1
|
Hee L, Terluk A, Thomas L, Hopkins A, Juergens CP, Lo S, French JK, Mussap CJ. Late clinical outcomes for SeQuent please paclitaxel-coated balloons in PCI of instent restenosis and de novo lesions: A single-center, real world registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 89:375-382. [PMID: 27113534 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to evaluate clinical outcomes following PCI using SeQuent Please paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) of ISR and denovo lesions (DNL), in all-comer patients at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. BACKGROUND There have been promising results for PCI using drug-coated balloons; however, long-term data for clinical outcomes are lacking. METHODS Baseline patient demographics, PCI procedural details, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MACE, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and clinical-driven target lesion restenosis (TLR). The median follow-up for clinical events was 1.3 [0.6-1.9] years. RESULTS A total of 188 lesions (n = 147 patients) were treated with PCB, comprising 118 (63%) ISR lesions and 70 (38%) DNL. Patient mean age was 67 ± 11years, 79% were male, and 54% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). MACE was recorded in 17 patients (12%), with cardiac death confirmed in 1 patient (0.7%). MACE was significantly lower for DNL than ISR (1% vs. 15%, P = 0.03), and PCB had favourable TLR for DNL. Cox regression demonstrated that DM (HR 7.17, 0.92-55.6, P = 0.05) and prior CABG (HR 3.22, 1.17-8.83, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of MACE for ISR lesions. CONCLUSIONS MACE rates were acceptable, with overall low incidence of cardiac death, MI, and TLR, for PCB treatment of ISR and DNL. Independent predictors of poor outcome in the ISR group were DM and prior CABG. The particularly low MACE for the DNL group supports direct PCB as a viable stent-sparing PCI strategy in challenging patients and lesion subsets. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leia Hee
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Terluk
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Liza Thomas
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Hopkins
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Craig P Juergens
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sidney Lo
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John K French
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christian J Mussap
- Cardiology Department, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costopoulos C, Latib A, Naganuma T, Sticchi A, Figini F, Basavarajaiah S, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Naim C, Kawaguchi M, Giannini F, Colombo A. The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 6:1153-9. [PMID: 24262615 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2013] [Revised: 06/07/2013] [Accepted: 07/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the role of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of diffuse de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) (>25 mm). BACKGROUND The use of DEB in diffuse CAD, either alone or in combination with DES, offers an alternative to stenting alone. Data regarding DEB in this context are limited. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated with DEB for diffuse CAD between June 2009 and October 2012. Endpoints analyzed were major adverse cardiac events, defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR), as well as TVR and target lesion revascularization separately. Results were compared with those obtained from a cohort of patients with similar characteristics treated with DES alone. RESULTS A total of 69 patients (93 lesions) were treated with DEB ± DES, and 93 patients with DES alone (93 lesions). A high proportion of patients were diabetic (46.4% vs. 44.1%, p = 0.77). Of the DEB-treated lesions, 56.0% were treated with DEB alone, 7.4% with DEB and DES as bail out, and 36.6% with DES and DEB as part of a hybrid approach for very long disease. Outcome rates with DEB ± DES were comparable to those with DES alone at 2-year follow-up (major adverse cardiac events = 20.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.74; TVR = 14.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.44; target lesion revascularization = 9.6% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS DEB may have a role in the treatment of diffuse de novo CAD, either alone in smaller vessels or in combination with DES in very long disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis Costopoulos
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basavarajaiah S, Latib A, Shannon J, Naganuma T, Sticchi A, Bertoldi L, Costopoulos C, Figini F, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Colombo A. Drug-eluting balloon in the treatment of in-stent restenosis and diffuse coronary artery disease: real-world experience from our registry. J Interv Cardiol 2014; 27:348-55. [PMID: 24815951 DOI: 10.1111/joic.12129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report a single-center experience of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and de novo coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND DEB are emerging as an alternative treatment for coronary stenosis especially when metal scaffolding is undesirable (in-stent restenosis and small-vessel de novo disease). Although there are various randomized trials and registry studies, the data from real-world cohorts are lacking. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with the In.Pact Falcon™ (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) paclitaxel-eluting balloon between January 2009 and December 2011 were retrospectively studied. The measured end-points were cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as combination of cardiac death, MI, and TVR. RESULTS A total of 275 lesions were successfully treated in 184 patients. The mean age was 66.2 ± 9.6 years, and 87% were males. The predominant indication for DEB use was ISR (62%), with de novo lesions accounting for the remainder (38%). A mean of 1.48 ± 0.9 DEB were used per patient. Bailout stenting was required in 24% of lesions. The median clinical follow-up was 14.6 months (IQR 12-23). The overall rates of cardiac death, MI, TLR, TVR, and MACE were 3.8%, 1.6%, 16.8%, 17.9%, and 21.7%, respectively. The overall rate of stent thrombosis was 0.5% (n = 1). CONCLUSION Our results suggests that DEB can be considered in lesions where the use of stents is not desirable, especially restenotic lesions. Further long-term follow-up of these patients will provide us more insights on the long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Basavarajaiah
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus, Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Interventional Cardiology Unit, The Heart of England Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Interventional Cardiology Unit, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|