|
1
|
Abadia B, Desco MC, Mataix J, Palacios E, Navea A, Calvo P, Ferreras A. Non-Mydriatic Ultra-Wide Field Imaging Versus Dilated Fundus Exam and Intraoperative Findings for Assessment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10080521. [PMID: 32764520 PMCID: PMC7466016 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10080521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: to compare the extent of the detached retina and retinal tears location in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) among non-mydriatic ultra-wide field (UWF) imaging, dilated fundus exam (DFE), and intraoperative evaluation. Methods: this retrospective chart review comprised 123 patients undergoing surgery for RRD. A masked retina specialist analyzed the UWF fundus images for RRD area, status of the macula, and presence and location of retinal breaks. The same variables were collected from a database including DFE and intraoperative recordings. Evaluation methods were compared. Results: mean age was 59.8 ± 14.9 years. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.25 ± 0.3 (Snellen) to 0.67 ± 0.3 at 12 months (p = 0.009). The RRD description and assessment of macula status (34.5% macula-on) did not differ between UWF, DFE, and intraoperative examination. The inferior quadrant was involved most frequently (41.5%), followed by the superior (38.9%), temporal (27.8%) and nasal quadrant (14.8%). Intraoperative exam detected 96.7% of retinal tears compared with DFE (73.2%, p = 0.008) and UWF imaging (65%, p=0.003). UWF imaging and DFE did not differ significantly. Conclusion: RRD extent on DFE and UWF images was consistent with intraoperative findings. UWF and DFE detection of peripheral retinal tears was similar, but 25% of retinal breaks were missed until intraoperative evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Carmen Desco
- FISABIO-Oftalmología (FOM), 46035 Valencia, Spain; (M.C.D.); (J.M.); (E.P.)
- Instituto de la Retina, 46005 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Jorge Mataix
- FISABIO-Oftalmología (FOM), 46035 Valencia, Spain; (M.C.D.); (J.M.); (E.P.)
- Instituto de la Retina, 46005 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Elena Palacios
- FISABIO-Oftalmología (FOM), 46035 Valencia, Spain; (M.C.D.); (J.M.); (E.P.)
| | | | - Pilar Calvo
- Clínica Baviera, 50001 Zaragoza, Spain; (B.A.); (P.C.)
- IIS-Aragón, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Antonio Ferreras
- IIS-Aragón, Miguel Servet University Hospital, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Surgery, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-97676-5558; Fax: +34-97676-5686
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hartley C, Moultrie F, Hoskin A, Green G, Monk V, Bell JL, King AR, Buckle M, van der Vaart M, Gursul D, Goksan S, Juszczak E, Norman JE, Rogers R, Patel C, Adams E, Slater R. Analgesic efficacy and safety of morphine in the Procedural Pain in Premature Infants (Poppi) study: randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 392:2595-2605. [PMID: 30509743 PMCID: PMC6294828 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31813-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infant pain has immediate and long-term effects but is undertreated because of a paucity of evidence-based analgesics. Although morphine is often used to sedate ventilated infants, its analgesic efficacy is unclear. We aimed to establish whether oral morphine could provide effective and safe analgesia in non-ventilated premature infants for acute procedural pain. METHODS In this single-centre masked trial, 31 infants at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK, were randomly allocated using a web-based facility with a minimisation algorithm to either 100 μg/kg oral morphine sulphate or placebo 1 h before a clinically required heel lance and retinopathy of prematurity screening examination, on the same occasion. Eligible infants were born prematurely at less than 32 weeks' gestation or with a birthweight lower than 1501 g and had a gestational age of 34-42 weeks at the time of the study. The co-primary outcome measures were the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) score after retinopathy of prematurity screening and the magnitude of noxious-evoked brain activity after heel lancing. Secondary outcome measures assessed physiological stability and safety. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (number 2014-003237-25). FINDINGS Between Oct 30, 2016, and Nov 17, 2017, 15 infants were randomly allocated to morphine and 16 to placebo; one infant assigned placebo was withdrawn from the study before monitoring began. The predefined stopping boundary was crossed, and trial recruitment stopped because of profound respiratory adverse effects of morphine without suggestion of analgesic efficacy. None of the co-primary outcome measures differed significantly between groups. PIPP-R score after retinopathy of prematurity screening was mean 11·1 (SD 3·2) with morphine and 10·5 (3·4) with placebo (mean difference 0·5, 95% CI -2·0 to 3·0; p=0·66). Noxious-evoked brain activity after heel lancing was median 0·99 (IQR 0·40-1·56) with morphine and 0·75 (0·33-1·22) with placebo (median difference 0·25, 95% CI -0·16 to 0·80; p=0·25). INTERPRETATION Administration of oral morphine (100 μg/kg) to non-ventilated premature infants has the potential for harm without analgesic efficacy. We do not recommend oral morphine for retinopathy of prematurity screening and strongly advise caution if considering its use for other acute painful procedures in non-ventilated premature infants. FUNDING Wellcome Trust and National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fiona Moultrie
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amy Hoskin
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Vaneesha Monk
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer L Bell
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew R King
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Miranda Buckle
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Deniz Gursul
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sezgi Goksan
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edmund Juszczak
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jane E Norman
- Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Rogers
- Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Chetan Patel
- Department of Ophthalmology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Eleri Adams
- Newborn Care Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebeccah Slater
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|