[Thrombophilia and thrombosis]

Hematologic parameters in coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and their clinical implications

Coronaviruses are a class of enveloped RNA viruses that cause infections of the respiratory tract, characterized by fever, tiredness, dry cough, diarrhea, loss of smell or taste, chest pain and shortness of breath. Many patients with mysterious pneumonia were distinguished in December 2019 in Wuhan. The pneumonia of obscure origin was found to be ascribed to a novel coronavirus and described as novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). The Chinese authorities initially reported the wave of mysterious pneumonia on December 31st, 2019 and it was declared as an outbreak of international concern on January 30th, 2020. A systematic search of relevant research was conducted, and a total of 58 primary research articles were identified, analyzed, and debated to better understand the hematologic profile in COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease) infection and its clinical implications. All the findings in this article manifest a true impression of the current interpretation of hematological findings of the SARS-COV-2 disease. Pathophysiology of COVID-19 disease can be better interpreted by taking into consideration the hematologic parameters. Clinical implications of the hematologic profile of COVID-19 patients including cytokine storm, coagulation profile, and thrombophilic complications are under-recognized. Therefore, this review focuses on the coagulation profile, cytokine storm, and its treatment options. The role of pre-existing thrombophilia in COVID-19 patients and how it could result in the poor prognosis of the disease is also debated. The recent data suggests that hypercoagulability could be the potential cause of fatalities due to COVID-19. Potential effects of tocilizumab, metronidazole, and ulinastatin in suppressing cytokine storm may help to treat SARS-COV-2 infection. This review also highlights the significance of thrombophilia testing in SARS-CoV-2 patients depending on the clinical features and especially in pregnant women.

Venous thromboembolism and oral contraception

Introduction. Because of their safety and efficacy, oral contraceptives are available without prescription in many countries. Monophasic combined oral contraceptives are a combination of estrogen and progestin taken in constant amounts. Venous thromboembolism. Combined oral contraceptives slightly increase the risk of venous thromboemolism, but this event is very rare among non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The absolute risk rises with age, obesity, recent surgery and certain forms of thrombophilia. The estrogen component of combined oral contraceptives increases the synthesis of several coagulation factors in a dose-dependent manner. Changes of most of these parameters are very small and there is no evidence that they have any effect upon the clinical risk of developing venous thrombosis. If a woman has an inherited coagulation disorder that increases her risk of developing thrombosis, the risk is increased several fold if she ingests estrogen containing oral contraception. Conclusion. The increased risk of venous thromboembolism associated with combined oral contraceptives should have little impact on healthy women, but may have substantial impact on women with a history of thromboembolism. Combined oral contraceptive use increases the risk of venous thromboembolosm in a dose-dependent manner. The absolute risk of venous thromboembolism rises with age, obesity, recent surgery and certain forms of thrombophilia, as well.