Prognostic implications of depression and inflammation in patients with metastatic lung cancer

The mechanism of cancer-depression comorbidity

Cancer and depression are closely interrelated, particularly in patients with advanced cancer, who often present with comorbid anxiety and depression for various reasons. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the study of depression in cancer patients, with the aim of assessing the possible triggers, predictors, adverse events, and possible treatment options for depression in several common cancers. The objective of this narrative review is to synthesize the extant literature on the relationship between the occurrence and progression of depression in several common patient categories. The authors conducted a comprehensive review of 75 articles published in PubMed over the past five years. This review was further evaluated in the present paper. Ultimately, it was determined that depression is a prevalent and detrimental phenomenon among cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Consequently, there is a pressing need to prioritize research and interventions aimed at improving the quality of life and psychosocial well-being of cancer patients, including those with advanced disease. The relationship between cancer and depression has been evolving dynamically in recent times. The current research findings indicate a strong association between cancer and depression. However, the direction of causality remains unclear. Focusing on depression in cancer patients may, therefore, be beneficial for these patients.

The Impact of a Diet Rich in Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Quality of Life of Patients with Squamous Cell Lung Cancer and Comorbid Depression: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a significant health concern, and is often accompanied by comorbid depression, leading to worsened prognosis and decreased quality of life for patients. This study aimed to investigate the potential influence of a diet rich in Omega-3 fatty acids on the quality of life of patients with squamous cell lung cancer and comorbid depression.

METHODS

A retroactive analysis of clinical information from patients with squamous cell lung cancer and comorbid depression admitted to Hongqi Hospital Affiliated to Mudanjiang Medical University from June 2022 to June 2023 was conducted. The patients were classified into two groups on the basis of different dietary care approaches: the Routine Dietary Group and the Omega-3 Fatty Acids Group. Baseline characteristics, pulmonary function tests, dietary intake, depression scoring, and quality of life scores were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

103 patients in total were included, with 51 in the Routine Dietary Group and 52 in the Omega-3 Fatty Acids Group. The Omega-3 Fatty Acids Group exhibited significantly higher ingestion of Omega-3 fatty acids in comparison with the Routine Dietary Group (3.15 ± 0.64 g/day vs. 2.93 ± 0.28 g/day, p = 0.022). Despite similar baseline pulmonary function tests, patients in the Omega-3 Fatty Acids Group showed significantly higher scores in physical (70.17 ± 4.81 vs. 68.18 ± 5.03, p = 0.043) and emotional (71.29 ± 4.58 vs. 69.38 ± 4.25, p = 0.030) functioning, as well as lower scores in insomnia (27.41 ± 4.51 vs. 29.34 ± 4.21, p = 0.027) and constipation (7.34 ± 1.66 vs. 8.43 ± 3.36, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

The study provided insights into the potential impact of a diet rich in Omega-3 fatty acids on the quality of life of patients with squamous cell lung cancer and complicating depression, suggesting that dietary interventions emphasizing Omega-3 fatty acids may be conducive to improving physical and emotional functioning, as well as symptom management, in this patient population.

Association between Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) treatment and depression among cancer patients in China: An outpatient-based cross-sectional study

Depression is a prevalent condition among cancer patients and significantly impacts their quality of life. Traditional Chinese Medicine, particularly Chinese Herbal Medicine (CHM), has shown potential in both anti-tumor and anti-depressive effects. However, there is a dearth of scientific literature exploring the association between CHM treatment and depression in cancer patients. This study aims to investigate the relationship between CHM treatment and depression in cancer patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer outpatients at Longhua Hosiptal, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, from June 2020 to April 2021 (Ethical approval number: 2020LCSY057). All patients signed informed consent and completed The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Hamilton depression scale was evaluated depression by psychiatrists. The power of the sample size was determined using Gpower statistical and SPSS were used for statistical analysis. A total of 809 completed the study. Gender, medical insurance, the classification of time since diagnosis, ECOG, cancer stage, metastasis, gene mutation, treatment plan and CHM treatment were an important factor affecting depression (P < .05). Further analysis investigated the impact of CHM treatment on depression. There were 374 enrolled in CHM group and 435 enrolled in Non-CHM group. The assessment results of Hamilton depression scale and EORTC QLQ-C30 in CHM group were superior to those in Non-CHM group. The morbidity of depression is 50.27% in CHM group and 66.44% in Non-CHM group. After adjusting for potential confounders (gender, medical insurance, cancer stage, etc.), CHM treatment indicated negative correlation with depression (Odds ratio (OR) = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5-0.9, P = .020). The interaction effects within each subgroup were no significantly affect the relationship between CHM treatment and depression (P > .05). CHM treatment was an independent protective factor for depression in cancer patients, and lead to better quality of life for cancer patients.

Psychological distress influences lung cancer: Advances and perspectives on the immune system and immunotherapy

Lung cancer has the highest incidence rate and mortality worldwide. Moreover, multiple factors may cause heterogeneity in the efficacy of immunotherapy for lung cancer, and preclinical studies have gradually uncovered the promotive effects of psychological distress (PD) on tumor hallmarks. Therefore, treatment targeted at PD may be a vital factor in adjusting and improving immunotherapy for lung cancer. Here, by focusing on the central nervous system, as well as stress-related crucial neurotransmitters and hormones, we highlight the effects of PD on the lung immune system, the lung tumor microenvironment (TME) and immunotherapy, which brings a practicable means and psychosocial perspective to lung cancer treatment.

Epidemiology and Nomogram for Predicting the Cancer-specific Survival of Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor: A Seer database study

OBJECTIVE

ovarian granulosa cell tumor (OGCT) is a kind of infrequent ovarian malignant tumor with limited epidemiological data available. we established a predictive nomograph to verify the clinical prognosis.

METHODS

1005 diagnosed with ovarian granulosa cell tumor (OGCT) were extracted from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) public database from 2000-2018. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to distinguish risk factors, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to determine the independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) of OGCT patients. The obtained prognostic variables were combined to construct a nomogram model for predicting CSS in OGCT patients.

RESULTS

Model performance was detected and evaluated with ROC curves and calibration plots. Data collected from 1005 patients were divided into two groups: training cohort(n=703,70%) and validation cohort(n=302,30%). The multivariate Cox model identified five covariates including age, marital status, AJCC stages, surgery and chemotherapy as independent interfering factors of CSS. The nomogram has shown a promising and excellent accuracy in evaluating 3 -, 5 -, 8-year CSS in OGCT patients. In terms of the CSS of the training cohort, the AUC values of the 3 -, 5 -, 8-year ROC curves were 0.819,0.8,0.819, while in terms of the CSS of the validation cohort, the AUC values of the validation cohort were 0.822,0.84,0.823, respectively. All the calibration curves showed pleasant consistency between predicted and actual survival rates. The nomogram model established in the study can improve the veracity of prognosis prediction, thereby improving the accuracy of individualized survival risk assessment, and providing targeted and constructive recommendations for specific treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Age, advanced clinical stage, widower and without surgery therapy are independent risk factors for poor prognosis and the nomogram we constructed can help clinicians efficiently recognize high-risk OGCT patients to guide targeted therapies and improve their outcomes.

Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer

BACKGROUND

Major depression and other depressive conditions are common in people with cancer. These conditions are not easily detectable in clinical practice, due to the overlap between medical and psychiatric symptoms, as described by diagnostic manuals such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Moreover, it is particularly challenging to distinguish between pathological and normal reactions to such a severe illness. Depressive symptoms, even in subthreshold manifestations, have a negative impact in terms of quality of life, compliance with anticancer treatment, suicide risk and possibly the mortality rate for the cancer itself. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of antidepressants in this population are few and often report conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of antidepressants for treating depressive symptoms in adults (aged 18 years or older) with cancer (any site and stage).

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was November 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing antidepressants versus placebo, or antidepressants versus other antidepressants, in adults (aged 18 years or above) with any primary diagnosis of cancer and depression (including major depressive disorder, adjustment disorder, dysthymic disorder or depressive symptoms in the absence of a formal diagnosis).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was 1. efficacy as a continuous outcome. Our secondary outcomes were 2. efficacy as a dichotomous outcome, 3. Social adjustment, 4. health-related quality of life and 5. dropouts. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 studies (1364 participants), 10 of which contributed to the meta-analysis for the primary outcome. Six of these compared antidepressants and placebo, three compared two antidepressants, and one three-armed study compared two antidepressants and placebo. In this update, we included four additional studies, three of which contributed data for the primary outcome. For acute-phase treatment response (six to 12 weeks), antidepressants may reduce depressive symptoms when compared with placebo, even though the evidence is very uncertain. This was true when depressive symptoms were measured as a continuous outcome (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.92 to -0.12; 7 studies, 511 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and when measured as a proportion of people who had depression at the end of the study (risk ratio (RR) 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.96; 5 studies, 662 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported data on follow-up response (more than 12 weeks). In head-to-head comparisons, we retrieved data for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) versus tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and for mirtazapine versus TCAs. There was no difference between the various classes of antidepressants (continuous outcome: SSRI versus TCA: SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.18; 3 studies, 237 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mirtazapine versus TCA: SMD -4.80, 95% CI -9.70 to 0.10; 1 study, 25 participants). There was a potential beneficial effect of antidepressants versus placebo for the secondary efficacy outcomes (continuous outcome, response at one to four weeks; very low-certainty evidence). There were no differences for these outcomes when comparing two different classes of antidepressants, even though the evidence was very uncertain. In terms of dropouts due to any cause, we found no difference between antidepressants compared with placebo (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; 9 studies, 889 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and between SSRIs and TCAs (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.22; 3 studies, 237 participants). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence because of the heterogeneous quality of the studies, imprecision arising from small sample sizes and wide CIs, and inconsistency due to statistical or clinical heterogeneity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the impact of depression on people with cancer, the available studies were few and of low quality. This review found a potential beneficial effect of antidepressants against placebo in depressed participants with cancer. However, the certainty of evidence is very low and, on the basis of these results, it is difficult to draw clear implications for practice. The use of antidepressants in people with cancer should be considered on an individual basis and, considering the lack of head-to-head data, the choice of which drug to prescribe may be based on the data on antidepressant efficacy in the general population of people with major depression, also taking into account that data on people with other serious medical conditions suggest a positive safety profile for the SSRIs. Furthermore, this update shows that the usage of the newly US Food and Drug Administration-approved antidepressant esketamine in its intravenous formulation might represent a potential treatment for this specific population of people, since it can be used both as an anaesthetic and an antidepressant. However, data are too inconclusive and further studies are needed. We conclude that to better inform clinical practice, there is an urgent need for large, simple, randomised, pragmatic trials comparing commonly used antidepressants versus placebo in people with cancer who have depressive symptoms, with or without a formal diagnosis of a depressive disorder.

Biomarker opportunities in the treatment of cancer-related depression

Depression comorbid with cancer is common and associated with a host of negative health outcomes. The inflammatory basis of depression is a growing area of research in cancer, focused on how stressors transduce into inflammation and contribute to the emergence of depression. In this review, we synthesize inflammatory biomarker associations with both depression and the currently available pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies in cancer, underscoring the need for expanding research on anti-inflammatory agents with antidepressant effects. Modulation of inflammatory neuroimmune pathways can slow tumor progression and reduce metastases. Biomarkers associated with depression in cancer may help with diagnosis and treatment monitoring, as well as inform research on novel drug targets to potentially improve cancer survival.

Understanding the basis of major depressive disorder in oncological patients: Biological links, clinical management, challenges, and lifestyle medicine

In recent years, the incidence of different types of cancer and patient survival have been rising, as well as their prevalence. The increase in survival in recent years exposes the patients to a set of stressful factors such as more rigorous follow-up and more aggressive therapeutic regimens that, added to the diagnosis of the disease itself, cause an increase in the incidence of depressive disorders. These alterations have important consequences for the patients, reducing their average survival and quality of life, and for these reasons, special emphasis has been placed on developing numerous screening tests and early recognition of depressive symptoms. Despite that cancer and major depressive disorder are complex and heterogeneous entities, they also share many critical pathophysiological mechanisms, aiding to explain this complex relationship from a biological perspective. Moreover, a growing body of evidence is supporting the relevant role of lifestyle habits in the prevention and management of both depression and cancer. Therefore, the present study aims to perform a thorough review of the intricate relationship between depression and cancer, with a special focus on its biological links, clinical management, challenges, and the central role of lifestyle medicine as adjunctive and preventive approaches to improve the quality of life of these patients.

Longitudinal Association of Universal Screening and Treatment for Major Depressive Disorder with Survival in Cancer Patients

Evidence for clinical screening and intervention for depression in cancer and the effect of this intervention on cancer prognosis is suboptimal. This study substantialized a complete model with universal screening and intervention for major depressive disorder (MDD) and explored its effect on survival in patients. This longitudinal study recruited cancer patients routinely screened for MDD with a two-stage model. Data including sex, age, cancer diagnosis, first diagnosis date, date of death, cancer stage, and MDD diagnosis and treatment were collected from medical records and the national registration system for cancer. Kaplan−Meier’s survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied to analyze the effects of associated factors on survival. Further subgroup analysis for 14 types of cancer primary site was also performed. Overall, the hazard for patients adhering to psychiatric treatment for MDD before cancer diagnosis was not statistically different from that for patients without MDD (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.061, 95% CI: 0.889−1.267, p = 0.512). The hazard for patients adhering to psychiatric treatment after cancer diagnosis was significantly lower than that for patients without MDD (HR = 0.702, 95% CI: 0.607−0.812, p < 0.001). Those who were diagnosed with MDD after cancer diagnosis and adhered poorly to psychiatric treatment had the greatest hazard (HR = 1.829, 95% CI: 1.687−1.984, p < 0.001). The effect of intervention for MDD varied across different primary cancer types.

Cancer-related inflammation and depressive symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms in patients with cancer are associated with poor quality of life and decreased survival. Although inflammation is reliably associated with depression in otherwise healthy individuals, the association in patients with cancer remains unclear. Given the high prevalence of cancer-related inflammation, the authors aimed to establish the relationship between inflammation and depression in cancer patients based on extant literature.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and registered under Prospero ID CRD42021226743. Three databases were searched including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO using the following criteria for inclusion: 1) measurement of a peripheral inflammatory marker, 2) use of a validated tool/scale to measure depression, and 3) a cancer diagnosis. Risk of publication bias was assessed by Funnel plot and Egger test.

RESULTS

Seventy-three studies were included in the systematic review and 54 studies (n = 5017) were included in meta-analyses. Associations with depressive symptoms were significant for peripheral blood interleukin (IL)-6 (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.82), I²  = 57.9%; tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11), I²  = 74.1%; and C-reactive protein (CRP) (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.27-0.87), I²  = 0%. IL-5, IL-13, albumin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with depressive symptoms but based on fewer studies. Most cancer settings were represented; the number of studies per inflammatory marker varied from 1 to 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Although peripheral inflammatory markers were unevenly studied, the most studied markers (IL-6, TNF, and CRP) were associated with depressive symptoms in cancer patients and may be useful for management of depressive symptoms in the cancer setting.

LAY SUMMARY

Peripheral blood inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF, and CRP) were associated with depressive symptoms in various cancer settings. Although further studies are warranted, these findings may help identify and manage depressive symptoms in patients with cancer.

Recent trends in the management of depression in persons with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Depression is a prevalent comorbidity in cancer that significantly increases the risk for numerous negative health outcomes. This review updates the current evidence base for management of depression in cancer, highlighting new research directions based on the inflammatory hypothesis of depression.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research on pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for depression in cancer has shown mixed efficacy partly because of methodological issues arising from the phenomenology of depression in cancer. After decades of stagnancy, more recent high-quality clinical trials are beginning to provide an evidence base to guide treatment. Inflammatory cytokine-associated depression is a subtype of depression that may have particular relevance in cancer, opening new avenues to explore therapeutic targets and biobehavioral impacts of interventions, which may improve cancer outcomes.

SUMMARY

The continuum of severity in cancer-related depression is important to consider in management approaches. Choice of treatment should be personalized to the patient and their symptom profile as there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend any particular medication or psychotherapy over another. Psychological interventions should be considered first line for mild-to-moderate depression, and pharmacological treatment added for more severe depression, which can be optimally delivered within a collaborative care model.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/YCO/A62.