Sutimlimab for treatment of cold agglutinin disease: why, how and for whom?

Complement-targeted therapeutics: Are we there yet, or just getting started?

Therapeutic interventions in the complement system, a key immune-inflammatory mediator and contributor to a broad range of clinical conditions, have long been considered important yet challenging or even unfeasible to achieve. Almost 20 years ago, a spark was lit demonstrating the clinical and commercial viability of complement-targeted therapies. Since then, the field has experienced an impressive expansion of targeted indications and available treatment modalities. Currently, a dozen distinct complement-specific therapeutics covering several intervention points are available in the clinic, benefiting patients suffering from eight disorders, not counting numerous clinical trials and off-label uses. Observing this rapid rise of complement-targeted therapy from obscurity to mainstream with amazement, one might ask whether the peak of this development has now been reached or whether the field will continue marching on to new heights. This review looks at the milestones of complement drug discovery and development achieved so far, surveys the currently approved drug entities and indications, and ventures a glimpse into the future advancements yet to come.

Cold-antibody Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: its Association with Neoplastic Disease and Impact on Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cold-antibody mediated autoimmune hemolytic anemia (cAIHA) is subclassified as cold agglutinin disease (CAD), secondary cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS), and paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH). This review aims to address the occurrence of neoplastic disorders with these three entities and analyze the impact of such neoplasias on treatment for cAIHA.

RECENT FINDINGS

"Primary" CAD is a distinct clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder in probably all cases, although not classified as a malignant lymphoma. CAS is secondary to malignant lymphoma in a minority of cases. Recent findings allow a further clarification of these differential diagnoses and the therapeutic consequences of specific neoplastic entities. Appropriate diagnostic workup is critical for therapy in cAIHA. Patients with CAD should be treated if they have symptomatic anemia, significant fatigue, or bothersome circulatory symptoms. The distinction between CAD and CAS and the presence of any underlying malignancy in CAS have essential therapeutic implications.

The impact of individual clinical features in cold agglutinin disease: hemolytic versus non-hemolytic symptoms

INTRODUCTION

During the last decades, the pathogenesis of cold agglutinin disease (CAD) has been well elucidated and shown to be complex. Several documented or investigational therapies have been made available. This development has resulted in major therapeutic advances, but also in challenges in choice of therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we address each step in pathogenesis: bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferation, composition and effects of monoclonal cold agglutinin, non-complement mediated erythrocyte agglutination, complement-dependent hemolysis, and other effects of complement activation. We also discuss the heterogeneous clinical features and their relation to specific steps in pathogenesis, in particular with respect to the impact of complement involvement. CAD can be classified into three clinical phenotypes with consequences for established treatments as well as development of new therapies. Some promising future treatment approaches - beyond chemoimmunotherapy and complement inhibition - are reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

The patient's individual clinical profile regarding complement involvement and hemolytic versus non-hemolytic features is important for the choice of treatment. Further development of treatment approaches is encouraged, and some candidate drugs are promising irrespective of clinical phenotype. Patients with CAD requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

Long-term efficacy and safety of continued complement C1s inhibition with sutimlimab in cold agglutinin disease: CADENZA study Part B

Background

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune haemolytic anaemia mediated by the classical complement pathway (CP). Sutimlimab selectively targets complement C1s inhibiting classical CP activation. In CADENZA Part A (26-weeks), a placebo-controlled study in patients without recent transfusion history, sutimlimab reduced haemolysis, anaemia, and fatigue, and was generally well tolerated.

Methods

The CADENZA study (NCT03347422) started in March 2018 (Part A) and completed in December 2021 (Part B). All patients in Part B were eligible to receive sutimlimab for up to 1 year after the last patient completed Part A. Efficacy and safety was assessed throughout Part B, until the last on-treatment visit with available assessment (LV), and after a 9-week washout.

Findings

In total, 32/39 patients completed Part B; median treatment duration: 99 weeks. Similar sustained improvements in haemolysis, anaemia, and quality of life were observed in patients switching to sutimlimab and those continuing sutimlimab. Mean LV values for the combined group (ie, placebo-to-sutimlimab group and sutimlimab-to-sutimlimab group) improved from baseline for haemoglobin (≥11.0 g/dL on-treatment vs 9.3 g/dL at baseline), bilirubin (≤20.0 μmol/L on-treatment vs 35.0 μmol/L at baseline), and FACIT-Fatigue scores. Following a 9-week washout, inhibition of CP activity was reversed, and haemolytic markers approached baseline levels. Overall, sutimlimab was generally well tolerated throughout the study. No patients developed systemic lupus erythematosus or meningococcal infections. During the 9-week washout, most adverse events could be attributed to recurrence of underlying CAD.

Interpretation

The CADENZA Part B results support the sustained efficacy and safety of sutimlimab for treatment of CAD; however, upon discontinuation disease activity reoccurs.

Funding

Sanofi.

Daratumumab monotherapy in refractory warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia and cold agglutinin disease

ABSTRACT

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare autoantibody-mediated disease. For steroid and/or rituximab-refractory AIHA, there is no consensus on optimal treatment. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, could be beneficial by suppression of CD38+ plasma cells and thus autoantibody secretion. In addition, because CD38 is also expressed by activated T cells, daratumumab may also act via immunomodulatory effects. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab monotherapy in an international retrospective study including 19 adult patients with heavily pretreated refractory AIHA. In warm AIHA (wAIHA, n = 12), overall response was 50% with a median response duration of 5.5 months (range, 2-12), including ongoing response in 2 patients after 6 and 12 months. Of 6 nonresponders, 4 had Evans syndrome. In cold AIHA (cAIHA, n = 7) overall hemoglobin (Hb) response was 57%, with ongoing response in 3 of 7 patients. One additional patient with nonanemic cAIHA was treated for severe acrocyanosis and reached a clinical acrocyanosis response as well as a Hb increase. Of 6 patients with cAIHA with acrocyanosis, 4 had improved symptoms after daratumumab treatment. In 2 patients with wAIHA treated with daratumumab, in whom we prospectively collected blood samples, we found complete CD38+ T-cell depletion after daratumumab, as well as altered T-cell subset differentiation and a severely diminished capacity for cell activation and proliferation. Reappearance of CD38+ T cells coincided with disease relapse in 1 patient. In conclusion, our data show that daratumumab therapy may be a treatment option for refractory AIHA. The observed immunomodulatory effects that may contribute to the clinical response deserve further exploration.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management

Autoimmune hemolytic anemias (AIHAs) are conditions involving the production of antibodies against one's own red blood cells (RBCs). These can be primary with unknown cause or secondary (by association with diseases or infections). There are several different categories of AIHAs recognized according to their features in the direct antiglobulin test (DAT). (1) Warm-antibody AIHA (wAIHA) exhibits a pan-reactive IgG autoantibody recognizing a portion of band 3 (wherein the DAT may be positive with IgG, C3d or both). Treatment involves glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing agents and may consider IVIG or monoclonal antibodies to CD20, CD38 or C1q. (2) Cold-antibody AIHA due to IgMs range from cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) to cold agglutin disease (CAD). These are typically specific to the Ii blood group system, with the former (CAS) being polyclonal and the latter (CAD) being a more severe and monoclonal entity. The DAT in either case is positive only with C3d. Foundationally, the patient is kept warm, though treatment for significant complement-related outcomes may, therefore, capitalize on monoclonal options against C1q or C5. (3) Mixed AIHA, also called combined cold and warm AIHA, has a DAT positive for both IgG and C3d, with treatment approaches inclusive of those appropriate for wAIHA and cold AIHA. (4) Paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria (PCH), also termed Donath-Landsteiner test-positive AIHA, has a DAT positive only for C3d, driven upstream by a biphasic cold-reactive IgG antibody recruiting complement. Although usually self-remitting, management may consider monoclonal antibodies to C1q or C5. (5) Direct antiglobulin test-negative AIHA (DAT-neg AIHA), due to IgG antibody below detection thresholds in the DAT, or by non-detected IgM or IgA antibodies, is managed as wAIHA. (6) Drug-induced immune hemolytic anemia (DIIHA) appears as wAIHA with DAT IgG and/or C3d. Some cases may resolve after ceasing the instigating drug. (7) Passenger lymphocyte syndrome, found after transplantation, is caused by B-cells transferred from an antigen-negative donor whose antibodies react with a recipient who produces antigen-positive RBCs. This comprehensive review will discuss in detail each of these AIHAs and provide information on diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment modalities.

Management of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in low-to-middle income countries: current challenges and the way forward

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of aetiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Therapy is becoming increasingly differentiated and evidence-based, and several new established and investigational therapeutic approaches have appeared during recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased medical and financial requirements for optimal diagnosis, subgrouping, and individualization of therapy, including the use of more advanced laboratory tests and expensive drugs. In this brief Viewpoint review, we first summarize the diagnostic workup of AIHA subgroups and the respective therapies that are currently considered optimal. We then compare these principles with real-world data from India, the world's largest nation by population and a typical low-to-middle income country. We identify major deficiencies and limitations in general and laboratory resources, real-life diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic practices. Incomplete diagnostic workup, overuse of corticosteroids, lack of access to more specific treatments, and poor follow-up of patients are the rule more than exceptions. Although it may not seem realistic to resolve all challenges, we try to outline some ways towards an improved management of patients with AIHA.

A case of cold agglutinin syndrome associated with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia harbouring mutations in CARD11 and KMT2D

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare cold autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (cAIHA) caused by IgM antibodies recognizing I antigens on erythrocytes. cAIHA is now mainly classified into two types: primary CAD and cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS). CAS develops in association with the underlying disease, which is most commonly malignant lymphoma. Recent studies have identified gene mutations in CARD11 and KMT2D in a high proportion of patients with CAD, which has led to recognition of CAD as an indolent lymphoproliferative disorder. We herein report a case of cAIHA without lymphocytosis or lymphadenopathy in whom bone marrow was infiltrated by a small population of clonal lymphocytes (6.8%) expressing cell surface markers consistent with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Whole-exome sequencing of bone marrow mononuclear cells revealed mutations in the CARD11 and KMT2D genes. This patient also had somatic hypermutation with overrepresentation of IGHV4-34, which is prevalent in CLL harbouring the KMT2D mutation. These observations suggest that CAS caused by early-phase CLL could be misinterpreted as primary CAD.

Cold agglutinin disease: A case report with atypical clinical findings

A female in her 60s presented to the allergy and immunology clinic for further investigation of ongoing dermatitis. She presented with chronic acrocyanosis, mainly in her left lower extremity, extending distally from her mid thigh with concurrent ulcerations in her foot resulting in immobility secondary to pain. She experienced these symptoms for years without a definitive diagnosis. The lack of diagnosis was due, in part, to her atypical symptoms and laboratory findings that required a high level of clinical suspicion to diagnose. Extensive autoimmune workup was largely unrevealing with the exception of a cold agglutinin titer of 1:250 and a positive anticomplement C3b direct antiglobulin test. A diagnosis of cold agglutinin disease was made and treatment with rituximab monotherapy was initiated.

A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2022

While new drug approvals by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had remained stable or even increased in the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 37 newly approved drugs in 2022 are considerably less than the 53 and 50 new drugs approved in 2020 and 2021, respectively, and less than the rolling 10-year average of 43. As in previous years of this annual review, we assign these new drugs to one of three levels of innovation: first drug against a condition ("first-in-indication"), first drug using a novel molecular mechanism ("first-in-class"), and "next-in-class," i.e., a drug using an already exploited molecular mechanism. We identify two "first-in-indication" (ganaxolon and teplizumab), 20 (54%) "first-in-class," and 17 (46%) "next-in-class" drugs. By treatment area, rare diseases and cancer drugs were once again the most prevalent (partly overlapping) therapeutic areas. Other continuing trends were the use of accelerated regulatory approval pathways and the reliance on biopharmaceuticals (biologics).

Complement therapeutics are coming of age in rheumatology

The complement system was described over 100 years ago, and it is well established that activation of this pathway accompanies the great majority of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. In addition, over three decades of work in murine models of human disease have nearly universally demonstrated that complement activation is upstream of tissue injury and the engagement of pro-inflammatory mechanisms such as the elaboration of cytokines and chemokines, as well as myeloid cell recruitment and activation. With that background, and taking advantage of advances in the development of biologic and small-molecule therapeutics, the creation and clinical evaluation of complement therapeutics is now rapidly expanding. This article reviews the current state of the complement therapeutics field, with a focus on their use in diseases cared for or consulted upon by rheumatologists. Included is an overview of the activation mechanisms and components of the system, in addition to the mechanisms by which the complement system interacts with other immune system constituents. The various therapeutic approaches to modulating the system in rheumatic and autoimmune diseases are reviewed. To understand how best to clinically assess the complement system, methods of its evaluation are described. Finally, next-generation therapeutic and diagnostic advances that can be envisioned for the future are discussed.

A patient with the highly suspected B cell lymphoma accompanied by the erythrocytes cold agglutination: Case report

RATIONALE

Cold agglutinins are related with B cell lymphoproliferative disorder and lymphoma, and can agglutinate red blood cells (RBCs) at an optimum temperature of 3-4°C, which is the undergoing cause of RBCs cold agglutination. RBC cold agglutination may lead to an extreme abnormality of RBC parameters of complete blood count (CBC).

PATIENT CONCERNS

The present study reports a case of an old patient with severe infectious fever and anemia presenting extremely abnormal levels of RBC parameters in CBC and a sand-like appearance of blood on tube wall. The validating tests indicated the presence of the RBCs cold agglutination and the highly suspected B cell lymphoma.

DIAGNOSES

The 37°C-incubation corrected the CBC results of the patient, and the microscopic observation and flow cytometry analysis of blood and marrow indicated many abnormal B lymphocytes. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with a highly suspected B-cell lymphoma.

INTERVENTIONS

The blood with a sand-like appearance was reanalyzed to validate the cold agglutination by 37°C-water incubation. The smears of peripheral blood and marrow were made for morphological observation by using optical microscopy. Moreover, the clusters of differentiation of the white blood cells were analyzed to confirm the type of abnormal white blood cells with a flow cytometer.

OUTCOMES

The RBCs cold agglutination was validated, and the highly suspected B cell lymphoma was proved as the undergoing cause.

LESSONS

This case focuses on the discovery and solutions of RBCs cold agglutination, and emphasizes the importance of microscopic observation in the exploration of undergoing causes of cold agglutination.

Monoclonal antibodies for treatment of cold agglutinin disease

INTRODUCTION

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a difficult-to-treat autoimmune hemolytic anemia and B cell lymphoproliferative disorder associated with fatigue, acrocyanosis and a risk of thromboembolic events. Cold-induced binding of autoantibodies agglutinates red blood cells and triggers the classical complement pathway, leading to predominantly extravascular hemolysis.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes clinical and experimental antibody-based treatments for CAD and analyzes the risks and benefits of B cell and complement directed therapies, and discusses potential future treatments for CAD.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional treatment of CAD includes a B cell targeted treatment approach with rituximab, yielding only limited treatment success. Addition of a cytotoxic agent (e.g. bendamustine) increases efficacy but this is accompanied by an increased risk of neutropenia and infection. Novel complement-directed therapies have emerged and were shown to have a good efficacy against hemolysis and safety profile but are expensive and unable to address circulatory symptoms. Complement inhibition with sutimlimab may be used as a bridging strategy until B cell directed therapy with rituximab takes effect or continued indefinitely if needed. Future antibody-based treatment approaches for CAD involve the further development of complement-directed antibodies, combination of rituximab and bortezomib, and daratumumab. Non-antibody based prospective treatments may include the use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Sutimlimab for the Treatment of Cold Agglutinin Disease

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia and a bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferative disorder. Hemolysis in CAD is complement-dependent and mediated by the classical activation pathway. Patients also frequently suffer from fatigue and cold-induced circulatory symptoms. Although not all patients need treatment, the symptom burden has previously been underestimated. Effective therapies target the clonal lymphoproliferation or the complement activation. Sutimlimab, a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody that binds and inactivates complement protein C1s, is the most extensively investigated complement inhibitor for the treatment of CAD. This review addresses the preclinical studies of sutimlimab and the studies of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We then describe and discuss the prospective clinical trials that established sutimlimab as a rapidly acting, highly efficacious, and low-toxic therapeutic agent. This complement inhibitor does not improve the cold-induced circulatory symptoms, which are not complement-mediated. Sutimlimab is approved for the treatment of CAD in the US, Japan, and the European Union. A tentative therapeutic algorithm is presented. The choice of therapy for CAD should be based on an individual assessment, and patients requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.

Three different pathways of IgM-antibody-dependent hemolysis are mainly regulated by complement

Antibodies to red blood cells (RBCs) may hemolyze erythrocytes via Fc-mediated phagocytosis or complement-dependent. Complement activation on RBCs can be detected by C3d-direct antiglobulin test (DAT), which is the only test in immune hematology that directly targets complement. However, a positive DAT with anti-C3d cannot distinguish between C3b-mediated extravascular hemolysis, C5b-C9-mediated intravascular hemolysis and C5b-C8-mediated eryptosis. Furthermore, DAT is not suitable to estimate the strength of hemolysis. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare disease that is caused by autoantibodies to red blood cells that is divided in warm AIHA and in cold agglutinin disease (CAD). The causative antibodies in CAD and sometimes in warm AIHA are from the IgM class. Depending on strength of complement activation they can induce extravascular hemolysis, intravascular hemolysis and eryptosis. We studied the three types of hemolysis by use of sera from patients with CAD under various conditions. We found that additionally to the routinely applied C3d-DAT, indirect tests for complement activity (free hemoglobin and Annexin V-binding to phosphatidylserine-exposing RBCs) should be used to determine the portion of extravascular, intravascular and eryptotic hemolysis. Eryptotic hemolysis may have a significant share in clinical relevant CAD or IgM warm AIHA, which should be considered for successful treatment.

Sutimlimab suppresses SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-induced hemolytic crisis in a patient with cold agglutinin disease

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare form of acquired autoimmune hemolytic anemia driven mainly by antibodies that activate the classical complement pathway. Several patients with CAD experience its development or exacerbation of hemolysis after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Therefore, these patients cannot receive an additional SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination and have a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sutimlimab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the classical complement pathway of the C1s protein and shows rapid and sustained inhibition of hemolysis in patients with CAD. However, whether sutimlimab could also inhibit hemolysis caused by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is uncertain. Here, we present the case of a 70-year-old man with CAD who repeatedly experienced a hemolytic crisis after receiving SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The patient eventually underwent SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination safely, without hemolytic attack, under classical pathway inhibition therapy with sutimlimab. This report suggests that appropriate sutimlimab administration can suppress SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination-induced CAD exacerbation, and that it could be a preventive strategy to minimize hemolytic attacks in susceptible populations.