Prognostication for C3 Glomerulopathy and Idiopathic Immunoglobulin-Associated Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis

Updates on C3 Glomerulopathy in Kidney Transplantation: Pathogenesis and Treatment Options

C3 glomerulopathy is a rare disease, characterized by an abnormal activation of the complement's alternative pathway that leads to the accumulation of the C3 component in the kidney. The disease recurs in more than half of kidney transplant recipients, with a significant impact on graft survival. Recurrence of the primary disease represents the second cause of graft loss after organ rejection. In C3 glomerulopathy, there are several risk factors which can promote a recurrence during transplantation, such as delayed graft function, infection and monoclonal gammopathy. All these events can trigger the alternative complement pathway. In this review, we summarize the impact of C3 glomerulopathy on kidney grafts and present the latest treatment options. The most widely used treatments for the disease include corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil, which are already used chronically by kidney transplant recipients; thus, additional treatments for C3 glomerulopathy are required. Currently, several studies using anti-complement drugs (i.e., eculizumab, Ravalizumab, avacopan) for C3 glomerulopathy in kidney transplant patients are ongoing with encouraging results.

Kidney diseases

Dysregulation and accelerated activation of the alternative pathway (AP) of complement is known to cause or accentuate several pathologic conditions in which kidney injury leads to the appearance of hematuria and proteinuria and ultimately to the development of chronic renal failure. Multiple genetic and acquired defects involving plasma- and membrane-associated proteins are probably necessary to impair the protection of host tissues and to confer a significant predisposition to AP-mediated kidney diseases. This review aims to explore how our current understanding will make it possible to identify the mechanisms that underlie AP-mediated kidney diseases and to discuss the available clinical evidence that supports complement-directed therapies. Although the value of limiting uncontrolled complement activation has long been recognized, incorporating complement-targeted treatments into clinical use has proved challenging. Availability of anti-complement therapy has dramatically transformed the outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, one of the most severe kidney diseases. Innovative drugs that directly counteract AP dysregulation have also opened new perspectives for the management of other kidney diseases in which complement activation is involved. However, gained experience indicates that the choice of drug should be tailored to each patient's characteristics, including clinical, histologic, genetic, and biochemical parameters. Successfully treating patients requires further research in the field and close collaboration between clinicians and researchers who have special expertise in the complement system.