Prophylactic Effect of Liaison Treatment on the Occurrence of Skeletal-Related Events in Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumours: An Exploratory Interrupted Time Series Study

A new era in the management of spinal metastasis

Despite the recent advances in cancer treatment, the incidence of patients with spinal metastases continues to grow along with the total number of cancer patients. Spinal metastases can significantly impair activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL), compared with other types of bone metastases, as they are characterized with severe pain and paralysis caused by skeletal-related events. Reduced ADL can also lead to treatment limitations as certain anticancer agents and radiation therapy are not compatible treatments; thus, leading to a shorter life expectancy. Consequently, maintaining ADLs in patients with spinal metastases is paramount, and spine surgeons have an integral role to play in this regard. However, neurosurgeon, orthopedic and spinal surgeons in Japan do not have a proactive treatment approach to spinal metastases, which may prevent them from providing appropriate treatment when needed (clinical inertia). To overcome such endemic inertia, it is essential for 1) spine surgeons to understand and be more actively involved with patients with musculoskeletal disorders (cancer locomo) and cancer patients; 2) the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach (coordination and meetings not only with the attending oncologist but also with spine surgeons, radiologists, rehabilitation specialists, and other professionals) to preemptive treatment such as medication, radiotherapy, and surgical treatment; and 3) the integration of the latest findings associated with minimally invasive spinal treatments that have expanded the indications for treatment of spinal metastases and improved treatment outcomes. This heralds a new era in the management of spinal metastases.

End-of-life walking ability in cancer patients with spinal metastases

BACKGROUND

Even terminal cancer patients desire to walk to the toilet by themselves until the very last day. This study aimed to describe the walking ability of patients with spinal metastases at the end-of-life stage and identify the factors affecting this ability.

METHODS

Among 527 patients who first visited our multidisciplinary team for bone metastasis between 2013 and 2016, 56 patients who had spinal metastases with a Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score ≥7 and died during follow-up were included. We collected general clinical data, performance status, Frankel classification, epidural spinal cord compression scale and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score at the first consultation. Patients' last day of walking and date of death were also examined. Univariate analyses (chi-squared tests) were performed to identify the factors that impacted walking ability 30 and 14 days before patients' death.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were extracted, and 57.1% (32/56) and 32.7% (16/49) of patients were ambulatory 30 and 14 days before death, respectively. Their performance status (P = 0.0007), Frankel grade (P = 0.012) and epidural spinal cord compression grade (P = 0.006) at the first examination, and administration of bone modifying agents during follow-up period (P = 0.029) were significantly related to walking ability 30 days before death. Among ambulatory patients 30 days before death, those with Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score ≥10 (P = 0.005), especially with high scores of collapse (P = 0.002) and alignment (P = 0.002), were less likely to walk 14 days before death. The walking period in the last month of their life was significantly longer in patients with total Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score 7-9 (P = 0.009) and in patients without collapse (P = 0.040) by the Wilcoxon test.

CONCLUSION

The progression of spinal metastasis, especially neurological deficit, at the initial consultation were associated with walking ability 30 days before death, and spinal stability might be crucial for preserving walking ability during the last month. Early diagnosis and implementation of appropriate bone management might be important for the end-of-life walking ability.