Recent clinical trials of immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer

The emerging nanomedicine-based technology for non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: how far are we from an effective treatment

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prominent etiology of cancer-related mortality. The heterogeneous nature of this disease impedes its accurate diagnosis and efficacious treatment. Consequently, constant advancements in research are imperative in order to comprehend its intricate nature. In addition to currently available therapies, the utilization of nanotechnology presents an opportunity to enhance the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients. Notably, the burgeoning knowledge of the interaction between the immune system and cancer itself paves the way for developing novel, emerging immunotherapies for treating NSCLC in the early stages of the disease. It is believed that with the novel engineering avenues of nanomedicine, there is a possibility to overcome the inherent limitations derived from conventional and emerging treatments, such as off-site drug cytotoxicity, drug resistance, and administration methods. Combining nanotechnology with the convergence points of current therapies could open up new avenues for meeting the unmet needs of NSCLC treatment.

Recent Developments and Challenges in Molecular-Targeted Therapy of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of lung cancer with conventional therapies, which include radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy results in multiple undesirable adverse or side effects. The major clinical challenge in developing new drug therapies for lung cancer is resistance, which involves mutations and disturbance in various signaling pathways. Molecular abnormalities related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (B-RAF) Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) mutations, translocation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification have been studied to overcome the resistance and to develop new therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). But, inevitable development of resistance presents limits the clinical benefits of various new drugs. Here, we review current progress in the development of molecularly targeted therapies, concerning six clinical biomarkers: EGFR, ALK, MET, ROS-1, KRAS, and B-RAF for NSCLC treatment.

A special prognostic indicator: tumor mutation burden combined with immune infiltrates in lung adenocarcinoma with TP53 mutation

BACKGROUND

TP53 mutation (TP53 mut) is significantly associated with immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), but not an ideal independent prognostic predictor for it. Here, we investigated a novel potential biomarker and constructed a model for prognostic prediction in LUAD TP53 mut patients.

METHODS

469 LUAD samples retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas database were divided into TP53 wt (wild-type TP53) and TP53 mut groups. TMB values were calculated based on the number of variants/exon lengths, and high- and low-TMB groups were divided by the median value. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two TMB groups were identified using "limma" package, and functional analyses were performed by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Gene Ontology, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. The infiltration ratio of 22 immune cells were calculated with the CIBERSORT algorithm. Survival analyses were estimated by Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test. Finally a TMB prognostic index (TMBPI) with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and calculated to evaluate the predictive value in TP53 mut LUAD.

RESULTS

There were diverse mutation types in 100% of TP53 mutants, while mutations were present in 86.5% of cases with TP53 wt. TP53 mut patients had higher TMB levels than TP53 wt patients. Overall survival in TP53 mut patients with low-TMB levels was significantly shorter than that in high-TMB TP53 mut patients. High-TMB patients had higher levels of CD8 T cell and effector B cell, while lower levels of resting memory CD4 T cells, monocytes, activated dendritic cells, etc. than low-TMB patients. Poor survival outcome in TP53 mut patients was correlated with lower effector B cell infiltration and higher activated dendritic cell. Survival risk analyses of 121 DEGs showed that good survival outcomes correlated positively with FBXO36 and KLHL35 expression levels, but correlated negatively with that of LINC0054. TMBPI analysis of the TP53 mut patients showed that high-TMBPI patients had worse survival outcomes than low-TMBPI patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the TMB value with immune infiltrates is a novel potential biomarker for prognostic prediction of TP53 mut patients. The TMBPI combined with detection of TP53 mutation can be used as a better predictor of prognosis in LUAD.

Nanomedicine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Conventional Treatments to Immunotherapy

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The heterogeneous nature of this disease hinders its diagnosis and treatment, requiring continuous advances in research aiming to understand its intricate nature. Consequently, the retrospective analysis of conventional therapies has allowed the introduction of novel tools provided by nanotechnology, leading to considerable improvements in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the development of novel immunotherapies based on the recently understood interaction of the immune system with the tumor highlights the real possibility of definitively treating NSCLC from its early stages. Novel engineering approaches in nanomedicine will enable to overcome the intrinsic limits of conventional and emerging therapies regarding off-site cytotoxicity, specificity, resistance mechanisms, and administration issues. The convergence point of these therapies with nanotechnology lays the foundation for achieving currently unmet needs.

Current Perspectives in Cancer Immunotherapy

Different immunotherapeutic approaches have proved to be of significant clinical value to many patients with different types of advanced cancer. However, we need more precise immunotherapies and predictive biomarkers to increase the successful response rates. The advent of next generation sequencing technologies and their applications in immuno-oncology has helped us tremendously towards this aim. We are now moving towards the realization of personalized medicine, thus, significantly increasing our expectations for a more successful management of the disease. Here, we discuss the current immunotherapeutic approaches against cancer, including immune checkpoint blockade with an emphasis on anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies. We also analyze a growing list of other co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory markers and emphasize the mechanism of action of the principal pathway for each of these, as well as on drugs that either have been FDA-approved or are under clinical investigation. We further discuss recent advances in other immunotherapies, including cytokine therapy, adoptive cell transfer therapy and therapeutic vaccines. We finally discuss the modulation of gut microbiota composition and response to immunotherapy, as well as how tumor-intrinsic factors and immunological processes influence the mutational and epigenetic landscape of progressing tumors and response to immunotherapy but also how immunotherapeutic intervention influences the landscape of cancer neoepitopes and tumor immunoediting.