AIR inhaled insulin in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, safety, and tolerability

An evaluation of the efficacy and value of CVT-301 for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Introduction: Levodopa is the most effective drug in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but its chronic treatment is linked to the occurrence of motor complications with fluctuations of motor performance and dyskinesia. Unpredictable OFF episodes can be severe and disabling and current rescue medications cannot always be used safely. Rescue therapy is characterized by a rapid and predictable ON response and the safety profile of levodopa will represent a major advantage for patients affected by unresponsive OFF episodes.Areas covered: CVT-301 is a new inhaled formulation of LD recently developed as a self-administered treatment for OFF periods. Herein, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, efficacy, and safety of CVT-301 are reviewed.Expert opinion: CVT-301 may offer several potential advantages including increased systemic bioavailability through pulmonary absorption, rapid onset of action, avoidance of first-pass drug metabolism, and less plasma level variability. It should be noted that the delivery device used has been described as relatively simple to use, but the few steps required to prepare and self-administer the dose can be challenging for PD patients during their OFF state. Additionally, resolution of an OFF episode requires the administration of two capsules of CVT-301, which further complicates the use of the device.

Lipid-based carriers for pulmonary products: preclinical development and case studies in humans

A number of lipid-based technologies have been applied to pharmaceuticals to modify their drug release characteristics, and additionally, to improve the drug loading for poorly soluble drugs. These technologies, including solid-state lipid microparticles, many of which are porous in nature, liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers, are increasingly being developed for inhalation applications. This article provides a review of the rationale for the use of these technologies in the pulmonary delivery of drugs, and summarizes the manufacturing processes and their limitations, the in vitro and in vivo performance of these systems, the safety of these lipid-based systems in the lung, and their promise for commercialization.

Feasibility of a 3D human airway epithelial model to study respiratory absorption

The respiratory route is an important portal for human exposure to a large variety of substances. Consequently, there is an urgent need for realistic in vitro strategies for evaluation of the absorption of airborne substances with regard to safety and efficacy assessment. The present study investigated feasibility of a 3D human airway epithelial model to study respiratory absorption, in particular to differentiate between low and high absorption of substances. Bronchial epithelial models (MucilAir™), cultured at the air-liquid interface, were exposed to eight radiolabeled model substances via the apical epithelial surface. Absorption was evaluated by measuring radioactivity in the apical compartment, the epithelial cells and the basolateral culture medium. Antipyrine, caffeine, naproxen and propranolol were highly transported across the epithelial cell layer (>5%), whereas atenolol, mannitol, PEG-400 and insulin were limitedly transported (<5%). Results indicate that the 3D human airway epithelial model used in this study is able to differentiate between substances with low and high absorption. The intra-experimental reproducibility of the results was considered adequate based on an average coefficient of variation (CV) of 15%. The inter-experimental reproducibility of highly absorbed compounds was in a similar range (CV of 15%), but this value was considerably higher for those compounds that were limitedly absorbed. No statistical significant differences between different donors and experiments were observed. The present study provides a simple method transposable in any lab, which can be used to rank the absorption of chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and is ready for further validation with respect to reproducibility and capacity of the method to predict respiratory transport in humans.

Further experimentation of inhaled; LANTUS, ACTRAPID and HUMULIN with todays' production systems

BACKGROUND

Several aerosol production systems have been used for aerosol insulin production. However; since the first studies several new models of jet-nebulizers and ultrasound nebulizers have been introduced in the market.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different models of jet-nebulizers (different brands, same properties) and three different ultrasound nebulizers (different brands, same properties). Six residual cups (2 small ≤ 6 ml and 3 large ≤ 8 ml) were used for the jet-nebulizers. The ultrasound nebulizers were used with their facemasks or with their inlets which were included in the purchase package.

RESULTS

Ultrasound nebulizers; LANTUS produces by far the lowest mean droplets (2.44) half the size of the other two drugs (4.43=4.97). GIMA nebulizer is the most efficient producing one third of the droplet size of SHIMED and one second of EASYNEB (2.06<3.15<6.62). Finally, the 4 ml loading concentration is more suitable for supporting the production of smaller droplets (3.65<4.24). Drugs and nebulizers act interactively yielding very large droplets when ACTRAPID and HUMULIN are administered in joint with SHIMED nebulizer (9.59=7.72). Jet-nebulizers; HUMULIN again is the least preferred insulin since it hardly reaches the low but equal performance of others at the loading level of 6 ml. Residual cups E and B produce uniquely lower mean droplets at loading level 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound nebulizers; the best suggested combination should be LANTUS insulin, GIMA nebulizer administered at loading dose of 4 ml jet-nebulizers. A global review can give the best combination: the lowest mean droplets are produced when the drugs LANTUS (mostly) and ACTRAPID are administered, applying the SUNMIST nebulizer in concert with residual cup B at loading levels of 6 ml.

Inhaled biopharmaceutical drug development: nonclinical considerations and case studies

Biopharmaceuticals are complex molecules often manufactured from living systems and their specificity and novelty holds great promise for the treatment of chronic diseases for which there are currently no cures. The inhalation route of biopharmaceutical drug delivery is attractive because the large surface area of the lung, and close proximity of the alveolar and vascular systems, maximizes the potential for drug delivery to the lung and/or systemic circulation. In addition, costs of delivery to the patient are potentially much reduced, in comparison with parental administration, since inhalation is non-invasive and likely to promote patient compliance. However, in comparison with small molecule drug development, developing an inhaled biopharmaceutical that is effective and safe for human use is associated with many challenges. This review considers some general principles of drug delivery to lung and issues associated with the translation of proof of concept studies to toxicology safety studies (e.g. aerosol generation, species selection, exaggerated pharmacology, and immunogenicity). This review also presents a summary of nonclinical and clinical data from inhaled biopharmaceuticals which are either marketed for human use or in Phase II clinical trials (e.g. DNase, insulin, human growth hormone, vaccines, therapeutic plasmid DNA complexes).

Can inhaled insulin be used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus?

Reluctance to start and adequately titrate subcutaneous insulin are major reasons why many patients with diabetes mellitus are insufficiently metabolically controlled. Pulmonary insulin administration has the advantage over subcutaneous insulin in that it is noninvasive, seems better accepted by the diabetic population and exerts equal efficacy in terms of glycemic control. As such, inhaled insulin has the potential to increase the diabetic (Type 2) patient's willingness to commence and adhere to insulin therapy. Inhaled insulin's short duration of action makes it suitable for prandial administration provided that basal insulin requirements are met by residual b-cell function, or by supplemental long-acting subcutaneous insulin. In clinical trials, inhaled insulin is comparable to short-acting subcutaneous insulin with regard to efficacy and hypoglycemic risk. Adverse effects associated with inhaled insulin include dry cough, which tends to diminish over time, a slight drop in pulmonary function that does not progress and is reversible in most patients if treatment is discontinued, and increased insulin antibody formation, albeit without clinical sequelae. Long-term safety remains an issue for a product intended to be used chronically for many years. Exubera((R)) was thus far the only inhaled insulin product to receive approval in the USA and Europe for use in adults with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes, but was recently withdrawn from the market. At present it is unclear how this decision will affect programs from other companies with inhaled insulin products under development.

Intestinal receptor targeting for peptide delivery: an expert's personal perspective on reasons for failure and new opportunities

The technology has been available more than 25 years that would enable the oral delivery of vaccines, proteins and peptides, thus avoiding the need for injection. To this day, injection is still the mode of delivery, yet not the main mode of choice. This review focuses on several of the potential modes for oral delivery of peptides, proteins and vaccines. Additionally, the review will provide the reader with an insight into the problems and potential solutions for several of these modes of oral delivery of peptides and proteins.

Neurological and endocrinological disorders: orphans in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often characterised by a range of characteristic co-morbidities that interfere with their pulmonary disease. In addition to a mere association with co-morbidities, a complex pathophysiological interaction and mutual augmentation occurs between COPD and its co-morbidities that may result in disease progression and increased morbidity and mortality. An interdisciplinary approach is required both for diagnosis and treatment to target co-morbidities early in the course of the disease. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the interaction with cerebrovascular disease and endocrinological co-morbidities in COPD patients. There is growing evidence that COPD is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke, increasing the risk about twofold. Stroke risk in COPD patients increases with the severity of the disease as measured by the degree of airflow limitation. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors is of particular importance for stroke prevention in COPD patients. Endocrinological co-morbidities are also important and many are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Impaired glucose metabolism ranges from insulin resistance to overt diabetes mellitus, which is a frequent finding and is associated with worse outcome.

Comparative pharmacoscintigraphic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two new formulations of inhaled insulin in type 1 diabetic patients

In this open, single-dose study, we compared the lung deposition and bioavailability of two newly developed insulin formulations for pulmonary delivery. Twelve type 1 diabetic patients were administered the two insulin products (2 U/kg b.w.), which had been radiolabelled with (99m)Tc. The formulations were either microparticles of insulin without excipients (F1) or lipid-coated insulin microparticles (F2). Lung deposition was assessed by γ-scintigraphy imaging performed immediately after administration. Bioavailability was evaluated by quantifying serum insulin levels over a period of 6 h. Lung deposition was found to be 50 ± 9% and 24 ± 8% for the F1 and F2 formulations, respectively. The insulin AUC₀₋₃₆₀ ratio of F1/F2 was 188%, which was consistent with scintigraphic imaging. The concordance between imaging and biological results suggests that the lower bioavailability of F2 is due to its lower lung deposition and not to a reduced absorption into the blood stream. Additional in vitro experiments indicated that the lower performance of F2 was most probably related to a lower disaggregation efficiency of the powder when administered at a sub-optimal flow rate. The two formulations showed interesting pharmacokinetic profiles (T(max) of 26 and 16 min for F1 and F2, respectively) that mimic the physiological insulin secretion pattern. The bioavailability of the developed formulations was within the range of other DPI insulin formulations that have reached the final stages of clinical development.

Inhaled insulin: too soon to be forgotten?

Inhalation is a potentially viable route of administration for numerous agents. In diabetes mellitus, the need for frequent injections to achieve ideal glycemic control remains a significant limitation for initiating and complying with insulin therapy in a large number of patients. To overcome this barrier, inhaled insulin was developed. The inhalation form of regular human insulin has been tested and administered in a large number of trials. Respiratory capacity was evaluated in patients with normal lung parenchyma in whom inhaled insulin was administered without complications. However, issues like cost, bulky device, fear for lung safety, and the small number of studies in subjects with underlying respiratory disease prevented widespread use of this new mode of delivery. In the present review, we will suggest a number of methods that could be applied in this form of administration to maximize drug absorption and fully exploit the advantages of this route of administration.

Novel hormonal delivery method using the ink-jet technology: application to pulmonary insulin therapies

BACKGROUND

A device developed based on ink-jet printer technology can precisely control the size and volume of droplets ejected. Here, we evaluated the application of this technology to the pulmonary administration of insulin mist as a therapeutic measure for diabetes.

METHODS

Insulin ejected from the ink-jet device was initially characterized by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry. Its effects on D-glucose uptake rate by L6 cells were then investigated. Next, different insulin solutions (with or without additives or ink-jet processing) were subcutaneously administered, and their pharmacodynamic features were evaluated. Finally, decreases in plasma glucose level in rats were examined after ventilator-assisted pulmonary administration of insulin mist.

RESULTS

Neither the HPLC nor the mass spectrometry profile of insulin was altered by the ink-jet process. The D-glucose uptake rate by L6 cells that received the recovered aerosolized insulin solution was similar to that of cells treated with control insulin, at 107%. Neither the addition of additives nor the ink-jet process used for insulin aerosolization impaired the plasma glucose-lowering action of subcutaneously injected insulin. Similarly, the efficacy of pulmonary insulin administration was not affected by the additives or the ink-jet process. Plasma glucose levels showed a trend towards decreasing after ventilator-assisted pulmonary administration of insulin mist. Plasma insulin level increased 30 min after the inhalation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ink-jet process did not affect the quality or biological activity of insulin, suggesting the potential use of the ink-jet device for insulin inhalation therapy for diabetes.

Insulin pharmacokinetics following dosing with Technosphere insulin in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVES

Insulin exposure after inhalation has been reported to be altered significantly in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, the rate and extent of insulin exposure was compared in healthy volunteers and subjects with COPD following administration of Technosphere * Insulin (TI), a dry powder insulin formulation for pulmonary delivery.

METHODS

Insulin pharmacokinetics were evaluated in an open-label, single-dose, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamp study in 19 nondiabetic, nonsmoking healthy subjects (mean age [±SD] = 50.9 ± 14.1 years, body mass index = 29.1 ± 3.5 kg/m(2), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) = 3.52 ± 1.02 L) and 17 nondiabetic subjects with mild-to-moderate COPD (mean age = 60.0 ± 9.0 years, body mass index = 28.5 ± 5 kg/m(2), FEV(1) = 2.56 ± 0.83 L). Subjects received a single 30-U dose of TI. Serial blood samples were obtained for insulin and C-peptide determination through 480 min after dosing. Insulin concentrations were adjusted for endogenous insulin by C-peptide correction; pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using the corrected values.

RESULTS

For the COPD and non-COPD groups, respectively, mean peak insulin (C(max)) was 34.7 µU/mL and 39.5 µU/mL (p = 0.29), median t(max) was 15 and 12 min (p = 0.24), and mean insulin exposure from time 0 to 240 min (AUC(0-240)) was 2037 µU/mL · min and 2279 µU/mL · min (p = 0.47). Cough was the most common respiratory adverse event observed. One instance of hypoglycemia was reported and was attributed to trial procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid insulin absorption and the resulting insulin pharmacokinetic profile following TI inhalation were not significantly altered in the mild-to-moderate COPD population studied; however, long-term safety and efficacy of TI have not been established in patients with mild or moderate COPD. Longer-term experience is needed to fully characterize the effects of COPD on insulin PK following TI administration.

Inhaled insulin: overview of a novel route of insulin administration

Diabetes is a chronic disease characterized by inadequate insulin secretion with resulting hyperglycemia. Diabetes complications include both microvascular and macrovascular disease, both of which are affected by optimal diabetes control. Many individuals with diabetes rely on subcutaneous insulin administration by injection or continuous infusion to control glucose levels. Novel routes of insulin administration are an area of interest in the diabetes field, given that insulin injection therapy is burdensome for many patients. This review will discuss pulmonary delivery of insulin via inhalation. The safety of inhaled insulin as well as the efficacy in comparison to subcutaneous insulin in the various populations with diabetes are covered. In addition, the experience and pitfalls that face the development and marketing of inhaled insulin are discussed.

AIR insulin capsules of different dose strengths may be combined to yield equivalent pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics

BACKGROUND

In order to assess pharmacokinetic (PK) and glucodynamic (GD) attributes relevant to the end user of an inhaled insulin, this study examined the exposure and GD effect of doses of AIR inhaled insulin (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) (AIR is a registered trademark of Alkermes, Inc., Cambridge, MA) by combining capsules of different strengths in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Fifty-nine healthy, nonsmoking, male or female subjects with normal pulmonary function were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, crossover study. Subjects underwent up to five euglycemic glucose clamp procedures, separated by 5-18 days. The five AIR insulin treatments tested included one 6 unit-equivalent (U-eq) capsule containing 2.6 mg of insulin, three 2 U-eq (0.9 mg) capsules (2.7 mg total), one 10 U-eq (3.9 mg) capsule, one 6 U-eq capsule plus two 2 U-eq capsules (4.4 mg total), and two 10 U-eq capsules (7.8 mg total). Samples for PK and GD assessments were taken up to 10 h post-dose.

RESULTS

Based on both PK (area under the curve from time 0 to time of return to baseline and maximum concentration) and GD (total amount of glucose infused and maximum glucose infusion rate) responses, administration of a 6 U-eq capsule was equivalent to three 2 U-eq capsules; 90% confidence intervals for the ratios were contained within the interval (0.8, 1.25). Similarly, both overall exposure and glucodynamic response after administration of a 10 U-eq capsule were comparable to the 6 U-eq plus two 2 U-eq capsule combination. AIR insulin exhibited PK dose proportionality and dose-dependent increases in GD responses over the 2.6-7.8 mg dose range.

CONCLUSIONS

AIR insulin exhibited dose strength interchangeability and dose proportionality after single-dose administration in healthy subjects.

Safety and efficacy of AIR inhaled insulin compared with subcutaneous insulin in patients having diabetes and asthma: A 12-month, randomized, noninferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Long-term safety and efficacy of AIR((R)) inhaled insulin (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, IN) (AIR is a registered trademark of Alkermes, Inc., Cambridge, MA) in patients with diabetes and concomitant lung disease remain to be established.

METHODS

This 1-year, randomized, open-label, active comparator, two-arm, parallel study compared the safety and efficacy of AIR insulin to subcutaneous (SC) insulin in patients having type 1 or type 2 diabetes and asthma. Patients with type 2 diabetes continued taking their prestudy oral antihyperglycemic medication.

RESULTS

Change in hemoglobin A1C from baseline to end point was similar for the AIR insulin and SC insulin groups (-0.063 +/- 0.128% and -0.315 +/- 0.128% respectively, P = 0.105), but noninferiority failed to be achieved (the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [-0.053, 0.555] was >0.4%). The total daily prandial dose increased more in the AIR insulin group than in the SC insulin group (0.150 U/kg and 0.044 U/kg, respectively, P = 0.002). Safety profiles were generally comparable between treatments. At end point, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) postbronchodilator (-0.016 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.002 +/- 0.005, P = 0.006) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (-1.214 +/- 0.325 mL/min/torr vs. -0.383 +/- 0.311 mL/min/torr, P = 0.028) both decreased more in the AIR insulin group than in the SC insulin group, but the differences were not present at follow-up. FEV(1) and FVC were similar between treatment groups at end point. Incidences of hypoglycemia were comparable between groups. Insulin antibody binding increased more in the AIR insulin group. Cough was the most common adverse event; however, there was no difference in incidence between the AIR insulin (15.3%) and SC insulin (12.4%) treatment groups (P = 0.572).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who have diabetes and asthma, AIR insulin demonstrated glycemic efficacy similar to SC insulin. Additionally, the safety profile of AIR insulin in patients with and without asthma is consistent.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of exenatide following alternate routes of administration

Exenatide is a 39-amino acid peptide incretin mimetic approved for adjunctive treatment of type 2 diabetes. It shares several glucoregulatory activities with the mammalian hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). In clinical use, subcutaneous exenatide injections demonstrate glucoregulatory and weight loss effects with sustained plasma concentrations in the 50-100 pM range. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of exenatide in normoglycemic rats and biological activity in diabetic db/db mice after delivery to various epithelial surfaces of the intestinal and respiratory tracts. In rats, elimination kinetics were similar for all routes of administration (median k(e) 0.017 min(-1)). Bioavailability (versus intravenous administration) and C(max) per unit dose differed markedly. For gastrointestinal administration, sublingual administration invoked the highest bioavailability (0.37%); in db/db mice, potentially therapeutic concentrations were obtainable. In contrast, intraduodenal bioavailability was low (0.0053%). In regard to respiratory surfaces, bioavailability of intratracheal exenatide was up to 13.6%, and for nasal administration, 1.68%. Both routes of administration produced therapeutic plasma concentrations and glucose-lowering in db/db mice. At high doses, aerosolized exenatide also achieved effective concentrations and glucose-lowering. In summary, the intestinal tract seems to have limited potential as a route of exenatide administration, with sublingual being most promising. In contrast, the respiratory tract appears to be more viable, comparing favorably with the clinically approved subcutaneous route. Despite little optimization of the delivery formulation, exenatide bioavailability compared favorable to that of several commercially available bioactive peptides.

AIR Inhaled Insulin System: a novel insulin-delivery system for patients with diabetes

Over time, most patients with Type 2 diabetes require insulin-replacement therapy to attain and sustain the increasingly stringent glycemic goals. Initiation of subcutaneous insulin may be delayed due to patient or provider resistance. This delay may increase the risk of complications from long-term hyperglycemia. The development of inhaled insulin-delivery systems has been pursued to facilitate earlier initiation and optimization of insulin therapy to achieve better treatment outcomes. The AIR((R)) Inhaled Insulin System utilizes relatively large, low-density particles, allowing efficient drug delivery to the deep lung from a simple inhaler. In clinical studies it has provided similar postprandial glycemic control compared with subcutaneously injected, short-acting insulin, and was preferred by more patients. The purpose of this article is to describe the AIR Inhaled Insulin System, provide an overview of other insulin-delivery systems and discuss future strategies for the treatment of diabetes.

Inhaled insulin

Inhaled insulin has attractive pharmacodynamic properties with a fast onset of action which should lead to improved postprandial blood glucose concentrations. Comparisons with regular subcutaneous (sc) insulin in clinical studies, however, showed lower fasting blood glucose concentrations. Overall, clinical efficacy of inhaled insulin was comparable to that of regular sc insulin. Treatment with inhaled insulin was safe and well tolerated, with slight and reversible changes in lung function parameters and a rise in insulin antibodies (not associated with any clinical or safety parameters) as main adverse effects. Treatment satisfaction in open-label studies was higher with inhaled than with sc insulin, indicating that inhaled insulin might help to overcome one of the major hurdles of diabetes therapy, i.e. a timely initiation of insulin therapy. The first inhaled insulin formulation was approved in the US and Europe in January 2006, but some countries granted reimbursement only for selected patients, or did not reimburse treatment with inhaled insulin at all because of the high treatment costs. These are due to the rather low bioavailability of approximately 8-15%. Therefore, further research is needed to improve the bioavailability of inhaled insulin: e.g. through optimization of the inhaler, the insulin formulation, or the inhalation technique. In view of the potential for further improvement, inhaled insulin may become a very attractive alternative to sc insulin, in particular in patients in whom insulin therapy has to be initiated and/or intensified.