[Natriuretic peptides and multimarker approach to risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes]

[New biohumoral markers of differential diagnosis in patients with suspected heart failure]

INTRODUCTION

In the regular clinic practice, the assessment of the cause of dispnea is a dilemma which has a significant implication in both the estimation of prognosis and treatment of the patient. In emergency cases, when most necessary, it is often very difficult to determine whether dispnea was caused by a heart or lung disease.

ROLE OF NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE IN PATIENTS WITH DISPNEA

An acute patient with dispnea might suffer serious consequences of inadequately established diagnosis so congestive heart failure (CHE) has to be diagnosed quickly and precisely in the ER. Unfortunately, symptoms and signs of CHF are unspecific, it is sometimes impossible to obtain an adequate anamnesis and diagnosic procedures currently applied are either insufficiently precise or provide scarce information or can not always be performed under appropriate conditions. On the basis of previous findings, it has been proved that brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) can considerably contribute to the establishment of correct diagnosis as well as to the possibility of introducing an adequate therapy for those patients. However, the real value of those peptides should be estimated in relation to other clinical manifestations and indicators and the specifics of examined patients including the age, gender and the presence or absence of pulmonary or renal diseases.

NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE IN ACCESSEMENT GRADIENT OF HEART FAILURE

Determination of natriuretic peptide has represented most probably the greatest progress in diagnosing the heart failure since the introduction of echocardiography into practice. Its high sensitivity and negative predicted value makes it a valid test for excluding congestive heart failure with a very high degree of certainty.

[Medical treatments in aortic stenosis: role of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors]

CALCIFIC AROTIC STENOSIS AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS: Aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease in western world and its incidence continues to rise. Aortic sclerosis is the first characteristic lesion of the cusps, which is today considered a process similar to atherosclerosis. The progression of the disease is an active process leading to forming of bone matrix and heavily calcified stiff cusps by inflammatory cells and osteopontin. Aortic stenosis is a chronic, progressive disease which can remain asymptomatic for a long time even in the presence of severe aortic stenosis. MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR AORTIC STENOSIS: The need for alternative to aortic valve surgery is highlighted by increasing longevity of the population and new therapeutic strategies to limit disease progression are needed to delay or potentially avoid, the need for valve surgery. Currently, there are no established disease modifying treatments in regard to the progression of aortic stenosis. The first results about influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on aortic sclerosis and stenosis progression are promising. Statins are likely to reduce cardiovascular events rather than disease progression, but may be potentially a valuable preventive treatment in these patients. The prejudice against the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors by patients with aortic stenosis is changing. The cautious use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition by patients with concomitant hypertension, coronary artery disease, and heart failure seems appropriate. Definite evidence from large clinical trials is awaited.