± 0.8 vs 3.8 ± 3.6; P < 0.001), the detection of mucinous plugs (3.7% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), chronic pancreatitis (7.4% vs 26.7%; P = 0.031), pancreatic atrophy (0% vs 50.0%; P < 0.001), thick septa (22.2% vs 53.3%; P = 0.004), and mural nodules (25.9% vs 3.3%; P = 0.016). Three dimensional CEUS showed similar results as compared with MRI in evaluating IPMNs smaller than 1 cm of diameter or greater than 2 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if MRI remains the criterion standard technique for the diagnosis of IPMNs, 3D-CEUS can be safely used to follow patients with IPMNs of less than 1 cm.

Clinical controversies in endoscopic ultrasound

The field of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is growing rapidly. Although EUS has enhanced our ability to diagnose and treat a wide variety of GI conditions, there are many controversial issues regarding the appropriate application of EUS techniques. In this review we discuss five controversial topics in EUS: the utility of EUS in staging of esophageal and gastric cancer; selection of appropriate needle gauge for fine needle aspiration (FNA); use of the stylet in FNA; and the emerging role of contrast agents in endoscopic ultrasound.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound

The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) introduced guidelines on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in 2004. This EFSUMB-document focused mainly on liver applications. However, new applications extending beyond the liver were developed thereafter. Increased interest in recent years in CEUS technique and in the application of CEUS in novel fields like endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has revolutionized indications and applications. As a result, the EFSUMB initiated a new update of the guidelines in 2011 to include this additional knowledge. Some of the contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) indications are established, whereas others are preliminary; these latter indications are categorized as emergent CEUS applications since the available evidence is insufficient for general recommendation. This article focuses on the use of CE-EUS in various clinical settings. The reader will get an overview of current indications and possible applications of CE-EUS. This involves the introduction of different contrast studies including color Doppler techniques (known as contrast-enhanced high mechanical index endosonography or CEHMI-EUS) as well as more modern high-resolution contrast-enhanced techniques (known as contrast-enhanced low mechanical index endosonography or CELMI EUS).

Pancreatic resections for cystic neoplasms: from the surgeon's presumption to the pathologist's reality

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms are based on the assumption that these lesions can be classified correctly on the basis of features of cross-sectional imaging. However, a certain degree of overlap between different lesions exists, and little is known about the rate of inaccurate preoperative diagnoses. To address this issue, preoperative and final pathologic diagnoses of patients resected for a presumed pancreatic cystic neoplasm were compared.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients managed operatively between 2000 and 2010. Preoperative workup was reviewed to identify diagnostic pitfalls and potential risk factors for incorrect preoperative characterization of cystic lesions presumed to be neoplastic.

RESULTS

We analyzed 476 patients. Final pathologic diagnosis matched the preoperative diagnosis in 78% of cases. The highest accuracy was reached for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (95%) and for main duct/mixed duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (81%). Surprisingly, 23 cysts (5%) were found to be ductal adenocarcinoma, whereas 45 patients (9%) underwent a pancreatic resection for a non-neoplastic condition. The use of a routine radiologic workup, including contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, was associated with a favorably correct characterization of the cystic lesion. Endoscopic ultrasonography did not seem to improve diagnostic accuracy. Increased levels of serum carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 resulted as risk factors for an incorrect diagnosis as well as for a final diagnosis of a ductal adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of inaccurate preoperative diagnoses in a tertiary care center with a broad experience in pancreatology approached 22%. Serum CA19-9 is an important complementary tool within the context of preoperative investigation of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Incidentally discovered benign pancreatic cystic neoplasms not communicating with the ductal system: MR/MRCP imaging appearance and evolution

PURPOSE

The authors sought to determine magnetic resonance/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MR/MRCP) imaging features of incidentally discovered benign, noncommunicating cystic neoplasms (BNCNs) of the pancreas to assess their evolution over time and identify MR/MRCP imaging features predictive of tumour growth.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study, so informed consent was waived. Sixty-two patients with a diagnosis of BNCN were assessed. Inclusion criteria were incidentally discovered cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with nonmeasurable walls, no mural nodules and no communication with the pancreatic ductal system and who underwent ≥ 1 MR/MRCP examination. Image analysis, performed at diagnosis and during follow-up, included macroscopic pattern (microcystic/macrocystic/mixed), number of cysts (unicystic/oligocystic/multicystic), BNCN maximum diameter and tumour growth rates.

RESULTS

A total of 64 BNCNs was detected. Macroscopic pattern was mixed in 31/64 (48%), microcystic in 28/64 (44%) and macrocystic in 5/64 (8%). BNCNs appeared multicystic in 38/64 (59%) cases, oligocystic in 22/64 (35%) and unicystic in 4/64(6%). All qualitative parameters remained unchanged during follow-up. At diagnosis, the median maximum BNCN diameter was 35.0 mm and 38.0 mm at the final examination (p<0.001). BNCNs showed a tumour growth rate of 2 mm/year.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed and microcystic patterns were the most common, accounting for 48% and 44% of cases, respectively, and showed no change over time. MR/MRCP features predictive of lesion enlargement were a mixed/ macrocystic pattern, and lesion size was >3 cm (both p<0.001).

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abdominal imaging

The administration of a contrast agent is considered an essential tool to evaluate abdominal diseases using Ultrasound. The most targeted organ is the liver, especially to characterize focal liver lesions and to assess the response to percutaneous treatment. However, the expanding abdominal indications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound make this technique an important tool in the assessment of organ perfusion including the evaluation of ischemic, traumatic, and inflammatory diseases.

Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: contrast-enhanced sonographic features

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine the features of solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas on contrast-enhanced sonography and correlate them with pathologic findings.

METHODS

Five patients with solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas underwent conventional sonographic, color Doppler flow imaging, and contrast-enhanced sonographic examinations. Time-intensity curves were used to calculate the contrast enhancement times, wash-out times, and enhancement patterns of the lesions. Three of the 5 patients also underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography. All cases were confirmed by surgery and pathologic examination.

RESULTS

The study included 3 women and 2 men. Tumor diameters ranged from 4.4 to 13.0 cm. Sonography revealed round well-defined encapsulated tumors. Two appeared as mixed cystic-solid and 3 as solid masses on conventional sonography. One mass had a macrocalcification. Some areas of blood flow were seen in 3 of the masses on color Doppler flow imaging. On contrast-enhanced sonography, the peripheral rims of the tumors showed isoenhancement during the early arterial phase, and the interiors of the masses showed heterogeneous enhancement consisting of regions of isoenhancement, hypoenhancement, and nonenhancement. Progressive wash-out of the contrast agent during venous phases revealed hypoenhancement compared with normal adjacent pancreatic parenchyma. Pathologic findings showed that each tumor was completely encapsulated and had varying degrees of internal hemorrhage and necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas have characteristic findings on contrast-enhanced sonography, including peripheral rim isoenhancement and internal heterogeneous enhancement with nonenhanced portions; these features may help differentiate solid pseudopapillary tumors from other pancreatic neoplasms.

Differentiation of pancreatic cysts with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging: an ex vivo pilot study

We demonstrate for the first time that optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging can reliably distinguish between morphologic features of low risk pancreatic cysts (i.e., pseudocysts and serous cystadenomas) and high risk pancreatic cysts (i.e., mucinous cystic neoplasms and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms). In our study fresh pancreatectomy specimens (66) from patients with cystic lesions undergoing surgery were acquired and examined with OCT. A training set of 20 pathology-OCT correlated tissue specimens were used to develop criteria for differentiating between low and high risk cystic lesions. A separate (validation) set of 46 specimens were used to test the OCT criteria by three clinicians, blinded to histopathology findings. Histology was finally used as a 'gold' standard for testing OCT findings. OCT was able to reveal specific morphologic features of pancreatic cysts and thus to differentiate between low-risk and high-risk cysts with over 95% sensitivity and specificity. This pilot study suggests that OCT could be used by clinicians in the future to more reliably differentiate between benign and potentially malignant pancreatic cysts. However, in vivo use of OCT requires a probe that has to fit the bore of the pancreas biopsy needle. Therefore, we have developed such probes and planned to start an in vivo pilot study within the very near future.

The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively determine the accuracy of baseline ultrasound (BUS) and of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions.

METHODS

Fifty-four pancreatic solid-cystic lesions in 52 patients were examined with BUS and CEUS, two different seniority radiologists read the images independently, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of BUS and CEUS in the diagnosis of benign or malignant pancreatic solid-cystic lesions, the diagnostic consistency between different seniority radiologists was evaluated by Kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Among the 54 lesions, there were pancreatic cyst five cases, pancreatic pseudocyst twenty cases, pancreatic cystadenoma eight cases, pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma seven cases, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas (IPMN) three cases, pancreatic carcinoma combined liquefied six cases, solid-pseudopallary tumor of pancreas (SPTP) three cases, pancreatic myopericytoma one case, pancreatic lymphangioma one case. After ROC analysis, the areas under the ROC curve (Az) were 0.752 by BUS, 0.928 by CEUS to resident radiologist, and 0.896 by BUS, 0.954 by CEUS to staff radiologist. The correct diagnosis rate of specific disease was 42.6% by BUS, 64.8% by CEUS to staff radiologist (P<0.05), and 33.3% by BUS, 53.7% by CEUS to resident radiologist (P<0.05). The interobserver agreement in CEUS is higher than that in BUS, the Kappa value was 0.889 ± 0.062 and 0.428 ± 0.126 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with BUS, CEUS can significantly enhance the diagnostic rate of pancreatic solid-cystic lesions.

Transabdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of pancreatic cancer

Since its introduction, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has significantly extended the value of ultrasonography (US). CEUS can be used to more accurately determine pancreatic lesions compared to conventional US or to characterize lesions already detectable by US. Thus, CEUS can aid in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. Using US contrast media, it is possible to visually detect microvessels in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Thus, the use of quantitatively evaluated transabdominal CEUS can help in the differentiation of patients with mass-forming pancreatitis from patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas. In neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors, different enhancement patterns can be observed in relation to the tumor mass: larger ones show a rapid early enhancement sometimes combined with necrotic central structures, and smaller ones disclose a capillary-blush enhancement. Pseudocysts, the most widespread cystic lesions of the pancreas, are not vascularized. They do not show any signal in CEUS and remain entirely anechoic in all phases, while true cystic pancreatic tumors usually have vascularized septa and parietal nodules. In summary, CEUS is effective for differentiating solid pancreatic tumors in most cases. CEUS is safe and cost effective and can better discriminate solid from cystic pancreatic lesions, thereby directing further imaging modalities.

Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS)

AIM

To describe the typical CEUS pattern of pancreatic lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in their characterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All US and CEUS examinations of focal pancreatic masses performed in six centers during a period of five years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: focal pancreatic mass pathologically proved, visible at ultrasound (US) and studied with CEUS. All lesions were then evaluated for size, aspect and enhancement pattern. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values with 95% CIs were calculated to define diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in respect to pathology. Diagnostic confidence of US and CEUS, discerning between benign and malignant lesions, were represented by using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves. Agreement was evaluated by means of k statistics.

RESULTS

1439 pancreatic lesions were included. At CEUS the lesions were divided into solid (89%) and cystic (12%) masses and classified into six and eight categories, respectively. Among the solid lesions, adenocarcinomas were characterized with an accuracy of 87.8%. Among the cystic lesions, cystic tumors were diagnosed with an accuracy of 97.1%. ROC curve area increased from 0.637 for US to 0.877 for CEUS (p<0.0001). Inter-observer agreement was slightly higher for solid (k=0.78) than cystic (k=0.62) lesions. In none of the centers side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is accurate in the characterization of pancreatic lesions. CEUS should be considered as a complementary imaging method for pancreatic lesions characterization.

Assessment of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study was to evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinoma and explore the enhancement patterns of the tumors.

METHODS

Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic examinations of 31 patients who underwent resection of insulinomas were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis sensitivity and localization specificity of CEUS for insulinomas were determined. Results of unenhanced ultrasonography and CEUS were compared by Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Unenhanced ultrasonography could display 9 of 37 (24.3%) surgically verified insulinomas in 31 patients, while the diagnosis sensitivity and localization specificity of preoperative CEUS was 33 (89.2%) and 32 (86.5%) of the 37 tumors, respectively. In contrast to the unenhanced ultrasonography, the improvement of CEUS in the diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinomas was significant (p<0.0001). The enhancement pattern of insulinoma on CEUS was fast wash-in and slow wash-out. All the tumors were homogeneous hypervascularity in the earlier arterial phase, while the tumors still displayed hyperenhancing pattern in the late phase.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the great potential of CEUS in the diagnosis and preoperative localization of insulinomas. Since CEUS is a convenient, inexpensive, effective and non-invasive modality, the study supports the use of CEUS as a primary tool in the evaluation of patients with insulinomas.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the pancreas

The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to major improvements in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound (US). The innovative use of CEUS for study of the pancreas has created the need for a definition of the most frequent dynamic features of solid and cystic masses. CEUS is less expensive compared to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and is able to significantly improve the accuracy of US, allowing better characterization and staging of pancreatic pathologies.

Resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is the enhancement pattern at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography a pre-operative prognostic factor?

The aim of our study was to determine whether the enhancement pattern of pancreatic adenocarcinoma at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is related to patient prognosis after resection. CEUS of 42 resected adenocarcinomas were retrospectively reviewed. Tumors were divided into two groups: group A=poorly vascularized (presence of avascular areas) or group B=well vascularized (absence of avascular areas). All lesions were resected and underwent pathological examination assessing tumor differentiation as: undifferentiated (poorly differentiated) or differentiated (moderately and well differentiated). Mean vascular density (MVD) was also evaluated. CEUS enhancement and pathology were correlated (Spearman's test). Survival was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox regression model. There were 30 differentiated and 12 undifferentiated adenocarcinomas at pathology. At CEUS, 10 lesions were poorly vascularized, whereas 32 lesions were well vascularized. Positive correlation was observed between CEUS groups and tumoral differentiation (rs=0.51; p=0.001) and between CEUS and MVD (rs=0.74; p<0.0001). Median survival in patients with group A vascularization at CEUS was significantly lower than in group B (p=0.015). Cox proportional hazard model revealed the presence of poorly vascularized tumor at CEUS (p=0.0001) as a predictor of higher mortality. In conclusion, CEUS enables accurate depiction of the vascularization of adenocarcinoma, with positive correlation to histology grade and MVD.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas

Ultrasound is often the first examination performed in patients with suspicion of pancreatic disease. The introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) has led to great developments in the diagnostic capabilities of ultrasound. Dynamic observation of an enhancement allows a highly sensitive evaluation of any perfusion of the abdominal organs. Study of the pancreas is a new and promising application of CEUS, and can be used to characterize pancreatic lesions visible with conventional ultrasonography (US). This article reviews the clinical and surgical applications of CEUS in different pancreatic diseases and in their management.

Contrast-enhanced sonography of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of malignancy and prognostic assessment continue to be problems in the management of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Histologic examination is the reference standard. The aim of our study was to compare B-mode and contrast-enhanced sonographic findings regarding nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Signs of malignancy, such as Ki67 index and presence of hepatic metastasis, were considered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 38 consecutively registered patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors evaluated with B-mode and contrast-enhanced sonography and resected. At contrast-enhanced sonography all lesions were divided into hypovascular lesions and isovascular or hypervascular lesions. On the basis of homogeneity of enhancement, lesions were classified as homogeneous and inhomogeneous. During the late phase of contrast enhancement, all solid focal hypoechoic liver lesions detected at contrast-enhanced sonography were considered hepatic metastatic lesions. Among pathologic data, grading, mitotic index, and Ki67 index were evaluated. Spearman's test was used to compare contrast-enhanced sonographic enhancement pattern with pathologic grade.

RESULTS

In the arterial phase, 24 of 38 nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors (63.1%) were hypervascular, seven (18.4%) were isovascular, and seven (18.4%) were hypovascular. Positive correlation was found between contrast-enhanced sonographic findings and Ki67 index (r(s) = 0.62; p < 0.0001). The difference between contrast-enhanced and B-mode sonography in the diagnosis of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Use of contrast-enhanced sonography increased diagnostic confidence in the detection of hepatic metastasis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.916 for B-mode sonography and 1.000 for contrast-enhanced sonography (p < 0.05). There was moderate positive correlation between contrast-enhanced sonographic enhancement pattern and the presence of hepatic metastasis at diagnosis (r(s) = 0.46; p = 0.004) and between Ki67 index and the presence of hepatic metastasis (r(s) = 0.48; p = 0.0022).

CONCLUSION

The contrast-enhanced sonographic enhancement pattern of nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors has a positive correlation with Ki67 index, which is considered the most reliable independent predictor of the presence of malignancy.