Lupus Nephritis in the Era of Biomarkers

Endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx shedding - potential as biomarkers in patients with lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a common and severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus and an important cause of acute and chronic kidney injury. Early diagnosis of LN and preventing relapses are key to preserving renal reserve. However, due to the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, clinical management remains challenging. Kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis of LN and subsequent assessment of kidney histopathology, but it is invasive and cannot be repeated frequently. Current clinical indicators of kidney function such as proteinuria and serum creatinine level are non-specific and do not accurately reflect histopathological changes, while anti-dsDNA antibody and C3 levels reflect immunological status but not kidney injury. Identification of novel and specific biomarkers for LN is prerequisite to improve management. Renal function deterioration is associated with changes in the endothelial glycocalyx, a delicate gel-like layer located at the interface between the endothelium and bloodstream. Inflammation induces endothelial cell activation and shedding of glycocalyx constituents into the circulation. This review discusses the potential role of soluble glycocalyx components as biomarkers of active LN, especially in patients in whom conventional serological and biochemical markers do not appear helpful.

Urinary Soluble CD163: a Novel Noninvasive Biomarker of Activity for Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND

Clinical distinction between patients with lupus nephritis who have active inflammation or chronic kidney damage is challenging. Studies have shown soluble CD163, which derives from cleavage of the CD163 M2c macrophage receptor and can be quantified in urine, correlates with active lupus nephritis.

METHODS

We measured urine CD163 at lupus nephritis flares in patients from a Mexican cohort and cross-sectional and longitudinal United States cohorts. We also performed serial urine CD163 measurements during the treatment of flares in a subset of patients from the Mexican and longitudinal United States cohorts, and assessed response to therapy at 12 months. In addition, we evaluated urinary CD163 agreement with histologic activity in 19 patients from the Mexican cohort who had repeated kidney biopsies on follow-up.

RESULTS

Urinary CD163 levels were significantly higher in patients with active lupus nephritis than in patients with active extrarenal SLE, inactive SLE, and other glomerular diseases, and correlated with disease clinical severity, histologic class, and the histologic activity index. Urinary CD163 increased from 6 months preflare to flare, diminishing progressively in complete and partial responders, whereas it remained elevated in nonresponders. Urinary CD163 <370 ng/mmol at 6 months predicted complete renal response at 12 months with >87% sensitivity and >87% specificity. Urinary CD163 <370 ng/mmol or >370 ng/mmol perfectly agreed (κ=1.0) with a histologic activity index ≤1 or >1 in repeated biopsies, respectively. Evaluation of urinary CD163 in patients with persistent proteinuria at 6 months improved the prediction of who would achieve complete renal response at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary CD163 reflects histologic inflammation in lupus nephritis and is a promising activity biomarker that varies over time with lupus nephritis activity and treatment.

Moderator's view: Cyclophosphamide in lupus nephritis

Mycophenolate mofetil was recently accepted as the effective induction treatment of lupus nephritis, with the potential to replace cyclophosphamide or at least expand our therapeutic armamentarium in patients with this lifelong disease often requiring repeated induction treatment of its relapses. Compared with cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate may be more effective in black patients, and the risk of gonadotoxicity may be significantly lower in mycophenolate-treated subjects. However, experience with mycophenolate in severe lupus nephritis is still limited and we also have insufficient data on the long-term outcome of mycophenolate-treated patients. Treatment with mycophenolate is more expensive than with cyclophosphamide, which may limit its use, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil may be more dependent on the patient's compliance compared with intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses. Low-dose cyclophosphamide remains an effective and relatively safe induction treatment of active lupus nephritis, but to decrease its cumulative toxicity, repeated exposure to cyclophosphamide in relapsing patients should be (if possible) avoided.